Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Department of Education School of Education and Behavioral Sciences Elementary Education CIP Code Program Code 350 Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Graduates will demonstrate competence in basic skills and in- depth knowledge of the subject matter they teach. (Knowledge, Comprehension, and Application) 2. Graduates will demonstrate professional knowledge and effective pedagogical skills. (Knowledge, Comprehension, and Application) 3.Graduates will demonstrate understanding of student development and create appropriate learning environments. (Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Synthesis) 4. Graduates will demonstrate the ability to think reflectively and critically about the teaching/learning process. (Evaluation) 5. Graduates will demonstrate ability to interact effectively with diverse students, parents/families, and communities. (Knowledge, Comprehension, Application) 6. Graduates will demonstrate ability to use a variety of strategies to assess, analyze, and modify teaching/learning. (Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Synthesis, Evaluation) Department of Education Elementary Education Program Goals and Objectives (Aligned with the Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) and the Oklahoma 15) Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Alignment Among Program Outcomes, CU Mission Statement & Strategic Plan 2013 Program Outcomes CU Mission StatementCU Strategic Plan Graduates will demonstrate competence in basic skills and in-depth knowledge of the subject matter they teach. “The university desires to assist its students and other persons living in its service area in acquiring the skills, knowledge, values, and attitudes that will enable them to lead creative, productive and self-fulfilling lives.” “Maintain and enhance Cameron’s commitment to providing programs of the highest quality in instruction, research and service to better meet the needs of the citizens of the region.” 2. Graduates will demonstrate professional knowledge and effective pedagogical skills. “The university desires to assist its students and other persons living in its service area in acquiring the skills, knowledge, values, and attitudes that will enable them to lead creative, productive and self-fulfilling lives.” “Capitalize on Cameron’s multiple levels of academic programs – associate, baccalaureate, and master’s – to enhance student learning and to increase opportunities for educational advancement.” 3. Graduates will demonstrate understanding of student development and create appropriate learning opportunities. “The university recognizes that the educational process includes the development of the intellectual, cultural, social, physical, moral, and occupational capacities of persons who participate in its programs and activities.” “Assure efficient, effective course delivery in multiple formats.” “Develop a centralized reporting system to monitor and expand student opportunities for service learning, to include internships, civic involvement, and off-campus educational activities.”

