General Education Model Presentation Report from the General Education Oversight Committee to the UMKC Faculty Senate Feb. 21 st, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ability-Based Education at Alverno College. Proposed Outcomes for Session 1. To introduce you to Alvernos approach to designing integrative general education.
Advertisements

Course Certification Process General Education Board
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Agenda Why the change? What changed?
 Log into Moodle and complete today’s Bell Ringer  When you finish, download today’s notes from Moodle REMINDER: Remember to be checking my website if.
AMY DOLING, CORYANNE HARRIGAN, AND STEVEN J. GRIFFITH SIMPSON COLLEGE, INDIANOLA, IOWA Widening the Circle: Creating Momentum for Curricular and Structural.
General Education Revision. Mission & Purpose Mission Rooted in the tradition of liberal arts education, FGCU’s General Education Program provides students.
A New Model for Our General Education Program A New Model for Our General Education Program Presented by Margaret Owens member of the GE Design Team* for.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
General Education Models General Education Reform Committee Lloyd Duman Carol Lindsay Sherry Simkins Karen Ruppel Bob Vogeler Peter Zao Bob Murray.
The new UMKC General Education Model General Education Implementation Committee August 17 th, 2012.
Integrated Core Proposal Team Members –Emmanuel Eneyo, Ind & Mnfg Engineering –Allison Funk, English Language and Literature –Jo Gibson, Office of the.
Final Recommendations.  A well-constructed curriculum:  Achieves the mission and the learning outcomes adopted by the University community  Is achievable.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Good teaching, good teachers and comparative analysis Fernando Reimers.
NMU Towards the 21 st Century Mitchell Klett Alan Willis Ruth Watry Laura Reissner Gary Brunswick.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
The Current Refocusing of General Education. Objectives for the Workshop Proposing and/or Renewing a Course Assessing the general education aspect of.
Terms, practices, and outcomes. What connections do we make? What about those connections is meaningful?  across courses  through reflection  linked.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Presentation to Faculty Council September 9, 2013 Miren Uriarte, CPCS and Peter Kiang, CEHD for the TCCS Faculty Planning Group MS and PhD Programs in.
General Education Framework Directors and Chairs Meeting Wednesday, August 25, 2010.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
“Knowledge” Do Now: As a teacher, what does this statement make think about or feel: “He Who Can Does He Who cannot Teaches” George Bernard Shaw.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Learning Outcomes and Assessment APCC Peter Wolf April
A General Education Core Curriculum at IUPUI Campus Town HallMarch 30, 2012.
Core Curriculum and Transfer Students Summer 2015.
Thinking Critically Model Model proposed by Lisa Borden- King, Alex Deufel, Jane la Plante, Beth Odahlen, and Deb Olson.
Undergraduate Core at Doane March 14, Overview of Undergraduate Core at Doane Philosophy of the Undergraduate Core at Doane (aligned with mission)
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
IImplementing and Assessing Integrative Learning through eFolios and AAC&U VALUES Initiative at San Francisco State tTTanya Augsburg Assistant Professor.
21st Century Skills: Just what are they?. Student Outcomes.
 Standardizing the Standards October 10, By September 2013  All teachers must utilize:  The 2009 New Jersey Core Content Curriculum Standards.
Information for new parents. Thursday Aug 21, 2014 Pak Patrick –MYP Coordinator Ibu Popy – MYP Associate, Personal Project Coordinator Pak Nanang- Community.
General Education at Oakland University. General Education  Broad-based knowledge  Skills  Preparation for citizenship, further study, and careers.
Expectations What do you expect from: C&I Faculty? Yourself and other students? The Bachelor of Science in Education Program?
Images from Gallery.html.
Draft implementation plan for our new purposes and objectives for General Education. Interim report of the Task Force on General Education and the Faculty.
General Education Revision Proposal Faculty Meeting – Tuesday, September 1, 2015.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.
The Gold Standard… Faculty are Key.  Annual Assessment based on  Address each SLO  Be specific, measurable, student- focused  Align the new.
Assessment at City Tech April 17, 2015 Living Lab Associate Seminar Susan Nilsen-Kupsch RDH MPA.
AAC&U Members on Recent Trends in General Education Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic.
Members of the CCBC General Education Review Board August 2013 General Education Program at CCBC.
9/22/2010Chem 007 General Education At Widener Scott Van Bramer.
MU Core Revision Proposal The Atom Visual Structure Please read information provided in each slide as well as the notes under each slide.
Laboratory Science and Quantitative Core Requirements.
Core Curriculum Workgroup Presentation to UEAC April 16, 2010.
Have you earned an ? Associate of Arts degree, A.A
CORE + An overview.
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
Academic Affairs Update Monday, April 17, 2017
General Education Review
TRCC TAP Course Vetting: What we have learned so far
Have you earned an ? Associate of Arts degree, A.A
General education reform
Elements of General Education
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
The General Education CLAS Core
NJCU College of Education
Revision of the General Education Curriculum DGE and Department Heads
CORE + An overview.
Charge from Provost The UMKC General Education Program 2.0 Task Force is charged with the review and re-design of the University’s General Education Program.
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
HART RESEARCH A S O T E C I AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
We Have a Mission, a Goal and Objectives… What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

General Education Model Presentation Report from the General Education Oversight Committee to the UMKC Faculty Senate Feb. 21 st, 2012

General Education Models We had multiple criteria we wished to fulfill: – Have an interdisciplinary curriculum. – Follow a developmental strategy. – Show students a clear path through general education. – Empower high-impact learning experiences. – Foster student achievement through cohort groups. We therefore present two models: – The first shows where we started from: assumptions that would show how we thought the content would be delivered under “laboratory” conditions not reflecting UMKC or it’s unique qualities. – The second displays how we adapted the model to the realities of UMKC: Faculty strengths, instructional mission, new and transfer students, etc.

