Other experimental designs Randomized Block design Repeated Measures designs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiple-choice question
Advertisements

ANOVA Two Factor Models Two Factor Models. 2 Factor Experiments Two factors can either independently or together interact to affect the average response.
Latin Square Designs. Selected Latin Squares 3 x 34 x 4 A B CA B C DA B C DA B C DA B C D B C AB A D CB C D AB D A CB A D C C A BC D B AC D A BC A D BC.
1-Way Analysis of Variance
Incomplete Block Designs. Randomized Block Design We want to compare t treatments Group the N = bt experimental units into b homogeneous blocks of size.
Latin Square Designs (§15.4)
ANOVA TABLE Factorial Experiment Completely Randomized Design.
1 Chapter 4 Experiments with Blocking Factors The Randomized Complete Block Design Nuisance factor: a design factor that probably has an effect.
Chapter 4 Randomized Blocks, Latin Squares, and Related Designs
Comparing k Populations Means – One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Design of Engineering Experiments - Experiments with Random Factors
1 Multifactor ANOVA. 2 What We Will Learn Two-factor ANOVA K ij =1 Two-factor ANOVA K ij =1 –Interaction –Tukey’s with multiple comparisons –Concept of.
Experimental Design Terminology  An Experimental Unit is the entity on which measurement or an observation is made. For example, subjects are experimental.
Chapter 10 - Part 1 Factorial Experiments.
DOCTORAL SEMINAR, SPRING SEMESTER 2007 Experimental Design & Analysis Further Within Designs; Mixed Designs; Response Latencies April 3, 2007.
Outline Single-factor ANOVA Two-factor ANOVA Three-factor ANOVA
Regression Approach To ANOVA
Biostatistics-Lecture 9 Experimental designs Ruibin Xi Peking University School of Mathematical Sciences.
Psy B07 Chapter 1Slide 1 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE. Psy B07 Chapter 1Slide 2 t-test refresher  In chapter 7 we talked about analyses that could be conducted.
Factorial Experiments
Latin Square Designs. Selected Latin Squares 3 x 34 x 4 A B CA B C DA B C DA B C DA B C D B C AB A D CB C D AB D A CB A D C C A BC D B AC D A BC A D BC.
The Randomized Block Design. Suppose a researcher is interested in how several treatments affect a continuous response variable (Y). The treatments may.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.
Repeated Measures Designs. In a Repeated Measures Design We have experimental units that may be grouped according to one or several factors (the grouping.
The Randomized Block Design. Suppose a researcher is interested in how several treatments affect a continuous response variable (Y). The treatments may.
MANOVA Multivariate Analysis of Variance. One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Comparing k Populations.
Factorial Experiments Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Experimental Design.
ANOVA: Analysis of Variance
Orthogonal Linear Contrasts This is a technique for partitioning ANOVA sum of squares into individual degrees of freedom.
Randomized Block Design (Kirk, chapter 7) BUSI 6480 Lecture 6.
1 Chapter 13 Analysis of Variance. 2 Chapter Outline  An introduction to experimental design and analysis of variance  Analysis of Variance and the.
Discussion 3 1/20/2014. Outline How to fill out the table in the appendix in HW3 What does the Model statement do in SAS Proc GLM ( please download lab.
Orthogonal Linear Contrasts
MANOVA Multivariate Analysis of Variance. One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Comparing k Populations.
Randomized Block Design Blocks All treats appear once in each block.
Repeated Measures Designs. In a Repeated Measures Design We have experimental units that may be grouped according to one or several factors (the grouping.
DOX 6E Montgomery1 Design of Engineering Experiments Part 9 – Experiments with Random Factors Text reference, Chapter 13, Pg. 484 Previous chapters have.
Orthogonal Linear Contrasts This is a technique for partitioning ANOVA sum of squares into individual degrees of freedom.
Design Of Experiments With Several Factors
Repeated Measures Designs. In a Repeated Measures Design We have experimental units that may be grouped according to one or several factors (the grouping.
Latin Square Designs KNNL – Sections Description Experiment with r treatments, and 2 blocking factors: rows (r levels) and columns (r levels)
Comparing k Populations Means – One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 12 Analysis of Variance.
Orthogonal Linear Contrasts A technique for partitioning ANOVA sum of squares into individual degrees of freedom.
Multivariate Analysis of Variance
IE241: Introduction to Design of Experiments. Last term we talked about testing the difference between two independent means. For means from a normal.
Chapter 9 More Complicated Experimental Designs. Randomized Block Design (RBD) t > 2 Treatments (groups) to be compared b Blocks of homogeneous units.
ANOVA TABLE Factorial Experiment Completely Randomized Design.
ANOVA Overview of Major Designs. Between or Within Subjects Between-subjects (completely randomized) designs –Subjects are nested within treatment conditions.
The p-value approach to Hypothesis Testing
Factorial Experiments Analysis of Variance Experimental Design.
The Analysis of Covariance ANACOVA. Multiple Regression 1.Dependent variable Y (continuous) 2.Continuous independent variables X 1, X 2, …, X p The continuous.
1 Topic 14 – Experimental Design Crossover Nested Factors Repeated Measures.
Two-Factor Study with Random Effects In some experiments the levels of both factors A & B are chosen at random from a larger set of possible factor levels.
Experimental Designs The objective of Experimental design is to reduce the magnitude of random error resulting in more powerful tests to detect experimental.
Comparing k Populations Means – One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Two-Way ANOVA Interactions. What we will cover Two-way ANOVA: Family of ANOVA tests More examples in R Looking at interaction plots How to interpret the.
Design Lecture: week3 HSTS212.
Factorial Experiments
i) Two way ANOVA without replication
Comparing Three or More Means
Comparing k Populations
Comparing k Populations
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Other Analysis of Variance Designs
Factorial Experiments
Latin Square Designs.
Chapter 10 – Part II Analysis of Variance
One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
STATISTICS INFORMED DECISIONS USING DATA
Presentation transcript:

Other experimental designs Randomized Block design Repeated Measures designs

The Randomized Block Design

Suppose a researcher is interested in how several treatments affect a continuous response variable (Y). The treatments may be the levels of a single factor or they may be the combinations of levels of several factors. Suppose we have available to us a total of N = nt experimental units to which we are going to apply the different treatments.

The Completely Randomized (CR) design randomly divides the experimental units into t groups of size n and randomly assigns a treatment to each group.

The Randomized Block Design divides the group of experimental units into n homogeneous groups of size t. These homogeneous groups are called blocks. The treatments are then randomly assigned to the experimental units in each block - one treatment to a unit in each block.

Experimental Designs The objective of Experimental design is to reduce the magnitude of random error resulting in more powerful tests to detect experimental effects

The Completely Randomizes Design Treats 123…t Experimental units randomly assigned to treatments

Randomized Block Design Blocks All treats appear once in each block

Example 1: Suppose we are interested in how weight gain (Y) in rats is affected by Source of protein (Beef, Cereal, and Pork) and by Level of Protein (High or Low). There are a total of t = 3  2 = 6 treatment combinations of the two factors (Beef -High Protein, Cereal-High Protein, Pork-High Protein, Beef -Low Protein, Cereal-Low Protein, and Pork-Low Protein).

Suppose we have available to us a total of N = 60 experimental rats to which we are going to apply the different diets based on the t = 6 treatment combinations. Prior to the experimentation the rats were divided into n = 10 homogeneous groups of size 6. The grouping was based on factors that had previously been ignored (Example - Initial weight size, appetite size etc.) Within each of the 10 blocks a rat is randomly assigned a treatment combination (diet).

The weight gain after a fixed period is measured for each of the test animals and is tabulated on the next slide:

Randomized Block Design

Example 2: The following experiment is interested in comparing the effect four different chemicals (A, B, C and D) in producing water resistance (y) in textiles. A strip of material, randomly selected from each bolt, is cut into four pieces (samples) the pieces are randomly assigned to receive one of the four chemical treatments.

This process is replicated three times producing a Randomized Block (RB) design. Moisture resistance (y) were measured for each of the samples. (Low readings indicate low moisture penetration). The data is given in the diagram and table on the next slide.

Diagram: Blocks (Bolt Samples)

Table Blocks (Bolt Samples) Chemical123 A B C D

The Model for a randomized Block Experiment i = 1,2,…, tj = 1,2,…, b y ij = the observation in the j th block receiving the i th treatment  = overall mean  i = the effect of the i th treatment  j = the effect of the j th Block  ij = random error

The Anova Table for a randomized Block Experiment SourceS.S.d.f.M.S.Fp-value TreatSS T t-1MS T MS T /MS E BlockSS B n-1MS B MS B /MS E ErrorSS E (t-1)(b-1)MS E

A randomized block experiment is assumed to be a two-factor experiment. The factors are blocks and treatments. The is one observation per cell. It is assumed that there is no interaction between blocks and treatments. The degrees of freedom for the interaction is used to estimate error.

The Anova Table for Diet Experiment

The Anova Table forTextile Experiment

If the treatments are defined in terms of two or more factors, the treatment Sum of Squares can be split (partitioned) into: –Main Effects –Interactions

The Anova Table for Diet Experiment terms for the main effects and interactions between Level of Protein and Source of Protein

Using SPSS to analyze a randomized Block Design Treat the experiment as a two-factor experiment –Blocks –Treatments Omit the interaction from the analysis. It will be treated as the Error term.

The data in an SPSS file Variables are in columns

Select General Linear Model->Univariate

Select the dependent variable, the Block factor, the Treatment factor. Select Model.

Select a Custom model.

Put in the model only the main effects.

