Design of a High-Field Block-Coil Superconducting Dipole Magnet Evangelos I. Sfakianakis School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Advertisements

Ramesh Gupta, BNL D1 Dipole Design / IR Magnet Study LARP Collaboration Meeting, Oct 5-6, D1 Dipole Design Task (terminated in 2005) IR Magnet Study.
Chapter 17 Current and Resistance. Electric Current Let us look at the charges flowing perpendicularly to a surface of area A The electric current is.
Block-coil NbTi dipoles for 6 Tesla Rapid-cycling SuperSPS
Hybrid QD0 Studies M. Modena CERN Acknowledgments: CERN TE-MSC CLIC Magnets Study Team: A.Aloev, E. Solodko, P.Thonet, A.Vorozhtsov “CLIC/ILC QD0” Meeting.
Applied superconductivity group L. García-Tabarés, F. Toral, I. RodriguezCIEMAT, I/2008.
Development of Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators and Detectors in High Energy Physics Takakazu Shintomi and Akira Yamamoto On behalf of.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Chapter 24 Electric Current. The electric current I is the rate of flow of charge through some region of space The SI unit of current is Ampere (A): 1.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Chapter 17 Current and Resistance. Electric Current Let us look at the charges flowing perpendicularly to a surface of area A The electric current is.
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
SuperB Meeting, May 2008 Status of the magnetic design of the first quadrupole (QD0) for the SuperB interaction region S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole.
Some considerations and back-of-the-envelope computations on the multipole correctors Giovanni Volpini, CERN, 7 March 2013.
115 December 2011 Holger Witte Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Elliptical Dipole.
1 Numerical study of the thermal behavior of an Nb 3 Sn high field magnet in He II Slawomir PIETROWICZ, Bertrand BAUDOUY CEA Saclay Irfu, SACM Gif-sur-Yvette.
Chapter 27 Current and Resistance. Electric Current The electric current I is the rate of flow of charge through some region of space The SI unit of current.
Concepts for 20 T dipoles SnowMass Preparation J. Van Nugteren.
Transformers Transformers are some of the most efficient machines that can be built, with efficiencies exceeding 99%. Only simple machines (levers, inclined.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
G.A.Kirby 4th Nov.08 High Field Magnet Fresca 2 Introduction Existing strand designs, PIT and OST’s RRP are being used in the conceptual designs for two.
R. Bonomi R. Kleindienst J. Munilla Lopez M. Chaibi E. Rogez CERN Accelerator School, Erice 2013 CASE STUDY 1: Group 1C Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study introduction Paolo Ferracin CERN, Geneva Claire Antoine
Open Midplane Dipole (OMD) Design for Dipole First Layout R. Gupta (BNL), N. Mokhov (FANL) bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
GROUP C – Case study no.4 Dr. Nadezda BAGRETS (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) Dr. Andrea CORNACCHINI (CERN EN Dept.) Mr. Miguel FERNANDES (CERN BE.
Magnet design issues & concepts for the new injector P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova Magnet design issues & concepts for the new injector P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova,
US LHC Accelerator Research Program (LARP) Background  Proposed in 2003 to coordinate efforts at US labs related to the LHC accelerator (as opposed to.
Muon Cooling Channel Superconducting Magnet Systems Muon Collider Task Force Meeting on July 31, 2006 V.S. Kashikhin.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
Update on Q4 DSM/IRFU/SACM The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Principals of fast injection and extraction R. Apsimon.
SUPERCONDUCTORS mobile electrons in conducting material move through lattice of atoms or ions that vibrate (thermal motion) when conductor is cooled down.
E. Todesco, Milano Bicocca January-February 2016 Appendix C: A digression on costs and applications in superconductivity Ezio Todesco European Organization.
Muons, Inc. 14 Jan 2010 S. Kahn--IR Quads 1 IR Quadrupoles with Exotic Materials Steve Kahn, Muons Inc. Bob Palmer, BNL Don Summers, Ole Miss.
Superconductivity and Superfluidity The Pippard coherence length In 1953 Sir Brian Pippard considered 1. N/S boundaries have positive surface energy 2.
Magnet R&D for Large Volume Magnetization A.V. Zlobin Fermilab Fifth IDS-NF Plenary Meeting 8-10 April 2010 at Fermilab.
XVII SuperB Workshop and Kick Off Meeting - La Biodola (Isola d'Elba) Italy May 28 th June 2 nd 2011 P.Fabbricatore Sezione di Genova The air core magnets.
IR Magnets for Muon Collider Alexander Zlobin and Vadim Kashikhin Muon Collider Physics Workshop, Fermilab November 12, 2009.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
New Magnet Design for FCC- ee Attilio Milanese, CERN 26 Oct presented by Frank Zimmermann.
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Dipole magnets A dipole magnet gives a constant B-field.
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
Iron-free high current pulsed air-core coil quadrupoles
The design schemes of the low field dipole magnets
Chapter 24 Electric Current.
High Field Hybrid Design
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Pierre-Alexandre Thonet
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
11T Dipole for the LHC Collimation upgrade
Design and Optimization of Force-Reduced Superconducting Magnets
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 2 Paolo Ferracin European Organization for Nuclear Research.
PROGRESS TOWARDS AN OPEN MIDPLANE SEPARATION DIPOLE
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
The limits of traditional magnets.
Qingjin XU Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP),
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

