A Case Study of Two Left-Moving Mesoanticyclonic Supercells on 24 April 2006 Chris Bowman National Weather Service – Wichita, KS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina.
Advertisements

Radar Climatology of Tornadoes in High Shear, Low CAPE Environments in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast Jason Davis Matthew Parker North Carolina State University.
Lemon and Doswell (1979) Lemon, L. R., and C. A. Doswell III, 1979: Severe thunderstorm evolution and mesoscyclone structure as related to tornadogenesis.
mesovortex apex of bow echo Bow Echo: radar-observed features mid-level overhang weak echo notch bookend vortex.
Echo Tops Fairly accurate at depicting height of storm tops Inaccurate data close to radar because there is no beam angle high enough to see tops. Often.
Anomalous Velocity Signatures in Low Level Super Resolution Data.
Analysis of Rare Northeast Flow Events By Joshua Beilman and Stephanie Acito.
Convective Dynamics Squall Lines Adapted from material from the COMET Program.
MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Deep Convection: Forecast Parameters.
Severe Weather Radar Features. Weak Echo Region (WER) Region of low radar reflectivities on inflow side of storm o Near the surface High reflectivities.
The Impact of Gravity Wave/Undular Bore Dissipation on the June 22, 2003 Deshler and Aurora Nebraska Tornadic Supercells AARON W. JOHNSON NOAA/NWS Weather.
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
An Overview of Environmental Conditions and Forecast Implications of the 3 May 1999 Tornado Outbreak Richard L. Thompson and Roger Edwards Presentation.
Northeast Convective Flash Floods: Helping Forecasters Stay Ahead of Rising Water Joe Villani - National Weather Service, Albany, NY Derek Mallia - University.
More Thunderstorms. Today Homework in Wind shear More multicellular storms.
Documentation of a Tornadic Supercell Thunderstorm in the San Joaquin Valley, California Ted B. Schlaepfer Department of Geosciences San Francisco State.
Kansas Severe Thunderstorm Outbreak May 7, 2002 Christopher Medjber Meteorology 503 Department of Geosciences SFSU Christopher Medjber Meteorology 503.
Dual-polarimetric and multi-Doppler analysis of a High Plains supercell Darren Clabo Nick Guy Nathan Hitchens.
Tornado Detection Algorithm (TDA) By: Jeffrey Curtis and Jessica McLaughlin.
Severe Squall Line over Quebec August 18th 2008 Robert Michaud QSPC – Montreal October 29th 2008.
Synoptic, Thermodynamic, Shear Setting May 7, 2002 Tornadic Thunderstorm in Southwestern Kansas Michele Blazek May 15, 2005.
The 4 August 2004 Central Pennsylvania Severe Weather Event – Environmental and Topographical Influences on Storm Structure Evolution Joe Villani NOAA/NWS,
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Meteorology 515/815 Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
Tornadoes October 3, Tornadoes  A tornado is a rapidly rotating column of air that blows around a small area of intense low pressure with a circulation.
Determining Favorable Days for Summertime Severe Convection in the Deep South Chad Entremont NWS Jackson, MS.
Bow Echoes By Matthieu Desorcy.
© Craig Setzer and Al Pietrycha Supercell (mesocyclone) tornadoes: Supercell tornado environments Developed by Jon Davies – Private Meteorologist – Wichita,
Severe Weather Operations. Severe Weather Staffing (Positions in orange are minimum needed) Severe Weather Coordinator – oversees the operations of the.
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office – Taunton, MA (BOX)
Matthew J. Bunkers WFO Rapid City, SD Last Updated 2/4/2002 Predicting Supercell Motion Using Hodograph Techniques.
A Study on the Environments Associated with Significant Tornadoes Occurring Within the Warm Sector versus Those Occurring Along Boundaries Jonathan Garner.
High-Resolution RUC CAPE Values and Their Relationship to Right Turning Supercells By: Andy Mair Mentor: Dr. William A. Gallus Jr. Department of Geological.
Update on NCAR Auto-Nowcaster Juneau, AK. The Auto-Nowcaster System An expert system which produces short-term (0-1 hr) forecasts of thunderstorm initiation,
NON-MESOCYLONE TORNADOGENESIS IN THE 26 OCTOBER 2006 CLOSED MID LEVEL LOW SEVERE CONVECTIVE EVENT Aaron Johnson NWS Dodge City KS.
Composite Analysis of Environmental Conditions Favorable for Significant Tornadoes across Eastern Kansas Joshua M. Boustead, and Barbara E. Mayes NOAA/NWS.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Continued.
TOP CWA Golf Ball Size Hail Study Bill Gargan WFO TOP, KS.
A Preliminary Investigation of Supercell Longevity M ATTHEW J. B UNKERS, J EFFREY S. J OHNSON, J ASON M. G RZYWACZ, L EE J. C ZEPYHA, and B RIAN A. K LIMOWSKI.
Northeast Convective Flash Floods: Helping Forecasters Stay Ahead of Rising Water Joe Villani - National Weather Service, Albany, NY Derek Mallia - University.
AOS 100: Weather and Climate Instructor: Nick Bassill Class TA: Courtney Obergfell.
Tropical Severe Local Storms Nicole Hartford. How do thunderstorms form?  Thunderstorms result from moist warm air that rises due to being less dense.
March 14, 2001 Bow Echo in Southeast Texas – A Mid-Altitude Radial Convergence Case Study Paul Lewis II.
Chapter 11: severe weather!! (a)thunderstorms (classification) (b)tornadoes (c)lightning, and (d)hail.
Analysis of the 2 April 2006 Quasi-Linear Convective System (QLCS) over the Mid- Mississippi Valley Region: Storm Structure and Evolution from WSR-88D.
Meteo 3: Chapter 14 Spawning severe weather Synoptically-forced storms Read Chapter 14.
WFO Huntsville, Alabama A Review of the North Alabama Violent Tornado Outbreak February 6, 2008 Brian Carcione & David Nadler NWS Huntsville, Alabama.
Title card A Look at Environments Associated with Nighttime Supercell Tornadoes in the Central Plains Meteorologist Jon Davies Private © Dick McGowan &
BP-31 Updated Radar-Based Techniques for Tornado Warning Guidance in the Northeastern United States Brian J. Frugis and Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/National.
A Review of the March 28, 2007 Tornado Event Teresa Keck NWS North Platte, Nebraska Courtesy of Mike Hollingshead.
GPS Doppler & Buoy 0 – 3 km 3 – 6 km 6 – 10 km Obs Cell Bunkers SFC Cell C CSCN Cell B BSBN 1040 UTC C E B F D A 1108 UTC Cell mergers Upwind flank development.
2. Basic Characteristics and Forecast The 500-hPa pattern for this event featured a deep low centered over Idaho. A composite analysis of past tornado.
A Rare Severe Weather and Tornado Event in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania: July 8, 2014 Presented by Mike Evans 1.
Ordinary Cells Multicell storms Supercells
Kenneth R. Cook James Caruso Mickey McGuire National Weather Service, Wichita, KS.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Continued.
The April 9 th Tornado Outbreak Across the Four-State Region By Nick Fillo & Ismari Ramos WFO Shreveport, LA 4 th Regional Severe Storms/Radar and Hydrology.
The 1 November 2004 tornadic QLCS event over southwest Illinois Ron W. Przybylinski Science and Operations Officer National Weather Service – St. Louis.
Thunderstorms (Tormenta) and Tornadoes After completing this section, students will discuss the formation of violent weather patterns such as thunderstorms.
Investigations of Using TAMDAR Soundings in the NCAR Auto-Nowcaster H. Cai, C. Mueller, E. Nelson, and N. Rehak NCAR/RAL.
WSR - 88D Characteristics of Significant Tornadoes in New York and New England Lance Franck University of Massachusetts Hayden Frank NOAA/NWS/Weather.
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
Convective: Part 2 Weather Systems – Fall 2017
Ted B. Schlaepfer Department of Geosciences
Hiding under a freeway overpass will protect me from a tornado.
Case Jan Squall line moves through early afternoon...leaving stable conditions, stratus and low LCLs over region through early night hours.
Forecast parameters, Tornadogensis, maintenance and decay
Rita Roberts and Jim Wilson National Center for Atmospheric Research
Brian J. Frugis NOAA/NWS Albany, New York NROW XIX – 7 November 2018
Supercells and Tornadoes.
Supercell tornado environments
Presentation transcript:

A Case Study of Two Left-Moving Mesoanticyclonic Supercells on 24 April 2006 Chris Bowman National Weather Service – Wichita, KS

The Situation… Synoptic environment favored supercells. Synoptic environment favored supercells. Tornado Watch 244 already issued. Tornado Watch 244 already issued. As the event is unfolding, storms are not taking on classic supercell characteristics. As the event is unfolding, storms are not taking on classic supercell characteristics. Two cells and especially one in particular begin to exhibit unusual radar signatures. Two cells and especially one in particular begin to exhibit unusual radar signatures.

RUC Model 22Z Forecast Sounding

22Z RUC Forecast Hodograph

KICT Reflectivity and SRM 0.5 ° Evolution 21:38Z – 22:13Z Animation

KICT Reflectivity and SRM All-Tilts 22:13Z 0.5° -19.5° Animation

KVNX Reflectivity and SRM 0.5 ° Evolution 21:37Z – 22:11Z Animation

KVNX Reflectivity and SRM 0.5 ° Evolution 22:16Z – 22:35Z Animation

KICT and KVNX Summary Observed Items of Interest Boundary interaction or cell merger (BICM). Boundary interaction or cell merger (BICM). Rapid strengthening of storm after BICM. Rapid strengthening of storm after BICM. Persistent and strengthening low-level (0.5°) rotation. Persistent and strengthening low-level (0.5°) rotation. KICT indicates cyclonic (≈1,000 ft), KVNX indicates anticyclonic (≈4,750 ft). KICT indicates cyclonic (≈1,000 ft), KVNX indicates anticyclonic (≈4,750 ft). KICT indicates a transition from low-level cyclonic rotation (≈900 – 2,700 ft) to a convergent signature (≈3,000 – 10,000 ft) to a mesoanticyclone (≈12,000 ft – 25,000 ft). KICT indicates a transition from low-level cyclonic rotation (≈900 – 2,700 ft) to a convergent signature (≈3,000 – 10,000 ft) to a mesoanticyclone (≈12,000 ft – 25,000 ft).

What’s the decision? Tornado? Severe? No warning? You’re in the warning chair under a tornado watch. You’re in the warning chair under a tornado watch. Storms have not exhibited typical supercell characteristics. Storms have not exhibited typical supercell characteristics. A storm develops rapidly with strengthening cyclonic rotation corroborated by another radar. A storm develops rapidly with strengthening cyclonic rotation corroborated by another radar. Storm appears to be supercellular but opposite of what was anticipated. Storm appears to be supercellular but opposite of what was anticipated. The storm is moving into the Wichita Metro. The storm is moving into the Wichita Metro.

What Actually Happened Tornado warning issued at 22:15Z for SW Sedgwick and NW Sumner Counties but polygon kept Wichita out of the warning. Tornado warning issued at 22:15Z for SW Sedgwick and NW Sumner Counties but polygon kept Wichita out of the warning. Two off-duty NWS mets as well as private mets observe a wall cloud with the storm. Only live report came from an off-duty NWS met as the storm and “ill- defined wall cloud” moved over his house. Two off-duty NWS mets as well as private mets observe a wall cloud with the storm. Only live report came from an off-duty NWS met as the storm and “ill- defined wall cloud” moved over his house. No tornado was reported but several severe hail reports were received. No tornado was reported but several severe hail reports were received. The storm, as viewed from KVNX, maintained its supercellular characteristics as it moved over Wichita, producing only hail reports. The storm, as viewed from KVNX, maintained its supercellular characteristics as it moved over Wichita, producing only hail reports.

KICT and KVNX Summary The Unexplained Although the environment favored left-moving, mesoanticyclonic storms (more on this later), there is no clear explanation for KICT’s vertical SRM transition from low-level cyclonic rotation to mid/upper-level anticyclonic rotation Although the environment favored left-moving, mesoanticyclonic storms (more on this later), there is no clear explanation for KICT’s vertical SRM transition from low-level cyclonic rotation to mid/upper-level anticyclonic rotation The low-level velocity signature from both KICT and KVNX are ≈3 miles north-northeast of the reflectivity signature. The low-level velocity signature from both KICT and KVNX are ≈3 miles north-northeast of the reflectivity signature. Reflectivity aloft is almost on top of low-level SRM signature. Reflectivity aloft is almost on top of low-level SRM signature. Possibly a boundary being ingested and stretched or even thunderstorm outflow. Possibly a boundary being ingested and stretched or even thunderstorm outflow.

