Giving Students a Voice in Mathematics Class Find info from this session online:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
1 Strengthening Teaching and Learning: Educational Leadership and Professional Standards SABES Directors’ Institute July 2011.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Iowa Core Leadership Session 1 for Welcome!!
LDC Lessons Learned The Coaching Perspective. Lessons Learned Teachers need to know what supports are available and R- group space is a great place to.
Design & Innovation Institute II Math in Common: 10 California School Districts February 19-20, 2015 Back Channel:
Welcome to the Parent Involvement Resources for Illinois Families and Schools webinar Presented by: Joseph Banks, Illinois State Board of Education Gail.
Getting the Most Out of CaMSP: Into, Through and Beyond Elk Grove Unified School District February 27, 2012 Anne Zeman, Ed.D, Director of Curriculum and.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Stone-Robinson Math Information Night Dr. Nicholas King, Principal December 9, 2014.
YOUR LOGO January 13, 2014 ALL Site Coaching Session.
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Boston Public Schools Elementary Math Plan: District-Wide Reform in Math Teaching and Learning Presented by: Linda Ruiz Davenport, Director of Elementary.
OAC Principals Collaborative Professional Learning Opportunities What can one teacher do? What can one administrator do? What can one school do? Fall Webinar.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
The Science Content, Conceptual Change, and Collaboration (SC4) Mathematics and Science Partnership - Maine U.S. Department of Education MSP Regional Meeting.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
OVERVIEW 1. WHAT IS FIP YOUR SCHOOL? 2 What is a FIP School? Our goal is to make every school in Ohio a FIP School – a school committed to embracing.
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
MEASURING THE QUALITY OF DISCOURSE K-6 TOSAs Training.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Imagine School at Town Center Academic Update June 17, 2014.
Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.
Elementary CCSSM Menu of Services Joseph Espinosa August 21, 2014 We innovate and transform learning to inspire excellence.
CTE PLC Meeting September 27,   Review some basic PLC information  Goal Setting  CTE PLC Teams  Changes  Focus of goals  New Forms and Procedures.
STAR3 Project for WS/FCS. STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide.
NASA LIFT OFF Overview Inquiry LIFT OFF Team ALAMEDA County Office of Education LOS ANGELES County Office of Education SANTA CLARA County Office.
CMP3 – Services Tiered Packages* PD Essentials PackagePD Fidelity PackagePD Growth Package Product Implementation Essentials Plus Product Implementation.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
What is Math in Common?. Our Community 10 districts learning together to lead the way in CCSS-Mathematics Implementation 2.
What is Math in Common?. Our Community 10 districts learning together to lead the way in CCSS-Mathematics Implementation 2.
Our Community 10 districts learning together to lead the way in CCSS-Mathematics Implementation 1.
Giving Students a Voice in Mathematics Class Find info from this session online:
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Measured Progress ©2011 Alaska Summer Leadership Institute Processes and Protocols for Learning Teams Julia Payne-Lewis- Professional Development Specialist.
Giving Students a Voice in Mathematics Class Find info from this session online:
Long Beach Unified School Distcit
On Going Support Training November 12, 2015 Grades 2-3 Presenters: Julie Villeneuve, Fran Gibson, and Pat Gibson.
Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Institute Pennsylvania Department of Education Upper Dublin School District.

Examining Student Work Middle School Math Teachers District SIP Day January 27, 2016.
Lesson Study Lesson study is a particular form of job-embedded professional development that involves collaborative discourse among teachers over an extended.
STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. Anchor Standards and Standards for Mathematical Practice Whole Staff: Professional Development Workshops Teams: Interdisciplinary.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
The Fort Worth ISD Learning Model
Building Academic Language
Building Academic Language
Building Academic Language
Presentation transcript:

Giving Students a Voice in Mathematics Class Find info from this session online:

What is Math in Common?

Math in Common?

Our Community 10 districts learning together to lead the way in CCSS-Mathematics Implementation 4

Co-Presenters Eric Frandsen Math Project Specialist Mikila Fetzer Math Project Lead Dianne Willson Math Program Specialist

What is Math in Common? A Community of Practice with 10 California school districts, serving nearly 400,000 students, working together toward: Providing professional development opportunities to support strong instructional practices Aligning instructional materials to the higher demands of CCSS-M Building leadership capacity throughout the participating districts Developing strong evaluation plans, including formative and summative measures.

Ed Partners’ Approach  District Teams create a vision for instruction and assessment  District Teams set desired outcomes aligned to their vision and grounded in data  District Teams identify and implement key actions connected to each desired outcome  District teams create a monitoring approach, both formative and summative, to continuously understand if their efforts are making progress toward their desired outcomes

Innovative Virtual Engagement Designing structures and spaces to sustain the learning over time…

Workshop Objective Leave this workshop with at least one actionable take-away that he/she can bring back to their school or district related to……………….(focal area of workshop) Each educator in the room today will…….

Essential Questions "How can we use a student observation form, with calibrated observers, to identify increase in quality of student-to-student discourse? How do we make sense of the evidence and act on our findings?

Case Study #1 District: Garden Grove Nick will add demographic info Nick will add district logo Dr. Emma Druitt Director, K-8 Math

Case Study #1: Focus on Peer-to-Peer Academic Discourse : Created Discourse Observation Tool to measure quantity of discourse Collaborated discourse observations in 37, 6 th -8 th grade classes (fall & spring) utilizing tool Administrator and TOSA training in use of tool 39, K-6 sites (1 grade level) and 3, 7-8 sites (math classes)using tool to determine next steps Summer Math Institute focused on discourse (40 teachers, 2 hours instruction, 2 hours PD for 9 days)

Student Transcription Sort

Case Study #1: Focus on Peer-to-Peer Academic Discourse : Majority of students scored “Beginning” on the Discourse Tool 31 of 40 Summer Math Institute teachers joining the Discourse Collaborative Administrators at 10 intermediate sites trained to use discourse tool and using it with math classes K-6 Administrators to receive “refresher” training in January to use with 2 grade levels

Case Study #1 Continued 3 Greatest Learnings from

Case Study #1 Continued 3 Greatest Learnings from cont… Teachers were unaware of how to incorporate opportunities for authentic discourse into math lessons (beyond pair/share) More explicit professional development was needed for teachers in the area of discourse as well as how to train their students

Case Study #1 Continued What changes did your team make from school year to this one based on your learnings? Modified the tool slightly to incorporate suggestions from the SMI group (comment box) Offering explicit professional development in peer-to-peer discourse through the Discourse Collaborative

Observation Tool ScoringTranscribing

Case Study #1 Continued What big question is your team still grappling with in relation to this area? “How do we continue to reach even more teachers about peer-to-peer discourse and move our students forward towards having proficient discourse in math?”

Case Study #2 District: Elk Grove Nick will add demographic info Nick will add district logo Please place a headshot of yourself with your name, title and e mail address here.

Case Study #2: Set the stage: – What are the key actions you are working to implement in this particular area and why? District logo

Case Study #2 Continued What were your three greatest learnings? District logo

Case Study #2 Continued What changes did your team make from school year to this one based on your learnings? District logo

Case Study #2 Continued What big question is your team still grappling with in relation to this area? District logo

Case Study #3 District: Sac City Nick will add demographic info Nick will add district logo Please place a headshot of yourself with your name, title and e mail address here.

Case Study #3: Set the stage: – What are the key actions you are working to implement in this particular area and why? District logo

Case Study #3 Continued What were your three greatest learnings? District logo

Case Study #3 Continued What changes did your team make from school year to this one based on your learnings? District logo

Case Study #3 Continued What big question is your team still grappling with in relation to this area? District logo

Exit Ticket 1) What was your greatest take-away from this session? *Consider something that is actionable as you return to your school site or district. 2) Do you have any lingering questions that are necessary to move that action forward? bit.ly/MiCCMCS or bit.ly/MiCCMCN Let’s stay connected: Check out our online community space! Bit.ly/MiCconferences QR Code