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Program OutcomesCU Mission StatementCU Strategic Plan Graduates will demonstrate ability to think reflectively and critically about the teaching/learning process. “The university desires to assist its students and other persons living in its service area in acquiring the skills, knowledge, values, and attitudes that will enable them to lead creative, productive and self-fulfilling lives.” “Maintain and enhance Cameron’s commitment to providing programs of the highest quality in instruction, research and service to better meet the needs of the citizens of the region.” 5. Graduates will demonstrate ability to interact effectively with diverse students, parents/families, and communities. “The university desires to assist its students and other persons living in its service area in acquiring the skills, knowledge, values, and attitudes that will enable them to lead creative, productive and self-fulfilling lives.” “Enhance and promote an active campus life by focusing on athletics, cultural events, student programs, and organizations.” “Expand the number of educational, cultural, and social opportunities for the region.” 6. Graduates will demonstrate ability to use a wide variety of strategies to assess, analyze, and modify teaching/learning. “The university recognizes that the educational process includes the development of the intellectual, cultural, social, physical, moral, and occupational capacities of persons who participate in its programs and activities.” “Maintain and enhance Cameron’s commitment to providing programs of the highest quality in instruction, research and service to better meet the needs of the citizens of the region.” Alignment Among Program Outcomes, CU Mission Statement & Strategic Plan 2013 Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Alignment Among Program Outcomes and Department of Education Mission Program Quality Improvement Report Program OutcomesDepartment of Education Mission 1. Graduates will demonstrate competence in basic skills and in-depth knowledge of the subject matter they teach. Educators who are competent use pedagogical and content knowledge to support learning for all, provide instruction based on standards and student needs, and use assessment and strategies for active engagement so that all can learn. 2. Graduates will demonstrate professional knowledge and effective pedagogical skills. Educators who are competent use pedagogical and content knowledge to support learning for all, provide instruction based on standards and student needs, and use assessment and strategies for active engagement so that all can learn. 3. Graduates will demonstrate understanding of student development and create appropriate learning opportunities. Educators who are caring are responsive to individual needs and create learning environments that promote positive social interactions and motivation. Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Alignment Among Program Outcomes and Department of Education Mission Program OutcomesDepartment of Education Mission 4. Graduates will demonstrate ability to think reflectively and critically about the teaching/learning process. Educators who are committed collaborate with others by using effective communication skills while being reflective decision makers and lifelong learners who are willing to change in order to continuously improve. 5. Graduates will demonstrate ability to interact effectively with diverse students, parents/families, and communities. Educators who are caring are responsive to individual needs and create learning environments that promote positive social interactions and motivation. 6. Graduates will demonstrate ability to use a wide variety of strategies to assess, analyze, and modify teaching/learning. Educators who are committed collaborate with others by using effective communication skills while being reflective decision makers and lifelong learners who are willing to change in order to continuously improve. Program Quality Improvement Report Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report OutcomeAction PlanImplementation #1 Graduates will demonstrate competence in basic skills and in-depth knowledge of the subject matter they teach. Candidates encouraged to take Introduction to Teaching prior to taking OGET. Implement a tutorial writing session for the constructed response item. Implemented by advisor Not implemented, but keep monitoring the scores. #2 Graduates will demonstrate professional knowledge and effective pedagogical skills. Implement a study skills seminar at RSU Continue to monitor the data at both sites in terms of reliability Implemented through SOEA Held meeting with Lawton and RSU supervisors to discuss what evidence should be seen when observing student teachers. Mentor teachers were all part of the discussion during mentor training. Rubric was created for the student teaching assessment to be used by supervisors and mentor teachers. #4 Graduates will demonstrate the ability to think reflectively and critically about the teaching/learning process. Add content of analyzing assessment results into either Practicum or Classroom Assessment course Added content in Practicum and Classroom Assessment. Action Plan Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Direct Measures of Assessment with Remediation Major Assessments (direct)Remediation Entry to Teacher Education Grade Equivalent of 12.0 or higher on the Nelson DennyReading lab activities and resources Passing score on OGETAttend SOEA workshop(s) Passing score on EDUC 3003 lesson plan rubricCandidates submit draft(s) of lesson plan in course prior to final portfolio submission; Resubmit/rescore Entry to student teaching Passing score on OSATOSAT study guide; consult content area textbooks; Study Island Passing score on State Phonics TestProvide with list of resources on phonics; Retake test Satisfactory portfolio check: Passing scores for a minimum of 5 OK competencies as evidenced by course artifacts and instructor-completed rubrics Candidates submit draft(s) of assignments in course prior to final portfolio submission; Resubmit/rescore Exiting student teaching Passing scores for remaining 10 OK competencies as evidenced by course artifacts and instructor-completed rubrics Candidates submit draft(s) of assignments in course prior to final portfolio submission; Resubmit/rescore Completed Teaching Styles checklistNONE One year post- graduation Completion of Follow-up SurveyNONE Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Indirect Measures of Assessment with Remediation Major Assessments (indirect)Remediation Entry to Teacher Education 3 satisfactory recommendation forms with dispositions (1from faculty within dept., 2 from faculty outside dept.) Letter of appeal to Admission & Retention Committee (Teacher Education Council); Recommendation letter from faculty member; 3 new recommendation forms with dispositions (1from faculty within dept., 2 from faculty outside dept.) Grade of “C” or better in the following courses: ENGL 1113, ENGL 1213, COMM 1113, MATH 1513 or higher, HIST 1483 or 1493, PS 1113, 2 Humanities, and EDUC 3003 Retake Course(s) Grade of “S” in EDUC 1800Receive a “U” and attend or retake Completion of Application for Admittance to Teacher EducationNONE Retention GPA of 2.5Academic Probation Concurrent enrollment or a grade of C or better in EDUC 3733 and Bio or Phys Science Retake Course(s) Satisfactory interview including assessment of critical thinking skillsProvide with list of resources (websites, books, articles, etc.) on developing critical thinking skills Entry to