Ken Jucks and Diane Wickland Carbon Monitoring System: Welcome from NASA HQ November 12, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An example of a large-scale interdisciplinary carbon problem Multidecadal climate variability Atmospheric evidence Ocean source? (upwelling, biological.
Advertisements

STRENGTHENING FINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT: PROPOSALS FROM THE PRIVATE SECTOR Compiled by the UN-Sanctioned Business Interlocutors to the International Conference.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2011 Day 3 DS-11 Global Forest Observation.
The GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Network: A spin-off of the EGIDA Project Hans-Peter Plag, Ian McCallum, Steffen Fritz, Shelley Jules-Plag,
Trend of international discussions on the UNFCCC
Summary discussion Top-down approach Consider Carbon Monitoring Systems, tailored to address stakeholder needs. CMS frameworks can be designed to provide.
SilvaCarbon Program Capacity building for implementing Monitoring, Reporting and Verification systems for REDD+ Sylvia Wilson U.S. Geological Survey SilvaCarbon.
1 Geographic Support System Proposed Initiative – FY 2011 and Beyond Timothy Trainor U.S. Census Bureau 1.
MGD Advisory Group Meeting Sydney 5 th March 2015.
Recommendations from the Sixth Meeting of the Ozone Research Managers of the Parties to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer Vienna,
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
NACP Breakout Session: North American Terrestrial Carbon Monitoring and Decision Support Capabilities (combined from CMS and CarboNA proposals) Organized.
Presented at the IISD and ASB Regional Workshop Hanoi, 19 th May 2011.
READINESS TO IMPLEMENTATION Lessons and Experiences from Zambia Presented by: Deuteronomy Kasaro National REDD+ Coordinator 7th November,
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Recent developments in the UNFCCC process in relation to global observations 4 th GTOS Steering Committee Paris, 1-2 December 2009 Rocio Lichte Programme.
Module developers: Erika Romijn, Wageningen University
External Communications Working Group Kevin Bowman, Peter Griffith, Kevin Gurney, Elizabeth Nelson, Ariane Verdy Interns: Maya Hutchins, Adam Norris 2013:
WMO GFOI Simon Eggleston SGCD-4, 4 th -6 th Sept 2013, Caltech, Pasadena, USA.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites John Bates Chair, Joint CEOS-CGMS Working Group on Climate 3 rd WCRP Data Advisory Committee.
Global Forest Observations Initiative Giovanni Rum, GEO Secretariat.
The ‘INCA KIP’: Knowledge Innovation Project for an Integrated system for Natural Capital and ecosystem services Accounting UNCEEA June 2015 Anton.
Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Climate Monitoring Architecture: Status and way forward Presented to CGMS-41 plenary session.
SAON is a process to support and strengthen the development of multinational engagement for sustained and coordinated pan-Arctic observing and data sharing.
GLOBAL FOREST OBSERVATIONS INITIATIVE (GFOI) Per Erik Skrøvseth, CEOS-Plenary, Lucca, Italy.
Participatory research to enhance climate change policy and institutions in the Caribbean: ARIA toolkit pilot 27 th meeting of the CANARI Partnership January.
WGClimate John Bates NOAA SIT Workshop Agenda Item #8 WGClimate Work Plan progress & Issues CEOS SIT Technical Workshop CNES, Montpellier, France 17 th.
Industrial Generation Performance Targets/Goals: » A set of starter methods that are characterized » A grid showing applicability, cost, uncertainty »
Identifying Grand Challenges in Climate Change Research: Guiding DOE’s Strategic Planning: Report on the DOE/BERAC workshop March Crystal City For.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Global Dialogue on Developing a Readiness Preparation Proposal August 13-14, 2009 Structure of the R-PP template Review.
Plenary Discussion of Framework for Engagement GEO XI Plenary Geneva, November, 2014.
