Module 2 MPLS Concepts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MPLS VPN.
Advertisements

Identifying MPLS Applications
Multi-Protocol Label Switch (MPLS)
Leading Edge Routing MPLS Enhancements to Support Layer 2 Transport Services Jeremy Brayley
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Introducing the TE Concept.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS  Multiprotocol Label switching.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—2-1 Label Assignment and Distribution Introducing Typical Label Distribution in Frame-Mode MPLS.
MPLS-VPN/BGP Approach Hari Rakotoranto Technical Marketing Engineer
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.1 Routing Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6.
Introducing MPLS Labels and Label Stacks
Introduction to MPLS and Traffic Engineering Zartash Afzal Uzmi.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 6. CS Summer 2003 Hierarchical LSP LSP1 LSP2 LSP3 Ingress LSR for LSP1 Egress LSR for LSP1 Ingress LSR for LSP3 Hierarchical.
MPLS H/W update Brief description of the lab What it is? Why do we need it? Mechanisms and Protocols.
Introduction to MPLS and Traffic Engineering
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Implementing Secure Converged Wide Area Networks (ISCW) Module 4: Frame Mode MPLS Implementation.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Implementing Secure Converged Wide Area Networks (ISCW) Module 4: Frame Mode MPLS Implementation.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Implementing Secure Converged Wide Area Networks (ISCW) Module 4: Frame Mode MPLS Implementation.
Multi-Protocol Label Switching
COS 420 Day 16. Agenda Assignment 3 Corrected Poor results 1 C and 2 Ds Spring Break?? Assignment 4 Posted Chap Due April 6 Individual Project Presentations.
A Study of MPLS Department of Computing Science & Engineering DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY, LEICESTER, U.K. By PARMINDER SINGH KANG
SMUCSE 8344 MPLS Virtual Private Networks (VPNs).
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—4-1 MPLS VPN Technology Forwarding MPLS VPN Packets.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—3-1 Frame-Mode MPLS Implementation on Cisco IOS Platforms Configuring Frame-Mode MPLS on Cisco.
MPLS Evan Roggenkamp. Introduction Multiprotocol Label Switching High-performance Found in telecommunications networks Directs data from one network node.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) presented by: chitralekha tamrakar (B.S.E.) divya krit tamrakar (B.S.E.) Rashmi shrivastava(B.S.E.) prakriti.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—1-1 MPLS Concepts Introducing Basic MPLS Concepts.
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)
1 Multi Protocol Label Switching Presented by: Petros Ioannou Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UCY.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
Introduction to MPLS and Traffic Engineering Zartash Afzal Uzmi.
University of the Western Cape Chapter 11: Routing Aleksandar Radovanovic.
1 Multiprotocol Label Switching. 2 “ ” It was designed to provide a unified data-carrying service for both circuit-based clients and packet-switching.
MPLS MultiProtocol Label Switching.
1 © 2001, Cisco Systems. MPLS Architecture Overview Jay Kumarasamy Adopted from Stefano Previdi’s presentation.
MultiProtocol Label Switching (MPLS) July 29, 2000TECON 2000 Pramoda Nallur Alcatel Internetworking Division.
MPLS Architecture Overview Adopted from Stefano Previdi’s presentation 麟瑞科技 技術經理 張晃崚.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS Introduction Module 4: Frame Mode MPLS Implementation.
Multi-protocol Label Switching Jiang Wu Computer Science Seminar 5400.
MPLS Forwarder Preliminary 1 Outline MPLS Overview MPLS Overview MPLS MRD MPLS Data Path HLD 48K MPLS Fwder HLD IPE MPLS Fwder HLD Issues Summary.
Lab MPLS Basic Configuration Last Update Copyright 2011 Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 1.
© 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. IP over MPLS. © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. QOS v1.0—11-2 Objectives Upon completing this module, you will be able to: Describe.
1 Network Layer Lecture 13 Imran Ahmed University of Management & Technology.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. FRAME MODE MPLS IMPLEMENTATION.
MPLS (MultiProtocol Labeling Switching) School of Electronics and Information Kyung Hee University. Choong Seon HONG.
MPLS Concepts Introducing Basic MPLS Concepts. Outline Overview What Are the Foundations of Traditional IP Routing? Basic MPLS Features Benefits of MPLS.
MPLS Label Last Update Copyright 2011 Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 1.
MPLS Some notations: LSP: Label Switched Path
MULTI-PROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING Brandon Wagner. Lecture Outline  Precursor to MPLS  MPLS Definitions  The Forwarding Process  MPLS VPN  MPLS Traffic.
Mr. Mark Welton.  WAN transportation method that formats data into frames and sent over a network controlled by a service provider  Frame Relay is often.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 1 v3.0 Module 10 Routing Fundamentals and Subnets.
1. Tag Switching RFC Cisco systems Tag Switching architecture overview. Switching In IP Networks - B.Davie, P.Doolan, Y.Rekhter. Presnted By - Shmuel.
© 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. BGP v3.2—6-1 Scaling Service Provider Networks Scaling IGP and BGP in Service Provider Networks.
Multiple Protocol Support: Multiprotocol Level Switching.
1 © 2004, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 1 Module 10 Routing Fundamentals and Subnets.
1 © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. MPLS Architecture & Operation Peter Tomsu Senior Consultant EMEA Peter Tomsu Senior Consultant EMEA
MULTI-PROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING By: By: YASHWANT.V YASHWANT.V ROLL NO:20 ROLL NO:20.
Multi-protocol Label Switching
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Routing algorithms provide support for performance goals – Distributed and dynamic React to congestion Load balance.
Multi-protocol Label Switching (MPLS) RFC 3031 MPLS provides new capabilities: QoS support Traffic engineering VPN Multiprotocol support.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.1 Routing Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6.
MPLS Introduction Computer Networks 2007 Week 9 Lecture 1 by Donald Neal.
MPLS Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)
Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6
B-TECH PROJECT MID-SEM PRESENTATION 2011
Implementing Secure Converged Wide Area Networks (ISCW)
MPLS Basics 2 2.
CHAPTER 8 Network Management
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6
Presentation transcript:

Module 2 MPLS Concepts

Objectives Upon completion of this chapter, you will be able to perform the following tasks: Identify the drawbacks of traditional IP routing Describe basic MPLS concepts and LSR types. Understand how different MPLS applications can coexist on the same platform using the same underlying technology. List the standard bodies that are working on MPLS technology and the relationship between Tag Switching and MPLS. Lesson Aim <Enter lesson aim here.>

Drawbacks of Traditional IP Routing © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. MPLS v1.0—2-3

Objectives Upon completion of this section, you will be able to identify the drawbacks of traditional IP routing. Lesson Aim <Enter lesson aim here.>

Traditional IP Forwarding Traditional IP forwarding is based on the following: Routing protocols are used to distribute Layer 3 routing information. Forwarding is based on the destination address only. Routing lookups are performed on every hop.

Traditional IP Forwarding (cont.) 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 Update: 10.0.0.0/8 Update: 10.0.0.0/8 Routing lookup Routing lookup Routing lookup Destination-based routing lookup is needed on every hop. Every router may need full Internet routing information (more than 100,000 routes).

IP over ATM 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 Layer 2 topology may be different from Layer 3 topology, resulting in suboptimal paths and link utilization. Layer 2 devices have no knowledge of Layer 3 routing information—virtual circuits must be manually established. Even if the two topologies overlap, the hub and spoke topology is usually used because of easier management.

Traffic Engineering with Traditional IP Forwarding Primary OC­192 link Large Site A Large Site B Backup OC­48 link Small Site C Most traffic goes between large sites A and B and uses only the primary link. Destination-based routing does not provide any mechanism for load balancing across unequal paths. Policy-based routing can be used to forward packets based on other parameters, but this is not a scalable solution.