student teaching Submission of completed application for student teachingNONE Satisfactory Practicum dispositional assessments in each of the following: Math Methods, Reading Diagnosis, and Practicum (school-based mentor) Faculty member, Chair, and candidate conference; Plan of Improvement created Satisfactory transcript check - minimum GPA of 2.5Academic Probation Minimum of 80 clock hours of field experiences with two diverse field placements completed Additional field experience Exiting student teaching Satisfactory student teaching evaluationsUniversity Supervisor,, and Intern Conference; Develop a Plan of Improvement Minimum retention GPA of 2.5Academic Probation Program completion Completion of exit surveyNONE Minimum retention GPA of 2.5Academic Probation Grade of “C” or better in all elementary education major courses, professional education courses, and courses that fulfill the state 4x12 requirement Retake Course(s) Satisfactory completion of foreign language proficiency requirementsNONE Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Student-Learning Outcome and Measurements Student-Learning Outcome and Measurements PROGRAM OUTCOME 1 CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE MEASUREMENTS OF STUDENT LEARNING Measurements Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments Methods used to determine reliability of measurements Schedule for measurements Graduates will demonstrate competence in basic skills and in- depth knowledge of the subject matter they teach. Elementary education majors OGET-Direct OSAT-Direct Student Teaching Evaluation Results- Indirect Follow-up survey results- Indirect Use of multiple assessors 5 times per year 2 times per year Annually Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Measure 1: OGET Oklahoma General Education Test Criterion-referenced and competency-based state teacher exam Assesses general knowledge A passing score of 240 required for admission to the Teacher Education program, along with other criteria such as an overall GPA of 2.5. Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OGET Critical Thinking: Reading and Communication Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OGET Communication Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OGET Critical Thinking: Mathematics Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OGET Mathematics Computation Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OGET Science, Art & Literature, Social Sciences Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OGET Critical Thinking: Writing Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Analysis of Data: RSU candidates maintained the 100% pass rate. 91% of CU candidates passed. This is a 15% increase over In 2008 – 2009 Cameron candidates only exceeded the state average in three areas: Computation Skills, Liberal Studies: Science, Art & Literature, Social Sciences, and Critical Thinking Skills: Writing. In candidates exceeded the state average in Communication, Liberal Studies: Science, Art & Literature, Social Sciences, and Critical Thinking Skills: Writing. Even though the writing scores exceeded the state average, they are still the lowest as compared to the other areas. Outcome 1 Measure 1: OGET Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Outcome 1 Measure 1: OGET Action Plan: In order to help students improve in the areas of Critical Thinking Skills in Mathematics, Reading and Communication, the Department of Education faculty will work in partnership with the General Education Faculty to review the test result data and the test objectives in order to create an action plan. This could be done by inviting them to be members of the Assessment Advisory Board. ( AY) Program Quality Improvement Report Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Measure 2: OSAT Oklahoma Subject Area Test Criterion-referenced and competency-based state teacher exam Composed of two sub-tests assessing subject content knowledge 1.evaluates through 55 selected response items & 1 constructed response item 2.evaluates through 55 selected response items Passing score of 240 required for admission to student teaching, along with other criteria such as an overall GPA of 2.5. Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OSAT Subtest 1 Reading Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OSAT Subtest 1 Language Arts Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OSAT Subtest 1 Social Studies Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OSAT Subtest 1 Constructed Response Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Outcome 1 Measure 2: OSAT Subtest 1 Analysis of Data: In 09 – 10, 79% of Cameron’s candidates and 100% of RSU’s candidates passed Subtest 1. This is a decline of 5% over last year for CU and an increase of 17% for RSU. CU candidates scored above the state average in but one are (SS) of the test. RSU candidates scored above the state averages in all but one area (LA). The writing scores for the CU campus declined while the RSU campus scores’ increased. This could be because the action plan was implemented by adding tutorial writing sessions through SOEA at the RSU campus. Program Quality Improvement Report Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Action Plan: (Recommended by Assessment Advisory) Take Reading Diagnosis before taking the Elementary OSAT. Add additional writing component to Reading Diagnosis writing exercises that include multistep directions. Emphasize strategy file in Reading Diagnosis course. (Spring 2011) Focus on (emphasize) objectives in the OCTP study guide to help improve test results. This could be accomplished by revisiting alignment among the methods courses’ objectives. (Spring 2011) Outcome 1 Measure 2: OSAT Subtest 1 Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OSAT Subtest 2 Math Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OSAT Subtest 2 Science Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OSAT Subtest 2 Health & Fitness Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OSAT Subtest 2 Fine Arts Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Analysis of Data: 80% of the RSU candidates and 84% of Cameron’s candidates passed Subtest 2. This was a decline of 20% over last year for RSU. This was an increase of 5% for CU. Cameron candidates scored below the state average in math, science, and Fine Arts. RSU candidates scored above the state averages in two areas (science and fine arts). For the CU campus, math continues to be the area with the lowest scores. Outcome 1 Measure 2: OSAT Subtest 2 Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Action Plan: Continue to evaluate the alignment of course objectives in the methods courses with the test objectives. Math test objectives focus on problem-solving, so emphasize in Math Methods course. ( AY) Outcome 1 Measure 2: OSAT Subtest 2 Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Outcome 1 Measure 3: Student Teaching Evaluations Revised beginning Fall 2007 Content addendum added Spring 2008 & scored once per placement Completed by mentor teacher at the end of each of two placements; by university supervisor twice during each placement Two evaluators ensures reliability and validity of scores. RSU students complete student teaching during spring semester only. Remediation provided if needed Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Measure 3: Student Teaching Evaluations - Lawton 1=Does not meet expectations 2=Meets expectations 3=Exceeds expectations Passing = 2 or above Item N= N= N=54 Language Arts Science Mathematics Social Studies The Arts Health Education Physical Education

