Temperature Assumptions for Dynamic Ratings in ERCOT CRR Auctions Proposal to differentiate between Day (PeakWD & PeakWE) and Night (Off-peak) October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 13, 2013 ERCOT Public CRR Transaction Limits NPRR463 Implementation Update Matt Mereness ERCOT Manager Day-Ahead Market and CRR Auction.
Advertisements

Appendix of Interval Data Plots RESLOWR Round 2 Load Research Report.
Utah Cost of Service and Rate Design Task Force Seasonality in Costs and Loads Maurice Brubaker June 15, 2005 Salt Lake City, Utah.
Line Efficiency     Percentage Month Today’s Date
1 Basis risk of hedging 1 Insufficient windSufficient windExcessive wind Turbine operation normal => YesPayoutNo payoutPayout => NoPayoutNo payoutPayout.
Unit Number Oct 2011 Nov 2011 Dec 2011 Jan 2012 Feb 2012 Mar 2012 Apr 2012 May 2012 Jun 2012 Jul 2012 Aug 2012 Sep (3/4 Unit) 7 8 Units.
HOW TO MAKE A CLIMATE GRAPH CLIMATE GRAPHING ASSIGNMENT PT.2.
NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues
2011 Long-Term Load Forecast Review ERCOT Calvin Opheim June 17, 2011.
Study Results Drought Scenario Study This slide deck contains results from the 2011 TEPPC Study Program. This study shows the impact in the interconection.
Market Analysis & Forecasting Trends Businesses attempt to predict the future – need to plan ahead Why?
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 External Web Services Update Nodal Implementation Team Presentation July 7, 2009.
Updated Cost/Benefit Analysis for PRR Part A/S Bidding Proposed Methodology.
CRR Auction Scope John Moseley. To outline aspects of the CRR market process to assure that these proposed CRR market protocols (as interpreted by ERCOT.
Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2012 ERCOT Dynamic Ratings Application.
Bill Hellinghausen EDF Trading North America
NPRR385, Security Violation Analysis and Reporting and Negative Price Floor WMS Meeting February 15, 2012.
Modeling with sine or cosine functions. Project Overview What do you know about the sine graph? What do you know about the equation of the sine function?
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
May 03, UFE ANALYSIS Old – New Model Comparison Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation May 03, 2007.
Matt Tozer ERCOT Manager, Settlements & Billing 9/4/2013 ERCOT Update Management of the Balancing Account CMWG.
March 6, 2012 ERCOT Public ERCOT CRR Update Matt Mereness ERCOT Manager Day-Ahead Market and CRR Auction.
Rocky Mountain Power - Utah Workgroups I and II Load Research and Peak-Hour Forecasting Presented by UTAH INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS Salt Lake City, Utah.
CRR Model Building Process Bradley Bell CRR Engineer.
ERCOT, Market Analysis 2013 Annual Constraint Competitiveness Test (CCT) Study Results – Update for 8/27/12 CMWG 8/27/2012 ERCOT Public.
Table 1: Annual Inflation, Dec – Nov 2008 Description OverallFood Non-food Dec Jan Feb Mar
ERCOT Monthly Operational Overview (July 2012) August 15, 2012.
Ippolitov I. I., Kabanov M. V., Komarov A. I., Kuskov A. I., Loginov S. V., Smirnov S. V. Structure and Dynamics of Ground Temperature and Pressure Fields.
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
ProjectImpactResourcesDeadlineResourcesDeadline Forecast Plan Time Resources Risk 001xx 002xx 003xx 004xx 005xx 006xx 007xx TotalXX Example 1: Portfolio.
California Independent System Operator ISO Department of Market Analysis1 ISO Department of Market Analysis Analysis of Day Ahead Congestion Costs, Curtailments,
1 Credit Parameters Review TAC July 2, Protocol Section , “Credit Requirement for DAM Bids and Offers” specifies: Credit Requirement for.
Four files erik_a2_stockholm_temp Erik simulation scenario A2 until 2100 erik_a2_stockholm_prec Erik simulation scenario A2 until.
1 NPRR638 (Seasonality) Back-Cast Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public October 3, 2014.
Project Funding Review February 7, Background ERCOT has a $15M project budget in 2013 (same as 2012) –To allow for new additions to the.
YOSEMITE BY ARSAL.
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
Baltimore.
Q1 Jan Feb Mar ENTER TEXT HERE Notes
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Constructing Climate Graphs

2017 Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
CORPUS CHRISTI CATHOLIC COLLEGE – GEOGRAPHY DEPARTMENT
FY 2019 Close Schedule Bi-Weekly Payroll governs close schedule

Calendar Year 2009 Insure Oklahoma Total & Projected Enrollment
MONTH CYCLE BEGINS CYCLE ENDS DUE TO FINANCE JUL /2/2015
Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
HOW TO DRAW CLIMATE GRAPHS
Electricity Cost and Use – FY 2016 and FY 2017

Study Results Drought Scenario Study
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Objective - To make a line graph.
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
TIMELINE NAME OF PROJECT Today 2016 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Pilot of revised survey
Presentation transcript:

Temperature Assumptions for Dynamic Ratings in ERCOT CRR Auctions Proposal to differentiate between Day (PeakWD & PeakWE) and Night (Off-peak) October 23, 2015

Contents  Current Methodology  Temperature Difference between Peak (Day) and Off-peak (Night)  Benefits  Is over-selling in the auction a risk? A look into nodal history  Proposed Changes  Appendix 1

Current Methodology According to ERCOT Nodal Protocols Section : (f) Thermal operating limits (including estimates for Dynamic Ratings) for transmission lines; (i) For a CRR Long-Term Auction Sequence, ERCOT shall use Dynamic Ratings based on a historical analysis of the maximum peak-hour temperatures for the previous ten years; and (ii) For the CRR Monthly Auction, ERCOT shall use Dynamic Ratings for the maximum peak-hour temperature forecast for the month; 2

Peak vs. Off-Peak Temperatures WZMoD*N** CurrentD vs. N COAST Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Coastal Weather Zone Example * Day Hours defined as HE ** Night Hours defined as HE and Additional data for all other Weather Zones is in the Appendix A

Benefits o Representing the Off-peak system closer to Day-Ahead market expectation would better correlate CRRs as a hedging instrument for Loads and Generators in the Market for Off-peak hours o Historical congestion in monthly auctions and Day-Ahead market show congestion during peak hours is ~16% more in the auctions than in Day- Ahead. However, the congestion in Off-peak hours is 49% higher in the auctions than in the Day-Ahead market. This causes an over valuation of Off- peak congestions risks, and therefore effectively increasing hedging costs in the Off-peak hours o If we were to assume that the Day (PeakWD and PeakWE) “hedging premium” of 16% is correct, then the implied Off-peak congestion in the auctions should only be $2.34B, which is $65M less than what it is now for four years of history, that is roughly ~$16M per year for the market 4 * Data used is Jun 21st 2011 to September 28th 2015 for Day-Ahead ** July 2011 to September 2015 CRR auction results CONGESTION RENTS ($M) MARKETDAYNIGHTTOTAL DAY-AHEAD *1, ,019 MONTHLY AUCTION **2, ,405 16%49%19% Better value expected Day-Ahead market in the Rolling/Monthly Auctions:

Benefits 5 * Data used is Jun 21st 2011 to September 28th 2015 for Day-Ahead ** July 2011 to September 2015 CRR auction results Better value expected Day-Ahead market in the Rolling/Monthly Auctions: o Even though overvaluation of Off-peak for all history is ~49%, for given months it can reach up to 600% and most recent 12-month moving average shows it to be ~77%. Much higher than the trend observed for the “Day” (WD and WE) group