Summary After completing this section, you should be able to identify the drawbacks of traditional IP routing

Review Questions List major drawbacks of traditional IP routing. Based on what information do routers forward IP packets? What mechanism can be used to forward packets based on other parameters? Why is this mechanism not suitable for large networks?

Basic MPLS Concepts © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. MPLS v1.0—2-11

Objectives Upon completion of this section, you will be able to perform the following tasks: Describe MPLS architecture. Describe the MPLS approach to IP routing. Describe the difference between data plane and control plane in MPLS. Describe the difference between packet-mode and cell-mode MPLS. List Label Switch Router (LSR) types. Describe LSR architecture. Lesson Aim <Enter lesson aim here.>

Basic MPLS Concepts MPLS is a new forwarding mechanism in which packets are forwarded based on labels. Labels may correspond to IP destination networks (equal to traditional IP forwarding). Labels can also correspond to other parameters, such as quality of service (QoS) or source address. MPLS was designed to support forwarding of other protocols as well.

MPLS Example Only edge routers must perform a routing lookup. 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 L=3 L=5 Routing lookup and label assignment 10.0.0.0/8  L=5 Label removal and routing lookup L=3 Label swapping L=5  L=3 Only edge routers must perform a routing lookup. Core routers switch packets based on simple label lookups and swap labels.

MPLS Versus IP over ATM 10.1.1.1 L=17 L=5 10.1.1.1 L=3 Layer 2 devices run a Layer 3 routing protocol and establish virtual circuits dynamically based on Layer 3 information Layer 2 devices are IP-aware and run a routing protocol. There is no need to manually establish virtual circuits. MPLS provides a virtual full mesh topology.

Traffic Engineering with MPLS Primary OC­192 link Large Site A Large Site B Secondary OC­48 link Small Site C Traffic can be forwarded based on other parameters (QoS, source, ...). Load sharing across unequal paths can be achieved.

MPLS Architecture MPLS has two major components: Control plane—exchanges Layer 3 routing information and labels Data plane—forwards packets based on labels Control plane contains complex mechanisms to exchange routing information, such as Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP), Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System (IS-IS), and BGP, and to exchange labels, such as Tag Distribution Protocol (TDP), label distribution protocol (LDP), BGP, and Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP). Data plane has a simple forwarding engine. Control plane maintains contents of the label-switching table (label forwarding information base, or LFIB).

MPLS Architecture Control Plane OSPF OSPF: 10.0.0.0/8 OSPF: 10.0.0.0/8 LDP LDP: 10.0.0.0/8 Label 17 LDP: 10.0.0.0/8 Label 4 417 Data Plane LFIB Labeled packet Label 17 Labeled packet Label 4 Router functionality is divided into two major parts: control plane and data plane

MPLS Modes of Operation MPLS technology is intended to be used anywhere regardless of Layer 1 media and Layer 2 protocol. MPLS uses a 32-bit label field that is inserted between Layer 2 and Layer 3 headers (frame-mode). MPLS over ATM uses the ATM header as the label (cell-mode).

Label Format LABEL EXP S TTL 19 20 22 23 24 31 MPLS uses a 32-bit label field that contains the following information: 20-bit label 3-bit experimental field 1-bit bottom-of-stack indicator 8-bit time-to-live (TTL) field

Frame-Mode MPLS Frame Header IP Header Payload Frame Header Label Layer 2 Layer 3 Routing lookup and label assignment Frame Header Label IP Header Payload Layer 2 Layer 2½ Layer 3

Cell_Mode MPLS Frame Header IP Header Payload Frame Header Label Layer 2 Layer 3 Frame Header Label IP Header Payload Layer 2 Layer 2½ Layer 3 VPI/VCI fields are used for label switching ATM Header ATM Adaptation Layer 5 (AAL5) Header Label IP Header Payload Cell 1 Layer 2 Layer 2½ Layer 3 ATM Header Payload Cell 2