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Measure 3: Student Teaching Evaluations – RSU 1=Does not meet expectations 2=Meets expectations 3=Exceeds expectations Passing = 2 or above Item n= N=13 Language Arts Science Mathematics Social Studies The Arts Health Education Physical Education

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Outcome 1 Measure 3 Student Teaching Evaluations Analysis of Data: Candidates are scoring well above passing in all areas Action Plan: Continue to monitor Program Quality Improvement Report Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Outcome 1 Measure 4: Follow-Up Survey Completed by school administrator, mentor teacher, and university representative at the end of candidate’s first year of teaching Used to assess how well the program prepared candidates Initial administration in year, compared to , 08-09, data in following chart (Lawton only) Have no data from RSU graduates because Cameron does not supervise resident teachers in NE Oklahoma Program Quality Improvement Report Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Understands the central concepts and methods of inquiry of the subject matter discipline(s) he or she teaches. AdministratorsMentors University Reps. Overall – – Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Measure 4: Follow-up Survey Data Mean Scores for CU Lawton Students Only (selected items,07-08, N=49; 08-09, N=43, 09-10, N=40) 1=Not Acceptable 2=Emerging 3=Competent 4=Exemplary Passing = 3 or above Analysis of Data: Administrators and University Representatives’ ratings increased from to Mentors rated candidates lower from to Action Plan: Consider more in-depth training for mentors so that they clearly understand what they are evaluating in regards to this specific item and how it relates to the candidate’s preparation and experience.

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Follow-Up Survey Program Quality Improvement Report Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Student-Learning Outcome and Measurements Student-Learning Outcome and Measurements PROGRAM OUTCOME 2 CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE MEASUREMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING Measurements Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments Methods used to determine reliability of measurements Schedule for measurements Graduates will demonstrate professional knowledge and effective pedagogical skills. Elementary education majors 1. OPTE- Direct 2. Teacher Work Sample- Direct 3. Student Teaching Evaluation Results- Indirect 4. Follow-up survey results- Indirect Use of multiple assessors 5 times per year 2 times per year Annually Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Measure 1: OPTE Oklahoma Professional Teacher Exam Criterion-referenced and competency-based state teacher exam Assesses professional knowledge & skills 75 selected-response items Constructed-response items consist of 3 written performance modules –Critical Analysis: Candidates analyze an educational issue related to learners and the learning environment. –Student Inquiry: Candidates describe an instructional activity which would help students achieve a specific learning goal. –Teacher Assignment: Candidates apply professional knowledge to evaluate a school or classroom situation and recommend a course of action. Passing score of 240 required to obtain an Oklahoma Teaching License Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OPTE: Learners in the Learning Environment Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OPTE: Instruction and Assessment Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OPTE: The Professional Environment Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OPTE: Critical Analysis Module Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OPTE: Student Inquiry Module Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Multi-Year Trend Chart OPTE: Teacher Assignment Module Overall Scores

