Table 1Table 2Table 3 Table 4Table 5Table 6. AMBASSADOR DESIGN TEAM MEETING #12 JUNE 3, 2015.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Ensuring Quality Feedback Reports: The Tech Editing Process for 2014 Briefing for.

Advertisements

+ Multiple Viewpoints, One Voice: Writing and Editing a Comprehensive Self- Study Leanne Owen, Ph.D. Holy Family University.

Kris Shaw Language Arts and Literacy Consultant

Teamwork. Can be in person or virtually. Organizing a Team Project Appoint a group manager Define a clear and definite goal Identify the type of document.

“Casting the Net” Building Consensus 2009 National Leadership Conference April 24, 2009 Lacosta Resort Carlsbad, California.

NAMES COUNCIL MEETINGS PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL RULES.

Bell-work Focus: Working in a team Explain the responsibilities of each of the following: Reporter Recorder( also called scribe) Information gatherer Leader.

Meetings, Meetings, Meetings Can they be better? YES! Kathleen Paulo, MSW 1.

Welcome and Questions? Day 4. Component 6: Procedures for Record Keeping & Decision Making.

Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities Presented by Jeanna Mullins, Mid-South Regional Resource Center, RRCP Document developed by members of the Systems.

Whose Job Is It? Part Two © Iowa Association of School Boards At the Board Table Discussion Tool.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.

IS 460 Notes Your IS 460 Strategic Planning Project By Thomas Hilton.

Bylaws, Rules, and Periodic Review – Updates from Standards and Practices Julie Adams, ASCCC Executive Director Craig Rutan, ASCCC South Representative.

Getting Ready for edTPA TM Jennie Whitcomb University of Colorado at Boulder 1 The edTPA trademarks are owned by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford.

Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.

Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,

Trinity County Collaborative Group Public Meeting April 12, 2013.

STRATEGIC PLANNING INTERNAL ENGAGEMENT TEAM KICKOFF January 2015.

Charter Review Recommendations - 1 Presentation Title Subtitle (optional) Date Vancouver City Council Workshop/Public Hearing Staff, Title Charter Review.

Ambassador Design Team meeting #6 March 25, 2015.

Ambassador Design Team meeting #5 March 11, 2015.

WECC Section 4.9 Review Update Town Hall Meeting August 26, 2015.

Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI STEERING TEAM TRAINING Selecting the Areas of Concern Document

 Each person read essay aloud  Each classmate note any concerns  Writer will then decide if you want to do any editing. If you do, return whole folder.

STRATEGIC PLANNING Final Draft June Agenda Highlights of Final ADT Meeting Sharing the plan What’s next?

AMBASSADOR DESIGN TEAM MEETING #10. WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS.

e5 & Professional Learning Presented by Camp Hill TPL Team 2010.

Ambassador Design Team meeting #3 February, 2015.

Table 1Table 2Table 3 Table 4Table 5Table 6. Ambassador Design Team meeting #9 April 22, 2015.

Policy Oversight Committee Update Board of Directors Meeting June 25-26, 2012 Stuart C. Sweet, MD, PhD.

Ambassador Design Team meeting #8 April 8, What’s your 6 word story for today? For example: “ADT is hearing the public’s feedback.” Write yours!

GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.

Ambassador Design Team meeting #7 April 1, What’s your 6 word story for today? For example: “ADT is hearing the public’s feedback.” Write yours!

Strategic Planning March The Community in the Process ~11,000 responses to the survey & 3,000 committed to continued involvement 150 people organized.

Ambassador Design Team meeting #4 February 25, 2015.

STRATEGY REVIEW TEAM (SRT) February 26, 2015 SRT LAUNCH & PRIORITIES IDENTIFICATION.

Writing in the 3-8 ELA Modules New to NTI Teachers/Coaches Session 5.

The Texas Legislature.

STRATEGIC PLANNING PRE-FEEDBACK: STRATEGIES ALL RIDE April 2015.

