1 Plans for first beams - - triggers from the BRM group (BSC, BPTX) Gábor Veres for the BRM group CMS Trigger Technical Coordination Meeting 8 October,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.
Advertisements

6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
The MAD chip: 4 channel preamplifier + discriminator.
MICE Fiber Tracker Electronics AFEII for MICE (Front end readout board) Recall: AFEs mount on ether side of the VLPC cass, with fibers going to the VLPCs.
Experimental Method Experimental Method Kihyeon Cho Kyungpook National University Spring Semester 2005 Experimental Method and Data Process.
24 September 2002Paul Dauncey1 Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
SPD commissioning Ricci, Míriam, Daniel, Edu, Hugo et al. from 1.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
1.ATLAS and ID 2.SCT 3.Commissioning 4.Integration 5.Latest Runs 6.Conclusions Commissioning the ATLAS Silicon Microstrip Tracker IPRD08 - Siena Jose E.
MICE Workshop Sept 2004 AFEII for MICE Recall: AFEs mount on ether side of the VLPC cass, with fibers going to the VLPCs between them. AFE has 8 identical.
CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Approved Plots from CMS First Beam Runs 2-October-2008.
1 HBD Commissioning (II) Itzhak Tserruya HBD group meeting November 28, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
The ATLAS Pixel Detector - Running Experience – Markus Keil – University of Geneva on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Vertex 2009 Putten, Netherlands,
LHCC, V0, Sept The V0 detector (Mexico Lyon collaboration)  Segmentation  Simulated performances secondaries / beam-gas  Counters design 1 /
Level 0 Topology Trigger Falk Meissner LBNL CTB Readout Topology CTB-DSM Tree Trigger Algorithm UPC Trigger Other Examples Motivation : Level 3 requires.
DE/dx measurement with Phobos Si-pad detectors - very first impressions (H.P Oct )
26 Jan 2010Paul Dauncey1 DESY beam test preparations Paul Dauncey.
1 ALICE T0 detector W.H.Trzaska (on behalf of T0 Group) LHCC Comprehensive Review, March 2003.
Early Commissioning of ATLAS First North American ATLAS Physics Workshop Tucson J. Pilcher University of Chicago.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
ATLAS Forward Detector Trigger ATLAS is presently planning to install forward detectors (Roman Pot system) in the LHC tunnel with prime goal to measure.
HBD FEM Overall block diagram Individual building blocks Outlook ¼ detector build.
1 Cosmic Rate Overview Rustem DZHELYADIN (CERN&IHEP, Protvino) The Set-up: Scintillating counters HV setting Coincidence adjustment Accidentals.
Triggering with the RPD E. Burtin, CEA-Saclay COMPASS Hadron run trigger meeting, Feb. 12, 2008.
Quarkonia spectra in PbPb at 2.76 TeV Abdulla Abdulsalam (Dr. Prashant Shukla) BARC, Mumbai Outline Motivation Event selection Kinematic cuts Acceptance.
Xiangming Sun1PXL Sensor and RDO review – 06/23/2010 STAR XIANGMING SUN LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LAB Firmware and Software Architecture for PIXEL L.
Motivation General rule for muon triggers: Never neglect a possible backup reduction factor. It will always come back to you. Even if RPC trigger works.
Tracker Timing and ISIS RF Edward Overton 1. At CM32… 2 Had done some preliminary checks on the ISIS RF. Was beginning to think about how to handle the.
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March Preparing for the V0 TDR (Lyon-Mexico project)  The V0 detector in 3 chapters  1 - Tests and simulations of detection.
Anatoli Romaniouk TRT Introduction TRT in ATLAS p. 2-4TRT in ATLAS p. 2-4 TRT design p. 5-7TRT design p. 5-7 TRT operation principles p. 8-9TRT operation.
January 31, MICE DAQ MICE and ISIS Introduction MICE Detector Front End Electronics Software and MICE DAQ Architecture MICE Triggers Status and Schedule.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
The Electromagnetic Calorimeter – 2005 Operation J. Sowinski for the Collaboration and the Builders Indiana Univ. Michigan State Univ. ANL MIT BNL Penn.
Update on final LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
Moriond, March 2011 Soft QCD Results from ATLAS and CMS Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna, Austria On behalf of the ATLAS.
TGC-electronics commissioning before beam collision Y. Sugaya Osaka-U アトラス総会2004 12/23 河口湖.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
CALICE Tungsten HCAL Prototype status Erika Garutti Wolfgang Klempt Erik van der Kraaij CERN LCD International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, October.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
Activity related CMS RPC Hyunchul Kim Korea university Hyunchul Kim Korea university 26th. Sep th Korea-CMS collaboration meeting.
Gábor I. Veres MB&UE WG, 31 May, CMS Minimum Bias and Diffraction Measurements Gábor I. Veres (CERN) Minimum Bias and Underlying Event Working.
The ALICE Experiment Event by Event fluctuations ALICE TOF Calibration 30th November 2007Chiara Zampolli1.
B.Satyanarayana Department of High Energy Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai,
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
DN/d  and dN/dp T analysis status Gabor Veres for the working group QCD meeting, Jan 12, 2010.
US AFEB timing in CSCs in splash events, run N. Terentiev, CMU CSC Synchronization meeting Nov. 16, 2009, CERN.
Status of the PSD upgrade - Status of the PSD cooling and temperature stabilization system - MAPD gain monitoring system - PSD readout upgrade F.Guber,
External Trigger System PAB To provide straight muon track efficient selection for TPC performance characterization Adjustable geometry for.
E.Gushchin,S.Filippov(INR,Moscow) 16 April 2008Calo commissioning meeting CERN PS/SPD LED monitoring system status General status LED signal is used for.
Trigger system for setup 2016 V. Rogov, V. Yurevich,D.Bogoslovski, S.Sergeev, O.Batenkov* LHEP JINR *V. G. Khlopin Radium Institute, St. Petersburg.
TRTViewer: the ATLAS TRT detector monitoring and diagnostics tool 4 th Workshop on Advanced Transition Radiation Detectors for Accelerator and Space Applications.
BRAN at IR2 and IR8: status, commissioning and operation Enrico Bravin AB-BI Joint LHC Machine-Experiments Workshop on Very Forward Detectors 25 January.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
"North American" Electronics
Beam detectors performance during the Au+Au runs in HADES
Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva
PSD Front-End-Electronics A.Ivashkin, V.Marin (INR, Moscow)
Summary: Workshop on CMS Beam Conditions, Radiation Monitoring and Luminosity Systems Oliver Stein, May 2013, CERN.
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
FIT detector as Luminometer for RUN3
Presentation transcript:

