Methods  DNA was isolated from blood samples collected at four separate locations.  Samples were Nanodropped to ensure proper concentrations of DNA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
applications of genome sequencing projects
Advertisements

Evolution in population
Lab 3 : Exact tests and Measuring of Genetic Variation.
Lab 3 : Exact tests and Measuring Genetic Variation.
Alleles = A, a Genotypes = AA, Aa, aa
Population Genetics and Natural Selection
Chapter 19 Evolutionary Genetics 18 and 20 April, 2004
Discovery of a rare arboreal forest-dwelling flying reptile (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea) from China Wang et al. PNAS Feb. 11, 2008.
Variation. 9.1 Phenotypic variation caused by genetic differences and by the environment Genetic variation is the foundation of evolution Understanding.
Plant of the day! Pebble plants, Lithops, dwarf xerophytes Aizoaceae
Signatures of Selection
Quantitative Genetics
Molecular Markers DNA & PROTEINS –mtDNA = often used in systematics; in general, no recombination = uniparental inheritance –cpDNA = often used in systematics;
Population Genetics.
Population Genetics: Populations change in genetic characteristics over time Ways to measure change: Allele frequency change (B and b) Genotype frequency.
Human Migrations Saeed Hassanpour Spring Introduction Population Genetics Co-evolution of genes with language and cultural. Human evolution: genetics,
Microsatellites as Indicators of Genetic Diversity in Natural Populations of Black Walnut (Juglans nigra L.) Across Indiana 1 Department of Forestry and.
Chapter 3 -- Genetics Diversity Importance of Genetic Diversity Importance of Genetic Diversity -- Maintenance of genetic diversity is a major focus of.
GENETIC FINGERPRINT ESTABLISHED FOR THE SELECTED ALFALFA GENOTYPES USING MOLECULAR MARKERS.
MECHANISMS FOR EVOLUTION Honors Biology. REVIEW Evidence for Evolution and Examples What is Natural Selection? How did Darwin develop theory of Natural.
Genetic diversity and population structure of sea trout in Gulf of Finland: implications for conservation and management Riho Gross, Marja-Liisa Koljonen,
Natural Variation in Arabidopsis ecotypes. Using natural variation to understand diversity Correlation of phenotype with environment (selective pressure?)
Rapid micro-evolution and loss of chromosomal diversity in Drosophila in response to climate warming A study by Francisco Rodriguez-Telles and Miguel A.
Systematics and the Phylogenetic Revolution Chapter 23.
Genes and Variation Biology.
Genotyping and association analysis of Gossypium hirsutum lines for resistance in Reniform Nematodes Megha V. Sharma*, Stella Kantartzi, David Weaver,
Chapter 24: Molecular and Genomic Evolution CHAPTER 24 Molecular and Genomic Evolution.
Complexities of modern leaf morphology, climate proxies, and applicability in the fossil record Claire Cleveland 1,2, Jennifer Hargrave 1, Betsy Bancroft.
Patterns of divergent selection from combined DNA barcode and phenotypic data Tim Barraclough, Imperial College London.
Evaluating Genetic Diversity Between Populations of New England Cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) and Eastern Cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) Tricia.
Finnish Genome Center Monday, 16 November Genotyping & Haplotyping.
Lab 7. Estimating Population Structure. Goals 1.Estimate and interpret statistics (AMOVA + Bayesian) that characterize population structure. 2.Demonstrate.
Evolution and Population GENETICS
Genetic differentiation of caribou herds and reindeer in Northern Alaska Karen H. Mager, Kevin E. Colson, and Kris J. Hundertmark Institute of Arctic Biology,
Clonal diversity matters High levels of functional and genetic diversity occur in the model microzooplankter Oxyrrhis marina S chool of B iological S ciences.
Populations: defining and identifying. Two major paradigms for defining populations Ecological paradigm A group of individuals of the same species that.
Lab 7. Estimating Population Structure
NEW TOPIC: MOLECULAR EVOLUTION.
Serial Founder Effects in Linguistics and Genetics Claire Bowern (with Keith Hunley and Meghan Healy) Yale and University of New Mexico Feb 9, 2012 Based.
The plant of the day Pinus longaevaPinus aristata.
Sequencing of the 1 st Intron: 30 DNA samples: (15 from 1997 & 15 from 2004) Amplified 3 B. rapa FLC genes of the 1 st intron using PCR Visualized DNA.
Chapter 16 Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Evolution What is evolution? A change in a population over time These changes is caused by many factors and are.
2.1 Multivariate Inheritance & Response to Selection Stevan J. Arnold Department of Integrative Biology Oregon State University.
Components of Natural Selection Phenotypic variation Fitness differences – phenotypic differences must influence fitness to some extent for there to be.
Marjana Westergren, Tine Grebenc. MOLECULAR MARKERS Molecular markers = fragment of DNA that is associated with a certain location within the genome or.
 DNA was extracted from New England cottontail fecal pellets 1 using a QiAmp DNeasy Stool Kit (Qiagen) Genetic Structure of an Isolated New England Cottontail.
Population Structure High population divergence at the state level Populations from western Indiana genetically differed from the BONWR population Genetic.
