Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #06 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #06.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team Space Jam Launch Readiness Review Paul Guerrie, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Taylor King, & Jamie Usherwood November 2,
Advertisements

Questions from the European colleagues & Answers (only) from the Chinese engineers present for Y.-W. Zhang and S.-G. Yuan Chinese Academy of Space Technology.
Clean Air Project: Team Big Green SpaceGasm Launch Readiness Review Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #27 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #27 T+9.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #04 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #04.
BalloonSat “Optimism Prime” Team “Thumbs Up” Conceptual Design Review Nick Lenk, Greg Nelson, Eddie Cyrus, Jake Varey, Chase Pritchett, Brian Inglis 9/23/08.
Team D.S.R.O Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Gracie Harsha Emily Howard Bobby Stillwell September 23, 2008.
Requirements Definition Marcin Pilinski Chris Koehler Colorado Space Grant Consortium.
Colorado State University- Pueblo Working with Risley Middle School and Craver Middle School.
Paul “Trey” Karsten Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki Brynn Larson Terek Campbell Marcus Flores 11/25/09 Final Revision.
Team Zephyr Critical Design Review Joseph Sheehey, Huy Le, Andrew Zizzi, Alex Morrow, Sam Evans, Logan Wright October 14, 2008.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #05 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #05.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #28 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #28.
Teamo Supremo Critical Design Review Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner Kimberley Fornall Barton Tofany Nick Martinez Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #27 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #27 T+3.
1 Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #09 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #09.
Student Hands On Training I (2009) Hands-On Activities Hands-On Activities.
GONS Final Presentation Steven Benedict Jake Danser Josh Hecht Brock Kowalchuk Erik Shuttlesworth Matthew Zemel December 4, 2007 Steven Benedict Jake Danser.
Oddballs Team 8 Final Presentation Jennifer McGraw Evan Townsend Jessica (JB) Brown Brian Roth Stephanie Jalovec Grant Fritz December 5, 2007.
Panoramic Rays Conceptual Design Review Brian Gonzales, Kaia Jerde, Harrison McLean, Anirudh Sarsam, Brett Traub, Matt Capron September 20, 2007.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Rev
Cydonia Final Review Presentation 6 December 2007 Greg Rancourt, Sarah Flinn, Dominic Boiko, Kevin Stuth, Derek Houtz, Max LaFon.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #30 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #30.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Oddballs Critical Design Review Team 8: Grant Fritz, Jessica Brown, Stephanie Jalovec, Jennifer McGraw, Brian Roth, Evan Townsend 10/18/07.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #06 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #06.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #24 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #24.
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
Launch Readiness Review 11 Nov Brady Phillips, Elliot Guber, Brandon Campbell, Dushyant Dhundra, Joel Mendez, Cameron Trussell.
Welcome Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 1.
1 Student Hands On Training I (2009) BalloonSats & Ballooning BalloonSats & Ballooning.
Space Debris Launch Readiness Review Seanna Renworth, Emily Logan, Corey Godwin, Sean Murphy, Cole Bostrom, Jonathan Kirchmaier November 11 th, 2008.
Conceptual Design Overview
Greg Rancourt, Sarah Flinn, Dominic Boiko, Kevin Stuth, Derek Houtz, Max LaFon.
Miscellaneous Notes: This is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here. Basically this.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #05 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #05.
A Scheduling Algorithm with Dynamic Priorities Status Presentation Matias Mora Klein UTFSM Computer Systems Research.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #04 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #04.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN 1400 / ASTR 2500 Class #06 Gateway To Space ASEN 1400 / ASTR 2500 Class #06 T-79.
Team Ramrod Critical Design Review Dan Armel, Michaela Cui, Andrew Grimaldi, Kyle Kemble, Silvia Peckham, Chris Sawyer, & Kelsey Whitesell 2007 October.
Project: Weather Video Sat 4/2/04 Mesa State College, Grand Junction.
Research & Technology Implementation TxDOT RTI OFFICE.
Space Monkeys Launch Readiness Review Project Curious George November 11, 2008 Project Curious George November 11, 2008.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN 1400 / ASTR 2500 Class #21 Gateway To Space ASEN 1400 / ASTR 2500 Class #21 T-25.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #03 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #03.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NUMBER: 2519S02 FOR
Sea Launch/Zenit Thrust: 8,180,000 N Fueled Weight: 450,000 kg Payload to LEO: 13,740 kg Cost per launch: $100,000,000 Cost per kg: $7,300 Launches: 31/28.
Evan Akselrad, Chris Anaya, Natalie Bixler, Melanie Dubin, Logan Finch, Ted Maritz, and Scott Williams November 11, 2008.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #05 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #05.
Victor Taberski, Ryan Walker, Allen Marshall, Matt Kerwin, Andrew Winthrop, Steven Ramm October 14, 2008 UANIOOU – (Upper Atmosphere Near-Infrared Optical.
GONS Critical Design Review Steven Benedict Jake Danser Josh Hecht Brock Kowalchuk Sean Pomeroy Erik Shuttlesworth Matthew Zemel October 17, 2007 Steven.
Quinn Kostelecky, Vincent Staverosky, Gloria Chen, Roshan Misra, Jacqueline Godina, Raymond Auyeung Fall 2011 Rev C
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #06 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #06.
PROJECT SCREAM PROPOSAL Josh Yeaton Kevin Dinkel Chris Kopacz Conrad Schmidt Chris Warren Dillon Thorse
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #05 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #05.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #3 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #3.
S.H.I.E.L.D. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Addison, Travis, Jared, Evan, Aaron, Matt 10/14/08.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #3 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #3.
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
BOWSER 1 COSGC Space Research Symposium 2010 BOWSER Balloon Observatory for Wavelength and Spectral Emission Readings.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
The Principles of Space Instrument Design Lauren Shea Based on research completed at MSSL Alton Convent School.
Spring REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NUMBER: 2500-SP03 FOR DESIGN CONCEPT OF THE Balloon Satellite (BalloonSat) PROPOSALS ARE.
Junk in a Box Critical Design Review
Colorado State University- Pueblo
Gateway To Space T+3 ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #25
Team SCREAM Launch Readiness Review
Proposal Team 8: Grant Fritz, Jessica Brown, Stephanie Jalovec, Jennifer McGraw, Brian Roth, Evan Townsend.
Team Icarus Brandon Scott Bosomworth Edgar Alejandro Flores
Presentation transcript:

Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #06 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #06

- We are now a class of 68 - HW 03 Assigned Today and next week - Movie Night This Thursday at 6:00 PM in ECCR I bring the food, you bring the drinks - General Questions? Announcements:

One Minute Paper:

Colorado Space Grant Consortium Team Videos Class #06 Team Videos Class #06

Fall 2006 Team Video

Your Mission

Civilization as you know it has been destroyed by killer tomatoes from Io. You and your clan are trying to understand what’s going on with the planet. Your clan has liberated EOSS headquarters and they are now at your disposal. Your clan also has access to the entire inventory at allelectronics.com, large amounts of gaseous helium, latex balloons, a machine shop, foam core, various batteries and a Noodles & Co, which still continues to operate. The fate of planet Earth is in your hands.

Colorado Space Grant Consortium Request for Proposals Class #06 Request for Proposals Class #06

What is an RFP? - There is a lot of money out there - There are a lot of ideas - Request For Proposal bring them together - Most satellites were at one time an RFP - Most of you will write or help write a proposal in your job - Now is your time to practice

SEE RFP

To Recap RFP: -Final weight shall not exceed 1000 grams - Shall image the Earth or the Balloon during flight and shall record internal and external temperature - Must have an additional experiment Chapter 8 nearspace.asp Chapter 8 nearspace.asp - Must follow all the guidelines while writing proposal - Why and How – this is your plan and foundation for project - Using screen shots…

So... -Take the ideas you came up with individually during the HW#2 - Start with these in your team and expand them during HW #3 - But…Keep It Simple Stupid (KISS Principle) - Start now! - You are writing a proposal not a request for proposal - Proposals September 23, Launch is November 15, 2008

What You Get…

17 Camera on Mars

Colorado Space Grant Consortium Semester Theme Class #06 Semester Theme Class #06

Fundamental Problems… -Weather - Night/daylight - Other

The Main Point A high-altitude, balloon-borne optical telescope could generate high resolution images on a par with HST. But do it at a tiny fraction of the cost.

The value of High Angular Resolution is obvious. 14,000 ft 250 miles

Just how high up do you have to go to avoid all clouds and stormy weather and start having space-like astronomical observing conditions?

A photo taken from the window of a TR-1 (U2) aircraft from an altitude of around 75,000 ft.

Lake Tahoe, CA

View of Oregon from a U2 flying at 70,000 ft. The cloud deck is more than 30,000 ft below. There is simply no weather above 60 kft. And the sky gets very dark.