Label Switch Router MPLS Domain 10.1.1.1 L=3 L=5 10.1.1.1 20.1.1.1 L=31 L=43 20.1.1.1 Edge LSR LSR Label switch router (LSR) primarily forwards labeled packets (label swapping) Edge LSR primarily labels IP packets and forwards them into MPLS domain, or removes labels and forwards IP packets out of the MPLS domain

ATM Label Switch Router MPLS Domain 10.1.1.1 L=1/3 L=1/3 L=1/3 L=1/5 L=1/5 L=1/5 10.1.1.1 20.1.1.1 L=1/6 L=1/6 L=1/6 20.1.1.1 L=1/9 L=1/9 L=1/9 ATM Edge LSR ATM LSR ATM LSR can only forward cells ATM edge LSR segments packets into cells and forwards them into an MPLS ATM domain, or reassembles cells into packets and forwards them out of an MPLS ATM domain

Architecture of LSRs LSRs, regardless of the type, perform the following three functions: Exchange routing information Exchange labels Forward packets (LSRs and edge LSRs) or cells (ATM LSRs and ATM edge LSRs) The first two functions are part of the control plane. The last function is part of the data plane.

Label Distribution Protocol Label Forwarding Table Architecture of LSRs LSR Control Plane Exchange of routing information Routing Protocol IP Routing Table Exchange of labels Label Distribution Protocol Data Plane Incoming labeled packets Outgoing labeled packets Label Forwarding Table LSRs primarily forward labeled packets or cells (ATM LSRs).

Architecture of Edge LSRs Control Plane Exchange of routing information Routing Protocol IP Routing Table Exchange of labels Label Distribution Protocol Data Plane Incoming IP packets Outgoing IP packets IP Forwarding Table Incoming labeled packets Outgoing labeled packets Label Forwarding Table Note: ATM edge LSRs can only forward cells.

Summary After completing this section, you should be able to perform the following tasks: Describe MPLS architecture. Describe MPLS approach to IP routing. Describe the difference between data plane and control plane in MPLS. Describe the difference between packet-mode and cell-mode MPLS. List Label Switch Router (LSR) types. Describe LSR architecture.

Review Questions What are the major drawbacks of traditional IP forwarding and how does MPLS solve them? What functions does an LSR perform? List the types of LSRs. Name the two modes of MPLS. Explain the difference between an LSR and an Edge LSR. Explain the difference between an LSR and an ATM LSR.

MPLS Labels and Label Stack © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. MPLS v1.0—2-30

Objectives Upon completion of this section, you will be able to perform the following tasks: Describe the format of MPLS label. Explain the concept of the MPLS Label Stack. Describe the way MPLS labels are used in Packet-mode and ATM environment. Lesson Aim <Enter lesson aim here.>

MPLS Label Format LABEL EXP S TTL 19 20 22 23 24 31 MPLS uses a 32-bit label field that contains the following information: 20-bit label (a number) 3-bit experimental field (usually used to carry IP precedence value) 1-bit bottom-of-stack indicator (indicates whether this is the last label before the IP header) 8-bit TTL (equal to the TTL in IP header)

MPLS Labels Labels are inserted between the Layer 2 (frame) header and the Layer 3 (packet) header. There can be more than one label (label stack). The bottom-of-stack bit indicates if the label is the last label in the label stack. The TTL field is used to prevent indefinite looping of packets. Experimental bits are usually used to carry the IP precedence value.

MPLS Label Stack Frame Header Label 1 Label 2 Label 3 IP Header Payload PID=MPLS-IP S=1 S=0 S=0 Protocol identifier in a Layer 2 header specifies that the payload starts with a label (labels) and is followed by an IP header Bottom-of-stack bit indicates whether the next header is another label or a Layer 3 header Receiving router uses the top label only

MPLS Label Stack Usually only one label assigned to a packet. The following scenarios may produce more than one label: MPLS VPNs (two labels—the top label points to the egress routers and the second label identifies the VPN) MPLS TE (two or more labels—the top label points to the endpoint of the traffic engineering tunnel and the second label points to the destination) MPLS VPNs combined with MPLS TE (three or more labels)

MPLS Forwarding An LSR can perform the following functions: Insert (impose) a label or a stack of labels on ingress. Swap a label with a next-hop label or a stack of labels in the core. Remove (pop) a label on egress. ATM LSRs can only swap a label with one label (VPI/VCI fields change).