Global Forest Observations Initiative Methods and Guidance Portal SDCG – Oslo – 24 th October 2014.
Update from the International Blue Carbon Policy Working Group 1 st workshop July, 2011 J. Tamelander.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Slide: 1 CEOS SDCG-3 Meeting|Sydney, Australia| 7-9 February 2013 Space Data Coordination Group Land Surface Imaging Virtual Constellation Ake Rosenqvist,
National Forest Monitoring Systems: M & MRV in the context of REDD+ Activities MJ Sanz, FAO REDD MRV Workshop for developing a roadmap to establish an.
NAS Board on Research Data and Information (BRDI) 30 November 2010 Gregory W. Withee Co-Chair, USGEO International Working Group Director, International.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
Recommendations from the GEO TASK AG Community of Practice Image: NASA, ASTER Science Team Minnesota Kansas Germany Bolivia Thailand Brazil.
SDCG-6 Oslo, Norway October 22-24, 2014 SDCG 3-Year Work Plan Stephen Ward, SDCG EXEC (Australia) SDCG-6: Oslo,
Ken Jucks and Diane Wickland Carbon Monitoring System: The NASA HQ Perspective November 13, 2014.
Terrestrial Carbon Observations TCO Previous Strategy 1- better identify the potential end users, and their requirements 2- organize and coordinate reliable.
Site-Level Model-Data Comparison A Proposed NACP Interim Synthesis Project Ken Davis, Peter Thornton, Kevin Schaefer, Dan Riciutto Coordinators.
Components of a Future Global System for Earth Observation.
UNCLASS1 Dr. Gene Whitney Assistant Director for Environment Office of Science and Technology Policy Executive Office of the President WISP Meeting - July.
Slide: 1 CEOS SIT Technical Workshop |Caltech, Pasadena, California, USA| September 2013 CEOS Work Plan Section 6.1 G Dyke CEOS ad hoc Working Group.
ATT Contribution to GEO Archive Task Team WGISS – 22 Sep 11 – 15, 2006 Annapolis, USA.
Global Forest Observations Initiative Simon Eggleston GFOI SDCG 5, Rome, Italy, 25 Feb 2014,
NASA Carbon Monitoring System (NASA-CMS) NASA Carbon Monitoring System Science Team Overview George Hurtt NASA-CMS Science Team Leader Department of Geographical.
Measurement, Reporting, and Verification Working Group Birdsey, Richard (WG Lead)USDA Forest Service Delgado Arias, SabrinaSigma Space Domke, GrantUSDA.
Application of NASA ESE Data and Tools to Particulate Air Quality Management A proposal to NASA Earth Science REASoN Solicitation CAN-02-OES-01 REASoN:
Land Surface Imaging VC: Terms of Reference Julio Dalge, P.G. Diwakar, John Faundeen INPE ISRO USGS CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA March 12,
NASA CMS Algorithm Assessment/Intercomparison Working Group Summary Presentation November 6 th, 2013 Coordinator: Scott Powell Members: David Baker, Molly.
Monitoring and MRV context of the Country National Forest Inventory (NFI): the previous NFI has not covered some forest type (the sampling strategy did.
WGCapD, CEOS and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Deputy CEOS Executive Officer / CSA Marie-Josée.
Support to National REDD+ Action: Global Programme Framework (SNA) Work Plan and Budget 2015 Information and Knowledge Sharing Sessions Twelfth.
Duncan Marsh The Nature Conservancy Inter-American Development Bank June 7, 2007 Reducing Deforestation in Developing Countries: Critical Issues and Directions.
Osamu Ochiai, GEO Secretariat GEO Work Program Symposium
Global Forest Observations Initiative - GFOI
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
2017 WPS Break-Out Session: Addressing Gaps
Lessons and Experiences from Zambia National REDD+ Coordinator
Bradley Reed USGS Climate and Land Use Change
Capacity Building GFOI SilvaCarbon
Potential Landsat Contributions
Cameroon National Monitoring Forest designing process
Unidata Policy Committee Meeting
CEOS Response to IPWG on Draft GEO Strategy
CEOS strategy for GFOI Phase 2
Forest & Biomass (inc GFOI)
Presentation transcript:

Ken Jucks and Diane Wickland Carbon Monitoring System: Welcome from NASA HQ November 12, 2014

2 Welcome! CMS is all about carbon monitoring products and capabilities to meet national needs. Since 2010 NASA has been prototyping and evaluating remote- sensing derived data products and has been interacting with representative end users of such information to better understand and meet their needs. This workshop represents an important next step in that process, and we are all very much looking forward to what you, the stakeholders here today, will present and the discussions that will follow!

3 NASA’s Approach to CMS The NASA Carbon Monitoring System (CMS) project is forward- looking and designed to make significant contributions in characterizing, quantifying, understanding, and predicting the evolution of global carbon sources and sinks through improved monitoring of carbon stocks and fluxes. CMS was initiated in 2010 in response to the following Congressional direction in NASA’s budget appropriation: The conference agreement provides: $6,000,000 for pre-phase A and pilot initiatives for the development of a carbon monitoring system. Any pilot developed shall replicate state and national carbon and biomass inventory processes that provide statistical precision and accuracy with geospatially explicit associated attribute data for aggregation at the project, county, state and federal level using a common dataset with complete market transparency, including extraction algorithms and correlation modeling.

4  NASA’s Approach in prototyping, researching, and scoping a carbon monitoring system emphasizes exploitation of the satellite remote sensing resources, computational capabilities, scientific knowledge, airborne science capabilities, and end-to-end system expertise that are major NASA strengths  Significant effort is being devoted to rigorous evaluation of the carbon monitoring products being produced, as well as to the characterization and quantification of errors and uncertainties in those products.  Emphasis has been on regional, national, and global satellite-based carbon monitoring products relevant to national needs for completely transparent carbon and biomass inventory processes.  NASA’s approach takes into account data and expertise that are the domain of other U.S. Government agencies and anticipates continuing close communications and/or partnerships with those agencies.  NASA’s approach also recognizes a need for complementary local-scale (airborne and in situ) information to demonstrate quantitative remote sensing methods; to aid in scaling up; and for essential evaluation of products.  Additionally, this approach lays the groundwork for CMS-related applications of future NASA satellite sensors now in development. NASA’s Approach to CMS

5 Phase 1 of CMS prototyping and pilot study research initiated in 2010 focused on two CMS pilot studies and several scoping efforts:  A Biomass and Carbon Storage Pilot Product  An Integrated Emission/Uptake (“Flux”) Pilot Product  Scoping studies and research to understand the needs of end users and scope potential new carbon monitoring products  A Science Definition Team (SDT) to guide the NASA Center-led work Phase 2a of CMS research was initiated in 2012 to build upon the lessons learned in the initial pilot studies and scoping efforts. The CMS activities selected involve:  Approaches that derive from or evolve the current pilot products and scoping efforts  Alternative approaches to the development of current carbon monitoring products (i.e., biomass and flux)  New carbon monitoring products, including those in need of further scoping research  A CMS Science Team (ST) and ST Leader (George Hurtt, U. Maryland) CMS Background Information

6 Phase 2b of CMS research was initiated in 2013 to focus on new studies to develop prototype Monitoring Reporting and Verification (MRV) system capabilities for local and regional applications and to fill gaps in the Phase 2a activities. The CMS activities selected involve: (1) acquisition, field sampling, quantification and development of prototype Monitoring Reporting and Verification (MRV) system capabilities which can provide transparent data products achieving levels of precision and accuracy required by current carbon trading protocols (7 studies), (2) use of this type of information for local and regional applications related to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) in developing nations (5 studies; with ties to SilvaCarbon), and (3) filling gaps in ongoing NASA CMS research regarding quantification of errors and uncertainties in NASA CMS products (3 studies) and in understanding and engaging the users of carbon monitoring information (2 studies). CMS Background Information

