Jefferson Lab’s Enabling Technologies: A Call for Strategic Planning W. OREN JLAB Engineering Division 9 February 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC , the State of Michigan.
Advertisements

Simulation Study For MEIC Electron Cooling He Zhang, Yuhong Zhang Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Abstract Electron cooling of the ion beams.
J EFFERSON L AB – A N I NTRODUCTION Hugh Montgomery; March 5, 2012.
FACET: A National User Facility Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond Orbach February 25, 2003 Briefing for the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee FY04 Budget.
February 19, 2008 FACET Review 1 Lab Overview and Future Onsite Facilities Persis S. Drell DirectorSLAC.
September 2005 Director of Education, Training and Research Partnerships Idaho National Laboratory and University Academic Centers of Excellence Andrew.
View from the NSF: Later Years J. Whitmore (EPP-PNA) M. Pripstein (LHC) M. Goldberg, J. Reidy (EPP) LEPP – CLEO CESR Symposium at Cornell, May 31, 2008.
Jefferson Lab Status Hall A collaboration Dec. 16, 2013 R. D. McKeown Deputy Director For Science.
SCRF ACCELERATOR INDUSTRY STEWARDSHIP OUTLOOK Ken Olsen SPAFOA Fermilab Meeting Nov. 13, 2012.
1 EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook June 27, 2014 Request for these slides: Comment on “EIC working group activities at Jefferson Lab, and how people could.
Jefferson Lab Strategic Plan Bob McKeown User Meeting June 8, 2011.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Grigori SHIRKOV Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia International Intergovernmental Organization 18.
Jefferson Lab Strategic Planning Divisional Town Meeting Mission Statement of your Division – What is or should be the mission statement of your division?
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Secretary of Technology Page 1 Jefferson Lab Overview Deb Magaldi Public Affairs
SURA Jefferson Laboratory Committee report J. L. Matthews, Chair Massachusetts Institute of Technology November 5, 2004.
M W PooleJoint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Jan 09 Introduction to ASTeC Programmes M W Poole Director.
Enrico Chesta CERN's High School Teachers Programme (HST) 2014 July 23 rd, 2014 Technology Transfer at CERN: Accelerating Innovation Enrico Chesta Head.
Bob McKeown Presentation to SoLID Collaboration March 22, 2013 Jefferson Lab Update.
DOE OFFICE OF SCIENCE ACCELERATOR STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM KEN OLSEN SPAFOA FRIB MEETING APRIL 3, 2013 (Includes slides prepared by Mark Zisman, DOE) IBT Workshop.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy RHIC Users Meeting BNL; June 8, 2006 Gulshan Rai RHIC/AGS Users Meeting Gulshan Rai Program Manager for Heavy.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Peter Bond Deputy Director for Science and Technology October 29, 2005 New Frontiers at RHIC Workshop.
J EFFERSON L AB – A N I NTRODUCTION Hugh Montgomery; May 14, 2012.
ASRH meeting 01/10/2014 ASSOCIATION SUISSE POUR LA RECHERCHE HORLOGERE CERN Technology Transfer Programme: Accelerating Science - Business Partnerships.
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
Comments from Physics Division Rolf Ent Associate Director for Experimental Nuclear Physics SOLID collaboration meeting, February 03, 2012 Thomas Jefferson.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Raymond L. Orbach Director Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Presentation to BESAC December 6, 2004.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
SURA IT Committee & Regional CASA Meeting “SURAgrid Partnership” Sheraton Four Points 1201 K Street, NW Washington, DC March 7, 2006 Jerry P. Draayer SURA.
1 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA.
P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC The Role of the LHC in US HEP Dan Green US CMS Program Manager January 28, 2003.
Welcome to Jefferson Lab R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab Hypernuclear Workshop May 27, 2014.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 International Linear Collider In August 2004 ICFA announced their technology selection for an ILC: 1.The.
The Berkeley Center for Magnet Technology Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of America Member’s Meeting September 23, 2015 Steve Gourlay Director,
1 June 8, 2008 Users Group Annual Meeting Hugh Montgomery.
Workshop on Women in Science and Engineering Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab November 16, 2009.
1 OFFICE OF ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING RESEARCH The NERSC Center --From A DOE Program Manager’s Perspective-- A Presentation to the NERSC Users Group.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 August 22, 2011 Jefferson Lab PAC Laboratory Overview Hugh Montgomery.
The 12 GeV Physics Program at Jefferson Lab R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab College of William and Mary PTSP 2013 – Charlottesville, VA September 9, 2013.
StatusUpdate Jian-ping Chen, JLab SoLID Collaboration Meeting September 11-12, 2015.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility SensL 6-Oct CHL-2 12 GeV CEBAF Upgrade magnets and power supplies Two 1.1GV linacs Enhanced capabilities.
Experiment Readiness Review P. Rossi – Hall C Coll. Meeting Jan 21, 2016.
Argonne Accelerator Institute Activites Rod Gerig Argonne May 18, 2007 Presentation to the Fermilab-Argonne Directors’ Collaboration Meeting.
BNL Overview DOE Annual HEP Program Review Brookhaven National Laboratory April 17-19, 2006 Sam Aronson.
Early Career Internal Review Research and development in superconducting detectors and associated electronics for high rates experiments. Study of radiation.
UK X-FEL National Laboratory Perspective Susan Smith STFC ASTeC IoP PAB/STFC Workshop Towards a UK XFEL 16 th February 2016.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
STFC’s National Laboratories Round Table on Synergies and Complementarity among Laboratories John Womersley Chief Executive, STFC 13 th Pisa meeting on.
US Accelerator Industry- Small Business Perspective April 30,2013 US-Japan Advance Science and Technology Symposium Science Projects Homeland Security.
‘Toward TIARA’ Final Plan for the collaborative R&D Program WP4 Presented by Paolo Pierini 26/11/2013.
Determining the Added-Value of Partnerships
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
1 Jefferson Lab Organization – December 2009 Director Accelerator Science Advisory Comm. Nuclear Physics Program Adv. Comm. Photon Science Program Adv.
Image courtesy of Oak Ridge National Laboratory Eric R. Colby † Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science U. S. Department of Energy Office of Science-Led.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager.
PRE-CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF A CW POSITRON SOURCE FOR JLAB (2013-LDRD-02) JOE GRAMES LDRD PROPOSAL REVIEW - JULY 17, 2013 PROJECT OVERVIEW THE TEAM LDRD EVALUATION.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Jefferson.
Particle Physics Sector Young-Kee Kim / Greg Bock Leadership Team Strategic Planning Winter Workshop January 29, 2013.
FNAL SCRF Review R. Kephart. What is this Review? FNAL has argued that SCRF technology is an “enabling” accelerator technology (much like superconducting.
Capabilities and Programmes of STFC’s Accelerator Science & Technology Centre (ASTeC)
Jefferson Lab Overview
Introduction to ASTeC Programmes
Dana M. Arenius Jefferson Laboratory Cryogenics Dept Head
Jefferson Lab Reliability Task Force and Initiatives
Introduction to Jefferson Lab
Scientific Computing Strategy
Project Management Issues John N. Galayda, SLAC April 24, 2002
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
Feedback from the Temple Town Meeting MEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
Perspectives from DOE NP
Presentation transcript:

Jefferson Lab’s Enabling Technologies: A Call for Strategic Planning W. OREN JLAB Engineering Division 9 February 2012

Enabling Technology Characteristics: –Essential to accelerator operations and the experimental program –Lab-driven: design, development, engineering and application requires unique skills –Extends the Lab’s scientific reach –In some cases, provides efficiencies and cost-savings required for successful facility upgrades and new experimental equipment projects

Enabling Technology – A Refined Definition We need many enabling technologies but one could think of 3 different levels: 1.The product or service is not readily available outside the lab and our needs push the technology. (Cryogenics) 2.The product or service might be available outside the lab but we must have an expert to “manage” it. (Magnets) 3.We could buy it outside the lab but we really need to have it here to be successful. (Alignment)

Jefferson Lab’s Enabling Technology Why include in strategic planning? –Enabling technologies are essential for success of the lab’s experimental program and scientific extensions –Strategic investment will sustain the core engineering capabilities needed to deliver scientific program –Targeted R&D will advance core technology and provide efficiencies and cost-savings required for successful facility upgrades and new experimental equipment projects

Enabling Technologies at JLab Magnets –Superconducting –Normal conducting SRF Engineering –Cryomodule/mechanical engineering –RF modeling and structures –RF controls 2K Cryogenics Detectors/fast electronics High-powered targets Beam diagnostics Engineered safety systems What else????

How Do We Sustain the Identified Technologies? These are unique technologies essential for achieving the scientific mission (where is the work??): 1.At Jefferson Lab NP program & FEL (12 GeV, XX GeV, MEIC?, FEL??…) 2.At DOE/NP Laboratories NP projects and experimental programs (FRIB, EIC, RHIC…) 3.At DOE/SC Laboratories and beyond SC projects and experimental programs (NGLS, ILC, …) International (ESS, …)

What’s Next? Develop Lab’s strategic plan for science (Town meetings) Lab Planning Group identify the key enabling technologies needed to achieve the scientific mission at JLab and, by extension, support the U.S. and international science community Develop a strategic readiness plan for each enabling technology –Technology requirements –R&D, as appropriate –Resource projections –Schedule –Partnerships

What is Next? Jefferson Lab Mission JLAB Enabling Technologies JLAB Planning Group “What technology does the Lab sustain?” Readiness Strategy  SC Magnets  NC Magnets  Cryomodule/ME  RF Modeling and Structures  2K Cryogenics  Detector & Fast Electronics  High-powered Target  Beam Dynamics  Engineered Safety  Technology R&D  Efficiency gains  Cost-savings  Expertise  Partnerships  NP at JLab: 12 GeV 50 GeV  NP at DOE Labs: FRIB EIC NGLS ILC, ESS  SC at DOE Labs & Beyond: JLAB Enabling Technologies-Applied