INTRODUCTION TO A NEW KIND OF RESORCE – F1000 Georg Reimer October 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OVERVIEW OF FACULTY OF 1000’S SERVICES
Advertisements

USING F1000PRIME TO FOLLOW YOUR RESEARCH INTERESTS AND FIND IMPORTANT PAPERS [Name of institution/audience, month and year] [Your name] [Your title/position.
SCOPUS Searching for Scientific Articles By Mohamed Atani UNEP.
Assessing and Increasing the Impact of Research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology Susan Makar, Stacy Bruss, and Amanda Malanowski NIST.
Kathy Perry, VIVA Director With special thanks to Peter Shepherd, COUNTER Executive Director Electronic Resources and Libraries Conference March 19, 2014.
ISI Web of Knowledge – Innovative Solutions ISI Web of Knowledge / Web of Science – coming developments BIOSIS Archive Web Citation Index – New product.
IMRaD: The Format for Scientific Writing
Bibliometrics Toolkit Google Scholar (GS) is one of three central tools (the others being ISI and Scopus) used to generate bibliometrics for researchers.
Ronald L. Larsen May 22, Trace relationships amongst academic journal citations Determine the popularity and impact of articles, authors, and publications.
CURTIN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider code 00301J July 2014 Tell your impact story:
The COUNTER Code of Practice for Books and Reference Works Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER UKSG E-Books Seminar, 9 November 2005.
Library Tricks & Tips Fall 2006 Karen Krasznavolgyi Senior Librarian Scott Memorial Library.
Navigating The Faculty of 1000 Biology Site The public site that displays all evaluations made by Faculty Members F1000 Toolbar.
F1000PRIME: INTERNATIONAL EXPERT OPINION AND WHY RESEARCHERS NEED IT. Kieran Campbell Account Manager Faculty of 1000
ACS PUBLICATIONS An Overview of Products & Services A C S P U B L I C A T I O N S H I G H Q U A L I T Y. H I G H I M P A C T.
Learn more about Open Access Breakfast meeting at BMC March 30th 2010 Aina Svensson and Karin Meyer Lundén Electronic Publishing Centre, Uppsala University.
Highlights from the Open Access Timeline (1) 1971, Project Gutenberg launched on the Internet (originally as an FTP site). There are now 18,000 free books.
INCITES PLATFORM NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA)
Reading the Literature
Cracking the Web of Science: International Diversity and Citation Analysis NEICON Conference St. Petersburg, Russia 26 May 2015 Christopher Burghardt Head.
Using Journal Citation Reports The MyRI Project Team.
Journal Citation Reports – The Impact Factor
Not all Journals are Created Equal! Using Impact Factors to Assess the Impact of a Journal.
Release 4 of the COUNTER Code of Practice for e- Resources and new usage- based measures of impact Peter Shepherd COUNTER May 2014.
Web of Science Pros Excellent depth of coverage in the full product (from 1900-present for some journals) A large number of the records are enhanced with.
Bibliometrics in Computer Science MyRI project team.
An introduction to BioMed Central and Open Access publishing Matthew Cockerill Managing Director, BioMed Central.
Types of Sources Used in Research Nancy McEnery, MLIS.
Journal Impact Factors and H index
Orientation to Web of Science Dr.Tariq Ashraf University of Delhi South Campus
How to Use Google Scholar An Educator’s Guide
The Web of Science database bibliometrics and alternative metrics
Welcome to Scopus Training by : Arash Nikyar June 2014
Lecture Five: Searching for Articles INST 250/4.  What are LCSH? ◦ Why should one hyperlink on the LCSH in the Library catalogue search?  Subject vs.
Library Resources Barbara Dorward November Previous session  Catalogues  Library resources  Finding information on the web  Evaluation of information.
Bibliometrics toolkit: ISI products Website: Last edited: 11 Mar 2011 Thomson Reuters ISI product set is the market leader for.
Rajesh Singh Deputy Librarian University of Delhi Measuring Research Output.
1 How to find literature - A very short introduction SMED 8004 Medicine and Health Library October 2014.
1 Scopus as a Research Tool March Why Scopus?  A comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature and quality web sources.
Thomson Scientific October 2006 ISI Web of Knowledge Autumn updates.
University of Antwerp Library TEW & HI UA library offers... books, journals, internet catalogue -UA catalogue, e-info catalogue databases -e.g.
OARE Module 5A: Scopus (Elsevier). Table of Contents About Scopus (Elsevier) Using Scopus Search Page Results/Refine Search Pages Download, PDF, Export,
Journal Impact Factors: What Are They & How Can They Be Used? Pamela Sherwill, MLS, AHIP April 27, 2004.
Where Should I Publish? Journal Ranking Tools eigenfactor.org SCImago is a freely available web resource available at This uses.
Thomson Reuters ISI (Information Sciences Institute) Azam Raoofi, Head of Indexing & Education Departments, Kowsar Editorial Meeting, Sep 19 th 2013.
The ISI Web of Knowledge nce/training/wok/#tab3.
Presented by Dr. S. C. Jindal Librarian Central Science Library University of Delhi Delhi Information Competency.
Research Quality Framework Presentation to APSR - ARROW - Repository Market Day 4 May 2007 Sandra Fox Department of Education Science and Training.
Making use of (alt)metrics Phill Jones, PhD Head of Publisher Outreach @altmetrics.
LAWRENCE P. KANE, PH.D. DEPT OF IMMUNOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE PUBLISHING IN THE 21 ST CENTURY.
F1000: HELPING YOU WRITE, DISCOVER AND SHARE SCIENCE [Your name] [date and location of talk]
When to Choose Google Scholar For finding journal articles or abstracts by title through a range of academic publishers, preprint repositories and electronic.
MARKO ZOVKO, ACCOUNT MANAGER STEPHEN SMITH, SOLUTIONS SPECIALIST JOURNALS & HIGHLY-CITED DATA IN INCITES V. OLD JOURNAL CITATION REPORTS. WHAT MORE AM.
1 e-Resources on Social Sciences: Scopus. 2 Why Scopus?  A comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature and quality web sources.
Measuring Research Impact Using Bibliometrics Constance Wiebrands Manager, Library Services.
Navigating The Faculty of 1000 Medicine Site F1000 Medicine Toolbar Rating badge & F1000 Factor Based on a consensus score.
Searching ProQuest Ebook Resources Susan Watson / Lou Peck June 2007.
Where Should I Publish? Journal Ranking Tools
It’s not about searching…. It’s about finding.
Google Scholar and ShareLaTeX
Our Digital Showcase Scholars’ Mine Annual Report from July 2015 – June 2016 Providing global access to the digital, scholarly and cultural resources.
How to Use Google Scholar An Educator’s Guide
Towards REF 2020 What we know and think we know about the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS Anglia.
Visibility and (alt)metrics of the Croatian Open Access (OA) journals
Citation Analysis Your article Jill Otto InCites Other?
QATAR NATIONAL LIBRARY
Advanced Scientometrics Workshop
[Your name] Faculty Member, F1000Prime [Section Name]
ACM Author-Izer Service
CRIS systems in Europe: brief overview
Presentation transcript:

INTRODUCTION TO A NEW KIND OF RESORCE – F1000 Georg Reimer October 2011

ABOUT FACULTY OF 1000

WHAT IS FACULTY OF 1000? An article-by-article review service Highlights and recommends the most important articles published in biology and medicine Articles selected by our global expert ‘Faculty’ of the world’s most prestigious scientists and clinicians Faculty Members and their evaluations are organized into over 40 faculties, which are further subdivided into over 300 sections (specialties)

WHO ARE THE EXPERTS? The Faculty Composed of 5,000 Faculty Members and 5,000 Associate Faculty Members. Our internationally renowned faculty includes: 6 Nobel Prize winners 12 Lasker Prize winners 81 Fellows of The Royal Society 97 Members of the Institute of Medicine 136 Members of the National Academy of Sciences

EVALUATIONS Browse & Search Abstract Comments Dissents Article rankings

Open Access repository Launched in June 2010 Over 300 key conferences covered Early release of novel research Faculty evaluations F1000 POSTERS

Review articles Written by our Faculty Members Indexed in PubMed with full text in PubMed Central Open Access Peer reviewed F1000 REPORTS

F1000 JOURNAL RANKINGS

WHAT ARE F1000 JOURNAL RANKINGS? F1000’s Journal Rankings are opinion-based. Each journal is given an individual score, the F1000 Journal Factor (FFj). The FFj is calculated from the sum of the F1000 Article Factors (FFa) achieved by the evaluated articles published in that journal. FFj scores are normalized to take the size of the journal into account.

WHAT ARE F1000 JOURNAL RANKINGS? The calculation includes 3 key considerations: Number of articles evaluated Total score of evaluated articles Total number of articles published

THE 3 LEVELS OF RANKINGS Current Rankings (Monthly) Calculated on the first day of each month Takes into account previous12 months Annual Rankings – Provisional Calculated July each year Based on previous full calendar year Annual Rankings – Final Calculated July each year Based on last but one full calendar year

BEYOND THE IMPACT FACTOR We have now published Beta versions of: Annual Rankings Final 2010 Annual Rankings Provisional Current Journal Rankings These historical rankings, based on a calendar year’s worth of articles, will be easy to compare with the Impact Factor.

RANKINGS BY SPECIALTY F1000 Journal Rankings can be viewed: Across all of F1000 Across Biology OR Medicine By individual Faculty By individual Section Researchers can use the rankings to discover which journals have the most evaluated papers in their own specialty.

KEY FEATURES OF F1000’S JOURNAL RANKINGS Qualitative Transparent Robust Essential Rapid F1000’s Journal Rankings are calculated based on the opinions of active scientists and clinicians, experts in their fields. This avoids inherent problems with assessing journals based on citations or download metrics.

KEY FEATURES OF F1000’S JOURNAL RANKINGS Qualitative Transparent Robust Essential Rapid We make it easy to see exactly which articles count towards a journal’s ranking, who selected each article, and why.

KEY FEATURES OF F1000’S JOURNAL RANKINGS Qualitative Transparent Robust Essential Rapid The rankings cannot be gamed by self- citation or manipulation of download counts. Our peer-selected Faculty agree to a strict code of conduct and the rankings do not include reviews or other non-primary research articles.

KEY FEATURES OF F1000’S JOURNAL RANKINGS Qualitative Transparent Robust Essential Rapid Based only on positive reviews of the literature, the rankings enable researchers to discover which journals they need to read, as well as the best places to publish in each discipline and specialty.

KEY FEATURES OF F1000’S JOURNAL RANKINGS Qualitative Transparent Robust Essential Rapid Most evaluations are received within three weeks of an article being published and will have an immediate impact on the monthly rolling rankings that F1000 publish.

THE FUTURE FOR F1000 What are we planning? More rankings Institutions Authors Expanding coverage More Faculty Members Request article from library