MPLS Forwarding (Frame-Mode) MPLS Domain 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 3 10.1.1.1 5 10.1.1.1 IP Lookup 10.0.0.0/8  label 3 LFIB label 8  label 3 IP Lookup 10.0.0.0/8  label 5 LFIB label 3  label 5 IP Lookup 10.0.0.0/8  next hop LFIB label 5  pop On ingress a label is assigned and imposed by the IP routing process. LSRs in the core swap labels based on the contents of the label forwarding table. On egress the label is removed and a routing lookup is used to forward the packet.

MPLS Forwarding (Cell-Mode) MPLS Domain 10.1.1.1 1/3 1/5 10.1.1.1 IP Lookup 10.0.0.0/8  label 1/3 LFIB label 8  label 1/3 IP Lookup 10.0.0.0/8  label 1/5 LFIB label 1/3  label 1/5 IP Lookup 10.0.0.0/8  Next hop LFIB label 1/5  pop Labels (VPI/VCI) are imposed during the IP lookup process on ingress ATM edge LSRs. Packets are segmented into cells. ATM LSRs in the core swap labels based on the contents of the ATM switching table. ATM LSRs cannot forward IP packets. On egress ATM edge LSRs the labels are removed (cells are reassembled into packets) and a routing lookup is used to forward packets.

Summary After completing this section, you should be able to perform the following tasks: Describe the format of MPLS label. Explain the concept of the MPLS Label Stack. Describe the way MPLS labels are used in Packet-mode and ATM environment.

Review Questions What fields does a label have? How does a receiving router know if the packet is labeled or not? How does a receiving router know if there is another label? Why is more than one label needed? What are the major differences between frame-mode and cell-mode MPLS?

MPLS Applications © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. MPLS v1.0—2-41

Objectives Upon completion of this section, you will be able to perform the following tasks: Identify various MPLS applications. Describe the overall structure of each MPLS application. Explain the interactions between several MPLS applications running on the same platform. Lesson Aim <Enter lesson aim here.>

MPLS Applications MPLS is already used in many different applications: Unicast IP routing Multicast IP routing Traffic Engineering (MPLS TE) QoS Virtual private networks (MPLS VPN) Regardless of the application, the functionality is always split into the control plane and the data plane: The applications differ only in the control plane. They all use a common label-switching data plane. Edge LSR Layer 3 data planes may differ. In general, a label is assigned to a forwarding equivalence class (FEC).

Unicast IP Routing Two mechanisms are needed on the control plane: IP routing protocol (OSPF, IS-IS, EIGRP, ...) Label distribution protocol (LDP or TDP) A routing protocol carries the information about the reachability of networks. The label distribution protocol binds labels to networks learned via a routing protocol. The forwarding equivalence class (FEC) is equal to a destination network, stored in the IP routing table.

Multicast IP Routing A dedicated protocol is not needed to support multicast traffic across an MPLS domain. peripheral interface manager (PIM) version 2 with extensions for MPLS is used to propagate routing information as well as labels. FEC is equal to a destination multicast address, stored in the multicast routing table.

MPLS TE MPLS traffic engineering requires OSPF or IS­IS with extensions for MPLS TE as the IGP. OSPF and IS-IS with extensions hold the entire topology in their databases. OSPF and IS-IS should also have some additional information about network resources and constraints. RSVP or CR-LDP is used to establish traffic engineering tunnels (TE tunnels) and propagate labels.

Quality of Service Differentiated QoS is an extension to unicast IP routing that provides differentiated services. Extensions to TDP or LDP are used to propagate different labels for different classes. FEC is a combination of a destination network and a class of service.

Virtual Private Networks Networks are learned via an IGP (OSPF, EBGP, RIP version 2 [RIPv2] or static) from a customer or via BGP from other internal routers. Labels are propagated via MP-BGP. Two labels are used: Top label points to the egress router (assigned through LDP or TDP). Second label identifies the outgoing interface on the egress router or a routing table where a routing lookup is performed. FEC is equal to a VPN site descriptor or VPN routing table.

Interaction Between MPLS Applications Control Plane Unicast IP Routing Multicast IP Routing MPLS Traffic Engineering Quality of Service MPLS/VPN Any IGP OSPF or IS-IS Any IGP Any IGP Unicast IP routing table Multicast IP routing table Unicast IP routing table Unicast IP routing table Unicast IP routing tables LDP or TDP PIM version 2 LDP RSVP LDP or TDP LDP BGP Data Plane Label forwarding table

Summary After completing this section, you should be able to perform the following tasks: Identify various MPLS applications. Describe the overall structure of each MPLS application. Explain the interactions between several MPLS applications running on the same platform.

Review Questions Where is MPLS used today? Where can MPLS potentially be used in the future? What do the different applications of MPLS have in common? What are the differences between the various applications of MPLS?

Differences Between Tag Switching and MPLS © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. MPLS v1.0—2-52

Objectives Upon completion of this section, you will be able to perform the following tasks: Explain the differences between Tag Switching and MPLS. List the IETF standards defining MPLS. Lesson Aim <Enter lesson aim here.>

MPLS Standardization MPLS functionality has been available in Cisco routers since Cisco IOS Release 11.1CT. It was called tag switching, and the switching part is equal to standard MPLS. The only difference between MPLS and tag switching is in the label distribution protocol: Cisco proprietary implementation uses TDP. IETF specifies LDP as the standard label distribution protocol. Although TDP and LDP are also functionally equivalent, they are not compatible. They can, however, coexist in an MPLS domain as long as any two peers are using the same protocol.

MPLS Standards MPLS is basically a standardized version of tag switching. The following are just some of the many drafts defining MPLS: draft-ietf-mpls-arch draft-ietf-mpls-label-encaps draft-ietf-mpls-ldp Many other drafts can be found at http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mpls-charter.html

TDP vs. LDP MPLS and tag switching are equal on the data plane. The only difference is on the control plane, where tag switching uses Cisco proprietary TDP and MPLS uses standard LDP. TDP and LDP are functionally equivalent but not compatible. TDP uses User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) port number 711. LDP uses UDP and TCP port number 646.

Combining TDP and LDP TDP & LDP TDP TDP LDP LDP TDP LDP TDP LDP TDP TDP to LDP This example shows possible combinations of TDP and LDP. TDP is used by default, but it may be necessary to enable LDP for non-Cisco peering routers.

MPLS Implementation MPLS is enabled per interface by enabling one or both distribution protocols. The moment LDP or TDP is enabled, a router will try to find neighbors through the interface and establish a TDP or LDP session. TDP is the default label distribution protocol.

Summary After completing this section, you should be able to perform the following tasks: Explain the differences between Tag Switching and MPLS. List the IETF standards defining MPLS.

Review Questions What is the difference between Tag Switching and MPLS on the data plane? What is the difference between Tag Switching and MPLS on the control plane? How can Tag Switching and MPLS be combined? Which label switching mechanism is the default switching mechanism on Cisco routers?

Summary After completing this chapter, you should be able to perform the following tasks: Identify the drawbacks of traditional IP routing. Describe basic MPLS concepts and LSR types. Describe how different MPLS applications can coexist on the same platform using the same underlying technology. List the standard bodies that are working on MPLS technology and the relationship between Tag Switching and MPLS.

© 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. www.cisco.com Chapter#-62