Design of a High-Field Block-Coil Superconducting Dipole Magnet Evangelos I. Sfakianakis School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens AT-MEL-EM Group CERN 2006 Summer Student Programme

Current Status & Future Goals The LHC Main Dipoles are the most state-of-the art superconducting dipole magnets worldwide. Their field producing capability exceeds 8 teslas. They are built in a twin aperture configuration with a common iron yoke. The windings follow the cos(θ) configuration and the material used for the cables is Nb-Ti. However, if the LHC has to be upgraded to reach even bigger energies, a field of 15 teslas will be needed, which current Nb-Ti magnets are unable to provide. Therefore research is carried out in both material science and design concepts (e.g. NED). So today the superconductor that is believed to be most suitable for such high- field magnets is Nb 3 Sn. The design of the next “big” magnet is still under debate.

Superconductivity It is known that superconductors can carry a large amount of electrical current without significant losses due to Ohm’s law. This makes them the only choice for building high-field magnets (in the multi-tesla region). However a lot of issues have to be taken into consideration when superconducting materials are used, such as  Temperature The cryogenics have to be able to keep the temperature at the desired level, which for the superconductors used in magnets is of the order of only a few Kelvin. Heike Kamerlingh Onnes  Quench Protection A local transition from the superconducting to the normal conducting state could drive the hole magnet to get normal conducting and eventually melt.  The Critical Temperature is a function of both the field and the Current of a superconductor, hence forming a Critical Surface, which determines the upper limit of a superconductor’s performance.

Magnet Anatomy (LHC Dipole)

Design Goals & Parameters  Field Strength For the same dipole length and the same angle of curvature, the field needed is proportional to the particles momentum. Hence if one wishes to go to higher energies (and higher momenta) the dipole field strength has to be increased proportionally.  Field Quality Since only a perfectly homogenous magnetic field can bend all particles in the same desired way, the field produced by the magnet inside the beam pipe should be as homogenous as possible, i.e. as closer to the ideal dipole as possible.  Stress Management Because of the extremely high current and field, the Lorentz force on the conductors has to be taken into account, so as not to damage the superconducting strands. This point, although important will be just briefly mentioned.  Other Parameters (e.g. cost) Several other parameters, such as the cost and time required for building the magnet, the robustness of the design as far as the fabrication imperfections are concerned, the power supply and cryogenics have to be taken into account, but will not be discussed further in this talk. The Simulation and Optimization were done using the ROXIE software package.

Multipole Field Errors (1) It is known that “any” periodic waveform can be expressed as a weighted (infinite) sum of real or complex trigonometric functions (Fourier Series). In exactly the same way any magnetic field configuration in an aperture can be analyzed as a weighted sum of the field produced by ideal multipoles. The main goal when designing a magnet is to be as close to the desired field as possible. A perfect dipole field can be obtained by a Current distribution that follows the law J=J o cos(θ).

Multipole Field Errors (2) The current distributions that are theoretically required for producing the field of an ideal multipole cannot be obtained in reality. That means that the resulting magnetic field is a sum of both the desired multipole field -in our case a dipole- and of higher order multipoles. Working on a small aperture magnet (30mm diameter) we were able to obtain a maximum field of about 16 T and keep the relative mutipole errors below 0.2. In order to design a larger aperture magnet (88mm) the resulting cross-section could be scaled up quite easily and when optimized the relative multipole errors were at about 0.3 or less and the maximum field exceeded 16T.

Effects due to the Iron Yoke The effects of the iron yoke differ from those of ordinary magnets. Its main purpose is to increase the field in the aperture while decreasing the field outside the magnet (fringe field). The iron leaves the linear region and saturates quite early because of the high field. This nonlinearity causes the multipole errors to vary with excitation current and has to be suppressed as much as possible. The coil was further optimized, taking the yoke’s contribution to the main field into account. The relative errors were kept below 0.2 and the maximum field exceeded 16T.

Persistent Currents Another source of errors is the so-called superconductor magnetization stemming from currents which are produced in order to screen the internal volume of the superconducting cable from the magnetic field. Because of the zero resistance of the cable they do not decay with time. In hard superconductors, such as the ones used for the coils, the persistent currents show a hystereses. In the region outside the cable the persistent currents produce a magnetic moment, that alters the field in the aperture.

Closing Remarks Special Thanks to: Nikolai Schwerg Bernhard Auchmann Stephan Russenschuck The Block-Coil Design is worth being studied in parallel to the cos(θ) configuration. It is easy to scale while keeping the main characteristics (field strength and multipole errors) in the desired region. The philosophy of the design follows the so-called Intersecting Ellipses scheme. Especially for large apertures, the cos(θ) Dipole suffers from stress due to the Lorentz force around the midplane. In a Block-Coil magnet stress is easier to handle by placing a non magnetic supporting structure around each conductor block. However the yoke and especially the persistent current compensation has to be further simulated and optimized. However a lot remains to be done and tested before a decision about the dipoles of the next high energy ring accelerator is reached.

Thank you!!! Superconducting Magnet Design is a challenging task where many contradicting parameters have to be taken into account and stands at the forefront of modern technology. Accelerator Technology is of great importance for High Energy Physics endeavors. Even for future linear colliders (ILC, CLIC), magnets will play an important role (e.g. focusing quadrupoles, damping ring dipoles).