Sunshine Farms P O Box 1777 Clanton, AL 35045 205-755-4203 Using Ultrasound Data in a Seedstock Production Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Controlled Breeding Chandler Akins GJCA Officer Convention Coordinator.
Advertisements

Selection and Judging of Beef
Professor N. Nelson Blue Mtn. Agriculture College.
Animal Breeding Systems
Replacement Heifers: Target Weights, Target Dates, and Fat Supplementation Replacement Heifers: Target Weights, Target Dates, and Fat Supplementation Rick.
Beef Production.  In this unit you learn about: Breeds and their Characteristics. Gestation Periods & Oestrous Cycle Dental Formula Grazing Systems Target.
BEEF PRODUCTION Beef. Introduction  The beef industry in Ireland is the largest sector of the Irish Agricultural Economy  There are 4.5 million beef.
Organic Beef Production – Sire breed comparison Richard Fallon, Brendan Swan & Elaine Leavy Organic Production Research Conference 2nd December 2008.
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
BEEF COW CALF & SEEDSTOCK INDUSTRY By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Unit 10: Beef Cattle Chapters 25 & 26.
20 th Anniversary of Ultrasound “Twenty Years of Progress”
Sexed Semen and Beef Cattle UW Extension Livestock Team Spring 2010.
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IS AI FOR YOU? PUREBRED COMMERCIAL.
Making the Web equal Profit Surfing for Genetics Dorian Garrick & Mark Enns Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
Value Difference of Feeder Cattle
Reproductive Management of the Cow Herd
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
Grass-finished Genetics Dan Glenn Deep Grass Graziers.
Cow-Calf Operations Makenna Ramos April 10, 2012 Animal Science.
Economic Feasibility of Adopting Genomic Selection in Beef Cattle Kenneth Poon & Getu Hailu University of Guelph CAES 2010, Niagara Falls June 18 th, 2010.
EPD 101 PredictingProfit… Red Angus – EPD 101. EPD 101 Members (Seedstock producers) succeed through enabling the success (profit) of their commercial.
Beef Production. Terms to Know Polled –born naturally without horns Horned –Born naturally with the ability to grow horns….may never grow though Marbling.
Daryl Strohbehn, Ph.D. Emeritus Professor Iowa State University Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Ext. Cow-Calf Specialist Kansas State University.
Heterosis – The Forgotten Tool? Dr. Tom Field Colorado State University Dr. Andy Herring Texas A&M University Cattlemen’s College 2005 NCBA Meeting, San.
Cow Fertility How can we affect it?. Objectives Identify three management areas Make a vaccination calendar Have a basic understanding of the body condition.
From Conception to Carcass 2006 National Angus Conference Mike Kasten.
Beef Evaluation and Pricing continued. Estimating Yield Grade Visually evaluate animal for differences in fat and muscle Shape.
Systems of Crossbreeding – Experiences in Research & Do’s and Don’ts R. Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Economic Effects of Estrus Synchronization and Artificial Insemination Dr. Les Anderson Beef Extension Specialist University of Kentucky Dr. Les Anderson.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
JAMAICA HOPE A Solution to Your Needs for Tropical Dairy Cattle Genetics
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
Show-Me-Select Replacement ™ Heifer Program Dr. Joe Parcell University of Missouri – Columbia.
Wade Shafer American Simmental Association. In the pursuit of genetic improvement all traits are antagonistically related to each other.
Characterizing Change in the Beef Industry Justin W. Waggoner, Ph.D. Beef Systems Specialist Kansas State University Garden City, KS.
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
Ottensmeier Angus A DECADE OF EXCELLENT ANGUS CATTLE.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Identifying Genetic Antagonisms Megan Rolf Oklahoma State University.
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
Beef Cattle Production
Achieving NISBP Targets – Stephen Maguire. Starting Baseline NISBP Av farm size (Ha adj Grassland) 118 (69ha owned) Av Cow herd 93 Av Stocking rate (LU/ha)
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
NBCEC Brown Bagger: Economic Selection Index Wade Shafer American Simmental Association.
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
The Five P’s of Marketing Product Packaging Place Price Promotion “The Purple Cow”
Challenges with Heifer Selection – HOW MANY Should I Breed, and What are they worth? Dr. Ron Lemenager Beef Extension Specialist
University of Minnesota Beef Improvement Federation
Selecting Herd Bull Beef Production Game. What is the job of our bull? Produce sperm Pass on quality genetics of rate of gain, muscling, structure Physically.
Cow Herd Performance Testing. Introduction Help evaluate economically important traits Calving ease Birth weight Weaning weight Calving interval Calf.
Charolais By: Maria and Aaron. Breed Characteristics They are usually white in color with a pink muzzle and pale hooves. There are now Charolais cattle.
Beef Cattle. BEFORE THE 1960’s… Approximately 20 different breeds were available in the United States. Today, there are over 70 breeds found in the United.
Research update Dr. Ron Lemenager Beef Extension Specialist
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Cow-Calf Enterprise Standardized Performance Analysis.
Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle Susan Keene A portion of these slides work of: Matthew I. Miller Extension Agent Animal Science This presentation is from.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
Using EPDs in Selection
From Conception to Carcass
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
WHAT ARE EPD’s?.
Using EPDs in Selection
Genetic Selection- More ways than 1!
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Presentation transcript:

Sunshine Farms P O Box 1777 Clanton, AL Using Ultrasound Data in a Seedstock Production Program

Sunshine Farms Sunshine Farms is located in Central Alabama and produces Sim- Angus bulls for commercial producers in the Southeastern states. The cowherd consists of 400 Sim-Angus, Angus and Simmental cows that calve Sept-Nov. The top 50% of bull calves are developed and sold as yearlings in an annual Bull Sale the first Saturday in December and at private treaty. Additional bulls are developed from a group of six breeders that operate as the Sunshine Group. Ten small cooperator herds also produce bulls for the program. A total of 250 bulls have been marketed from the 2004 calf crop. Complete performance and ultrasound data is provided on all bulls. The entire heifer crop is developed as yearlings. The heifers are ultrasounded for carcass traits and then synchronized and bred A. I. Culling begins after pregnancy testing and continues after each calf crop.

Sunshine Farms Production & Genetic Goals Cow Efficiency Goals: Calves actual 225 day weight equal 50% of dam’s weight. Results: Spring 2005: 400 cows Av Wt 1275 Av BCS 5.8 Av age calves 223 days Bull calves av 639 lbs =50% HC av 567 lbs = 44% All calves av 604 lbs = 47% Cow Reproduction Goals: Cows calve every 12 months in a 90 day breeding season. Results: April 2005 preg. ck: 94% bred (79% bred to calve 1 st 60 days of season) Ultrasound Goals: 1/2Sim 1/2Ang Bulls WDA 3.00Adj. REA 13.4 Adj.%IMF 4.25 Results: 2005: 76 bulls WDA 2.78 Adj. REA Adj.%IMF : 43 bulls WDA 2.91 Adj. REA Adj.%IMF 3.18 Ultrasound Goals: 1/2Sim1/2 An Heifers: WDA 2.00 Adj. REA 9.40 Adj. %IMF 5.00 Results: 2005: 87 heifers WDA 2.14 Adj. REA 9.89 Adj. %IMF : 32 heifers WDA 1.85 Adj. REA 8.41 Adj. %IMF 4.32 Carcass Goals: CW 825 REA FT % YG 1&2’s 10% Pr 80% Ch Results: hd. Av. CW 793 REA FT.45 61%YG 1&2’s 0% Pr 78% Ch hd. Av. CW 866 REA FT.57 58% YG 1&2’s 0% Pr 73% Ch

Ultrasound Data on 1/2 Sim 1/2 An bulls YearNo HdAgeWtWDAAdj REA Adj %IMF FTREA/CWT

Ultrasound Data on 1/2 Sim 1/2 An heifers YearNo HdAgeWtWDAAdj REA Adj %IMF FTREA/CWT

With out Ultrasound Data Can You Outrun Your Competition?