12/3/2015R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Board, 12 July 2005Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Status of the FMD Børge Svane Nielsen Niels Bohr Institute.
Advertisements

First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
25/06/2015Robert King, Oxford University - Graduate Seminar Series 1 Electronic speckle pattern interferometry at the SLHC.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
Tube to Foam Interface (Tim). Outline Discuss what’s known about the tube to foam interface – Describe problem – Issues – Theoretical Calculations – Anecdotal.
Outer Stave Prototype Update E. Anderssen, M. Cepeda, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman, J. Silber LBNL W. Miller, W. Shih Allcomp, Inc ATLAS.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
Velo Module 0 minus minus Paula Collins. Investigating Module 0 thermal performance Baseline module design combines elements of different CTE (and Young’s.
Carbon-Epoxy Composite Base Plates for the PHOBOS Spectrometer Arms J.Michalowski, M.Stodulski The H.Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow.
Mechanics: Status and Plans Bill Cooper (Fermilab) (Layer 1) VXD.
SVX4 chip 4 SVX4 chips hybrid 4 chips hybridSilicon sensors Front side Back side Hybrid data with calibration charge injection for some channels IEEE Nuclear.
ZTF Cryostat Finite Element Analysis Andrew Lambert ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 IPR October Independent Project Review of 12 GeV Upgrade Jefferson Lab October 18-20,
LHCb UT UPSTREAM TRACKER – Mechanics and Cooling –
18 November 2010 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) SVD Mechanics IDM.
26 April 2013 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD Overview.
1 VI Single-wall Beam Pipe tests M.OlceseJ.Thadome (with the help of beam pipe group and Michel Bosteels’ cooling group) TMB July 18th 2002.
Mechanics and Cooling of Pixel Detectors Pixel2000 Conference Genoa, June 5th 2000 M.Olcese CERN/INFN-Genoa.
1 S. Coelli, M. Monti - INFN MILANO Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Sezione di Milano LHCb – UT TRACKER UPGRADE 30 September 2013 UT TRACKER DETECTOR.
HPS Collaboration Meeting JLAB, May Tracker Design Status M.Oriunno, SLAC.
Low mass carbon based support structures for the HL-LHC ATLAS pixel forward disks R. Bates* a, C. Buttar a, I. Bonad a, F. McEwan a, L. Cunningham a, S.
FPCCD VTX Overview Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK Tokubetsu-Suisin annual meeting 11.
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Upgrade Stave Study Topics Current Analysis Tasks –Stave Stiffness, ability to resist.
Update on UT cooling specifications and status of activities LHCb CO2 cooling meeting 8/7/2015 Simone Coelli For the Milano UT group INFN milano 1 Istituto.
1 Engineering issues for FPCCD VTX Detector Y. Sugimoto KEK July 24, 2007.
BTeV Pixel Substrate C. M. Lei November Design Spec. Exposed to >10 Mrad Radiation Exposed to Operational Temp about –15C Under Ultra-high Vacuum,
Thermal & Mechanical Support for Diamond Pixel Modules Justin Albert Univ. of Victoria Nov. 6, 2008 ATLAS Tracker Upgrade Workshop.
The Belle II Silicon Vertex Detector Florian Buchsteiner (HEPHY Vienna)
CLAS12-RICH Mechanical Design Status-Report CLAS12 RICH Review September 5-6 th 2013 S. Tomassini, D. Orecchini1 D. Orecchini, S. Tomassini.
FPCCD VTX Overview Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK Tokubetsu-Suisin annual meeting 11.
November 12, 2001 C. Newsom BTeV Pixel Modeling, Prototyping and Testing C. Newsom University of Iowa.
PHENIX Silicon Vertex Tracker. Mechanical Requirements Stability requirement, short and long25 µm Low radiation length
FVTX Review, November 17th, FVTX Mechanical Status: WBS 1.6 Walter Sondheim - LANL Mechanical Project Engineer; VTX & FVTX.
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
W.O. Miller i T i VG 1 Two Pixel Configurations Under Study First: A Monolithic Integrated Structure First: A Monolithic Integrated Structure –Axial array.
FPCCD VTX Overview Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK Tokubetsu-Suisin annual meeting 11.
1 VI Single-wall Beam Pipe Option: status and plans M.Olcese TMB June 6th 2002.
Detector cooling system Update on UT cooling specifications and status of activities LHCb CO2 cooling meeting Simone Coelli For the Milano UT Group INFN.
D. M. Lee, LANL 1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Overview Technical Design Overview Design status.
Thermal Model of Pixel Blade Conceptual Design C. M. Lei 11/20/08.
Walter Sondheim 6/9/20081 DOE – Review of VTX upgrade detector for PHENIX Mechanics: Walter Sondheim - LANL.
1. Efficient trigger for many B decay topologies Muon System CALORIMETERS PRS + ECAL+ HCAL RICH1 VERTEX LOCATOR Efficient PID Good decay time resolution.
OUTLINE: 1.Current Design 2.Hybrids, Staves 3.Radiation Length 4.Cooling, etc.
H. Katajisto RE EDR 10/10/02 Enclosures for the RPC Link Boards Outline Introduction Periphery General Services Components, materials Manufacture, Assembly.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
10 September 2010 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD Upgrade, Mechanics and Cooling OEPG/FAKT Meeting 2010.
Technical Design for the Mu3e Detector Dirk Wiedner on behalf of Mu3e February Dirk Wiedner PSI 2/15.
B [OT - Mechanics & Cooling] Stefan Gruenendahl February 2, 2016 S.Grünendahl, 2016 February 2 Director's Review -- OT: Mechanics &
Upgrade activities DT-LHCb coordination meeting 14 March 2016.
Plans for the UT Installation LHCb infrastructure workshop February Burkhard Schmidt for the UT group.
13 May 2011 Eddy Jans 0 Plans for the VELOpix-module LHCb-Nikhef discussion some specifications some requirements some ideas about the VELOpix-module some.
Stave thermal analysis Cooling connections CO2 warm Test
DT-LHCb coordination meeting 18 April 2016
Feedback on transfer line sizing and flow calculations for UT
GSI, for the CBM Collaboration
Progress with System Integration of the CBM Silicon Tracking Detector
Micro Vertex Detector of PANDA Status of Strip BARREL and DISC
TT Upgrade Power Review
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
IBL Overview Darren Leung ~ 8/15/2013 ~ UW B305.
Are there better ways to build a stave?
Micro Vertex Detector of PANDA Strip Detector
Simulated vertex precision
UT Integration meeting UT CO2 COOLING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
FP420 Detector Cooling Thermal Considerations
WG4 – Progress report R. Santoro and A. Tauro.
SIT AND FTD DESIGN FOR ILD
LHCb VErtex LOcator For precision measurements of CP-violation at CERN (GENEVE) HALF of DETECTOR Si strip detector Read-out electronics Secondary vacuum.
LHCb VErtex LOcator For precision measurements of CP-violation at CERN (GENEVE) HALF of DETECTOR Si strip detector Read-out electronics Secondary vacuum.
Presentation transcript:

12/3/2015R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR2

Relevant Design Points Four planes of sensors: XUVX Sensors mounted on vertical “staves,” integrated mechanical support, per plane Cooling manifolds bring in CO 2 for each half-plane, individually Planes plus Outer Box and Frame (not shown) constructed in two UT halves – designed to retract horizontally from beam pipe R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR UTbX UTaU UTbV UTaX ~ 1650 mm ~ 315 mm ~ 1500 mm ~ 1700 mm Y X Z Stave Half-Plane (A/C-side) Manifold 12/3/20153 Planes: Beam Pipe UT Halves (A/C) retract

12/3/20154R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR SENSOR ASICs COOLING TUBE 99.5 mm wide ~1640 mm long HYBRID-FLEX DATA-FLEX MODULE FACING Stave Basics Main thermal/mechanical element of the UT Provides for precise positioning of sensors Stiff sandwich structure, mounted vertically Integrated with the cooling system Three stave types: A,B,C Comprised of competing mechanical, thermal and electronic elements Components of fully-loaded stave “Bare” stave: basic innermost structural support / cooling tube Data-flex: signal readout / power distribution / control lines Module: Sensor / hybrid (w ASIC) / stiffener, mounted on both sides of stave least power, large number most power, small number COOLING TUBE

Bare Stave: CFRP (Carbon Fiber Reinforce Polymer) face sheets epoxied to foam core in sandwich structure with embedded cooling tube, all-epoxy construction Foams: thermal foam for heat transfer, lightweight structural foam for rigidity of sandwich structure Cooling Tube: Ti mm OD, 135 um wall, “snake” shape, runs under all ASICs and edge of each sensor Goals: Keep sensors at –5°C or below, uniform ΔT=5°C across sensor, ASICs < 40°C (6 mW/ch, W/asic) SENSOR ~3.5 mm thick ASICs STIFFENER WITH ANCHOR TABS COOLING TUBE “SNAKE”-SHAPED (displaced for clarity) FOAM (STRUCTURAL) FOAM (THERMAL) 99.5 mm wide ~1640 mm long ~8 mm thick BEAMPIPE CUTOUT CARBON FIBER SHEETS (BOTH FRONT AND BACK) HYBRID-FLEX DATA-FLEX 12/3/20155R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR FACING HEAT LOADS

12/3/2015R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR6

1. Temperature difference within a given sensor: Not to exceed ∆T of 5°C To limit the sensor deformation due to thermal contraction To limit relevant stresses induced on the sensor by cooling Controlled by local stave and module design – Overall heat transfer between cooling tube and sensor This ∆T set for most sensors – Worst case sensor T3 on the central staves, with 8 ASICs and directly over the flex: take ∆T as 10°C for this, including safety margin 2. Maximum temperature for any sensor: To be maintained below T_max of –5°C A functional requirement for sensor operation under the worst conditions: after maximum irradiation, at the end of its life. Set to avoid thermal runaway Consequences: T (cooling tube) ≤ T _max(sensor) – ∆T (sensor) ≤ –15°C T (CO 2 ) ≤ T (cooling tube) – ∆T (tube wall) – ∆T (conv) ≤ –30°C (with 10°C safety margin)  T_op = –30°C 12/3/2015R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR7

3. Maximum ASIC temp: Not to exceed T(ASIC) of +40°C Electronic readout ASICs should be maintained at the lowest possible temperature compatible with other requirements of the system ASICs are the most powerful local heating source in the detector, so this the maximum temp present in the detector Meeting other requirements will automatically retain an acceptable ASIC temperature – From FEA: expected T(ASIC) ≤ +5°C 12/3/2015R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR8

ASIC power consumption Estimated to be 6 mW/channel, giving W/ASIC Total = 3220 W/UT Major source of heat in UT FLEX power dissipation Estimated as 10% ASIC power (will refine as prototyping continues) Total = 322 W/UT SENSOR self-heating Joule heating from increased standing bias current over time due to radiation damage of silicon Need to avoid thermal runaway Estimated to be small – 260 mW/sensor for central sensor – Total < 15 W/UT  Total Heat Load = 5000 W 12/3/2015R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR9

12/3/2015R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR10

12/3/2015R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR11 NORMAL DATA-TAKING

12/3/2015R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR12 LIKE DATA-TAKING BUT LESS POWER, ELECTRONICS TESTS CATCH-ALL, PARTIAL POWER, FOR MAINTENANCE

12/3/2015R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR13

12/3/2015R. Mountain, Syracuse University LHCb CO2 Cooling EDR14