Storm #2 Actually occurred before the tornado warned storm. Actually occurred before the tornado warned storm. Exhibited similar characteristics (including velocity signature ≈3 miles north-northeast of reflectivity signature) but only observed from KVNX. Exhibited similar characteristics (including velocity signature ≈3 miles north-northeast of reflectivity signature) but only observed from KVNX. Storm not as persistent and not as strong. Storm not as persistent and not as strong.

KVNX Storm #2 0.5° Reflectivity and SRM 21:27Z – 21:51Z Animation

Storms #1 and #2 Summary Two storms in the same county within several volume scans of each other both develop low- level anticyclonic rotation displaced by about 3 miles to the north of the reflectivity signature. Two storms in the same county within several volume scans of each other both develop low- level anticyclonic rotation displaced by about 3 miles to the north of the reflectivity signature. Both have a boundary interaction or cell merger and strengthen rapidly afterward. Both have a boundary interaction or cell merger and strengthen rapidly afterward. Both storms are in the same environment and this is the key. Both storms are in the same environment and this is the key.

Environmental Data

Parameters derived from surface T/Td of 76/66. Parameters derived from surface T/Td of 76/66. Near storm environment was actually ≈ 74/64. Near storm environment was actually ≈ 74/64. Not a huge difference right? In this case it actually makes a big difference. Not a huge difference right? In this case it actually makes a big difference. Need to modify sounding as a result. Need to modify sounding as a result.

Environmental Data

Modified sounding drops CAPE from 2,038 J/Kg to 1,324 J/Kg. Modified sounding drops CAPE from 2,038 J/Kg to 1,324 J/Kg. Increases CIN from -10 J/Kg to -68 J/Kg. Increases CIN from -10 J/Kg to -68 J/Kg. Results in an environment that is elevated. Results in an environment that is elevated. As a result, a modified hodograph needs to be used. As a result, a modified hodograph needs to be used.

Environmental Data Unmodified hodograph with derived parameters. V(obs) SRH values are positive. Storm motion = 21 kts.

Environmental Data Modified hodograph with derived parameters using an elevated depth of 1 km and actual storm motion of 29 kts. V(obs) SRH values have become negative.

Case Summary Two storms occurred in the same county and within several volume scans of each other that exhibited unusual radar characteristics including: Two storms occurred in the same county and within several volume scans of each other that exhibited unusual radar characteristics including: Persistent and strengthening low-level (0.5°) rotation. Cycolnic with KICT and anticyclonic with KVNX. Persistent and strengthening low-level (0.5°) rotation. Cycolnic with KICT and anticyclonic with KVNX. The rotation (from KICT and KVNX) is displaced ≈3 miles north-northeast of reflectivity. The rotation (from KICT and KVNX) is displaced ≈3 miles north-northeast of reflectivity. KICT indicates a transition from low-level cyclonic rotation to a mid/upper-level mesoanticyclone. KICT indicates a transition from low-level cyclonic rotation to a mid/upper-level mesoanticyclone.

Case Summary Model data indicated a surface based environment when the near storm environment was actually elevated. Model data indicated a surface based environment when the near storm environment was actually elevated. Model forecast storm motion was not correct. Model forecast storm motion was not correct. Modified hodograph, taking into account the elevated nature and actual storm motion, reveals an environment favorable for left-moving, mesoanticyclonic supercells. Modified hodograph, taking into account the elevated nature and actual storm motion, reveals an environment favorable for left-moving, mesoanticyclonic supercells.

Acknowledgements Matt Bunkers, SOO, WFO Rapid City Matt Bunkers, SOO, WFO Rapid City For his help and expert opinions as well as his hodograph spreadsheet. Ken Cook, SOO, WFO Wichita Ken Cook, SOO, WFO Wichita