Estimation of Genetic Multipliers for Douglas-Fir Height- and Diameter- Growth Models Peter J. Gould, David D. Marshall, Randy Johnson and Greg Johnson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phenotypes for training and validation of genome wide selection methods K G DoddsAgResearch, Invermay B AuvrayAgResearch, Invermay P R AmerAbacusBio, Dunedin.
Advertisements

The Simple Regression Model
A JOINT VENTURE OF CSIRO & FOREST RESEARCH Ensis-Genetics THE JOINT FORCES OF CSIRO & SCION Harry Wu and Milos Ivkovich Breeding For Wood Quality And End-Products.
1.Area regulation 2.Volume regulation 3.Structural regulation Approaches to regulation in the selection method and maintaining a balanced stand with sustainable.
Modeling Tree Growth Under Varying Silvicultural Prescriptions Leah Rathbun University of British Columbia Presented at Western Mensurationists 2010.
Cost Impact Analysis Proposed College Station Tree Ordinance.
Douglas-fir mortality estimation with generalized linear mixed models Jeremy Groom, David Hann, Temesgen Hailemariam 2012 Western Mensurationists’ Meeting.
DAY ONE Chapter 8 Understanding Populations
What is a Population A population is a group of organisms of the same species that live in a specific geographical area and interbreed. A population is.
Growth Model Users Group Growth Model Run-Off January 2002.
Modeling Effects of Genetic Improvement in Loblolly Pine Plantations Barry D. Shiver Stephen Logan.
Improving Diameter Growth Prediction of Douglas-fir in Eastern Washington State, U.S.A. by Incorporating Precipitation and Temperature Andrew D. Hill,
Examining Clumpiness in FPS David K. Walters Roseburg Forest Products.
1 Effect of Site, Age, and Treatments of Type II Installations on Standing Tree Acoustic Velocity David Briggs, Eric Turnblom, Gonzalo Thienel File: Agenda_2020_TreeLogMill_Study.
Forestry Measurements
A Young Douglas-fir Plantation Growth Model for the Pacific Northwest Nick Vaughn University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
Simulating growth impacts of Swiss needle cast in Douglas-fir: The blood, sweat and tears behind the ORGANON growth multiplier Sean M. Garber April 26,
REGRESSION MODEL ASSUMPTIONS. The Regression Model We have hypothesized that: y =  0 +  1 x +  | | + | | So far we focused on the regression part –
Timed. Transects Statistics indicate that overall species Richness varies only as a function of method and that there is no difference between sites.
Correlation and Regression Analysis
Estimation and Application of Genetic- Gain Multipliers for Douglas-Fir Height and Diameter Growth Peter J. Gould 1, David D. Marshall 2, Randy Johnson.
Modeling the Effects of Genetic Improvement on Diameter and Height Growth Greg Johnson Weyerhaeuser Company.
Regression and Correlation Methods Judy Zhong Ph.D.
Inference for regression - Simple linear regression
Populations Chapter 8.
Foliage and Branch Biomass Prediction an allometric approach.
The Potential of the Alder Resource: Challenges and Opportunities David Hibbs and Andrew Bluhm Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative Department of Forest Science.
Montecarlo Simulation LAB NOV ECON Montecarlo Simulations Monte Carlo simulation is a method of analysis based on artificially recreating.
Name: Angelica F. White WEMBA10. Teach students how to make sound decisions and recommendations that are based on reliable quantitative information During.
Introduction to Linear Regression
Generic Approaches to Model Validation Presented at Growth Model User’s Group August 10, 2005 David K. Walters.
REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,
Simple Linear Regression. Deterministic Relationship If the value of y (dependent) is completely determined by the value of x (Independent variable) (Like.
Modeling Crown Characteristics of Loblolly Pine Trees Modeling Crown Characteristics of Loblolly Pine Trees Harold E. Burkhart Virginia Tech.
Lecture 12 FORE 3218 Forest Mensuration II Lecture 12 Tree-Growth and Stand-Table Projection Avery and Burkhart, Chapter 16.
Do stem form differences mask responses to silvicultural treatment? Doug Maguire Department of Forest Science Oregon State University.
Improving the accuracy of predicted diameter and height distributions Jouni Siipilehto Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa
Incorporating stand density effects in modeling tree taper Mahadev Sharma Ontario Forest Research Institute Sault Ste Marie, Canada.
ANOVA Assumptions 1.Normality (sampling distribution of the mean) 2.Homogeneity of Variance 3.Independence of Observations - reason for random assignment.
Pairwise Sequence Analysis-III
Growth Model Users Group November 15, 2013 Greg Johnson Weyerhaeuser NR Company.
SWBAT: Calculate and interpret the residual plot for a line of regression Do Now: Do heavier cars really use more gasoline? In the following data set,
RAP-ORGANON A Red Alder Plantation Growth Model David Hibbs, David Hann, Andrew Bluhm, Oregon State University.
Statistics 3: mixed effect models Install R library lme4 to your computer: 1.R -> Packages -> Install packages 2.Choose mirror 3.Choose lme4 4.Open the.
USING THE FOREST VEGETATION SIMULATOR TO MODEL STAND DYNAMICS UNDER THE ASSUMPTION OF CHANGING CLIMATE Climate-FVS Version 0.1 Developed by : Nicholas.
What is an EPD? Expected Progeny Difference
A Picture’s Worth a Points: Phodar as an Alternative to LiDAR Peter Gould and Jacob Strunk Washington State Department of Natural Resources.
Annualized diameter and height growth equations for plantation grown Douglas- fir, western hemlock, and red alder Aaron Weiskittel 1, Sean Garber 1, Greg.
Incorporating Genetics into Growth Models: Results from Block-Plot Trials of Douglas-Fir Peter Gould and Brad St Clair PNW Research Station Keith Jayawickrama.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Heritability and the Environment Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
GROWTH AND YIELD How will my forest grow? Dr. Glenn Glover School of Forestry & Wildlife Sciences Auburn University.
Leah Rathbun PhD Candidate, University of British Columbia
Lecture 6 Feb. 2, 2015 ANNOUNCEMENT: Lab session will go from 4:20-5:20 based on the poll. (The majority indicated that it would not be a problem to chance,
Pine Productivity Increases from Seedling Genetic Improvements
Research methodology MSC COURSE VALIDATING of MODELS
ln(CR) = HAB + b1BA + b2BA2 + b3ln(BA)
Simple Linear Regression
Taylor Woods Plots 4/14/04.
Approaches to regulation in the selection method and maintaining a balanced stand with sustainable yield Area regulation Volume regulation Structural regulation.
Developing Edition 3.0 of CIPSANON
Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Pankaj Das, A. K. Paul, R. K. Paul
CIPS80 v. 1.0.
Regression Analysis Week 4.
Comparisons among methods to analyze clustered multivariate biomarker predictors of a single binary outcome Xiaoying Yu, PhD Department of Preventive Medicine.
~adapted for Walch Education
Additional notes on random variables
Additional notes on random variables
The Simple Regression Model
Presentation transcript:

Estimation of Genetic Multipliers for Douglas-Fir Height- and Diameter- Growth Models Peter J. Gould, David D. Marshall, Randy Johnson and Greg Johnson

1. Estimate growth differences between average (wood’s-run) tree and individual families in terms of genetic-gain multipliers. 2. Relate multipliers to breeding value (BV = percent gain at age 10). 3. Evaluate multipliers effects in model. Study Objectives

Effect of Multipliers Initial Size Advantage Gain Multiplier= 0.05 Typical Tree

Coop: breeding zone. Completely independent families. Sites: Geographical locations within coops. NWTIC 1 st -Generation Progeny Tests Rep 1Rep 2 Rep 3Rep 4 Rep 1Rep 2 Rep 3Rep 4 Rep 1Rep 2 Rep 3Rep 4 SET 1SET 2SET 3

DBH Data: Variation between Coops 10-YR GROWTH PERIOD

DBH Data: Variation between Sites 10-YR GROWTH PERIOD

DBH Data: Variation between Sets 10-YR GROWTH PERIOD

DBH Data: Breeding Values BV = Age 10 Gain 1 (percent)

1. Average growth = wood’s run. 2. Multipliers work with any unbiased growth model. 3. Removing sources of variation other than genetics is very important. Modeling Strategy: Assumptions

Strategy: 1. Fit models with random effects at site-set level. 2. Calculate genetic multiplier (m) for each family at coop level. Obs = m ∙ Pred 3. Estimate m from BV. m = A0 + A1 ∙ BV

>16 coops > 109 sites > 513 site-sets > 2485 families > observations 10-YR Modeling Dataset: HT Model

∆HT = b1∙HT b2 ∙b3 HT random effects on b1,b2,b3 Fixed Effects: ∆HT = 231.7∙HT 0.94 ∙0.86 HT HT Model 1

ModelR2R2 Base37.6 Base + random effect69.0 Residual Variation (%)31.0 Between Families (%) 2.4

HT Model Results: Family M

>7 coops > 45 sites > 193 site-sets > 1160 families > observations Modeling Datasets: DBH Model

∆DBH = b1∙DBH b2 ∙b3 DBH ∙b4 BA REP random effects on b1,b2,b3 Fixed Effects: ∆DBH = 3.7∙DBH 0.3 ∙1.01 DBH ∙0.97 BA REP DBH Model 1

ModelR2R2 Base25.5 Base + random effect61.6 Residual Variation (%)38.4 Between Families (%) 3.3

DBH Model Results: Family M

10-yr A1 estimates: StudyHtDiameter Gould Marshall R. Johnson (BV = 13%) G. Johnson (assume BV=13%) ?

Other Periods Ht data for 5-yr (167,000 obs) and 15-yr (7600 obs) growth. DBH data for 5-yr (7,700 obs) and 15-yr growth (20,000). Estimates of m are higher for 5-yr, but about the same for 15-yr growth.

What’s Next? Manuscript on multipliers. ORGANON interface. Test multipliers.