Closing Items:

Science Theme: 1.0 Sky Brightness Measurements 2.0 Video Capture of Stars Using CCD Imaging System 3.0 Stabilized Video Capture of Stars 4.0 Attitude Determination of Instrumentation 5.0 Attitude Determination and Control of Instrumentation

Presentation: Presentation Templates

Final Written Report: Design Document Template

Final Presentation: -Should cover same items in report - team video

Drawings:

Functional Block Diagram:

Requirements Definition Marcin Pilinski Chris Koehler Colorado Space Grant Consortium

Anatomy of Requirements Mission Statement (aka Mission Goal) A very general description of the problem being addressed by the system. Mission Objectives 3 to 5 general statements elaborating the Mission Statement. Objective Requirements Quantify each objective: when, what, where, for how long System Requirements The system as a whole must perform to this set of specifications in order to meet the objective requirements, mission objectives, and mission statements Subsystem Requirements Each subsystem must perform to these specifications in order to meet the criteria defined above. This part is done separately for each subsystem i.e. power, mechanical, computer, science, thermal. Step 1: General definition. Subjective description and a few numbers Step 2: Numbers and ranges. Focus in on defining the problem. Step 3: Subsystems. Repeat step 2 for every subsystem, tracing from system requirements G O Requirements Level

An Example from Class: Icarus Goal (G1) The BalloonSat Aquintus shall ascend to an altitude of approximately 100,000 feet to carry out scientific experiments that will measure tilt of the satellite, forces acting upon it, wind speed, and solar energy to better understand the conditions in which high altitude observatories would be in. Goal (G1) The BalloonSat Aquintus shall ascend to an altitude of approximately 100,000 feet to carry out scientific experiments that will measure tilt of the satellite, forces acting upon it, wind speed, and solar energy to better understand the conditions in which high altitude observatories would be in. Goal (G1) The BalloonSat Aquintus shall ascend to an altitude of approximately 100,000 feet to carry out scientific experiments that will measure tilt of the satellite, forces acting upon it, wind speed, and solar energy to better understand the conditions in which high altitude observatories would be in. O1 (comes from G1) Construct BalloonSat to improve understanding of HA conditions at X-100,000 ft for under $YYY dollars by MM/DD/YYYY. O2 (comes from G1) Measure tilt in one axis and forces in the range of X mN to YmN as a function of altitude in the range of X-100,000. O3 (comes from G1) Measure wind speed perpendicular to one face of the BalloonSat and solar energy as a function of altitude.

2. Objective Requirements and System Requirements Before Starting the next level… (system level or level 1 in this scheme) 1.A requirement must be NECESSARY, must have a clear need 2.A requirement must be TRACEABLE 3.A requirement must HAVE A METHOD OF VERIFICATION 4.A requirement must be ATTAINABLE 5.A requirement must be CLEAR 1.SYS2The system shall determine the densities of neutral particles to a 1-sigma precision of 2x kg/m 3. (Goal 1x kg/m 3 ). O3 Ex.

2. Objective Requirements and System Requirements General Guidelines and Wisdom For the Young Engineer 1.A requirement defines the “WHAT” not the “HOW” –“HOW” defines the implementation, i.e. the solution –“WHAT” defines the functionality which is the first thing you need before starting anything! 2.A requirement has some standardized wording –shall: denotes a requirement which must be verified, use it in every requirement “there is no try, only do or do-not” –should: denotes a goal for which a best effort will be made –will: denotes a factual or explanatory statement 3.A requirement is succinct, strong, and gets to the point fast –Avoid “or” statements and “if” stipulations –No wordiness, a brief statement saying WHAT the system shall do. –DO NOT use the following words or ones like it: A FEW WEASEL WORDS TO AVOID: Adequate, Always, Bad, Better, Clearly, Easily, Efficient, Etc., Every, High, Ideal, Large, Maximize, Maximum, May, Most, Minimize, Minimum, Must, Never, Normal, Rapid, Real-time, Satisfactory, Significant, Simultaneous, Small, Sometimes, Sufficient, User-friendly, Worse… These words introduce ambiguity, doubt, and deception… …an engineer craves not these things.

Questions?

Colorado Space Grant Consortium Special Class Discussion Class #06 Special Class Discussion Class #06

Special Class Discussion Class #05 Special Class Discussion Class #05

Special Class Discussion Class #05 Special Class Discussion Class #05

Special Class Discussion Class #05 Special Class Discussion Class #05

Special Class Discussion Class #05 Special Class Discussion Class #05