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Analysis of Data: In 09 – 10, 100% of RSU candidates passed, while 96% of CU candidates passed. This was consistent for RSU; however, it’s a 3% increased for CU over last year. Also, Cameron candidates scored above the state average in all areas except two. RSU candidates scored above the state average in four areas and fell below state average in the areas the Professional Environment, and the Teacher Assignment Module. This is consistent with last year; however, scores increased in Instruction and Assessment over last year. Action Plan: (Recommended by Assessment Advisory ) Develop writing exercises that include multi-step directions; Focus on objectives in the OCTP Study Guide. (Spring 2011) Outcome 2 Measure 1: OPTE Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Measure 2: Teacher Work Sample Multi-week thematic unit created by the teacher candidate Taught in a public school classroom under guidance of a public school mentor teacher Organized into 6 “factors” or sections Emphasis on using assessment to guide instruction & achieving student learning gains Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Teacher Work Sample Factor 2: Unit Goals and Objectives Program Quality Improvement Report Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Teacher Work Sample Factor 4: Instructional Design Program Quality Improvement Report Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Outcome 2: Measure 2 Teacher Work Sample Data Analysis of Data: Scores indicate students are competent in professional knowledge and skills More candidates have exceeding scores in Unit Goals and Objectives as compared to Instructional Design. Candidates who have “not met” scores are given an opportunity to reach the competent level. Action Plan: None at this time Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Outcome 2: Measure 3 Student Teaching Evaluations – Lawton Mentor Teacher Ratings 1=Does not meet expectations 2=Meets expectations 3=Exceeds expectations Passing = 2 or above Item N= N= N=58 Follows Oklahoma Criteria for Teaching Performance Reviews and revises decisions based on evidence Is sensitive to student needs Willingness to use or familiarity with technology Takes advantage of professional growth opportunities

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Outcome 2: Measure 3 Student Teaching Evaluations - Lawton University Supervisor Ratings 1=Does not meet expectations 2=Meets expectations 3=Exceeds expectations Passing = 2 or above Item N= N= N=58 Follows Oklahoma Criteria for Teaching Performance Reviews and revises decisions based on evidence Is sensitive to student needs

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Mentor Teacher Ratings 1=Does not meet expectations 2=Meets expectations 3=Exceeds expectations Passing = 2 or above Outcome 2: Measure 3 Student Teaching Evaluations - RSU Item N= N=13 Follows Oklahoma Criteria for Teaching Performance Reviews and revises decisions based on evidence Is sensitive to student needs Willingness to use or familiarity with technology Takes advantage of professional growth opportunities

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Item N= N=13 Follows Oklahoma Criteria for Teaching Performance Reviews and revises decisions based on evidence Is sensitive to student needs Outcome 2: Measure 3 Student Teaching Evaluations - RSU University Supervisor Ratings 1=Does not meet expectations 2=Meets expectations 3=Exceeds expectations Passing = 2 or above 56

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Outcome 2 Measure 3 Student Teaching Evaluations Analysis of Data: Candidates are well above passing. Overall data shows a slight dip in scores for Lawton students candidates and a slight increase for RSU students. This may be due to the “leveling” meeting that occurred in fall Action Plan: Continue to monitor the data at both sites in terms of reliability. Program Quality Improvement Report Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Measure 4: Follow Up Survey Data Mean Scores for CU Students Only (selected items, N=49; 08-09, N=43; 09-10, N=40) 1=Not Acceptable 2=Emerging 3=Competent 4=Exemplary Passing = 3 or above YearRating Party Administrators Mentors University Reps Overall – 08 Administrators Mentors University Reps Overall – 09 Administrators Mentors University Reps Overall Administrators Mentors University Reps Overall Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Item 8. Creates learning experiences that make the subject matter meaningful to students. Item 10. Uses a variety of communication techniques to foster active inquiry Item 11. Plans instruction based upon curriculum goals 58

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: YearRating Party Administrators Mentors University Reps Overall – 08 Administrators Mentors University Reps Overall – 09 Administrators Mentors University Reps Overall Administrators Mentors University Reps Overall Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Item 17. Understand the process of continuous, life-long learning Item 19. Actively seeks opportunities for continuous professional growth. Item 22. Understands and develops instructional strategies/plans based on OK core curriculum Measure 4: Follow Up Survey Data Mean Scores for CU Students Only (selected items, N=49; 08-09, N=43; 09-10, N=40) 1=Not Acceptable 2=Emerging 3=Competent 4=Exemplary Passing = 3 or above 59

