FEBRUARY MTSS FACILITATOR MEETING SHELLY DICKINSON, MTSS TRAINER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTI RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION Creating Tier I/PIPs Cleaning the Windshield.
Advertisements

Tier III Meeting Outline. Roles of Team Members Coordinator –Set up meetings, contact parents, inform members of team about agenda, inform teachers about.
Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include: Report student progress toward.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
RTI 101 Mia Hyde Tennessee Department of Education Coordinator of Reading Content & Resources.
RtI Case Studies RSS RtI Foundations Training August 2010 Amy Roberts & Erin Banks School Psychologists.
1. 2  Stay focused  You are the trainers, so think with the end in mind  Keep sense of humor  Silence cell phones  Honor time limits 3.
Building Level Benchmark Data This represents the percent of students who demonstrated the following proficiency levels on benchmark assessments. AP-Advanced.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Implementation Training December 10, Goal: Develop Math Fact Fluency The FASTT Math intervention program: Helps all students achieve math fact fluency.
FOCUS ON FLUENCY BRIDGING THE GAPS Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Midwest and the Great Lakes West Comprehensive Center present Making Connections:
RtI Day 2 EXCEED Trainer of Trainers SDUSD October 2011 Linda Trousdale Michelle Crisci Several slides were adapted from: Washoe County School District,
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Data Teams and TIPS Processes Multi-Tiered System of Support.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Facilitating Teacher Growth for State-wide Student Success in Mathematics Professional Learning for Intermediate Grades.
Melissa Long, MTSS Teacher Trainer Janet Stephenson, MTSS Teacher Trainer.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
K-5 Interventionists Training Session 2 September 26, 2013.
1 RtI Math How did this get started? What is your role? Connecting RtI to the CCSS.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
3-5 Interventionists Training Session 3 November 19, 2013 Range Line Conference Room 1:00-4:00.
U SING THE IPST F ORMS TO S UPPORT THE P ROBLEM S OLVING P ROCESS Shelly Dickinson Janet Stephenson.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
P ROBLEM S OLVING W ITHIN THE MTSS F RAMEWORK Shelly Dickinson MTSS Trainer.
Elementary Math: 2 nd Grade Professional Development January 2012.
High Quality Math Instruction
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Developing the Plan. Tier III Developing the Intervention Plan Developing the Intervention Plan.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
1 Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) Problem-Solving Model Tier II North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Plan Development & Evaluation Activity Handouts (Problem Solving Process) ASPIRE North.
Response to Instruction & Problem Solving Teams Summer 2010.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Student Progress Monitoring and How Will it Help Me? Laura Florkey.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
What is (RtI)?  Establishes a comprehensive assessment and intervention process to support students in need of academic and behavioral.
Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charlie Eccleston, MTSS Trainer.
Problem Solving December 17, 2012 Aubrey Tardy Michelle Urbanek.
Tier III Implementation. Define the Problem  In general - Identify initial concern General description of problem Prioritize and select target behavior.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
What is (RtI)?  Establishes a comprehensive assessment and intervention process to support students in need of academic and behavioral supports.
Daily Math Review 2 nd Grade February 6, :30 – 3:45pm.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
P ROBLEM S OLVING W ITHIN THE MTSS F RAMEWORK Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charles Eccleston, MTSS Trainer.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Assistance Team Procedures Iredell-Statesville Schools.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
CASE STUDY - MATH PROBLEM SOLVING TO DESIGN & IMPLEMENT INTERVENTIONS.
Literacy-Based Promotion Act & 3 rd Grade Summative Assessment Parent Information Night September 29, 2015.
Information taken from the Kansas Special Education Process handbook. See
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
(MTSS) Multi-Tiered System of Supports Charles R. Eccleston, District MTSS Trainer.
Review of the Three - Tier Intervention Process
Welcome PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING TASKS WHILE WAITING FOR THE CLASS TO BEGIN: Rate your knowledge of the MTSS process using the colored dot. Rate.
Teacher-Based Problem-Solving for Groups (TBIT)
Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Overview
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.
Presentation transcript:

FEBRUARY MTSS FACILITATOR MEETING SHELLY DICKINSON, MTSS TRAINER

AGENDA REVIEW HAND OUTS MTSS OVERVIEW VIDEO WORK THROUGH CASE STUDY & COMPLETE IPST FORMS

HAND OUTS (RESOURCES) A SAMPLE OF COMPLETED IPST FORMS RIOT BY ICEL MATRIX – A GUIDE FOR PROBLEM ANALYSIS TIER 2: INTERVENTION TOOLBOX FOR BEHAVIOR CASE STUDY - NICK

MTSS OVERVIEW VIDEO WHETHERBEE’S MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT CARING FOR EVERY CHILD CARING FOR EVERY CHILD WHETHERBEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – ORLANDO, FL

CASE STUDY - MATH PROBLEM SOLVING USING IPST FORMS

NICK SMITH – CASE STUDY IPST FORM 1 10 YEARS OLD 4 TH GRADE CURRENT SCHOOL: X ELEMENTARY NICK IS AN ONLY CHILD LIVING WITH BOTH PARENTS, BOTH PARENTS WORK. DAD IS A BANKER, MOM IS A TEACHER ASSISTANT. ENGLISH IS THE ONLY LANGUAGE SPOKEN. PARENTS BOTH GRADUATED FROM COLLEGE. MOTHER CLAIMED DIFFICULTY IN MATH, FATHER NONE. NICK PUTS EFFORT IN HOMEWORK BUT IS BECOMING DISCOURAGED DUE TO DIFFICULTIES IN MATH. PLAYS SOCCER AND IS IN SCOUTS. HAS CLOSE FRIENDS. NICK HAS A HISTORY OF ASTHMA, WHICH CAUSES ABSENCES. HE USES AN INHALER NUMBER OF ABSENCES FOR CURRENT YEAR: 2 NUMBER OF ABSENCES FOR PREVIOUS YEAR: 13 NO TARDIES DOCUMENTED. NICK MOVED TO FLORIDA FROM TENNESSEE DURING HIS 2ND GRADE YEAR. NICK HAS MET ALL DEVELOPMENTAL MILESTONES AS EXPECTED ACCORDING TO K - 3 REPORT CARDS. THERE IS NO HISTORY OF BEHAVIOR DIFFICULTIES, RETENTIONS, OR 504 PLANS. HE DOES NOT WEAR GLASSES. HE PASSED HIS VISION SCREENING AND HEARING SCREENING LAST YEAR - 9/17/14. CLASSROOM TEACHER NOTICED ON NICK'S REPORT CARDS THAT MATH GRADES WERE AVERAGE AND READING GRADES WERE ABOVE AVERAGE.

IPST FORM 2 A PMP (Progress Monitoring Plan) was triggered for math since Nick received a Level 1 on the Math FCAT for 3rd grade. Nick's teacher conferenced with his parents (on 9/15/2014) to discuss his performance in math, which is below grade level. She explained the Progress Monitoring Plan and which strategies she would implement for Nick during the Math Tier 1 Core Instruction block. Small group instruction, peer tutor, use of manipulatives and visual representations, and differentiated instruction. During the conference, the parents expressed that Nick attends after school tutoring and he is participating in a math group that works basic multiplication/division facts for 4 days a week, 30 minutes sessions. Nick's teacher has brought his data to the Teacher Data Team to discuss his case due to failing math grades on class assignments, quizzes and tests, and on the district benchmark assessments. Nick's teacher met with his parents (on 9/27/14) to discuss Nick's progress in math. It is end of the first nine weeks and she discussed his progress and his failing report card grade for math. In addition, Nick's teacher presented the intervention data and updated his PMP with his parent input.

IPST FORM 5 Math FCAT District Math Assessments Tier 1 Classroom Math Assessments

IPST FORM 7 Tier 2 Intervention - 3X a week, 20 minutes per session = Total of 60 minutes per week Group Size - 5 students Progress Monitoring Tool: Weekly - 5 problems assessing place value Intervention Start Date: 9/3/2014 End Date: 10//2014 Setting: Classroom Using place value blocks, number line models, and other visual representations to represent number values. The interventionist (classroom teacher) will provide explicit, direct instruction to students providing multiple strategies and opportunities to represent numbers in place value systems from the concrete to the pictorial and finally to the abstract representation including written form Nickxx A 1/ 5 xx x 3/53/5 xx x 2/52/5 A x x xx x 2/52/

POSITIVE? QUESTIONABLE? POOR?

* MTSS GUIDEBOOK - REFER TO PAGES 40 – 41 Teacher Data Team Meeting #2  Evaluate Intervention Data (Problem Solving Step #4)  Teacher reports Nick’s Tier 1 Assessments are below proficiency  Teacher reports Nick’s self-esteem and motivation during math time is improving  Teacher meets with parents to discuss Nick’s failing report card grade and intervention data  Teacher updates PMP and adjusts strategies using Parent’s input. DECISION POINT  Teacher Data Team recommends to change the focus of the intervention from Place Value to Number Sense  Teacher Data Team recommends to intensify the intervention by increasing the time  Teacher Data Team recommends skills to be “chunked” and give more opportunities for practice  Note – If Nick does not show progress within 4 weeks of the intervention, schedule an IPST meeting.

IPST FORM 7 – INTERVENTION #2 – NUMBER SENSE Tier 2 Intervention #2 - 5X a week, 20 minutes per session = Total of 100 minutes per week Group Size - 4 students Progress Monitoring Tool: Weekly – 5 problems (Number Sense Skill) Intervention Start Date: 10/8/2014 End Date: 11/18/2014 Setting: Classroom Specific Intervention: To provide number sense strategies for exploring numbers, number relationships, and number operations and to discover rules and invent algorithms. Will focus on number magnitude, mental computation, and computational estimation for procedural fluency. Goal Statement: By 11/18/14, the group will use number sense strategies as evidenced by 90% on Teacher Made OPM.

SCENARIO #1 – EVALUATE (PROBLEM SOLVING STEP #4) IS THE STUDENT RESPONDING TO THE INTERVENTION? WEEK 1WEEK 2WEEK 3WEEK 4WEEK 5WEEK 6 10/810/910/1010/1110/12 OPM (5)10/1510/1610/1710/1810/19 OPM (5)10/2210/2310/2410/2510/26 OPM (5)10/2910/3010/3111/111/2 OPM (5)11/511/611/711/811/9 OPM (5)11/1211/1311/1411/1511/16 OPM (5) NICK2 A435 A45 STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT IPST FORM 7 - INTERVENTION #2 (NUMBER SENSE) Nick’s Attendance Rate: 93%

IPST FORM 7 – INTERVENTION #2 – NUMBER SENSE Nick’s Trend Line Positive Response? Questionable? Poor?

* MTSS GUIDEBOOK - REFER TO PAGES 40 – 41 Teacher Data Team Meeting #3  Evaluate Intervention Data (Problem Solving Step #4)  Teacher reports Nick’s Tier 1 Assessments are improving (Grade Average 72)  Teacher reports Nick’s participation in class and class assignments are showing improvement  Teacher reports Nick’s procedural fluency is improving  Teacher will continue updating a PMP for Nick DECISION POINT  Teacher Data Team recommends to continue supporting Nick with Supplemental Instruction focusing on skills to support Tier 1.  Teacher Data Team recommends to continue intervention time (5x a week for 20 min.) * Note – Nick is a student that will need continued Tier 2 Supplemental Instruction in order to be proficient in Tier 1.

SCENARIO #2 – EVALUATE (PROBLEM SOLVING STEP #4) IS THE STUDENT RESPONDING TO THE INTERVENTION? IPST FORM 7 - INTERVENTION #2 (NUMBER SENSE) Nick’s Attendance Rate: 93% WEEK 1WEEK 2WEEK 3WEEK 4WEEK 5WEEK 6 10/810/910/1010/1110/12 OPM (5)10/1510/1610/1710/1810/19 OPM (5)10/2210/2310/2410/2510/26 OPM (5)10/2910/3010/3111/111/2 OPM (5)11/511/611/711/811/9 OPM (5)11/1211/1311/1411/1511/16 OPM (5) NICK 2 A234 A22 STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT

IPST FORM 7 – INTERVENTION #2 – NUMBER SENSE Nick’s Trend Line Positive Response? Questionable? Poor?

* MTSS GUIDEBOOK - REFER TO PAGES 41– 42 IPST Meeting #1  IPST evaluates Tier 2 Intervention Data (Rounds #1-2)  IPST reviews IPST Forms 1, 2, & 5  Teacher gives an overview of Nick’s Tier 1 performance  Nick’s parents inform IPST of Math concerns  PMP is updated by classroom teacher  IPST determines who will complete Classroom Observation (IPST Form 4)  IPST will meet in 6 weeks to evaluate Tier 3 Intervention Data, Classroom Observations, and other relevant data. DECISION POINT  IPST completes IPST Form 6 (Academic)  IPST designs a Tier 3 Intervention  After reviewing data, IPST concludes Nick is about 2 grade levels below  Nick is lacking core basic math skills

IPST FORM 6 (ACADEMIC) Specify Area of Concern: Math Number Sense Use RIOT to Analyze I.C.E.L. Domains (Use hand out) Hypothesis: The problem may be occurring because there is a significant skill gap in prerequisite math skills. If conceptual understanding of math (Number Sense) would occur, the problem may be reduced. Identify Progress Monitoring Tool: easyCBM Math Probe Grade Level Expectation – *49 Correct Digits Per Minute Current Student Expectation – 15 CDPM Growth Needed – 34 CDPM Realistically this growth can occur across 28 weeks *Curriculum-Based Measurement Computation Fluency Norms (Burns, VanDerHeyden, & Jiban, 2006; Deno & Mirkin, 1977; Fuchs & Fuchs1993; Fuchs & Fuchs, n.d.)

IPST FORM 7 – TIER 3 INTERVENTION #1 – NUMBER SENSE Tier 3 Intervention #1 - 5X a week, 15 minutes per session = Total of 75 minutes per week Group Size - 2 students Intervention Provider: Title 1 Teacher Progress Monitoring Tool: Weekly – Grade Level Multi-digit Math Probe Intervention Start Date: 11/18/2014 End Date: 1/9/15 Setting: Classroom Specific Intervention: Recognizing arithmetic patterns in addition tables. Practice basic math facts addition/subtraction. Understand the relationship between addition and subtraction. Repeat with multiplication and division. Use concrete, pictorial and abstract representations Goal Statement: By 1/9/15, Nick will show at least a 1.2 CDPM per week on a 1-minute math probe.

TIER 3 INTERVENTION #1 – NUMBER SENSE 1/9/2015 Positive Response? Questionable? Poor? Data indicates Nick's performance lagged due to lack of instruction and practice.

* MTSS GUIDEBOOK - REFER TO PAGES 42 IPST Meeting #2  IPST evaluates Tier 3 Intervention Data (Rounds #1)  Baseline Data Point = 15 CDPM and Week 6 Data Point = 28 CDPM (Growth Rate 13 CDPM in 6 weeks) Goal was 7 CDPM.  Teacher gives an update on Nick’s Tier 1 performance, which is the same - below district, grade, class, and subgroup level on district assessments and classroom assessments  Nick’s parents attend meeting and give additional input on Nick’s progress at home (tutoring)  IPST analyzes the completed Classroom Observation forms - (IPST Form 3 & 4) DECISION POINT  The team completes IPST Form 8?  Based on Nick’s current progress in Tier 1 and the intervention(s) rate of progress, the IPST recommends a Formal Evaluation?  IPST recommends to continue, modify, or discontinue Tier 3 intervention?  Perform Additional Assessments?