7 Phase 2c of CMS research was initiated in 2014 to focus on new studies to develop prototype Monitoring Reporting and Verification (MRV) system capabilities for local and regional applications and to allow for extension or improvement of the Phase 1 CMS flux and biomass products. The CMS activities selected involve: (1) Studies using commercial off-the-shelf technologies to produce and evaluate prototype monitoring, reporting, and verification system approaches and/or calibration and validation data sets for future NASA missions, including support of REDD, REDD+, or SilvaCarbon projects (6 studies), (2) Studies that address research needs to advance remote sensing-based approaches to monitoring, reporting, and verification (3 studies), and (3) Studies that advance upon, extend, and/or improve the existing CMS products for biomass and flux resulting from NASA’s first phases of CMS pilot studies (7 studies). CMS Background Information

8 In the first 2010 and 2012, NASA funded mo. studies at the Congressionally directed level out of current FY funds only. In 2013, for Phase 2b, NASA created an ongoing budget line and committed to 3-year budget profiles. NASA expects Congress to continue to provide guidance for how CMS funding is allocated.  NASA has a desire to continue NASA-appropriate and productive activities where current funding is about to expire.  However, it is necessary to follow Congressional direction when setting future directions.  Feedback from stakeholders will be essential in guiding these future directions. Building a Long-term Program

9 Backup

10 Proposers in 2013 (Phase 2b) were encouraged to consider research activities that contribute to or enhance activities of the U.S. SilvaCarbon program.  The U.S. SilvaCarbon program is working in partnership with developing countries to identify, test, and disseminate good practices and cost-effective, accurate technologies for monitoring and managing forest and terrestrial carbon.  SilvaCarbon is a flagship program under U.S. fast-start financing for REDD+ and is a U.S. contribution to the Forest Carbon Tracking (FCT) task of the intergovernmental Group on Earth Observations (GEO).  Proposers interested in contributing MRV-related research in support of international REDD and REDD+ projects are encouraged to review the list of SilvaCarbon and FCT nations and consider proposing research activities supportive of their REDD measurement needs. CMS and SilvaCarbon

FY2014 Congressional Appropriation Direction: "Of the funds provided within the Earth Science research and analysis activity, the Committee recommends $10,000,000 to continue efforts for the development of a carbon monitoring system. The majority of the funds should be directed toward acquisition, field sampling, quantification, and development of a prototype Monitoring Reporting and Verification [MRV] system which can provide transparent data products achieving levels of precision and accuracy required by current carbon trading protocols. The Committee is concerned that NASA has not established a program of record around the development of MRV system, and therefore expects a plan from NASA not later than 90 days after enactment of this act incorporating such a system into its operating plan and long-term budget projection. The Committee recognizes that the current orbital and suborbital platforms are insufficient to meet these objectives. Therefore, the use of commercial off-the-shelf technologies is recommended as these products could provide robust calibration validation datasets for future NASA missions." CMS 2014 Direction

FY2015 DRAFT: "Carbon Monitoring. - Of the funds provided within the Earth Science research and analysis activity, the Committee recommends no less than $8,000,000 to continue efforts for the development of a carbon monitoring system. The majority of the funds should be directed toward acquisition, field sampling, quantification, and development of a prototype monitoring, reporting and verification system. Priority should be given to mapping States that have previously demonstrated the ability and willingness to map forests on a county level to enable the program to demonstrate how to cost effectively scale these measurements." CMS 2015 Draft Language

13 To advance from the prototyping and “pre-phase-A” work NASA has been directed to conduct to a U.S. Carbon Monitoring System responsive to MRV needs will require coordinated multi-agency attention. At a minimum, the following agencies and their data and other capabilities must be involved:  NOAA: Tower and airborne observations of GHGs  USDA: Forest and soil carbon inventories  DOE: AmeriFlux  EPA: U.S. official reporting  How to get from here to there? And what can be done with existing capability, without major new investments? U.S. Carbon Monitoring