Strategic Planning Prototype Feedback Cycle 2 March 2015.

Ambassador Design Team meeting #2 January 29, 2015.

AMBASSADOR DESIGN TEAM INFO SESSION DECEMBER 1, 2014.

Strategic Planning Process Summary January The Players in the Process (1)The Council on Elementary and Secondary Education: The body that: (1) has.

STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo.

Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.

Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 3.

PLC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY November 17/December 15/January 19 Jeremy Koselak Secondary RtI Coordinator.

Key Functions & Responsibilities (from the old governance document) – Coordinates the program-level adaptive management system and assists the GITs in.

Revising The Bylaws CSD 11 Presidents Council and CSD 11 Title 1 DPAC For trainings please

Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.

Summary of potential priority actions for CMWG Case Management Working Group Meeting 8-9 July 2009.

Contents Major issue states and transitions Tools.

ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.

Identifying and Developing Future Principal Supervisors September 29, 2015 Ben Fenton Gina Ikemoto.

An Integrated Approach to the Future Role of the RCARO in Support of the RCA Programme.

Wrap-up and Next steps Donatella & Bri

Chapter 15 Enhancing Family Functioning Relationships

Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities

Aim: What type of Committees exist in Congress?

Embedding Foundation Skills in ACE Course Activities

Getting Started with lead improvement team

Robert’s Rules of Order

Analyzing the Task Prompt

Robert’s Rules of Order

Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities

HOLDING MEETINGS.

Whose Job Is It? Part Two At the Board Table Discussion Tool

District of Innovation

Providing Effective Feedback to Students

Presentation transcript:

Table 1Table 2Table 3 Table 4Table 5Table 6

AMBASSADOR DESIGN TEAM MEETING #12 JUNE 3, 2015

Definitions of Success

Process GPS

TODAY Make Substantial Revisions Based Upon Feedback NEXT MEETING Clarifying Feedback Wordsmithing Smaller Edits

Meeting Values Curiosity Empathy Optimism

Evolution of Prototype 4 Revisions

Sources of In-Person Feedback Board State House Chamber of Commerce School Committees Teachers RIDE

Summary of In-Person Feedback Missing actors Aligning outcomes to strategies Instructional core? Role of families? PD for everyone

Clarifying Feedback vs. Revisions Based Upon Feedback

Context of Highlighted Changes Based on feedback from a considerable number of significant sources Default is to Accept Changes in Plan If it’s not highlighted, it’s not up for conversation…yet.

Activity #1 – Read & React

Read and React to 5 “Other” Priorities in Plan Read 5 “other” priorities of plan Sticky note strong disagreement with proposed changes “I strongly suggest you reject this edit because…”

Activity #2 – Improve

First Pass – Highlighted Text Only – Accept, Edit or Reject Read priority highlighted changes & ADT stickies

First Pass – Highlighted Text Only – Accept, Edit or Reject Clarifying questions to staff member Discussion Proposal to: Accept as written Accept content, but hold for editing Reject Vote – majority rules

Second Pass – Address Highlighted Text Held for Editing Group write using LCD Majority vote to accept the proposed edits

Third Pass – Address Additional Feedback Review ADT Crocodoc to determine if substantive changes should be made to improve the document

Staff Member Role Is: Recorder Timekeeper Process checker Clarifier Is NOT: Advocate Writer

Activity #3 – Priority Report Out

Next Steps

Decide on Editing Options -Option 1- appoint a representative from each team to serve on editing committee to work virtually with us -Option 2 - we propose edits with tracked changes to review as homework prior to 6/17 meeting -Please vote as a group

Additional (Optional) HW Tasks Glossary editing (2-3 people) Preamble editing (2-3 people)

Closing Thoughts

If Time Allows

EndorsementEndorsement with a Minor Point of Contention Agreement with Reservations Stand AsideFormal Disagreement Move to drop Safety as a value in Prototype 4.