Obtain the ANOVA table If I want to break apart the Diet SS into components representing Source of Protein (2 df), Level of Protein (1 df), and Source Level interaction (2 df) - follow the subsequent steps

Replace the Diet factor by the Source and level factors (The two factors that define diet)

Specify the model. There is no interaction between Blocks and the diet factors (Source and Level)

Obtain the ANOVA table

The ANOVA table for the Completely Randomized Design SourcedfSum of Squares Treatmentst - 1SS Tr Errort(n – 1)SS Error Totaltn - 1SS Total SourcedfSum of Squares Blocksn - 1SS Blocks Treatmentst - 1SS Tr Error (t – 1) (n – 1) SS Error Totaltn - 1SS Total The ANOVA table for the Randomized Block Design

Comments The ability to detect treatment differences depends on the magnitude of the random error term The error term,, for the Completely Randomized Design models variability in the reponse, y, between experimental units The error term,, for the Completely Block Design models variability in the reponse, y, between experimental units in the same block (hopefully the is considerably smaller than.

Example – Weight gain, diet, source of protein, level of protein (Completely randomized design)

If the treatments are defined in terms of two or more factors, the treatment Sum of Squares can be split (partitioned) into: –Main Effects –Interactions

The Anova Table for Diet Experiment terms for the main effects and interactions between Level of Protein and Source of Protein

Using SPSS to analyze a randomized Block Design Treat the experiment as a two-factor experiment –Blocks –Treatments Omit the interaction from the analysis. It will be treated as the Error term.

The data in an SPSS file Variables are in columns

Select General Linear Model->Univariate

Select the dependent variable, the Block factor, the Treatment factor. Select Model.

Select a Custom model.

Put in the model only the main effects.

Obtain the ANOVA table If I want to break apart the Diet SS into components representing Source of Protein (2 df), Level of Protein (1 df), and Source Level interaction (2 df) - follow the subsequent steps

Replace the Diet factor by the Source and level factors (The two factors that define diet)

Specify the model. There is no interaction between Blocks and the diet factors (Source and Level)

Obtain the ANOVA table

Repeated Measures Designs

In a Repeated Measures Design We have experimental units that may be grouped according to one or several factors (the grouping factors) Then on each experimental unit we have not a single measurement but a group of measurements (the repeated measures) The repeated measures may be taken at combinations of levels of one or several factors (The repeated measures factors)

Example In the following study the experimenter was interested in how the level of a certain enzyme changed in cardiac patients after open heart surgery. The enzyme was measured immediately after surgery (Day 0), one day (Day 1), two days (Day 2) and one week (Day 7) after surgery for n = 15 cardiac surgical patients.

The data is given in the table below. Table: The enzyme levels -immediately after surgery (Day 0), one day (Day 1),two days (Day 2) and one week (Day 7) after surgery

The subjects are not grouped (single group). There is one repeated measures factor - Time – with levels –Day 0, –Day 1, –Day 2, –Day 7 This design is the same as a randomized block design with –Blocks = subjects

The Anova Table for Enzyme Experiment The Subject Source of variability is modelling the variability between subjects The ERROR Source of variability is modelling the variability within subjects

Analysis Using SPSS - the data file The repeated measures are in columns

Select General Linear model -> Repeated Measures

Specify the repeated measures factors and the number of levels

Specify the variables that represent the levels of the repeated measures factor There is no Between subject factor in this example

The ANOVA table

Example : (Repeated Measures Design - Grouping Factor) In the following study, similar to example 3, the experimenter was interested in how the level of a certain enzyme changed in cardiac patients after open heart surgery. In addition the experimenter was interested in how two drug treatments (A and B) would also effect the level of the enzyme.

The 24 patients were randomly divided into three groups of n= 8 patients. The first group of patients were left untreated as a control group while the second and third group were given drug treatments A and B respectively. Again the enzyme was measured immediately after surgery (Day 0), one day (Day 1), two days (Day 2) and one week (Day 7) after surgery for each of the cardiac surgical patients in the study.

Table: The enzyme levels - immediately after surgery (Day 0), one day (Day 1),two days (Day 2) and one week (Day 7) after surgery for three treatment groups (control, Drug A, Drug B)

The subjects are grouped by treatment –control, –Drug A, –Drug B There is one repeated measures factor - Time – with levels –Day 0, –Day 1, –Day 2, –Day 7

The Anova Table There are two sources of Error in a repeated measures design: The between subject error – Error 1 and the within subject error – Error 2

Tables of means DrugDay 0Day 1Day 2Day 7Overall Control A B Overall

Example : Repeated Measures Design - Two Grouping Factors In the following example, the researcher was interested in how the levels of Anxiety (high and low) and Tension (none and high) affected error rates in performing a specified task. In addition the researcher was interested in how the error rates also changed over time. Four groups of three subjects diagnosed in the four Anxiety-Tension categories were asked to perform the task at four different times patients in the study.

The number of errors committed at each instance is tabulated below.

The Anova Table