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Follow-Up Survey-Item 8 Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Follow-Up Survey-Item 10 Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Follow-Up Survey-Item 11 Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Follow-Up Survey-Item 17 Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Follow-Up Survey-Item 19 Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Follow-Up Survey-Item 22 Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Analysis of Data: Students scored well above passing on all items. Administrators rated graduates higher in nearly all items during Steady gains indicated on item 10 over the years may indicate that action plan for that item was successfully implemented Action Plan: Continue modeling how to find and use PASS objectives for students in Intro to Teaching and methods courses where students create lesson plans and units of instruction. Bring in professional development opportunities for students on campus such as OEA teaching consultants or other guest speakers. Outcome 2 Measure 4: Follow-up Survey Results

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Student-Learning Outcome and Measurements Student-Learning Outcome and Measurements PROGRAM OUTCOME 4 CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE MEASUREMENTS OF STUDENT LEARNING Measurements Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments Methods used to determine reliability of measurements Schedule for measurements Graduates will demonstrate the ability to think reflectively and critically about the teaching/learni ng process. Elementary education majors 1. Teacher Work Sample- Direct 2. Student Teaching Evaluation Results- Indirect 3. Follow-up survey results- Indirect Use of multiple assessors 2 times per year Annually Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Measure 1:Teacher Work Sample Factor 5: Analysis of Learning Program Quality Improvement Report Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Measure 1:Teacher Work Sample Factor 6: Reflection on Teaching and Learning Program Quality Improvement Report Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Outcome 4: Measure 1 Teacher Work Sample Data Analysis of Data: Most candidates exceed the criteria on this assessment, therefore indicates the program outcome is being met. Candidates who have “not met” scores are given an opportunity to reach the competent level. Action Plan: None at this time. Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Outcome 4: Measure 2 Student Teaching Evaluations - Lawton 1=Does not meet expectations 2=Meets expectations 3=Exceeds expectations Passing = 2 or above University Supervisor Ratings Mentor Teacher Ratings Item N= N= N=58 Is a reflective decision maker N= N= N=58 Is a reflective decision maker

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report =Does not meet expectations 2=Meets expectations 3=Exceeds expectations Passing = 2 or above Fall 2010 Outcome 4: Measure 2 Student Teaching Evaluations - RSU Item N= N=13 Is a reflective decision maker N= N=13 Is a reflective decision maker University Supervisor Ratings Mentor Teacher Ratings 72

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Outcome 4 Measure 2 Student Teaching Evaluations Analysis of Data: Candidates are well above passing. Overall data shows a slight dip in scores for Lawton students candidates and a slight increase for RSU students. This may be due to the “leveling” meeting that occurred in fall Action Plan: Continue to monitor the data at both sites in terms of reliability. Program Quality Improvement Report Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Measure 3: Follow Up Survey Data Mean Scores for CU Lawton Students Only (selected items,07-08, N=49; 08-09, N=43; 09-10, N=40) 1=Not Acceptable 2=Emerging 3=Competent 4=Exemplary Passing = 3 or above YearRating Party 16: Evaluates the effects of his/her choices and actions on others and modifies those actions when needed. 18:Displays the willingness to change when change will lead to greater student learning and development Administrators Mentors University Reps Overall – 08 Administrators Mentors University Reps Overall – 09 Administrators Mentors3.86 University Reps Overall Administrators Mentors University Reps Overall Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Follow-Up Survey-Item 16 Fall Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Multi-Year Trend Chart Follow-Up Survey-Item 18 Fall Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Outcome 4: Measure 3 Follow-up Survey Results Analysis of Data: Students scored well above passing on all items. Administrators’ and mentors’ ratings were consistent in Administrators rated candidates the lowest in University Reps rated candidates the lowest in Action Plan: Consider implementing the Fred Jones model into the Classroom Management course. Fall

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Outcome 4: Measure 3 Follow-up Survey Results Analysis of Data: All ratings well above average for each item rated Administrator and Mentor ratings were down in from in both items, while University Rep. ratings increased. Action Plan: The residency committees are no longer a state requirement, we will be using a new way to gather the data only from graduates, university faculty, and principal (as available).

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Published information on graduates 09-10* Entered Graduate School Working In DisciplineUnknown Fall 2009 (n=30)2244 Spring 2010 (n=27)1210 Total (n=57) Entered Graduate School Working In DisciplineUnknown Spring 2010 (n=13) 066 Total 066 Lawton RSU Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report *Status of students not included above is known: awaiting certification, job hunting, or electing not to work. 79

Program Name: Elementary Education CIP Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Questions? Fall