School Year Session 3: October 16, 2013 Deconstructing Geometric Understanding 1.1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

A didactic plan for a communicative translation class Dr. Constanza Gerding Salas Leipzig Universität - Universidad de Concepción May 2012.
A Story of Geometry Grade 8 to Grade 10 Coherence
School Year Session 5: November 6, 2013 Planning for Reasoning, Reasons for Planning 1.1.
Building Geometric Understanding Hands-on Exploration in Geometric Measurement Grades 3-5.
Using the Crosscutting Concepts As conceptual tools when meeting an unfamiliar problem or phenomenon.
What Happened? In your group, discuss what happened in your district regarding SB 1 after our last meeting. Each group will share (1)one positive outcome.
Inquiry and Communication in Maths and Stats:
Strengthening Mathematics Instruction Cognitive Complexity and Instructional Strategies Dr. Vicki Jim
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Scoring Student Work 1 K. Thiebes.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
Common Core High School Mathematics: Transforming Instructional Practice for a New Era 7.1.
School Year Session 13: April 2, 2014 The Cycle Closes: Modeling with Algebra and Functions 1.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
2.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 2 16 JUNE 2015 CONGRUENCE IN HIGH SCHOOL.
Welcome to Common Core High School Mathematics Leadership
Valerie Mills NCSM President Oakland Schools, Waterford MI.
The Importance of Coherent Lessons in Elementary Mathematics Linda Schoenbrodt, MSDE, Elementary Programs Specialist October, 2014.
Common Core State Standards Initiative Mathematics FPS Implementation Wednesday October 10,
Common Core High School Mathematics: Transforming Instructional Practice for a New Era 8.1.
TIPM3 Second and Third Grade Geometry November 3, 2010.
Common Core High School Mathematics: Transforming Instructional Practice for a New Era 6.1.
6.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 6 29 JUNE 2015 SEQUENCING BASIC RIGID MOTIONS; THE KOU-KU THEOREM.
Welcome to Common Core High School Mathematics Leadership
School Year Session 10: February 19, 2014 Geometry? Algebra? We Couldn’t Decide. What the Heck, We’ll do Both! 1.1.
School Year Session 11: March 5, 2014 Similarity: Is it just “Same Shape, Different Size”? 1.1.
1.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 3 17 JUNE 2015 SIMILARITY IN MIDDLE SCHOOL.
CCSS 101: Standards for Mathematical Practice Class 3 March 14, 2011.
PVNC MATH 3 PROJECT DIGGING DEEPER WITH DIFFERENTIATION Session 2.
9.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 17 SEPT 2014 TAKING CHANCES (IN CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY)
Class 4: Part 1 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class April 4, 2011.
4.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 4 18 JUNE 2015 SIMILARITY IN HIGH SCHOOL.
School Year Session 12: March 19, 2014 Similarity: Moving from Theory to Classroom Practice 1.1.
T1PM3 – Geometry & Measurement Grades 2 and 3 October 7, 2010 Dr. Monica Hartman
1.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2014 SESSION 8 25 JUNE 2014 CONDITIONAL PROBABILITIES AND EVALUATING INDEPENDENCE.
LOOKING AT ASSESSMENTS DOK – PART 2. GOALS FOR TODAY Review Depth of Knowledge (DOK) levels Identify assessment questions of various DOK levels Understand.
1.6 What if it is Reflected More than Once? Pg. 26 Rigid Transformations: Translations.
1.6 What if it is Reflected More than Once? Pg. 23 Rigid Transformations: Translations.
Today you will explore mathematical ways of sliding, turning, and flipping an object without changing its size or shape. These types of movements are called.
Common Core High School Mathematics: Transforming Instructional Practice for a New Era 2.1.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. 3 Day Goals Planning: Writing Assessment Items and Choosing a 3 Act Task Create a 3 Act Task.
CCSS 101: Standards for Mathematical Practice Class 3 March 14, 2011.
School Year Session 7: December 4, 2013 Lesson Outcomes: Claims and Evidence 1.1.
12.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION MAR 2015 SAMPLING, VARIABILITY, AND PROPORTION (OH MY)
1 Learning to Lead Mathematics Professional Development.
WHAT IS A COMPUTER? LESSON 1-1. OBJECTIVES The student will be able to: Explain and give examples of the concepts on computers and computing.
School Year Session 4: October 30, 2013 Catching Student Thinking in the Web 1.1.
14.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION MAY 2015 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF STATISTICS: A BROAD VIEW.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
1.7 What if it is Rotated? Pg. 28 Rigid Transformations: Rotations.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
School Year Session 6: November 20, 2013 Lesson Planning: Down to the Wire 1.1.
Common Core High School Mathematics: Transforming Instructional Practice for a New Era 1.1.
10.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION FEB 2015 NORMAL IS A STATE OF MIND BEST FORGOTTEN, BUT.
Academic Language and Standards-Based Instruction Session 4 1/28/16.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Network for New Science/Math Teachers November 20, 2008 Lexington, KY University of Kentucky Partnership Institute for Math & Science Education Reform.
7.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 7 30 JUNE 2015 MODELING USING SIMILARITY; COPYING AND BISECTING.
8.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 8 1 JULY 2015 POINTS OF CONCURRENCIES; UNKNOWN ANGLE PROOFS;
02.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 2 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 BUT WHAT IF MY YARD IS MORE OF A RECTANGLE?
Collaborative Grouping 6-12 Math Teachers. Workshop Outcomes Participants will gain effective strategies for forming and facilitating a classroom culture.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
06.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 6 18 NOVEMBER 2015 PUMP UP THE VOLUME.
Welcome! Please arrange yourselves in groups of 6 so that group members represent: A mix of grade levels A mix of schools 1.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
03.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 3 14 OCTOBER 2015 EVERYTHING OLD IS NEW AGAIN.
Key Concept: Reflections, Translations, and Rotations
Identify reflections, translations, and rotations.
Presentation transcript:

School Year Session 3: October 16, 2013 Deconstructing Geometric Understanding 1.1

Agenda Homework Discussion Linking Claims and Evidence Break Precision in Geometry Homework and closing remarks 1.2

1.3 Homework Discussion Activity 1: Sit with others teaching the same content as you this semester. One person places a task (original and modified versions) face up on the table. Other group members study them individually, in silence, for 1 minute. Discuss the modifications you see in the task. Repeat, until everyone has had a chance to present.

1.4 Homework Discussion Activity 1: Now that we have worked on task modification: What do you notice about the work of modifying tasks? What do you wonder about? What do you want to know more about, and what keeps you up at night about this idea?

Learning Intentions & Success Criteria Learning Intentions: We are learning to use evidence from classroom sources to make claims about student understanding Success Criteria: We will be successful when we can identify and describe evidence for SBAC claims in given pieces of student work. 1.5

1.6 Linking Claims and Evidence Activity 2: Julie wants to fence in an area in her yard for her dog. After paying for the material to build her doghouse, she can afford to buy only 36 feet of fencing. She is considering various different shapes for the enclosed area. However, she wants all of her shapes to have 4 sides that are whole number lengths and contain 4 right angles. All 4 sides are to have fencing. What is the largest area that Julie can enclose with 36 feet of fencing? Support your answer by showing work that would convince Julie that your area is the largest.

1.7 Linking Claims and Evidence Activity 2: Consider the student work from the NAEP item, Julie’s Fence. With your group, create three claims: A claim about most or all of these artifacts A claim about some, but not all of these artifacts A claim about few or none of these artifacts Link each of your claims about the work to one of the four SBAC claim categories. Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures Claim 2: Problem Solving Claim 3: Communicating and Reasoning Claim 4: Modeling and Data Analysis

1.12

1.14 Linking Claims and Evidence Activity 2: What claims would you have liked to have made about this set of work? What would you need to do to be able to collect the evidence for those claims?

Learning Intentions & Success Criteria Learning Intentions: We are learning to use evidence from classroom sources to make claims about student understanding Success Criteria: We will be successful when we can identify and describe evidence for SBAC claims in given pieces of student work. 1.15

Break 1.12

1.17 Precision in Geometry At your tables, come to consensus on a careful definition of each of the following: A rigid motion A reflection A rotation A translation Activity 3:

1.18 Precision in Geometry With your table group, find a way to model the particular rigid motion you have been given. You may use any tools or objects you can find in the room, including yourselves. Be prepared to justify your model by showing how you can connect it to the formal definition of your transformation. Activity 3:

1.19 Homework & Closing Remarks Homework: Read “Open-Ended Questions and the Process Standards” by Wendy Sanchez Make any further modifications to your chosen tasks that you think desirable after today’s homework discussion. Teach the final version of your tasks, and bring representative samples of student work to class on October 30. Reflect on how you might incorporate the principles you are learning into the lesson or unit you have chosen for your main semester project. (Recall that this is a lesson or unit you plan to teach between November 20 and December 4.) Activity 4: