1 Using PROPID for Inverse Design Michael S. Selig Associate Professor Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs Selig, Tangler, and Giguère August 2,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Influence of Aerodynamic Damping in the Seismic Response of HAWTs
Advertisements

Blade Nomenclature.
Kyle K. Wetzel Wetzel Engineering, Inc. Lawrence, Kansas USA
AeroAcoustics & Noise Control Laboratory, Seoul National University
Wind Farm Noise Impact Assessment
A Computational Efficient Algorithm for the Aerodynamic Response of Non-Straight Blades Mac Gaunaa, Pierre-Elouan Réthoré, Niels Nørmark Sørensen & Mads.
EWEC 2009 Marseille, France Design of Wind Turbine Passive Smart Blades ©University of Bristol Department of Aerospace Engineering Slide 1 Design of Wind.
Theoretical & Industrial Design of Aerofoils P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department An Objective Invention ……
WIND POWER POWER AVAILABLE FROM THE WIND PERFORMANCE OF A HAWT DESIGN PROCEDURES.
Wind Engineering Module 5
DESIGN OF AXIAL FLOW COMPRESSORS Proper Integration of Mild Compression Stages !!! P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department.
Design of Wind Turbines P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Selection of Optimal Geometrical & Kinematic Variables ….
Module 5.2 Wind Turbine Design (Continued)
Wind Turbine Project Recap Wind Power & Blade Aerodynamics
Computational Modelling of Unsteady Rotor Effects Duncan McNae – PhD candidate Professor J Michael R Graham.
Power Generation from Renewable Energy Sources
Ted Light Jeff Robinson December 13, 2003
Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs
Jarred Morales and Cody Beckemeyer Advisior: Dr. Junkun Ma ET 483.
Aerodynamics and Aeroelastics, WP 2
Some effects of large blade deflections on aeroelastic stability Bjarne S. Kallesøe Morten H. Hansen.
1 Part III: Airfoil Data Philippe Giguère Graduate Research Assistant Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs Selig, Tangler, and Giguère August 2, 1999.
John Wloch Wind-Aid Preliminary Design Review 11 March 2008.
Smart Rotor Control of Wind Turbines Using Trailing Edge Flaps Matthew A. Lackner and Gijs van Kuik January 6, 2009 Technical University of Delft University.
Dynamically Variable Blade Geometry for Wind Energy
The Answer is Blowing in the Wind… The Power of Wind.
Energy in the Wind Walt Musial Senior Engineer National Wind Technology Center National Renewable Energy Laboratory Kidwind Teachers’ Workshop May 14,
Troubleshooting, Parametrization, and Design Professor Christiani 11/17/2014.
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
Introduction people business vision and goals Product design aims features and benefits competitive comparison current status What we are looking for manufacturing.
1 Rotor Design Approaches Michael S. Selig Associate Professor Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs Selig, Tangler, and Giguère August 2, 1999  NREL.
Wind Engineering Module 4.1 Blade Element Theory
HW II – AE 6070 GA TECH Michael Duffy September 27 th, 2006.
ECE 7800: Renewable Energy Systems
Wind Engineering Module 4.2 WT_PERF Analysis Lakshmi Sankar
PROPELLER SYSTEM 1st - Look at how lift is generated
Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines Part -3
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF WIND TURBINE AERODYNAMICS Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows The Analysis.
1 Part IV: Blade Geometry Optimization Philippe Giguère Graduate Research Assistant Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs Selig, Tangler, and Giguère.
Power Generation from Renewable Energy Sources Fall 2012 Instructor: Xiaodong Chu : Office Tel.:
1 Using PROPID for Analysis Michael S. Selig Associate Professor Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs Selig, Tangler, and Giguère August 2, 1999 
9.0 New Features Min. Life for a Titanium Turbine Blade Workshop 9 Robust Design – DesignXplorer.
AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2009
Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows
Supervisor: Dr David Wood Co-Supervisor: Dr Curran Crawford
Aerodynamic forces on the blade, COP, Optimum blade profiles
WIND TURBINE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows The Analysis.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. H.A.W.T.
Theory of Turbine Cascades P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Its Group Performance, What Matters.……
Turbine blade basics. Calculation of Wind Power Where P = power, measured in watts (W) or joules per second (J/s)  = density of fluid, measured in.
Wind Turbine Project Recap Wind Power & Blade Aerodynamics.
Wind Turbine Control System
Wind Turbine
DYNAMIC STALL OCCURRENCE ON A HORIZONTAL AXIS WIND TURBINE BLADE
Betz Theory for A Blade Element
Actual Power Developed by A Rotor
Off-design Performance of A Rotor
AERSP 496 (10/10/2017) Milton Rahman.
Rotors in Complex Inflow, AVATAR, WP2
Dynamic Controllers for Wind Turbines
Euler’s Vision of Newton’s Laws of Motion
H.A.W.T. Development Prototype and Testing - Final Report
DESIGN, SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs
ME 252 Thermal-Fluid Systems G. Kallio
Using PROPID for Inverse Design
Using PROPID for Analysis Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs
Design of Wind Turbines
Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs
Dual Induction theory for Wind Turbines
Presentation transcript:

1 Using PROPID for Inverse Design Michael S. Selig Associate Professor Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs Selig, Tangler, and Giguère August 2, 1999  NREL NWTC, Golden, CO Department of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

2 Peak Power Specification for a Stall Regulated Turbine (1-D Iteration) PROPID Run: wt04a.in –Baseline Power Curve, No Iteration

3 –Iterate on Scale factor (% Growth) –NEWT1ISWP Line

4 –Variables for Iteration (ITP* Parameters)

5 –Running Interactively with Newton Iteration

6 –NEWT1ISWP Line - Variations

7 –The Quickest Approach

8 –Final Converged Power and Baseline –Radius Grew from 24.6 ft  25.5 ft (see ftn021.dat) New rotor

9 PROPID Run: wt05a.in –Iteration on Blade Pitch Instead –NEWT1ISWP Line

10 –Variables for Iteration (ITP* Parameters)

11 –Final Converged Power Curve and Previous Ones –Pitch Change: 2 deg  4.3 deg wt04a.in & wt05a.in Example of 1-D Newton Iteration New rotor

12 2-D Newton Iteration PROPID Run: wt06a.in –Rotor Scale  Peak Power (500 kW) –Rotor RPM  Tip Speed (150 mph, 220 ft/sec)

13 –Screen Grab from Run - Stages

14 –Resulting Power Curve –Radius Change: ft  39.9 ft –RPM Change: 64 rpm  52.6 rpm AEP = 694 MWh/yr 500 kW Peak Power

15 Lift and Axial Inflow Specifications (Multidimensional Newton Iteration) PROPID Run: wt07a.in (analysis only) –Rotor Radius Same as wt06a.in (39.9 ft) –Variable Speed Turbine Design, TSR = 6

16 –DP and Special Input Lines

17 –Cp (2D_SWEEP) & Power Curve (2D_SWEEP)

18 –Blade Aero and Geometry (1D_SWEEP)

19 –Power Curves –AEP 790 MWh/yr (wt07a) vs 694 MWh/yr (wt06a) Stall Regulated Baseline Variable Speed Case

20 –Lift Distribution –Desire Cl-dist for Best L/D-dist

21 –Axial Induction Factor Distribution –Desire a = 1/3 Betz Optimum

22 PROPID Run: wt08a.in –Desired Cl-dist vs Baseline

23 –Tabulated Cl-dist

24 –Stage 1: Segment 8 = 1.00 –Iterate Pitch –NEWT1LDP Cl Segment 8

25 –Stage 2: Segments 9-10 Relative to 8 –Iterate Segments 9-10 –NEWT2SDDP

26 –Details Cl Segment 9 Relative to Segment 8

27 Relative Cl Values Segment # Values Relative to Segment 8

28 –Iteration Schedule for Cl

29 –Stage 3: Segments 2-7 Relative to 8 –Iterate Segments 2-7

30 –Converged Cl Distribution

31 –Stage 4: Axial Segment 8 =.333 –Iterate Segment 8

32 Iteration for Axial Inflow at Segment 8

33 –Stage 5: Axial Segments 9-10 Relative to 8 –Iterate Segments 9-10

34 –Iteration Schedule for Axial Induction Factor

35 –Stage 6: Axial Segments 2-7 Relative to 8 –Iterate Segments 2-7

36 –Converged Axial Inflow Distribution

37 –Automatic Convergence: Uncomment these lines

38 –Power Curve Comparison –AEP 803 MWh/yr (wt08a) vs 790 MWh/yr (wt07a)

39 Debugging an Input File Screen Dump on Crash –Now What?

40 –Turn on Debugging Feature (ECHO_INPUT Line) Bad NEWT1LDP Line

41 Errors, Warnings, and Notes at Runtime –Not Again! *&)*^)^(^:)????

42 –Refer to warnerr-doc.txt Problem Not Solved? – Philippe Giguère! He has offered free tech support during all of August 1999.