Supplementary Figure 1. Summary of repeat field surveys and temporal genetic analysis for 10 sites with multiple years of collections, including (i) site.
Evolution of Populations
Crystiana Tsujiura (’14) and Judy L. Stone
Local Landraces of Rice from Sri Lanka :
Figure 5. Do not be afraid to leave plenty of white space around your figures. If you use someone else’s figure, always acknowledge the source. Figures.
Observed Heterozygosity Expected Heterozygosity
Quantitative genetics
OUTLINE 21 POPULATION GENETICS I. The New Synthesis A. Challenge
Rachel Bautzmann, Mentor: Dr
BIOLOGY NOTES EVOLUTION PART 2 PAGES
Chapter 16 Table of Contents Section 1 Genetic Equilibrium
The Evolution of Populations
Track the Split of Crocodile Sub Populations
Sopiko Kurdadze Supervisor: Professor David Tarkhnishvili
BIOLOGY NOTES EVOLUTION PART 2 PAGES
THE EVOLUTION OF POPULATIONS
Chapter 7 Beyond alleles: Quantitative Genetics
Volume 25, Issue 15, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Modes of selection.
explain how crime scene evidence is
Mechanisms of Evolution Microevolution
The Evolution of Populations
Presentation transcript:

Methods  DNA was isolated from blood samples collected at four separate locations.  Samples were Nanodropped to ensure proper concentrations of DNA.  PCR reactions were run using eight different microsatellite loci with fluorescent-labels (neutral genetic markers).  Gel electrophoresis was used to confirm a successful PCR reaction.  Genotyping was performed by Iowa State University DNA facility and scored using Genemapper.  Population parameters were calculated using Arlequin, Genepop, Genalex, and Structure.  In testing each locus for Hardy Weinberg equilibrium, locus TelCa3 was dropped from the project. Results  A total of 88 samples were successfully genotyped. (see Table 1)  One locus was dropped from analysis because it was out of Hardy Weinberg equilibrium in all four populations.  In comparing levels of genetic diversity, Stones (ST) had the lowest heterozygosity and fewest alleles.  Fst values were significantly different among many locations. Stones had the most genetic divergence. (Table2) Conclusions  We found significant genetic structure among the four populations.  This structure was significant within the lake as well as between Lake and Meadow locations.  The degree of structure was similar to the previous study on other locations around Eagle Lake.  Of the four populations, Stones is the most genetically distinct and also has the least genetic diversity. Future Directions 1.Extend the study to include four additional locations. 2.Determine if multiple paternity is present in garter snakes, and if so, to what extent. 3.Determine if the degree of multiple paternity in the studied populations of garter snakes is strongly linked to the life history traits defined by the differing ecotypes. Population genetics in western garter snakes Courtney Wolken¹, Megan Manes², Tonia Schwartz², Anne Bronikowski² ¹Newton High School, Newton, IA ²Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology Iowa State University, Ames, IA Literature cited 1.Manier, M.K. and Arnold S.J Ecological correlates of population genetic structure: a comparative approach using a vertebrate metacommunity.. Proc. R. Soc. B 2.Uller, T. and Olsson M Multiple paternity in reptiles: patterns and processes. Molecular Ecology Bronikowski, A. and Arnold S The evolutionary ecology of life-history variation in the garter snake Thamnophis elegans. Ecology 80. Acknowledgements  NSF Plant Genome Research Program  homepage.html Questions Previous research has identified morphological and physiological differences between the ecotypes (Lakeshore versus Meadow), based on common garden experiments. This variation has both a genetic and environmental basis. We address the following questions as the first step to understanding the genetic basis for these differences. 1.Do the populations vary in their amount of genetic diversity? 2. Are the populations genetically different? Introduction Eagle Lake, California provides habitats for two different ecotypes of terrestrial Gartner snake, Thamnophis elegans. Based on location they have evolved differing life history traits. Lakeshore ecotype: fast growth, early maturation, short lifespan, found at low elevations Meadow ecotype: slow growth, late maturation, long lifespan, found at higher elevations. sitecodeecotype sample size observed heterozygosity average # of alleles SummitSMM StonesSTL MerrillMLL GallatinGAL Mountain Meadow Lakeshore MLSTSMGA ML ST0.061** SM ** GA ***0.048*** Fig. 2. Graphical representation from Structure. SM ST ML GA Fig. 1: (TOP) Ecotypes of garter snake found at Eagle Lake. The checkered snake represents the Lake Shore ecotype, the black and yellow striped snake represents the Meadow Ecotype. (BOTTOM) Map of locations in the study. Red dots denote the lakeshore locations the blue dot denotes the mountain meadow location. ML GAL ST SM Table 2 Pairwise Fst values: ** indicates P-value < 0.01; *** indicates P-value <  Using Bayesian statistics, the program Structure was able to group the individuals into genetic populations (Fig. 2). Table 1. Sites, codes, ecotypes, sample sizes, and measures of genetic diversity for the studied locations. Ecotype refers to the habitat and snake phenotype. L denotes a Lakeshore habitat, M denotes a Meadow habitat