10 th LECC Workshop, 13-17 September 2004, Hauser et al.1 Experience with Trigger Electronics for the CSC System of CMS J. Hauser*, E. Boyd, R. Cousins,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CPT Week, Nov 2003, B. Paul Padley, Rice University1 CSC Trigger Status, MPC and Sorter B. Paul Padley Rice University November 2003.
Advertisements

TMB-RAT Software Update USCMS Slice Test Rice University August 16, 2004 Martin Von der Mey / Yangheng Zheng* University of California, Los.
US CMS Collaboration Meeting, UC Riverside, May 19, Endcap Muons John Layter US CMS Collaboration Meeting May 19, 2001.
CSC Muon Trigger September 16, 2003 CMS Annual Review 1 CSC Muon Trigger - Annual Review Jay Hauser, with many slides from Darin Acosta and Stan Durkin.
CSC Muon Trigger September 16, 2003 CMS Annual Review 1 Current Status of CSC Trigger Elements – Quick Summary Jay Hauser, with many slides from Darin.
US Test Beam Results Of Front End Timing T. Ferguson, N. Terentiev* (Carnegie Mellon University) CMS EMU Meeting University of California, Davis Feb 25.
Commissioning of CSCs and Peripheral Crates Task L M. Ignatenko UCLA October
Endcap Muon meeting: CMU, Oct 19, 2003 J. Hauser UCLA 1 CSC Trigger Primitives Test Beam Studies Main Test Beam 2003 Goals: Verify the peripheral crate.
Jay Hauser, Fermilab Director’s Review, Apr. 30, CSC Muon Trigger Jay Hauser Director’s Review Fermilab, Apr 30, 2002 Outline The CSC muon trigger.
Jay Hauser, Emu meeting at Florida, 9 January CSC Trigger Meeting Summary Cast of many.
Preliminary Results from Structured Beam Test CMS Trigger Meeting June 3, 2003 Brian Mohr UCLA Dept. of Physics.
CSC Muon Trigger September 21, 2004 CMS Annual Review 1 CSC Muon Trigger - Annual Review Jay Hauser, with many slides from Darin Acosta and Paul Padley.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida1 Muon Track-Finder Trigger Darin Acosta University of Florida June, 2002.
CSC Trigger Report: Results from June 25 ns beam test Production plans Software Darin Acosta University of Florida.
October 1st th Workshop on Electronics for LHC Experiment at Amsterdam 1 Beam Test Result of the ATLAS End-cap Muon Level-1 Trigger Chikara Fukunaga.
CHEP March, B. Scurlock, University of Florida1 D. Acosta, V. Golovtsov, M. Kan, A. Madorsky, B. Scurlock, H. Stoeck, L. Uvarov, S.M. Wang University.
The Track-Finding Processor for the Level-1 Trigger of the CMS Endcap Muon System D.Acosta, A.Madorsky, B.Scurlock, S.M.Wang University of Florida A.Atamanchuk,
Emulator System for OTMB Firmware Development for Post-LS1 and Beyond Aysen Tatarinov Texas A&M University US CMS Endcap Muon Collaboration Meeting October.
An Asynchronous Level-1 Tracking Trigger for Future LHC Detector Upgrades A. Madorsky, D. Acosta University of Florida/Physics, POB , Gainesville,
Printed by Topical Workshop on Electronics for Particle Physics TWEPP-08, Naxos, Greece / September 2008 MEZZANINE CARDS FOR.
Status of the CSC Track-Finder Darin Acosta University of Florida.
Track-Finder Trigger at the Beam Test Results and Features Darin Acosta, Rick Cavanaugh, Victor Golovtsov, Lindsey Gray, Khristian Kotov, Alex Madorsky,
CPT Week, April 2001Darin Acosta1 Status of the Next Generation CSC Track-Finder D.Acosta University of Florida.
Design Considerations for an Upgraded Track-Finding Processor in the Level-1 Endcap Muon Trigger of CMS for SLHC operations Sep TWEPP09 D. Acosta,
Test Beam Wrap-Up Darin Acosta. Darin Acosta, University of Florida 18 June 2004 USCMS Meeting 2 Agenda n Darin/UF: General recap of runs taken, tests.
CSC EMU/Track Finder Clock and Control Board (CCB’2004) Status Plans M.Matveev Rice University August 27, 2004.
W. Smith, DOE/NSF Review, August, 2006 CMS Trigger - 1 SORT ASICs (w/heat sinks) EISO Bar Code Input DC-DC Converters Clock delay adjust Clock Input Oscillator.
CSC ME1/1 Upgrade Status of Electronics Design Mikhail Matveev Rice University March 28, 2012.
1.2 EMU Electronics L.S. Durkin CMS Review CERN, September 2003.
A Study of Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC The Ohio State University - Task A.2 B.G. Bylsma, L.S. Durkin, D. Fisher, J Gilmore, J.H. Gu, D. Larson,
T.Y. Ling EMU Meeting CERN, September 20, 2005 Status Summary Off-Chamber Electronics.
CSC Track-Finder Plans for Commissioning at Bat.904 and Point 5 Darin Acosta University of Florida.
RPC Upscope Meeting Jay Hauser 05 Feb 20101/11 Overview of the CSC Phase I Upgrade plans ME4/2 upgrade: 72 new large chambers for high-luminosity triggering.
CMS Latency Review, 13th March 2007CSC Trigger 1 Latency and Synchronization update.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, B.Paul Padley, Rice University1 CSC Muon Trigger On Detector Components B. Paul Padley Rice University June, 2002.
Track-Finder Test Beam Results Darin Acosta. Darin Acosta, University of Florida 30 July 2004 Trigger Meeting CSC Beam Test (Muon Slice Test) ME.
W. Smith, U. Wisconsin, US CMS DOE/NSF Review, September 2004 Trigger Report - 1 CSC Trigger Muon Port Card & Sector Processor in production Mezzanine.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review, 20 November Trigger - W. Smith1 WBS Trigger Wesley H. Smith, U. Wisconsin CMS Trigger Project Manager DOE/NSF Status.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: April 11-13, Trig. - Estimate to Complete.
S. Durkin, Software Review, March 16, 2006 FED Library S. Durkin The Ohio State University CSC Online Software Review, March 16,2005.
Electronics Review, May 2001Darin Acosta1 OPTICAL SP 1 Muon Sorter 3  / port card 3  / sector ME1 ME2-ME3 ME4 SR DT TF SP From CSC Port Cards MS MB1.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review, May Trigger Plenary - W. Smith1 WBS Trigger Wesley H. Smith, U. Wisconsin CMS Trigger Project Manager DOE/NSF.
M.Matveev Rice University March 20, 2002 EMU Muon Port Card Project.
W. Smith, U. Wisconsin, US CMS DOE/NSF Review, May, 2004 Trigger Report - 1 CSC on-detector peripheral crate SBS VME Controller Muon Port Card: Output.
CSC Ops/DPG meeting, 05-Oct-2011 Hauser1 ALCT boards for ME4/2 etc.
CMS Week, 3-7 November CSC Trigger Test Beam Report Cast of many.
Timing/Synchronization Status
CSC EMU Muon Port Card (MPC)
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
University of California Los Angeles
Muon Track-Finder Trigger
CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS
University of California Los Angeles
University of California Los Angeles
University of California Los Angeles
Regional Cal. Trigger Milestone: Major Production Complete
Current Status of CSC Trigger Elements – Quick Summary
CSC Muon Trigger - Annual Review
CSC Trigger Update Specific issues:
Darin Acosta University of Florida
September CSC Beam Test Report
ALCT, TMB Status, Peripheral Crate Layout, CSC Event Display
Regional Cal. Trigger Milestone: Production & Testing Complete
CSC Trigger Primitives Test Beam Studies
CSC Trigger Muon Port Card & Sector Processor in production
Changes in Level 1 CSC Trigger in ORCA by Jason Mumford and Slava Valuev University of California Los Angeles June 11,
Updates & Rates in the Level-1 CSC Trigger Primitive code in ORCA
CSC Trigger Meeting Summary
Sector Processor Status Report
Plans for the 2004 CSC Beam Test
Presentation transcript:

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.1 Experience with Trigger Electronics for the CSC System of CMS J. Hauser*, E. Boyd, R. Cousins, S. Haapanen, M. Mey, B. Mohr, J. Mumford, V. Valuev, J. Werner, Y. Zheng (UCLA), M. Matveev, P. Padley, J. Roberts, G. Veramendi (Rice U.), D. Acosta, A. Drozdetski, A. Korytov, A. Madorsky, B. Scurlock, H. Stoeck (U. Florida), B. Bylsma, S. Durkin, J. Gilmore, J. Gu, T.Y. Ling (Ohio State) *Presenter,

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.2 CMS Detector Layout CMS Endcap Muon System Cathode Strip Chambers

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.3 Cathode Strip Chambers (CSC) cathode strips Cathode plane wires avalanche mm cathode strips wires avalanche  cathode plane 9.5 mm 3.1 mm muon 6-layer chambers Radial, trapezoidal cathode strips Azimuthal anode wires Induced charges on strips - precise  coordinate Closely spaced wires - fast timing Wires ganged in groups of for r coordinate

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.4 Front-end Electronics Requirements Acquire data for muon hits Cathode strips: precise  - coordinate determination by interpolation of induced strip charges.   Q/Q total = 0.01 per CSC layer Anode wire groups: precise timing for bunch crossing tagging and radial position determination.  2 ns discriminator slewing Generate primitives for Level-1 Trigger Identify Local Charged Track (LCT) segments using cathode and anode signals Cathode charges Anode hits

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.5 System Layout CSC CFEB ALCT 1 of 24 CFEB 1 of 2 LVDB LV Distribution Board 1 of 5 Anode Front-end Board Cathode Front-end Board Anode LCT Board MPCMPC DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB CCBCCB CONTROLLERCONTROLLER Peripheral Crate on iron disk Slow Control Trigger-Timing-Control Muon Sector Receiver Lev-1 Trigger Trig Motherboard DAQ Motherboard Clock Control Board Readout Data FED Crate in USC55 DDU,DCC Boards

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.6 CSC Trigger Elements On-chamber: AFEB (Anode Front-End Board) discriminates anode hits. ALCT (Anode Local Charged Track) receives anode hits, forms anode muon stubs, and sends trigger information to TMB. CFEB (Cathode Front-End Board) contains cathode amplifiers and trigger comparator ASICs that discriminate and find cluster positions to ½-strip accuracy. Peripheral crate: TMB (Trigger MotherBoard) receives anode stubs and cathode hits, forms cathode muon stubs, correlates in time with anode stubs, and sends matched muon stubs to MPC. One TMB per chamber. MPC (Muon Port Card) receives muon stubs from 9 TMBs, send the 3 highest-quality stubs to the SRSP on optical links. Counting house: SRSP (Sector Receiver/Sector Processor) receives matched muon stubs from up to 4 stations, looks for tracks, and assigns muon track position and momentum.

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.7 Summer 2003 Beam Test Goals // 1.Multi-chamber system test using preproduction versions of off-chamber electronics. 2.Re-verify triggering with high spatial resolution and bunch ID efficiency. 3.Check the high-rate system capability.

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.8 May-Sept CSC Beam Test Setup at CERN X5A Peripheral Crate 2 DMB, 2 TMB 1 CCB, 1 MPC FED crate 1 DDU PC TTC crate DAQ Data Trigger primitives S1 S2 S3 beam CSC 1 CSC 2 Track Finder Crate TRIDAS 2 CSC’s, all on-chamber boards Up to 80K events read out in 2.6s spill

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.9 On-chamber CSC Trigger Electronics Comparator ASICs Compare pulse heights from adjacent strips to find cluster to ½-strip channel ASICS on CFEB boards (OSU) Production complete ALCT Boards Finds tracks among anode hits, stores data for readout XCV600 and XCV1000s used for main FPGA 468+spares boards of 3 types (288-, 384-, 672- channel) Production complete (making more spares)

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.10 Peripheral Crate: Trigger Motherboard Generates Cathode LCT and matches ALCT with CLCT 9U x 400 mm form factor Uses XC2V4000 for main FPGA 32 pre-production boards have been built (CMS uses 468) ALCT input connectors Front-panel CFEB Input connectors

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.11 Track Finder Crate: SP2002 (Main Board) Optical Transceivers 16 x 1.6 Gbit/s Links Front FPGA TLK2501 Transceiver Phi Local LUT Eta Global LUT Phi Global LUT VME/ CCB FPGA To/from custom GTLP back- plane Data conversion: Receiver: 12 Used in CMS System

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.12 Muon Event Display (2 chambers, CSC1 tilted)

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.13 Trigger Primitive Algorithms: Anodes 6 layers * up to 112 wire groups per layer (672 channels) Hits delayed in 2ns steps to optimum phase for timing, then recorded every 25 ns bunch crossing (BX). In each anode pattern, pre-trigger when e.g. 2 layers receive hits. Confirm pre-trigger with e.g. 4 or more layers with hits within a pattern. ALCT board outputs up to 2 ALCTs per chamber/BX. Choose those having maximum number of layers. Logic is fully programmable: plenty of adjustments are allowed. xxx__ layer 0 _xx__ l ayer 1 __x__ l ayer 2 __xx_ l ayer 3 __xxx l ayer 4 __xxx l ayer 5 Anode Collision Muon Pattern

