PBT Profiler Helps Identify Persistent, Bioconcentrating and Toxic Chemicals Workshop on PBT Reduction Activities and Opportunities, NEWMOA Web Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Consumer Exposure Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A ccomplishments and Opportunities for Global Collaboration Thomas Brennan.
Advertisements

Jim Jones Acting Assistant Administrator Office of Chemical Safety & Pollution Prevention 1.
PBT – P2 Preventing Pollution: A Tool to Reduce and Eliminate Persistent Toxic Substances in the Great Lakes Basin.
P2 Framework and Sustainable Futures: Designing / Selecting Safer Chemicals Bill Waugh December 3, 2004 Lowell Center for Sustainable Production.
Sustainable Approaches: Industrial Ecology and Pollution Prevention Chapter 21 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Transition to Safer Substitutes n Propyl Bromide Case Study Liz Harriman Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Challenges and opportunities for effective implementation of TSCA Joel A. Tickner, ScD School of Health and Environment, UMASS Lowell US EPA National Pollution.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan Chief, Existing Chemicals Branch, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention.
1 Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS): U.S. Update.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.
Green Chemistry Section 18.5
P2 Framework Models Overview Jan P2 Framework Models Overview Bill Waugh U.S. EPA
Controlling Toxic Chemicals: Production, Use, and Disposal Chapter 19 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Web-based “Green” Munitions Analytical Compliance System (G-MACS) Presented by Kevin Kennedy VP, Operations 706 Route 15 South, Suite 207 Lake Hopatcong,
The Path Forward: Green Chemistry and Chemicals Policy Reform Ken Zarker, Manager Pollution Prevention & Regulatory Assistance Section
Chemical Screening Programs Ted Smith Dale Phenicie.
1 Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic Pollutants Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic Pollutants Programme (PBT) launched by the EPA in 1998: - Reduce.
Chemicals Policy – A View from the United States Joel Tickner, ScD, Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
Washington Toxics Reduction Strategy PPRC Roundtable October 24, 2012 Holly Davies, PhD Washington State Department of Ecology.
Energy & Materials Flow & Cost Tracker (EMFACT) Terri Goldberg, NEWMOA.
UNEP POPs Negotiations Background Mandate Status Report Relevance to Great Lakes.
Environmental Issues and Cancer Prevention Strategies.
Characterizing Chemical in Commerce: Using Data on High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals December 12, 2006 L. Twerdok, Ph.D, DABT NPPTAC Member Report.
Update on the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) Program February 2005.
1 Discussion of the 2006 Inventory Update Reporting Data December 12, 2006 Nhan Nguyen U.S. EPA.
Executive Order Greening the Government Through Leadership in Environmental Management.
REACH Industry Update WERCS US User Group Meeting 2008 Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy.
Oregon Toxics Reduction Strategy: Tools and Initiatives June 25, NW NAHMMA Conference Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ Agency Toxics Coordinator
Oregon Toxics Reduction & Green Chemistry PPRC Roundtable – October 24, 2012 Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ Agency Toxics Coordinator
United States Chemicals Management Petroleum Sector Approach Jennifer Galvin, PhD, DABT, CIH Sound Management of Chemicals Working Group – Stakeholder.
The Use of the Risk Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI) Program to evaluate 13 Counties of Northwest Florida TRI & RSEI Evaluations.
November 8, 2011 Improving Public Access to Pollution Prevention, Toxic Chemical Safety, and Greener Products Beginning from Data to Results 11/8/2011.
The project is funded by The European Union The project is implemented by IOMC June 2015 Introduction to the IOMC Toolbox for Decision-Making in Chemicals.
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency October 25, 2005 Region 2 Emerging Chemicals Workshop.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
1 Selected Current and Suggested Ideas on Uses of HPV Challenge Data Nhan Nguyen US EPA Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce: Using Data on High Production.
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA) Yunmi Lee (period 6 )
Identifying “Greener” Analytical Methods in NEMI for More Environmentally Friendly Monitoring Jennifer L. Young 1, Paul T. Anastas 1 and Lawrence H. Keith.
1 EPA Regulatory Authority and PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
Paul Leinster Director Environmental Protection. Overview Spearheads Regulatory & Charging Strategy Move towards Environmental Risk Based Regulation Integration.
Quantitative Assessment of Cumulative Impacts: Challenges and Progress Lauren Zeise Cal/EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment CAPCOA Workshop:
Overview of the NSF 375 Draft Sustainability for the Water Treatment and Distribution Industry October 30, 2012.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Jesse Eaves US EPA
Risk Assessment and Monitoring for Environmental Chemicals. DEYSI VEGARA CRUZ Name of organization that you belong to Social Security Panama, The Panama.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
Industry environmental self- monitoring and reporting UK experience with reference to the Pollution Inventory Dr Ian Whitwell The Environment Agency of.
HC Screening State of the Science Reports Update to the ICG February 14th/05 Presented by: Bette Meek Existing Substances Division Health Canada.
ROPES & GRAY LLP Chemical Policy Reform: State/Federal Approaches Mark Greenwood.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
ChemSTEER Chemical Screening Tool for Exposures & Environmental Releases Scott Prothero US EPA AIHCE May 25, 2000.
Design for the Environment Program Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce Austin, Texas December 13, 2006 Clive Davies U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Environmental Summit May 20, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Developing PRTR Systems in Europe : EPER, E-PRTR and the PRTR Protocol Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Programme October 15, 2007.
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review 1 2 nd Global Round Table on PRTRs 25 November 2015 Andreas Grangler.
Environmental Protection Agency 1 The High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) Demonstration and Status National Environmental Partnership Summit.
EPA National Pollution Prevention Update Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Pollution Prevention Division.
1 TASK 3.2 C CMEP Mandate Mario Carere, Chiara Maggi, Bernd Gawlik, Valeria Dulio.
Design for the Environment – Recognition for Safer Products Federal Environmental Symposium East Breakout Session 2.8: “Developing, Testing, and Deploying.
GHS as a basis for sound management of Chemicals Regional GHS Workshop for The Caribbean 3-5 September 2013 St. Ann, Jamaica UNITAR.
IEc INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, INCORPORATED Attributing Benefits to Voluntary Programs: Practical and Defensible Approaches Cynthia Manson, Principal June 23,
Design for the Environment Program Overview April 6 th, 2005.
How Humans Impact the Environment. Why Do We Pollute the Environment? The “Environment” divisions The natural environment The built environment The social.
Green Chemistry at Ecology and Northwest Green Chemistry
Decision Contexts in a Changing Toxicology Paradigm
Outsourcing development
Ken Grimm National Environmental Partnership Summit May 10, 2006
Energy & Materials Flow & Cost Tracker (EMFACT)
Presentation transcript:

PBT Profiler Helps Identify Persistent, Bioconcentrating and Toxic Chemicals Workshop on PBT Reduction Activities and Opportunities, NEWMOA Web Conference Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2003 Ihab H. Farag, Sc.D., P.E. Hamel Professor of Innovation and Technology Chemical Eng Dept University of New Hampshire (UNH) Durham, NH 03824-3591,USA Phone: 1-603-862-2313, fax: 1-603-862-3747 email:ihab.farag@unh.edu

What is the PBT Profiler? Estimate Persistence, Bioconcentration Potential, and Fish Chronic Toxicity of a Chemical From the Structure Compares predictions to EPA regulatory criteria for PBT-related action under TRI and TSCA New Chemical Program (PMNs), and to international criteria Provides PBT-related data previously unavailable Measured data retrieved if available Predictions when data are lacking Useful when data are lacking about the chemical

Chemicals and PBTs PBT Profiler PBT Profiler Demo Next steps PBT Profiler: Helps Identify Persistent, Bioconcentrating and Toxic Chemicals Agenda Chemicals and PBTs PBT Profiler PBT Profiler Demo Next steps 2

R&D Process - Status Quo Performance Availability Cost Chemicals Meeting All the Desired Criteria Will Be Evaluated Based on Additional Criteria: Market Research Final Product Development

Drugs, Cosmetics, Food Additives Chemicals in Commerce Industrial Chemicals ~80,000 On TSCA Inventory 2,000 new chemicals/year Relatively little Hazard data are available Stakeholders make chemical choices among competing products / processes Stakeholders are often forced to choose among chemicals without information on PBT tradeoffs. Which chemicals are PBTs? Pesticides ~2000 Drugs, Cosmetics, Food Additives ~2,000

Chemicals Are Considered PBTs If They Meet EPA and/or International PBT Criteria For Environmental Persistence AND Bioconcentration Potential AND Toxicity 3

Persistence (P) Criteria and Color scheme in PBT Profiler Green Font Orange Font Red Font

Bioconcentration (B) Criteria and Color scheme in PBT Profiler Green Font Orange Font Red Font

Fish Chronic Toxicity (T) Criteria and Color scheme in PBT Profiler Green Font Orange Font Red Font

Which Chemical is a PBT? A B C D

Status of the PBT Profiler Created by EPA to address the PBT Initiative Developed as a collaborative effort with industry (ACC, SOCMA, CCC) and NGOs (ED) Beta tested by more than 100 participants from industry, academia, and government Peer Reviewed following EPA’s Peer Review Guidelines and Peer Review is posted on EPA’s E-Docket http://cascade.epa.gov/RightSite/dk_public_home.htm, “quick search” for “PBT Profiler” Released to the public in Sept 2002 and available at no cost at www.pbtprofiler.net

Why EPA Is Making The PBT Profiler Available to Industry? Help Industry Pre-Screen Chemical Alternatives Understand Potential PBT Characteristics Of Product Alternatives Under Consideration at R&D Understand Potential PBT Trade-offs of Alternatives Under Consideration Reduce Product Development Costs Stimulate the Development of Environmentally Preferable Products and Processes

Hazard-related Information from PBT Profiler Once released, will chemical go to air, water, soil, sediment? How long will chemical stay in media? Will chemical present a hazard?

PBT Profiler Environmental Media Compartments Air Soil Water Sediment

www.pbtprofiler.net

PBT Profiler

PBT Profiler 11

(Input o-Xylene, CAS 95-47-6) PBT Profiler (Input o-Xylene, CAS 95-47-6)

PBT Profiler (o-Xylene, CAS 95-47-6) 12

PBT Profiler (o-Xylene, CAS 95-47-6) 12

PBT Profiler (Output o-Xylene, CAS 95-47-6) 13

Flag for Chemicals on PBT Lists Benz(a)anthracene (CAS 56-55-3) New TRI Reporting Threshold = 100 lbs 26

Benz(a)anthracene (CAS 56-55-3) New TRI Reporting threshold: 100 lbs

Limitations of the PBT Profiler Over 60% of the 80,000 Chemicals on the TSCA Inventory Can Be Profiled using the PBT Profiler Chemicals That Can Be Profiled (62%) Discrete organics Mixtures with representative component 62% 38% Chemicals That Should Not Be Profiled (38%) Complex products (e.g., distillates and rosin) Natural products (e.g., oils, tallow, and enzymes) Chemicals of unknown structure (e.g., reaction products, ores) Metals and metal salts Polymers

Chemicals That Should Not be Profiled Using the PBT Profiler Chemicals With Experimental Data - Don’t use predicted data when measured data exist! Inorganic Chemicals Chemicals that Rapidly Hydrolyze - Acid Halides; Isocyanates; Sulfonyl Chlorides; Siloxanes; alpha‑Chloro ethers. Note: hydrolysis products can be evaluated. Cationic salts of Group I, Group II, Transition metals, Actinide, and Lathanide Organo Metallic Compounds Highly Reactive Compounds High MW Compounds, polymers, chems w MW >1,000 Mixtures – Each substance in mixture can be evaluated Chemicals with Unknown or Variable Composition

Example of Flag for Mixtures Mixed Xylenes (CAS 1330-20-7) Example of Flag for Mixtures

CAS 7439-97-6

PBT Profiler Security and Anonymity All connections to the PBT Profiler are completely anonymous No user-entered or chemical information is purposefully or systematically written to a disk drive or other permanent storage device The only data collected are the number of PBT Profiles run

PBT Profiler User Quotes “The PBT profiler is an excellent tool to add to my risk assessment of existing and new chemicals” “I will encourage my chemists to use it in their research projects in addition to the regulatory/tox assessment that I am responsible for.” “We think this is a useful tool... for new raw’s we will surely check it.” “This fits in well with our internal policy on lifecycle analysis and product stewardship.” “The PBT Profiler is an excellent instrument for a first screening of the potential impacts of substances”

P2 & PBT screening in the absence of data PBT Comparison of Solvent A and Potential new Alternatives (B,C) All solvents have no data High Moderate Low

The key to managing PBTs is Pollution Prevention The EPA PBT Profiler is an excellent tool for Chemical Choosers and Chemical Formulators

PBT Profiler: Next Steps UNH Provides technology transfer and technical assistance in PBT Profiler Identify industry partners interested in using the PBT Profiler in case studies/success stories. Identify Small Business partners interested in using the PBT profiler in the decision making process. 1 23

PBT Profiler Contacts Ihab Farag, UNH ph: 603-862-2313 ihab.farag@unh.edu fax: 603-862-3747 Dwight Peavey, EPA R1 ph: 617-918-1829 peavey.dwight@epa.gov fax: 617-918-1810 Bill Waugh, USEPA ph: 202-564-7657 waugh.bill@epa.gov fax: 202-564-9063 Maggie Wilson, USEPA ph: 202-564-8924 wilson.maggie@epa.gov fax: 202-564-9063

Acknowledgment UNH efforts are funded by grants from EPA OPPT Bill Waugh 202-564-7657 Maggie Wilson 202-564-9063 Dwight Peavey 617-918-1829

Thank you for your time. 219