1 Plans for first beams - - triggers from the BRM group (BSC, BPTX) Gábor Veres for the BRM group CMS Trigger Technical Coordination Meeting 8 October, 2009

2 BSC and BPTX are primarily beam monitoring tools. Their secondary functionality is triggering. Triggers are implemented not to detract from the primary functionality. Operation/readout is independent of the other CMS subsystems. i.e. BRM readouts are independent of CMS DAQ (stand-alone). BSC, BPTX and triggering

3 “Customers” for the BRM triggers BPTX zero bias; one or both beam bunches present an essential trigger for CMS in general. QCD directly uses it. BSC beam halo triggers: tracker group (tracker end-cap alignment) BSC beam splash triggers: HF group (calibrations using one beam) BSC minimum bias triggers: QCD group (min. bias analyses, trigger x-section monitoring) Heavy Ion group (min. bias trigger for Pb+Pb) BSC high multiplicity trigger: QCD and HI group (clean high-multiplicity events)

4 Beam halo triggers (4) +z inner (beam 2) -z inner (beam 1) -z outer (beam 1) +z outer (beam 2) +/- z refers to the direction of the muon Coincidence: at least 1 hit each side, in any segment, w/in 40 ns timed for muons moving with c

5 Beam Halo trigger logic (NIM)

6 Minimum bias triggers (5) MB inner >=1 (at least 1 hit) MB inner >=2 (at least 2 hits) MB all >=1 MB all >=2 MB all OR “single sided” (any hit) Coincidences timed for collisions

7 Beam splash triggers (2) +z beam gas (at least 2 hits) –z beam gas (at least 2 hits) Single-side coincidences At startup, it will be useful for triggering on beam-gas events occurring in the CMS volume, before collisions occur Not sensitive to single beam halo muons Also sensitive to cosmic muons and p+p collisions

8 Minimum bias and beam splash trigger logic

9 High Multiplicity trigger 8 hits each side Selects events with very high multiplicity at the startup (when pileup<<1)

10 BSC triggers - details Logic based on NIM, converted to LVDS, width = 25 ns Width of coincidences: = 40 ns LVDS signals connected to the general trigger Connections to trigger boards tested Standalone monitoring: Trigger signals connected to VME scalers Analog signals are connected to ADC Bits 36-39: beam halo triggers Bits 40-41: two minimum bias triggers based on all segments (>=1, >=2) Bits 42-43: beam splash triggers "BSCMBI1" : BSC Min Bias Inner >=1 "BSCMBI2" : BSC Min Bias Inner >=2 "BSCOR" : BSC Min Bias Single Sided OR "BSCHIGHM" High Multiplicity Technical bits External Condition bits

11 BPTX triggers Sensors picking up the mirror charge of the passing beams. Trigger: 3 cables (with max. 4 signals) to trigger boards: Cable 1: BPTX +z.AND. BPTX –z ‘zero bias’ (technical)BPTX +z BPTX –z BPTX +z.OR. BPTX –z Cable 2: (technical)BPTX +z.AND. BPTX –z‘zero bias’ BPTX +z.AND. (.NOT. BPTX –z)‘empty target’, BPTX –z.AND. (.NOT. BPTX +z)for beam gas studies Cable 3: (external BPTX +z.AND. BPTX –z‘zero bias’ conditions) (We prefer the notation ‘BPTX1’ = beam direction +z to –z). These triggers are important for timing trigger efficiencies dead-time measurements zero bias physics data taking Responsible: Vladimir Ryjov }

12 Plans for first beam set/adjust HV values (~ few days) study MIP signals with first halos/splashes (~ few days) set discriminator levels accordingly (~ 1 day) time in all segments w.r.t. each other (~ few days) (apply few ns cable delays if needed) measure event-by-event jitters (~ 1 day) test trigger signals/logic (~ few days) rate checks and comparisons btw triggers with collisions (~ few days) Some of the above can be done in parallel Continuous beam/collisions are preferred

13 Conclusion BSC and BPTX trigger hardware is available and tested Full software implementation is needed/ongoing commissioning planned with the first beam

14 BACKUPS

15 Geometry of the BSC Paddles not  -symmetric 8 channels/side BSC1 annular rings: inner radius: 21 cm outer radius: 45 cm 8 channels/side At z = ± m Distance: 73 ns·c (also BSC2: a few smaller segments further away in z) BC408 scintillators

16 BSC rack S1F08 at point 5 NIM logic and VME readout NIM  LVDS converter Trigger boards

17 BSC trigger rates Channel noise rates: < 1Hz (about 0.1 Hz) Trigger rates without beam are very small: min. bias ‘OR’: few Hz other m.b. triggers: < Hz beam halo: < Hz beam gas: < 0.1 Hz Pulse height stability: good, less than 10% level Scalars: monitoring the rate of all channels and all triggers Time [h] Channel noise rates with very low threshold [Hz]

18 Timing of the BSC signals The analog signals from the 32 channels will be re-synchronized with the first beam (compensate few ns variations) Trigger signals will be timed in after that Approximate arrival time of the signals to the GT board after the bunch crossing (status at the moment): Beam 1 halo (+z -going muon):550 ns Beam 2 halo (-z -going muon):490 ns Minimum bias: 570 ns Beam gas:560 ns High multiplicity:570 ns

19 Simulation of BSC triggers CMSSW 2_2_9 was used PYTHIA event generator was used with: - default CMS min-bias settings (D6T tune) - ATLAS tune with higher dN/d  Trigger cross sections for inelastic p+p: double sided (>=1 hits each side): 51% (D6T tune), 56% (ATLAS tune) single sided OR (any hit): 84% (D6T tune), 90% (ATLAS tune)