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.14 Structure repeats during 2.6 s spill length 48 bunches 25 ns bunch spacing bunch width 3-5 ns SPS orbit period 1.2  s 23  s 2003 Synchronous Beam Structure

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.15 Structured Beam Bunch Structure and ALCT Delay Tuning BX efficiency vs. ALCT delay setting 0-31 ns Chamber 1Chamber 2 Expect muons in 48 out of 924 bx verified by CLCT BXN from data

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.16 BX Distributions With Optimal Anode Delays Note logarithmic scale Cathodes: Data mostly in 3 BX (no fine time- adjustment possible) Anodes: Data 98.7% in 1 BX Chamber 1 Chamber 2

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.17 Trigger Primitive Algorithms: Cathodes 6 layers * up to 80 wire groups per layer (480 channels) Form “di-strips” by OR’ing 4 adjacent ½-strip bits. In each cathode pattern, pre-trigger when 2 layers are hit, confirm pre- trigger when 4 layers are hit. Simultaneous ½-strip patterns for high-P T muons, di-strip patterns for low- P T muons: CLCT board outputs up to 2 CLCTs per chamber/BX. Choose those having: 1.Maximum number of layers. 2.½-strip patterns preferred over di-strip patterns. 3.Straightest pattern. Logic is fully programmable: lots of adjustments are allowed. TMB Patterns x___ xx__ _x__ _xx_ __x_ pattern 1 _x__ __x_ pattern 2 x___ xx__ _x__ pattern 3 _x__ pattern 4 __x_ _xx_ _x__ pattern 5 _x__ x___ pattern 6 __x_ l ayer 0 __x_ l ayer 1 _xx_ l ayer 2 _x__ l ayer 3 xx__ l ayer 4 x___ l ayer 5 pattern 7

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.18 Comparator ½-strip ID Particles tracked using precision charge readout on cathodes Position difference between center of ½-strip and the fitted track:

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.19 Cathode Comparator Behavior Source of imperfect ½-strip resolution due to imperfect comparators Resolution ~5 ADC counts (2.9 fC) Offset ~8 ADC counts (4.6 fC)

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.20 Comparators vs. Cluster Charge At low cluster charge,  drops due to too little charge for comparison At highest cluster charge,  drops due to slow saturation of amplifiers Perfect ½-strip ID Correct strip ID Correct or +-1 half-strip ID

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.21 CLCT Position Correlations Relative position of CLCTs from Chamber 2 vs. Chamber 1 N.B. Chamber 1 is vertically higher than Chamber 2 (thus the offset in position). Zoom

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.22 Angle Scan: Cathode Trigger (CLCT) Patterns Simultaneous searches for di-strip patterns (low-Pt) and half-strip patterns (high-Pt) Simulate low-Pt by tilting the chamber (phi)

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.23 Quality = Layers-3  =0 o  =5 o  =20 o 1/2-strip patterns2-strip patterns HQ straight 1/2-strip HQ bent 1/2-strip HQ bent 2-strip

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.24 CLCT Quality, Pattern vs. Chamber Tilt Quality (layers) Pattern Phi_b (tilt)

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.25 Trigger Primitive Rate Tests Expected LCT rate at LHC is 97 KHz/chamber (ME1/1) (CMS note ) data consistent with dead-time = 225 ns Chamber #1 CLCT ,000 1,500 2, ,0001,5002,0002,5003,000 Beam Intensity (KHz) CLCT Rate (KHz) Max. LHC

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.26 Trigger Primitive Algorithms: Matching and other Notes TMB anode-cathode matching is done primarily by timing. If 2 ALCT and 1 CLCT or vice versa are found, two matched stubs are reported by copying the single stub view. If 2 ALCT and 2 CLCT are found, they are matched by the number of layers. Trigger hits and stub information are all read out to the DAQ system for 16 BX, starting 2 to 5 BX before the first hit.

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.27 Absolute ALCT*CLCT Efficiency Given an ALCT*CLCT matched stub in chamber 1, the efficiency for a matched stub in Chamber 2 can be found. Using a  5 strip and  3 wire-group tolerance:  =97.9% in one BX  =98.9% in two BX (correct BX or one after)  =99.1% in three BX (correct BX  1) as determined from logged Track-Finder data abs(wg3-wg8) abs(strip3-strip8)

10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.28 ConclusionsConclusions This was the first time the CMS endcap muon group demonstrated a complete electronics chain from chamber to muon tracks using pre-production electronics. The CSC trigger (and DAQ) system performed extremely well at the 2003 test beam. A few hardware problems were found (e.g. optical link clocking) and have since been addressed. Further “system integration” tests are underway at 2004 test beams at CERN.