Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Abortion Surveillance in the United States:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TM Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Advertisements

State Center for Health Statistics Division of Public Health NC Dept. of Health and Human Services.
Using Health Marketing Tools To Promote Your PRAMS Program Demetrius Parker Angela Ryan Health Communication Specialists Marketing and Communication Strategy.
Laurin Kasehagen, MA, PhD MCH Epidemiologist / CDC Assignee to CityMatCH Maternal & Child Health Epidemiology Program Applied Sciences Branch, Division.
Evaluating Fetal Death in NYC: How do Reporting Challenges Affect the Data? 2014 NAPHSIS Annual Meeting June 9, 2014 Ann Madsen, PhD, MPH Director, Office.
National Center for Health Statistics DCC CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION Changes in Race Differentials: The Impact of the New OMB Standards.
1 Gina M. Brown, M.D., Katrina Manzano, M.P.H., Deborah Kaplan, R-PA, M.P.H. Bureau of Maternal, Infant, and Reproductive Health, NYC DOHMH Acknowledgements:
Unintended Pregnancy: New Estimates for the United States Lawrence B. Finer, Ph.D. Mia R.S. Zolna, M.P.H. RH 2010 September 25, 2010.
Laura L. McDermott, PhD, FNP, RN Gale A. Spencer, PhD, RN Binghamton University Decker School of Nursing THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Division of Vital Statistics.
A Brief Introduction to Epidemiology - VII (Epidemiologic Research Designs: Demographic, Mortality & Morbidity Studies) Betty C. Jung, RN, MPH, CHES.
Michigan Birth Defects Registry Overview and Status.
NCHS Data – Strengths and Weaknesses from the NHLBI Perspective Paul Sorlie, Ph.D. Chief, Epidemiology Branch National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Guidance for Industry Establishing Pregnancy Registries Pregnancy Registry Working Group Pregnancy Labeling Taskforce March, 2000 Evelyn M. Rodriguez M.D.,
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A SOCIAL PERSPECTIVE Beverly Andrews Biostatistician Caribbean Epidemiology Centre Epidemiology Division.
Prescription Opioid Use and Opioid-Related Overdose Death — TN, 2009–2010 Jane A.G. Baumblatt, MD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epidemic Intelligence.
Health Statistics and Informatics An introduction to cause-of-death statistics Department of Health Statistics and Information Systems Presented by Doris.
Birth Certificate and Hospital Discharge Linkage Survey: Results from 52 jurisdictions Shin Y. Kim 1, Sukhjeet Ahuja 2, Caroline Stampfel 3, Dhelia Williamson.
Public Health Matters for Women and Families: A National Maternal and Child Health Perspective Brittany Argotsinger, MPH, PHPS Fellow Office for State,
BC Jung A Brief Introduction to Epidemiology - IV ( Overview of Vital Statistics & Demographic Methods) Betty C. Jung, RN, MPH, CHES.
Introducing HealthStats Eleanor Howell, MS Manager, Data Dissemination Unit State Center for Health Statistics February 2, 2012.
Press Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:CONTACT: Roseanne Pawelec, Tuesday, July 23, 2002(617) NEARLY HALF OF ALL MASSACHUSETTS RESIDENTS OVERWEIGHT.
A Valuable Resource: Health Sector as a Beneficiary and Contributor to CRVS Systems.
General Introduction of Community Health Services in the Hongkou District Amy Jiang, MPA Shanghai, China.
Melissa VonderBrink, MPH Ohio Department of Health Center for Public Health Statistics and Informatics.
© 2006 Population Reference Bureau Rising Family Planning Use, Developing Countries Married Women 15 to 49 Using Any Method Percent Source: Population.
Improving Security, Systems, and Statistics San Diego, CA June 4 th – 8 th, 2006 Developing a Community Health Information System NAPHSIS Conference –
A Population Based Survey of Infant Inconsolability and Postpartum Depression Pamela C. High*, Rachel Cain**, Hanna Kim** and Samara Viner-Brown** Hasbro.
 Health insurance is a significant part of the Vietnamese health care system.  The percentage of people who had health insurance in 2007 was 49% and.
Desirable Characteristics and Current Status of State Web-based Data Query Systems National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems.
TM Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Amita Toprani, MD, MPH New York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene EIS Field Assignments Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CSTE.