Benefits o This would allow to better represent the available capacity of the system given a forecasted (DAM) or telemetered (RTM) temperatures The Day-Ahead Market uses a temperature forecast for every weather zone and every hour to determine the expected dynamic rating of all dynamically rated equipment In Real-Time operations, ERCOT telemeters temperatures in the system every 15-minutes for every weather zone 6 Align the CRR models Day-Ahead and Real-Time Markets:

Benefits 7 * Weather Assumptions (MIS Report ID 12325) ** Forecasted Temperature Adjusted Dynamic Ratings (MIS Report ID: 12346) *** Real Time Dynamic Rating Data (MIS Report ID: 11024) **** Seq1 rolling and Monthly auction for Sep 2015 used the same temperature (and rating) assumption Dynamic Ratings in Day-Ahead, Real-Time and Auction (With New Methodology)

HISTORICAL DAM CONGESTION RENTS BY EQUIPMENT TYPE ($M)* EQUIPMENTDAYNIGHTTOTAL INTERFACE XF LINE (STATIC) LINE (DYNAMIC) TOTAL:1, ,019 8 * Data used is Jun 21st 2011 to September 28th 2015  Only $32M (~1.6%) of Historical Day-Ahead Market Congestion was on Dynamically Rated Lines during Off-peak hours A look into DA Congestion in ERCOT for the last four years: Is over-selling in the auction a risk?

9 * Summation of Rating B for equipment in CIM SEP ML4  According to table below, dynamically rated lines would have in average 5% more capacity in the Off-peak auction for the entire year. The highest change would be in the summer months with ~5.7% increase  As for the entire system, the additional capacity is ~2.2% for the annual average, with its peak in the summer of about 2.6% Percentage increase in System Capacity* for the Off-peak (Night) Cases with this new methodology: PCNT INCREASE CAPACITY FOR OFF-PEAK COMPARED TO PEAK RATINGS (%) SCENARIO INCLUDED IN CALCULATION? JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecAvg XFMR LINE STATICDYNAMIC ALL SYSTEMYES TRANS. LINES ONLYNOYES DYNAMIC LINES ONLYNO YES Is over-selling in the auction a risk?

Proposed Changes 10  Utilize different temperature assumptions between Day (PeakWD and PeakWE) and Night (Off-peak) CRR cases  The methodology to derive the Day** and Night** temperature assumptions uses the same analysis as the current methodology, except that it uses two datasets, one for Day (HE 700 to 2200) and another one for Night (HE and ) Methodology to choose Temperatures for Auction Models CurrentlyProposed AuctionPeakWDPeakWEOff-peakPeakWDPeakWEOff-peak Rolling10Y Historical Analysis (No day/night distinction)*10Y Historical Analysis (DAY**) 10Y Historical Analysis (NIGHT***) MonthlyERCOT Fcst*ERCOT On-Peak Fcst 1.ERCOT Off-Peak Fcst? 2.Same method as rolling? 3.A combination between ERCOT Peak Fcst and 10Y Historical DAY to derive a NIGHT “multiplier” or “adder” *ERCOT Nodal Protocols Section **Day Hours defined as HE *** Night Hours defined as HE and

Appendix A 11

Appendix A – Weather Zone Temperature Day vs. Night WZMoDN CurrentD vs. N COAST Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Coastal:

WZMoDN CurrentD vs. N EAST Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Eastern: Appendix A – Weather Zone Temperature Day vs. Night

WZMoDN CurrentD vs. N FWEST Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Far West: Appendix A – Weather Zone Temperature Day vs. Night

WZMoDN CurrentD vs. N NCENT Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec North Central: Appendix A – Weather Zone Temperature Day vs. Night

WZMoDN CurrentD vs. N NORTH Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Northern: Appendix A – Weather Zone Temperature Day vs. Night

WZMoDN CurrentD vs. N SCENT Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec South Central: Appendix A – Weather Zone Temperature Day vs. Night

WZMoDN CurrentD vs. N SOUTH Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Southern: Appendix A – Weather Zone Temperature Day vs. Night

WZMoDN CurrentD vs. N WEST Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Western: Appendix A – Weather Zone Temperature Day vs. Night