Anchor Courses- linked to Discourse courses Reasoning and Values Culture and DiversityCivic and Community Engagement Interdisciplinary Platform Courses GenEd Bridge experience (1-3 credits) 300 level Model 1 II: 200 level partnered Discourse II: Culture and Diversity III: 300 level partnered Discourse III: Civic & Community Engagement I: 100 level partnered Discourse I: Reasoning and Values 100/200 Arts & Humanities Social & Behavioral Sciences Natural & Physical Sciences Anchor courses are developmentally sequenced and expected to be team taught; they will have cohorting of students and partnering of teachers across the all levels. Course levels in the platform relate to expectations derived in anchor courses above: each will integrate expectations from a specific level of Discourse courses. The “Capstone” experience is ideally experiential: for example, clinic, SEARCH research, internships, semester abroad, etc. It will related to the goals of the GenEd program and students will be expected to write a report about their experiences. There is a pool of approved courses in the platform that relate to each subject area noted.

I: 100 level linked Reasoning and Values Culture and DiversityCivic and Community Engagement Discourse I: Reasoning & Values III: 300 level partnered Discourse III: Civic & Community Engagement Anchor courses are developmentally sequenced and expected to be team taught The Capstone course experience will have cohorting of students and partnering of teachers across the III: 300 level and Discourse III classes. Course levels in the platform relate to expectations derived in anchor courses above: each will integrate expectations from a specific level of Discourse courses. Some Platform courses may be experiential: for example, clinic, SEARCH research, internships, semester abroad, etc. There is a pool of approved courses in the platform that relate to each subject area noted, and these courses will help introduce and discuss disciplinary boundaries. Anchor Courses Platform Courses Reflectively Applied Knowledge and Integration /200/300 Discourse II: Culture and Diversity II: 200 level linked 100/200/300 Arts & Humanities Social & Behavioral Sciences Natural & Physical Sciences General Education Elective Model 2 Gen. Ed. Capstone Courses

General Education Model and Student Learning Outcomes *Platform courses draw from the sciences, arts & humanities, and society. Students may choose content areas and levels of courses, but must complete 12 hours of coursework with a minimum of 3 hours each of the three areas. Many current UMKC course offerings may be approved to fulfill this requirement. Students may select 12 hours of interdisciplinary courses, still meeting the distribution of perspectives from the natural and physical sciences, arts & humanities, and social and behavioral sciences. Interdisciplinary courses will be coded with perspective designations to facilitate selection to meet this requirement. **The General Education elective may draw from any of the approved platform courses but must meet at least some of the learning outcomes identified. Constitution requirement may be met here or elsewhere within General Education. GEOC Model Proposed Courses Level I Courses Level II Courses Prerequisite: Discourse I Platform Courses* Prerequisite: Discourse I or II Level determined by learning outcomes of the course. Level III Courses Prerequisite: Discourse II; Upper-level course required by all transfer students Assessment UMKC General Education Student Learning Outcomes Anchor I: Reasoning and Values(3) Discourse I: Reasoning and Values (3) Anchor II: Culture and Diversity (3) Discourse II: Culture and Diversity (3) Platform: Natural & Physical Sciences (3) Platform: Arts & Humanities (3) Platform: Social & Behavioral Sciences(3) Platform: Gen. Ed Elective (3) Anchor III: Civic & Comm. Engagement (3) Discourse III: Civic & Comm. Engagement (3) Co-Requisites Communication Skills xxxx xxx Technology & Information Literacy x x ** x Interdisciplinary & Innovative Thinking xxxx xx Human Values & Ethical Reasoning (x) x** Culture & Diversity xx x** Civic & Community Engagement xx Scientific Reasoning & Quantitative Analysis (x) x ** Arts & Humanities x **

Sample Course Description Sample Description for a “Reasoning and Values” team-taught course – “Darwin: Scientific and Cultural Texts and Contexts” – Stephen Dilks, Gerald Wyckoff, and more. – The course puts Darwin's major texts, Voyage of the Beagle, Origin of the Species, and The Descent of Man, in the context of his sources and influences. This includes his social milieu, his scientific precursors, the British Anti-Slavery movement, the Victorian Age of Reform and Doubt, and the contemporary literature of natural science, geology, creation, scientific classification, and natural selection. We will discuss social values and scientific reasoning including the roles played by scientific racism, social Darwinism, industrial technology, empirical methodology, and the emancipation movement.