USING MEDICAID AND BIRTH DATA FOR EVALUATION OF PERINATAL ORAL HEALTH INITIATIVE IN THE HUSKY PROGRAM PRESENTATION TO OVERSIGHT COUNCIL ON MEDICAL ASSISTANCE.
Overview of National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Data Systems Mary Burgess NCHS Librarian
CDC’s Preemie Act Activities Wanda Barfield, MD, MPH, FAAP Director, Division of Reproductive Health National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and.
National Surveillance Estimates of Unintentional, Non-fire Related Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Jackie Clower, MPH Contractor, Air Pollution & Respiratory.
July 31, 2009Prepared by the Maine Health Information Center Overview of All Payer Claims Data Suanne Singer, Senior Consultant Maine Health Information.
Session 3: Assessment & Evaluation Lisa Jacques-Carroll, MSW NCIRD, CDC.
Patricia W. Potrzebowski, Ph.D. Executive Director National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems January 25, 2012 Vital Statistics.
Components of HIV/AIDS Case Surveillance: Case Report Forms and Sources.
NCHS and Public Health Data Standards Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics.
Studying Injuries Using the National Hospital Discharge Survey Marni Hall, Ph.D. Hospital Care Statistics Branch, Division of Health Care Statistics.
Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Oregon PEP: Oregon’s campaign to improve.
Core State PCH Indicators: A Preliminary Report of Multi-State Findings Using Data from the BRFSS CDR Lauren B. Zapata, PhD, MSPH Division of Reproductive.
Data Sources-Cancer Betsy A. Kohler, MPH, CTR Director, Cancer Epidemiology Services New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services.
Sandy Jones Public Health Advisor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion April.
Extending Our Reach Through Partnerships June 2-6, 2013 Phoenix, Arizona.
Health, United States: History, Uses, and Future Directions Health, US Over the Years: Diane Makuc Health, US in the 21 st Century: Amy Bernstein Media.
Integration of HIV/AIDS, STD, TB and Viral Hepatitis New York State’s Experience Guthrie S. Birkhead, M.D., M.P.H. Director, AIDS Institute Director, Center.
Flojaune Griffin, PhD, MPH Preconception Health Coordinator
How Epidemiologists Think About Suicide Roger B. Trent, Ph.D. EPIC Branch California Department of Health Services.
Births and Birth Outcomes for Single- and Multiple-Race American Indian and Alaskan Native Mothers Brady E. Hamilton, Ph.D. National Center for Health.
Introduction to US Health Care Unit 4 Chapter 14 Public Health Policy 14-1.
Overview of Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems
United Nations Workshop on Principles and Recommendations for a Vital Statistics System, Revision 3, for African English-speaking countries Addis Ababa,
Trends in childhood asthma: NCHS data on prevalence, health care use and mortality Susan Lukacs, DO, MSPH Lara Akinbami, MD Infant, Child and Women’s Health.
 The development of the perinatal assessment tool was a vital precursor leading to the addition of data collection of the perinatal population. Data collected.
Clifford Johnson, Director U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics.
Implementing Sexual Health Education Policies and Programs in Challenging Environments Kendra LeSar, MPH, CHES Marsha Broussard, DrPH Kelley McDonough,
Lesson 4Page 1 of 27 Lesson 4 Sources of Routinely Collected Data for Surveillance.
Overview of National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Data Systems Mary Burgess
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 6 General Health and Population Indicators.
Factors associated with maternal smoking during early pregnancy: relationship to low-birth-weight infants and maternal attitude toward their pregnancy.
Implications and Limitations The Asthma H.E.L.P. program demonstrates that an asthma management program can be integrated into the casework process of.
Lesson 3 Page 1 of 24 Lesson 3 Considerations in Planning Public Health Surveillance.
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Bruce B. Cohen, PhD Massachusetts Department of Public Health
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference Aug , 2016
SCHS and Health Statistics
Virginia Maternal Mortality Data Quality & Data Collection
Presentation transcript:

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Abortion Surveillance in the United States: Future Directions and Challenges Karen Pazol, PhD, MPH Maternal and Infant Health Branch Division of Reproductive Health National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Abortion data are important for monitoring reproductive health Combined with data on births and fetal losses to calculate pregnancy rates Monitor clinical practice patterns and changes in use of procedures over time Guide efforts to reduce unintended pregnancy and assess the impact of changes in policy and the implementation of family planning programs

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Organizations collecting abortion data in the United States Organization Data SourceOrigin of Data Information ObtainedDates -,CDCNCCDPHP Division of Rep. Health State Vital Statistics Agencies Individual records from abortion providers Aggregate report: N’s + basictraits Annually,1969 present- Guttmacher Institute Abortion Provider Survey Counts from abortion providers TotalN’sPeriodically, 1974present Abortion Patient Survey Responses from women seeking abortion Basic traits1987, 1994, 2000, NCHS National Survey of Family Growth Responses from reproductive aged women N’s + basic traits 1982, 1988, 2001, & N-State Vital Statistics Agencies Individual records from abortion providers ’s + basic traits

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 CDC’s Abortion Surveillance System and its strengths Challenges of combining data collected through independent state-run systems Efforts to facilitate work carried out in the states and integrate data collected through independent systems Talk overview

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Each year CDC requests aggregate data from the 50 states, NY City and DC Legally mandated and voluntary elements Most states (N=47) require provider reporting States submit data to CDC voluntarily, yet participation is high (N=49 areas in 2007) Most but not all states have a reporting system Prior to 1997, five states had no system Prior to 1998, CDC conducted surveys in hospitals and other abortion facilities CDC’s Abortion Surveillance System

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 CDC compiles abortion data on a consistent annual basis Calendar years with abortion counts CDC Guttmacher Institute

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Information collected by CDC: Gestational age Procedure type Place of Residence Maternal age Maternal race CDC proportions are applied to Guttmacher Institute total counts to estimate the incidence of abortion within population subgroups CDC compiles information on a wide range of variables ● Maternal ethnicity ● Marital status ● Number prior births ● Number prior abortions

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 CDC counts closely track results from the Guttmacher Patient Survey

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 CDC’s Abortion Surveillance System and its strengths Challenges of combining data collected through independent state-run systems Efforts to facilitate work carried out in the states and integrate data collected through independent systems Talk overview

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 CDC does not obtain abortion counts from all 52 reporting areas 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Central reporting agencyHospitals & other abortion facilities # areas contributing to CDC totals % contribution of areas that reported to CDC to the Guttmacher Institute totals

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 States vary considerably in the completeness of reporting 0%25%50%75%100% CDC counts by state as a percentage of Guttmacher Institute counts 2000(N=4) 2005 (N=45) Voluntaryreporting Mandatory reporting 2000(N=44) 2005 (N=3) 35% 69% 96%

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Active outreach to abortion providers can improve reporting

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 States vary in the amount of information they collect

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 States vary in the amount of information they collect

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 States vary in the level of detail provided for each variable Number areas reporting by procedure and with medical abortion as a separate category reported by procedure typemedical abortion separate category FDA approval of medical abortion

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 States vary in the level of detail provided for each variable

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 CDC’s Abortion Surveillance System and its strengths Challenges of combining data collected through independent state-run systems Efforts to facilitate work carried out in the states and integrate data collected through independent systems Talk overview

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Analyses of trends over time based on continuously reporting areas

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Analyses of trends over time based on continuously reporting areas

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Revised analyses retain compatibility with current reporting

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Revised analyses retain compatibility with current reporting Medical (Nonsurgical) Abortion: A procedure (that) involves the administration of a medication or medications to induce an abortion. Medications (e.g., methotrexate, mifepristone, misoprostol, etc.) are used most frequently early in the first trimester of pregnancy. However, some medications (e.g., prostaglandin suppositories, injectable prostaglandins, etc.) may be administered during the second trimester of pregnancy to induce abortion.

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Revised analyses retain compatibility with current reporting

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Revised analyses retain compatibility with current reporting

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Revised analyses retain compatibility with current reporting

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Revised analyses retain compatibility with current reporting

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Establish improved dialogue with state vital statistics departments Increase the compatibility of CDC data requests with state data systems Develop more efficient methods for transferring aggregate reports to CDC CDC efforts to understand state systems and enhance collaboration

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 CDC has compiled the most consistent annual record of abortions CDC collects important information on maternal demographics, procedure type and gestational age CDC faces many challenges in combining data from 52 independent sources Conclusions

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Attempts to overcome variation and improve surveillance: Trends based on continuously reporting areas Revisions to analyses compatible with current reporting formats Increase communication and understanding of state systems to enhance collaboration Conclusions

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Douglas Cook, CDC Sonya Gamble, CDC Laura Hall, CDC Saeed Hamdan, CDC Wilda Parker, CDC Suzanne Zane, CDC Acknowledgements Elizabeth Nash, Guttmacher Institute Mary Chase, Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment