1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Role of Bus Transit in the Regional Transportation, Present and Future Howard Benn, Chair, TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee TPB Regional Priority Bus.
Advertisements

Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
1 Presentation to Transportation Planning Board Ronald Kirby, Director of Transportation Planning January 28, 2009 Status Report on Criteria and Process.
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
Transportation Operations Master Plan John Ward ITS-Pennsylvania Panel Discussion Vision for Achieving Regional Mobility through ITS November 23, 2010.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Five-Year Mass Transit Fund Financial Forecast April 6,
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)] DECEMBER 2014.
1 Multi-Sector Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Metropolitan Washington Region Land Use and Transportation Strategies Prepared for:
1 Multi-Sector Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Metropolitan Washington Region Land Use and Transportation Strategies Prepared for:
1 The 2010 Financially Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan And FY Transportation Improvement Program TPB Technical Committee November.
Transportation Planning Board: Background, Constrained Long- Range Plan, and Ongoing Work Presentation to the Board of Directors Metropolitan Washington.
1 Regional Priority Bus Projects List Steve Yaffe, Arlington County December 17, 2008 TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee Presented to the Transportation Planning.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
1 Draft Regional Priority Projects List Steve Yaffe, Arlington County November 20, 2008 TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee Presented to the TPB Access For All.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
1 Presented by Tom Harrington WMATA Office of Long-Range Planning TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Future Metrorail Capacity Needs.
Transportation leadership you can trust. prepared for National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board presented by Arlee Reno, Cambridge Systematics.
Structure of Presentation Federal Requirement Methodology WMATA Expenditures and Core Capacity Constraint Draft Revenues and Expenditures for 2015 – 2040.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Update to the Financially Constrained Long Range Plan (CLRP) Status Report Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
1 Briefing on Draft Safety Element for the 2007 CLRP Michael J. Farrell Andrew J. Meese, AICP COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee November 2, 2007 Item.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
1 Monica Bansal and Michael Eichler Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee December 5, 2008 Progress on “CLRP.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
1 Development of a Regional BRT System Proposal Presented to the TPB Access for All Committee April 23, 2009 Michael Eichler and Monica Bansal Transportation.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
1 Transit and Climate Change April 10, 2008 Deborah Lipman Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
On the Right Track Meeting Greater Boston’s Transit and Land Use Challenges May 17, 2006.
1 FTA Research Programs Ronald Hynes Acting Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation April 17, 2007.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
1 Transit Capacity Constraint Presented to: TPB Technical Committee April 1, 2005 Lora Byala Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Business.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Prop 1B: Infrastructure Bonds 2007 Bay Area Vendor Fair Oakland, CA May 24,2007 Bay Area Transportation:
Draft 2008 Congestion Management Process (CMP) Technical Report Andrew J. Meese COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Item # 8.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 17 Transportation Planning Overview.
1 Presentation to TAC May 20, 2009 Priority Corridor Network (PCN) Evaluation Project Introduction.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
City and County of San Francisco Mayor’s Transportation Task Force: Draft Findings and Recommendations Presentation from the San Francisco Controller’s.
1 Briefing on the Congestion Management Process (CMP) Andrew J. Meese, AICP Melanie Wellman COG/TPB Staff Travel Management Subcommittee November 27, 2007.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
The Regional Big Picture Preparing to Conduct Outreach For the 2010 Constrained Long-Range Plan Presentation to the TPB Access for All Advisory Committee.
Regional Transit Framework Regional Council March 31, 2010.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Provisions Jeff Lindley Director of the Office of Transportation Management Office of Operations Federal Highway.
Summary of the WILMAPCO Congestion Management Process Prepared for T3 Webinar September 18, 2007.
1 Briefing on Draft Congestion Management Process Elements for the 2007 CLRP Andrew J. Meese, AICP Melanie Wellman COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
1 Briefing on the TPB Transportation Planning Process Certification Summary Report Sandra Jackson Federal Highway Administration Transportation Planning.
Access Pasco 10-Year Transit Development Plan ( ) October 2013.
County Board Work Session with County Manager Transit Planning Update March 6, 2015.
Status Report on the Regional Value Pricing Study Ronald F. Kirby, Director of Transportation Planning November 15, 2006 Item 11.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Monica Bansal Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB CAC November 13, 2008 Progress on “CLRP Aspirations” & “What Would it Take?”
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
Implementing the Transportation/Land Use Connection Program
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Presentation transcript:

1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 20, 2008

2 The Regional Bus Subcommittee Formed by TPB Resolution R on January 17, 2007 Mission: To provide a permanent process for the coordination of bus planning throughout the Washington region, and for incorporating regional bus plans into the CLRP and TIP. Membership includes representatives from all transit bus transit operators in the region as well as the DOTs and other regional transportation agencies. Subcommittee recommends actions in this presentation to increase the profile of bus transit in TPB projects and deliberations and expand its contribution to meeting regional needs.

3 Bus Services Are Versatile The Region has many different types of bus systems serving different needs: –Commuter/Express bus –Local bus –Feeder/Circulator bus

4 Bus Services Are Effective Different bus systems perform different roles 13 bus transit operators form a coordinated network of bus transit services in the region Customers benefit from services tailored to their needs.

5 Bus Services Are Important to the Region Bus systems in the region account for 45% of transit trips and 45% of transit operating costs. Coordinated bus network represent a significant share of transit in the region.

6 Bus Services Provide Extensive Regional Coverage

7 Bus Services Offer Many Benefits Respond to market needs Provide a range of services over a wide area of coverage Can be quickly implemented Have lower capital costs relative to rail projects –Services are scalable to demand Support Rail Services –Feeder and circulator systems extend the reach of rail –Rail relief bus lines can relieve pressure from congested Metrorail system Bus Services:

8 Bus Service Demand Is Growing Ridership on the regions bus systems is growing steadily, as is growth of Metrorail ridership.

9 Bus Services Have History of Coordinated Plans Regional Bus Study, 2003 –Service improvements improving existing routes, creating new routes, and establishing high- performance services –Capital improvements fleet improvement, passenger amenities, running way treatments and ITS technology The challenge has been getting the plan implemented Regional Bus Summit, November 2006, intended to encourage implementation –One strategy included creating a regional transit planning group

10 Regional Bus Subcommittee: 2007 Work Plan 2007 Activities of the Regional Bus Subcommittee –Mapping transit service and land use for 2030 –Establishing regional bus transit LOS standards for planning –Facilitating electronic delivery of transit schedules between operators and TPB staff –New Greenhouse Emissions exercise, using transit to help reduce carbon footprint of the region –Coordinating with other TPB committees and activities, including AFA, MOITS task forces, Congestion Management, etc. –Sharing perspectives on common policy issues –Regional Bus Survey, Spring 2008 Other TPB Planning Activities Involve Bus Transit –The Scenario Study (RMAS) Examined large increases in regional transit service –Regional Value Pricing Study Examining enhanced bus service along a congestion-free network of variably priced lanes

11 Regional Bus Subcommittee: 2008 Work Plan Support implementation of the Regional Bus Plan Develop a list of priority project recommendations –Analogous to that of the Bike/Ped Subcommittee –Will include regionally significant transit projects and highway projects that will improve bus service Bottlenecks, signals, bus lanes Inform upcoming Scenario Study activities Address regional planning issues that impact multiple operators/jurisdictions Continue to press for increased funding The Regional Bus Subcommittee is pursuing long-range planning for the region’s bus systems. However, long-range planning is hindered by the short-range challenges of the region’s bus systems.

12 Bus Services Face Real Monetary and Infrastructure Needs Maintaining existing fleet in state of good repair Investing in clean fuel technologies Providing buses for expanded service and to reduce congestion on existing routes Expanding and constructing maintenance and storage facilities Funding to cover operating costs Metrorail’s challenges are well known, the region’s bus systems are facing similar issues.

13 Bus Services Have Other Regional Considerations Providing quality bus stops and transit transfer centers Implementation of BRT technologies Compliance with the ADA Planning for the conversion of HOV lanes to HOT-lane facilities Inclusion in land-use and transit- oriented development decisions

14 Bus Service Needs Can Be Addressed In Various Ways Planning –Land Use forms/ functions/ relations –Developer provided improvements –Right of Way reservations/ public facility siting requirements Operating –“Transit First” strategies for traffic system management –Safe & adequate roads, stops, layover and transfer facilities –Maintaining bus stops and pedestrian systems in good condition Funding –Local initiatives (i.e. bonds, Fairfax Transit Plan) –Regional funding programs (i.e. NVTA bond program) –Project generated revenue (i.e. I-95/395 HOT) –State and federal grants (i.e. formula and discretionary) * Proposed for inclusion in the 2008 CLRP

15 Summary Bus services are an important part of the region’s transportation system Bus systems face real monetary and infrastructure needs –to maintain existing services and respond to growing demand Bus services are one of the solutions to the future growth challenges of the region

16 Recommendations from the Regional Bus Subcommittee Continuing Actions for the Subcommittee: Ensure that bus transit needs be addressed Create a brochure to highlight the major points of this report Identify ways to improve fare and service coordination among the regional and local services Recommend bus projects in regional plans and strategies Advocate bus considerations in TPB UPWP activities Requests for the TPB: Incorporate bus issues in other committee work plans Continue to inquire about the role of bus services when considering project submissions Encourage early consideration of role of bus in developing local transportation projects and land-use decisions