 Dust control is a challenge for all unpaved road managers.  Fugitive dust from unpaved roads creates human health concerns in the form of inhalable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Aquatic Programs Administered by the WV Division of Natural Resources Dan Cincotta WVDNR P. O. Box 67 Elkins, WV
Advertisements

WORLD ECOTOURISM CONFERENCE 2010 Noor Jalilah Binti Jumaat
The Critical Challenge of Antibiotic Resistance: Are Wastewater Treatment Plants a Concern? Kourtney Brown 1, Stefan Walston 2, Channah Rock 2, & Jean.
BEFORE AFTER. New Effluent Limitation Guidelines On November 28th, 2008, the EPA issued a proposed regulation which strengthened the existing National.
LEPIDOPTERA LARVAE AS AN INDICATOR OF MULTI-TROPHIC LEVEL RESPONSES TO CHANGING SEASONALITY IN THE ARCTIC K. M. Daly, 1 H. Steltzer, 1 L. Gough, 2 M. Rich,
Missouri Department of Transportation US Fish and Wildlife Service Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge Habitat Restoration Breakout Session Shannon Kusilek,
Advancements in the field of nanotechnology have attracted global attention both in the industrial and scientific world. There has also been increasing.
Careers in Wildlife Management WORKING ON THE WILD SIDE.
The Effects of Caffeine and Triclocarban on Gammarus pseudolimnaeus Jim Fietzer Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin – Whitewater.
Walker River Basin Project Water PlantSoil Interactions Interactions.
Ground Beetles and Butterflies of Corn and Old Field Areas Along a NE Iowa Trout Stream Before Riparian Habitat Reconstruction Kirk J. Larsen Department.
Do installed steam logjams increase macroinvertebrate richness and abundance? Seyeon Kim and Ong Xiong with faculty mentor Dr. Todd Wellnitz Biology Department.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
Thesis  Erin Harrington  Advisors  Bobbi Low  Phil Myers.
Chicago Wilderness: An Ecosystem Management Plan Katy Berlin Shelly Charron Lisa DuRussel NRE 317 April 11, 2001.
Environmental Health XIV. Standards and Monitoring Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental.
The Nevada Department of Agriculture Water Quality Program The Nevada Department of Agriculture has been involved in groundwater protection since 1990.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Embracing Tree Health Monitoring. TREE HEALTH MONITORING PROJECT PARTNERS.
West Virginia University Natural Stream Restoration Program An Interdisciplinary Program Focusing on Research, Education, and Professional Services in.
Heartland Network Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
Low Flow Analysis & Water Use Plan Science & Community Environmental Knowledge Fund Forum June 10, 2004 Barry Ortman Diversified Technical Services Dawson.
Watershed assessment, management and restoration of Little Kern golden trout in the Little Kern River, California Acknowledgements Assess the current status.
Landfill. ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS 7 essential components are: (a) A liner system at the base and sides of the landfill which prevents migration.
Municipal GIS Applications JOHN C. CHLARSON, P.E. UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL TECHNICAL ADVISORY SERVICE FURE.
I-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project Tanya Lamb Urban Geography, GEOG 481 Description 15-mile stretch Hyak (MP 55.1) to Easton (MP 70.3) 2010 scheduled to.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Monitoring: Data Collection and Analysis Strategies for Designing Program.
1 Questions Addressed What are the options for reducing pollutant inputs to Lake Tahoe? Pollutant Reduction Opportunities.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Meeting Agenda Monday, September 27, :30 pmMeet and.
Walker River Basin Project Agriculture, Restoration, and Plant/Soil/Water Interactions Tasks 4 & 5 Summary2008.
Figure 2. Decrease in K and NO 3 over time in (a) AN1, (b) AN2, (c) CA2. Best fit determined by moving average. Potential for using anaerobic settling.
Critical Loads and Target Loads: Tools for Assessing, Evaluating and Protecting Natural Resources Ellen Porter Deborah Potter, Ph.D. National Park Service.
DOE ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP Natural Resource Trusteeship John J. Bascietto
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
- Aquatics - Presented by: Rick Pattenden Mainstream Aquatics Ltd.
The Relationship of Wetland Soil Chemistry to the Appearance of the bog turtle, Clemmys muhlenbergii Kayla Kyle, Department of Biology, York College of.
Funded through Florida International University National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences Impacts from CCA-Treated Wood Within Marine and Terrestrial.
Ecology of Fall Migrating Sora in Missouri Auriel M.V. Fournier 1, David G. Krementz 2, Doreen C. Mengel 3, Andy H. Raedeke 3 1 Arkansas Cooperative Fish.
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
The Delineation and Monitoring of the McWilliams Farm Replacement Wetland Area in Southern York County Patrick Fetich – Department of Biology, York College.
Potential Biodiversity and Environmental Impacts of Commercial Willow SRC Production in the UK. Rebecca L. Rowe 1, Nathaniel R. Street 1, Michael E. Hanley.
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Population Ecology. What is a Population? Population - A group of individuals of the same species that live together and interbreed Populations: o Share.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Seldovia Road Dust Monitoring ( ) Presented by Tracie Merrill, Seldovia Village Tribe.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
Introduction Methods Results and Discussion Collin Ahrens and Carol Auer Department of Plant Science University of Connecticut Drought and Salinity Tolerance.
Chesapeake Bay. Is the largest estuary in the United States The Bay’s watershed is 64,000 square miles (60% forested) and covers parts of 6 states These.
Health Consultation Cincinnati Country Day School Lead Site Cincinnati, OH Ashley Roberts February 9,2009.
References. Methods Results We conducted avian point counts at pre-established points (created by USFWS within the Whittlsey Creek Watershed in the
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
How do diurnal tidal cycles affect habitat selection in Piermont marsh? Giselle Triviño and Janeth Ortega Piermont Marsh Abstract MethodsResults Number.
Initial Assessment of Habitat Use by Stocked Lake Sturgeon in the Genesee River D. E. DITTMAN 1 and E. C. ZOLLWEG 2 1 Tunison Laboratory of Aquatic Science,
Dr. Patrick Doran, The Nature Conservancy in Michigan. Climate Change: Challenges to Biodiversity Conservation. Chris Hoving, Michigan Department of Natural.
Marco A. Galang, Lawrence A. Morris, and Daniel Markewitz D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The University of Georgia, DW Brooks Drive,
Establishment of Milkweed Seeds under Different Conditions
USGS Science for a Changing Everglades
Brown Trout Growth: Growing, Growing, or Gone
An Integrated Approach for Source Water Protection and Awareness in
Carbon Cycling in Perennial Biofuel Management Systems
Discover Life in West Virginia ( )
Niagara River Area of Concern
Lancaster County Conservancy Long Range Protection Plan
Robert Lafreniere1,2, Alyson Eberhardt2,3
Ecological Restoration of Standing Dead Wood: Evaluation of the use of bark beetle pheromones and other snag-creation methods to provide standing dead.
Butternut Creek Biomonitoring
Robert Lafreniere1,2, Alyson Eberhardt2,3
Environmental Regulations:
Presentation transcript:

 Dust control is a challenge for all unpaved road managers.  Fugitive dust from unpaved roads creates human health concerns in the form of inhalable particulate matter, decreases visibility and driver safety, and compromises road surface integrity through the loss of fine particles.  Chemical dust control treatments have many benefits, but may also have the potential to harm roadside plants and animals.  Road managers need better information on the potential impacts of applications of dust control chemicals on roadside organisms. This need is especially great for road managers on wildlife refuges or in national parks and forests. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Quantifying the effect of dust control treatments at Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge: Roads and roadside organisms Bethany K. Kunz, Greg Linder, and Edward E. Little USGS-Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia MO, 1/11/2016 Introduction Objective Conclusions Ongoing work Acknowledgments Ecological pathways To evaluate product performance and environmental safety of selected dust control products under real-world conditions Results—Roadside invertebrates continued Special thanks to N. Fischer, C. Kudrna, S. Miller, D. Walker, R. Reeves, J. Davis, B. Parra, S. Phegley, D. Welchert, and L. Landowski for field assistance, to EnviroTech Services and Midwest Industrial Supply for project cooperation, and S. Suder, B. Jutz, and S. Furniss for general project support. This project is a collaboration with the US Fish and Wildlife Service, funded through the Federal Lands Highway Refuge Roads Program. Methods Results—Product performance Study site and test layout Initial applications Two products applied to replicated sections of the Squaw Creek auto tour loop (Fig. 1). All road sections (including untreated control) received new surface aggregate prior to road preparation. Products were applied according to vendor specifications. durablend-C™—Polymer-enhanced calcium chloride from EnviroTech Services, CO. Applied as one Compact & Cap™ mixed-in application. EnviroKleen®—Synthetic fluid with binder from Midwest Industrial Supply, OH. Applied as initial topical application and a maintenance dose ~10 months later. Figure 2. Dust production (average total particulate matter) measured while driving on test sections under standard conditions on three sampling dates (1 sample/sec, n=3 trips/section). Error bars represent standard deviations. Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge, Missouri ~7,500 acres (wetlands, grasslands and forest) Designated a Globally Important Bird Area Roads immediately adjacent to wetland habitats 140,000 visitors/year Moderate-to-severe issues with dust Figure 1. Layout of experimental treatment sections on the southern half of the Squaw Creek auto tour loop. Refuge boundary in yellow. Performance monitoring 6 visits over 17 months post-application Replicated dust measurements made with mobile-mounted DustTrak DRX meter Road surfaces assessed and documented Discussions with refuge staff and visitors Auto tour loop immediately adjacent to wetland Figure 3. Roadside invertebrate captures on sticky traps (left) and during two cycles of pitfall trapping (right) during summer 2015, approximately one year after initial product applications. Error bars represent standard deviations. Dotted reference line=untreated control value. Treatment with durablend-C™ or EnviroKleen® generally reduced dust production by >90% on treated road sections relative to the untreated section for 11 months after initial applications. Treatment reduced the need for routine road maintenance and may be a useful strategy for preserving aggregate. Leachates from treated and untreated aggregates did not negatively affect rainbow trout in short-term toxicity tests. Dust control treatments did not reduce the number of invertebrates captured in roadside traps the following summer, relative to the untreated section. These techniques provide an important link between laboratory toxicity test results and field exposures, and could be applied to monitor important target organisms for effects of road treatments in other settings. Summary of soil chemistry data Summary of objective road surface rating data Final round of dust measurement (18 months post-application) Final comparisons and report, including analysis of product performance, longevity, cost, roadside soil chemistry, and roadside organism responses Typical dust conditions prior to treatment Results—Aquatic organism test No leachate caused significant mortality of juvenile rainbow trout in 96-hour tests, despite differences in water quality parameters among leachates (Table 1). Product application Overspray/drift Runoff Leaching/migration Roadside soils/vegetation Roadside wetlands/streams Invertebrates Aquatic organisms Methods—Roadside organisms Treated particulates Aquatic organism test Composite surface aggregate samples from all test sections (treated and untreated) taken immediately after application, 11 and 16 months post-application. 600-g subsamples soaked in deionized water to create leachates (overlying water). Leachates used in 96-hr toxicity tests with juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under static conditions at 12°C. Roadside invertebrate sampling Invertebrates trapped during June-July 2015 as an indicator of invertebrate response after a year of potential product exposure. Pitfall and sticky traps installed along four transects adjacent to each test section of road. Pitfall traps opened for two 24-hr sampling periods; sticky traps deployed for a 2-week period. Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge Each treatment section=0.8 km (0.5 miles) Table 1. Leachate test results from treated and untreated aggregates collected from Squaw Creek roads at three sampling periods. Survival values are from three replicate jars with five fish/jar. Water quality values are means (n=2-4) with standard deviations in parentheses. Untreated durablend-C™ EnviroKleen® Road preparation durablend-C™ application EnviroKleen® application More than 20 families of invertebrates were captured in roadside traps. Capture rates along road sections treated with either product were comparable to those along the untreated road section (Fig.3) Analyses of species composition along each section are ongoing. Untreated durablend-C™ Untreated durablend-C™ EnviroKleen® Untreated durablend-C™ EnviroKleen® 2 months3 months11 months Treatment with either product reduced dust by 89-99% relative to the untreated section (Fig. 2) for a period of 11 months after initial applications. These reductions occurred with a single application (durablend-C™) or an application and maintenance dose (EnviroKleen®). Refuge staff reported better road surface condition and a reduced need for maintenance on treated sections. No maintenance blading was required for 17 months post-application. Sticky trap dataPitfall trap data