Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching 2015 - 2016.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information

Advertisements

Are You (Click).

Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track

Santa Rosa County District Schools Professional Orientation Program (POP) Professional Improvement Plan (PIP)

C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST

Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 13, 2015.

Teacher Evaluation Model

Teacher Performance Assessment for State Licensure and District Evaluation Raymond Pecheone, Stanford University Peter Youngs, Stanford University National.

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.

David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird

Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.

ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.

ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.

ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors

Differentiated Supervision

1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.

REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.

Components of a Quality Induction Program Shirley P. Andrews Valdosta State University Valdosta, Georgia.

for School Library Media Specialists

Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.

ADEPT Framework

October 12, College- and Career-Ready Expectations for All Students 2. State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support.

Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.

MULTIPLE MEASURES What are they… Why are they… What do we do… How will we know… Dr. Scott P. Myers KLFA Wednesday, August 28, 2013.

Growth, Not Gotcha: Evaluating and Supporting Beginning Teachers INTC 8 th Annual Induction and Mentoring Conference February 26, 2013 Liam Goldrick Director.

Revised Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE-R)

Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.

Division of School Effectiveness Office of Instructional Practices and Evaluations.

PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.

Educator Effectiveness System Changes Overview Using Data to Drive Effective Teaching Elizabeth Ayotte – EES Support, BKM Complex Daniel Espaniola – EO.

Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.

The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.

1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site

Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….

Maine Teacher Effectiveness Status.  Maine approved a teacher evaluation law during in the 2012 Legislative sessions.  The rules were determined in.

PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.

NC Teacher Evaluation Process

Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.

MODIFIED CURRENT PRACTICE MODEL (SAVING THE BABY!!!) Olde English Consortium Teacher Evaluation Plan – Modified Current Practice Model May 15, 2015.

The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.

Summary Rating Responses November 13, 2013 Adobe Connect Webinar Bill Bagshaw, Kayeri Akweks - KSDE.

SAFE-T NET Introduction

Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.

Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.

Texas Educator Evaluation & Support System Systems US Department of Education NCLB Waiver-Fall 2013 Condition of Waiver to develop new Texas evaluation.

Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.

ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.

Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.

Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.

Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.

SCDE Expanded ADEPT Advisory Team Meeting April 23, 2015.

Teacher Observations Summative or Formative? ( Glickman et. al.)

Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.

Peer Assistance and Review Program Volusia County Schools “ I couldn’t have done it without you!”

Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.

1 Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education December 13, 2011 Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation.

1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.

Identifying and Using Multiple Measures Bill Bagshaw.

PADEPP PROGRAM FOR ASSISTING, DEVELOPING, AND EVALUATING PRINCIPAL PERFORMANCE CHANGES FOR 2015 – 2016 SCHOOL YEAR.

Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.

New Teacher Program for Induction Contract Teachers

Teacher Evaluation Timeline

Teacher Evaluation Process

What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?

Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation

Five Required Elements

Teacher Evaluation Process

Presentation transcript:

Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching

ESEA Waiver and SCDE Requirements The system for evaluation & supporting teachers will: Support continuous improvement of instruction Differentiate performance using at least 3 performance levels Use multiple measures to determine performance levels Incorporate student growth as a significant factor – Student Learning Objectives – Value Added Measures Evaluate teachers on a regular basis Provide clear, timely, and useful feedback. Generate data that will be used to inform personnel decisions.

Contract Timeline Induction: 1 st year Annual Formal: 2 nd year or new to SC Annual GBE: 3 rd year or 2 nd year in SC Continuing: At least a 4 th year teacher who has a professional certificate

Induction (Formative Feedback) First year teachers without prior experience STARTS Seminar Program Evaluation team consists of an administrator & trained mentor Observations with formative feedback Portfolio development Student growth component practice during 2 nd semester If successful, move to Annual Formal 1 the next year and participate in ADEPT SAFE-T Formal Evaluation (SAFE-T: Summative ADEPT Formal Teacher Evaluation)

Annual (Summative Feedback) Second year teachers or teachers with experience in another state ADEPT SAFE-T Formal Evaluation process Evaluation team: administrator & at least 1 peer evaluator Beginning, mid-year and final conference with administrator and peer evaluator to provide summative feedback Conferences include the development & monitoring of student growth component If successful, move to Annual Goals Based Evaluation the next year and participate in the expanded ADEPT GBE process

Continuing Contract Teachers Experienced teacher with a professional certificate Expanded ADEPT Goals Based Evaluation Process: 4 levels – Research & Development – Comprehensive Formal (5-yr cycle recertification year) – Competence-building (based on previous performance) – Summative Formal Evaluation (based on previous performance)