HERMES dipole magnet model for CBM CBM Collaboration Meeting September 25-28,2006 Pavel Akishin Elena Litvinenko Victor Ivanov LIT JINR, Dubna

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hall C SHMS Fringe Field Analysis Michael Moore Hall C Winter Meeting
Advertisements

1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Dipole magnet for CBM: current status P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev, V.V. Borisov,
Stato dei lavori Ottimizzazione dei wiggler di DA  NE Simona Bettoni.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
Systems of magnetic dipolar particles with shifted dipoles Details to be found in the poster.
HERMES tracking for OLYMPUS. Part #1. Detector survey. A.Kiselev OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting DESY, Hamburg,
News about magnetic field simulation and progress ‘Towards magnetic field measurement benches’ Nikolay Morozov JINR Dubna.
Monte-Carlo simulations and reconstruction for 12-degree ep-elastic Luminosity Monitor A.Kiselev OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting DESY, Hamburg,
D 0  K -,  + reconstruction with CBM STS detector I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04 Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
CBM Superconducting Dipole Magnet
IFluka : a C++ interface between Fairroot and Fluka Motivations Design The CBM case: –Geometry implementation –Settings for radiation studies –Global diagnosis.
CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.
Robin Wines. Verbal agreement with BNL to acquire 48D48 magnet Contact at BNL indicates 4 of these magnets in storage BNL agrees to disassemble magnet.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Radiation levels in CBM Radiation effects iFluka (Fluka C++ interface to CbmRoot) Fluka Geometry Models Results Conclusion.
IFluka : a C++ interface between Fairroot and Fluka Motivations Design The CBM case: –Geometry implementation –Settings for radiation studies –Global diagnosis.
SC dipole magnet for CBM E.A.Matyushevskiy, P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev, V.V. Ivanov, E.I. Litvinenko, A.I. Malakhov JINR, Dubna CBM Collaboration.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
LDC Meeting Vienna 17. November 2005 Karsten Büßer LDC Machine Detector Interface Update.
M. Deveaux, CBM collaboration meeting, Oct. 2008, Dubna, Russia A revision of the concept of the CBM – MVD Or: Do we need an intermediate pixel.
Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.
RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT for CBM (at LHE JINR) Yu.V. Zanevsky Laboratory of High Energies JINR, Dubna - NEW INFRASTRUCTURE - FAST GAS DETECTORS - DIPOLE.
Summary STS working group Design optimization STS (Strip) layout R&D (MAPS) Working packages.
FLUKA dose and fluence simulations for CBM experiment I.Kadenko, O.Bezshyyko, V.Pluyko, V.Shevchenko National Taras Shevchenko University of Kiev.
PrimEx collaboration meeting Energy calibration of the Hall B bremsstrahlung tagging system using magnetic pair spectrometer S. Stepanyan (JLAB)
S. Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting, Split, CBM beam pipe and integration inside the Magnet Status report Sergey Belogurov,
Fast Beam Diagnostics at the ILC Using the Beam Calorimeter Christian Grah, Desy FCAL Workshop February Cracow.
Simulations and Software CBM Collaboration Meeting, GSI, 17 October 2008 Volker Friese Simulations Software Computing.
SksMinus status Hyperball collaboration meeting 2009/3/11 K. Shirotori.
Geant4 Simulation of the Beam Line for the HARP Experiment M.Gostkin, A.Jemtchougov, E.Rogalev (JINR, Dubna)
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
SHMS Spectrometer Update Hall C 2008 Users Meeting Paul Brindza January 18, 2008.
Evgeny Kryshen (PNPI) Mikhail Ryzhinskiy (SPbSPU) Vladimir Nikulin (PNPI) Detailed geometry of MUCH detector in cbmroot Outline Motivation Realistic module.
Vyacheslav Klyukhin, SINP MSU Simulation of magnetic toroids for CMS forward muon detection April 22, 2013V. Klyukhin, General Muon mtg, CERN1.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory.
1 Participation of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna) in PANDA experiment at Future GSI Facility Nuclear Structure Physics Physics with Antiprotons.
Johann M. Heuser – The CBM Experiment at FAIR 1 STS and magnet engineering.
Monday, January 24 TimeTitleSpeaker 10:00 – 10:30The CBM experimentV. Friese (GSI) 10:30 – 11:00CBM Silicon Pixel Vertex DetectorM. Deveaux (GSI/IReS)
Realistic detector layout for MUCH system M.Ryzhinskiy, SPbSPU CBM Collaboration Meeting September 25-28, 2007, Dresden, Germany.
CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Torus Magnetic Field - qualitative look at the field distribution How well do we need to know the B-field? - momentum.
Ring finding efficiencies and RICH event display Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration.
12 GeV MOLLER U PDATE TO THE H ALL A C OLLABORATION Juliette M. Mammei.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
Magnetic Field Task Dietrich Liko. Overview A lot of progress in the last two weeks I try to summarize the status Discussion on additional.
JRA1 PCMAG field mapping Elements of the work: Hall sensors: improvements and production Calibration of Hall sensor cards Mechanical mapping device Installation.
LIT participation LIT participation Ivanov V.V. Laboratory of Information Technologies Meeting on proposal of the setup preparation for external beams.
Min Huang g2p/GEp Collaboration Meeting April 18, 2011.
Track Reconstruction in MUCH and TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory of Information.
1 Perturbation of vacuum magnetic fields in W7X due to construction errors Outline: Introduction concerning the generation of magnetic islands Sensitivity.
Simulation / reconstruction with GEMs at DAC A.Zinchenko, A.Kapishin, V.Vasendina for the collaboration VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna,
SAMURAI magnet Hiromi SATO SAMURAI Team, RIKEN Requirements Geometry Magnetic field Superconducting coil and cooling system Present status of construction.
Superconducting dipole magnet for CBM. The status of the SC dipole magnet for project CBM. E.A. Matyushevskiy, P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev,
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
One plane dipole corrector for the CLIC MBQ TYPE 1
Current Status of the Geometry Database for the CBM Experiment
Discussion of modification to DID field for detectors with TPC
▪ Issues after KOBRA review meeting
Tas and Q0: Simple parametric study for Tas 15/03/07
MDL0L02 Dipole Hysteresis Loop Study
A Cold SCU Phase-Shifter
Chapter 29 Examples Examples 1, 6, 7.
DAFNE wiggler optimization
New results on electromagnetic field simulation
SksMinus simulation program
Measurement and Characterization of a 5T Solenoid Field
Presentation transcript:

HERMES dipole magnet model for CBM CBM Collaboration Meeting September 25-28,2006 Pavel Akishin Elena Litvinenko Victor Ivanov LIT JINR, Dubna

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September The available magnetic field maps… cbmroot/ AUG07 / FieldActive.root FieldMuonMagnet.root FieldMuonMagnet_small.root cbmroot / FEB 07 / FieldActive.root FieldAlligator.root FieldActive_Bs.root FieldDipole.root FieldHera.root FieldHeraP.root FieldHeraS.root FieldIron.root FieldMuonMagnet.root

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September … and the “Active” magnet geometry 1.8 m 4.24 m

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September … and the “MuonMagnet” geometry 1m 2.9 m MuonMagnet

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September The new addition to cbmroot magnets Input data – one A4 page with a schematical view and the basic parameters of the dipole magnet from the HERMES experiment at DESY Motivation – checking the chances to use the existing magnet for CBM

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September D model for TOSCA calculations HERMES magnet model:

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September Field map “FieldHermes” for cbmroot

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September cbmroot geometry “magnet_hermes.geo”

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September m 1.9 m 2.1 m 1.75 m 1.12 m 25º 1.19 m Target (-11.7cm) Angular acceptance of the magnet Integral = 0.76 Tm Hermes

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September m 1.12 m Modification of the magnet geometry 1 m 1.41 m 1.61 m Hermes HermesE

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September The changes of the coil current geom: magnet_hermesmagnet_hermes_e.geo field map: Hermes HermesEn HermesE Nominal current: 1500A Number of coils: 2 Turns/coil: A 1650 A

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September m 1.9 m 2.1 m 1.75 m 1.42 m 25º 1.51 m Target (-63.9 cm) Modified angular acceptance Last STS detector 1 m Integral = 0.79 Tm HermesE

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September The most significant field component |By| (z), x=y=0

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September |By| (z,y) x=0 for HERMES

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September Available Field Maps namesymmetry x,y ranges [cm] z range [cm]grid step Active1/8 [-150,150] [-300,300]1 cm MuonMagnet_small1/8[-150,150] [-250,250]1 cm MuonMagnet1/8[-150,150] [-450,450]2 cm Hermes->HermesE 1/4[-300,300] [-450,450]2 cm

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September Together with the existing field maps

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September Field Integrals along z axis (z1,z2) [Tm] FieldMap:(-50,50cm)(-50,100)(-50,200)(-100,100)(-200,200) Active MuonMagnet Hermes HermesEn HermesE

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September Existing maps: |By| (z,y) x=0

Volker Friese CBM Simulation Meeting 15. September And with “Hermes”: |By| (z,y) x=0

Elena Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting September The results HERMES magnet model is available The variant of the minimal magnet modification is proposed to improve the angular acceptance The files are available for the simulations : / u/litvinen/cbmroot/input/ FieldHermes.root FieldHermesEn.root FieldHermesE.root /u/litvinen/cbmroot/geometry/ magnet_hermes.geo magnet_hermes_e.geo -”-