PIANC MarCom Working Group 51 Report “Guidelines for Water Injection Dredging (WID)” Smits, J., Vandycke, S., van den Heuvel, M., Welp, T., Cranch, A.,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 nd Annual Dredged Material Management Summit Minimizing Sedimentation In Harbors and Marinas 6 October, 2005 Minimization Of Sedimentation In Harbors.
Advertisements

WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Dredging.
1 Dredging Phases 4 phases –excavation –lifting –transportation –disposal Guide 4: Machines, Methods and Mitigation; Chapter 2: Phases of a Dredging Project;
Hydrodynamics and Sediment Transport Modelling Ramiro Neves
Session 5: Dredging in sensitve areas
GENERAL ACOUSTICS © GENERAL ACOUSTICS GmbH, Germany Phone: DSLP ® - Service Approved.
DREDGING YOUR DOCKS 2013 Supported by: USACE Galveston District U. S. Coast Guard Sabine Neches Navigation District.
Dredging the Chesapeake Bay The 1999 Debate Heather Beall Intro to Coastal Management November 4, 2004.
Fluidyn FLOWCOAST FLOOIL 3D Fluid Dynamics Model to Simulate Oil slick movement in coastal waters or rivers FLOOIL.
Harwich Haven Authority. Harwich Haven Authority and the Port of Felixstowe are working together on the early stages of a Haven Navigation Channel deepening.
STREAM SEDIMENT SAMPLING
Restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast Barrier Plan June 16, 2010 Kyle Graham Deputy Director of Planning and Programs Office of the Governor – Coastal.
DREDGING YOUR DOCKS 2012 Organized By CRA Hydrographic Surveyors Orion Marine Group.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
CEDA Dredging Days Antwerp Steps towards the development of green dredging technology 3 October 2008 Henk van Muijen MTI Holland BV.
Suspended Load Above certain critical shear stress conditions, sediment particles are maintained in suspension by the exchange of momentum from the fluid.
The situation in Norway concerning sediments/dredging Tore Lundestad, Port of Borg, Norway.
Overview of Continuous Water-Quality Monitoring. Purpose of Monitoring Define the objectives of the water quality monitoring project 1. Environmental.
Page 1 CONSULTANCY AND RESEARCH IN AQUACULTURE AND THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT A Company in the NIVA-group Methodology for Environmental monitoring of aquaculture.
Savannah Harbor Expansion Project
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Two.
Plan Formulation for Deep Draft Harbors Navigation Measures.
Modelling Mixing Mechanisms Professor Ian Guymer, Professor of Civil Engineering School of Engineering, University of Warwick CIVIL RESEARCH GROUP SEMINAR.
Sediment Management Technologies W. H. McAnally PhD, PE, D.CE, D.NE, F.ASCE Research Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering Mississippi State University,
Challenges of Performing Contaminated Sediment Remediation and Restoration in China and Taiwan Brian J. Mastin, Ph.D. Dave Renfrew Jerry Chen Samuel Wu.
Dredging Engineering: Building & Maintaining Underwater Highways
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 6, 2012 Beneficial Use Opportunities.
OHHI Beach Modeling Group Meeting March 23, 2006 GLERL, Ann Arbor, MI Project Summary Project Title: Predicting Pathogen Fate in the Great Lakes Coastal.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Arben Asllani University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Prescriptive Analytics CHAPTER 7 Business Analytics with Shipment Models Business Analytics with Management.
S.A. Talke, H.E. de Swart, H.M. Schuttelaars Feedback between residual circulations and sediment distribution in highly turbid estuaries: an analytical.
Potential Impacts of a Seawater Intake Structure and a Brine Disposal System for the Proposed Desalination Plant at Mile 6, Swakopmund Marine Ecological.
The Severn Barrage Presentation to Severn Estuary Forum 8th June 2006
 These two agents: erosion and deposition are the most important agents that affect weathered materials.  Erosion involves the physical removal of weathered.
Where’s My Material? Appropriate Planning for Cap and Habitat Restoration Material Quantities Presented by Paul LaRosa, P.E., John Verduin, P.E., and Ram.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Tools for Assessing the Fate of Dredged Material Speaker: Joseph Gailani Research Hydraulic Engineer Research.
Effect of dredging sequence on the efficiency of water injection dredger and trailing suction hopper dredger, a case study of the port of Calais Abbass.
Development, Testing and Application of the Multi-Block LTFATE Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Model Earl J. Hayter See instructions for customizing.
Time (s) Angle (degrees) Pump via bottom reflection Pump via surface reflection Pump Drag head Underwater Anthropogenic.
Julio A. Zyserman, DHI, Solana Beach, California
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mississippi Coastal Improvements Program (MsCIP) “Comprehensive Barrier Island Restoration Plan” PIANC 2012.
Everything Goes Somewhere: Tracking the Movement of Dredged Sediments in Port and Coastal Environments Using Dual Signature Sediment Tracers Kevin Black.
Variational data assimilation for morphodynamic model parameter estimation Department of Mathematics, University of Reading: Polly Smith *, Sarah Dance,
Bayesian Networks for Modeling Dredging Decisions and Evaluating Alternative Regulatory Approaches Martin T. Schultz, Ph.D., presented by Matthew Bates.
VIEWING SURVEY DATA IN CONTEXT: CRITICAL, MAINTENANCE AND DESIGN TRIGGER LEVELS Jonathan Clarke Canterbury City Council.
Chapter 3 Facility Design and Construction. Chapter Objectives 1.Describe the process of facility design and construction 2.Demonstrate proficiency in.
DEVELOPING THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN. OBJECTIVES  Discuss why preliminary plans are important in the landscape design process.  Explain the functions of.
LECTURE 5 Nangwonvuma M/ Byansi D. Components, interfaces and integration Infrastructure, Middleware and Platforms Techniques – Data warehouses, extending.
Soil mechanics and foundation engineering-III (CE-434)
Computational Fluid Dynamics P AVEL P ETRUNEAC B ACHELOR OF S CIENCE D ISSERTATION R ENEWABLE E NERGY OF TURBULENCE EFFECTS ON THE SEABED Supervisor(s):
Same dredger, different location: Environmental impacts of dredging
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Lecture # 11 Water treatment:.
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
A Proposal: An outline of the guidance document
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
PIPE LIFTING KIT HAMMER MULETRAX 2300 C
Objectives Describe seven important potential environmental consequences of mining. Name four federal laws that relate to mining and reclaiming mined land.
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Infra program Project outline Jouko Kankainen
“EFFECTS Of CLIMATE CHANGE ON PORT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT”
Objectives Describe seven important potential environmental consequences of mining. Name four federal laws that relate to mining and reclaiming mined land.
Working Group on estuaries and coastal zones
Overview of Article 6 procedures under the Habitats Directive
PIANC, Chair of WFD Navigation Task Group
BOSTON HARBOR DEEP DRAFT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Presentation transcript:

PIANC MarCom Working Group 51 Report “Guidelines for Water Injection Dredging (WID)” Smits, J., Vandycke, S., van den Heuvel, M., Welp, T., Cranch, A., de Broe, E., Nasner, H., Stengel, T., Hesk, P., De Vlieger, H., Smit, P., Clay, N., and Gérard,E. Tim Welp Research Hydraulic Engineer Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory 23 October 2012

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® Presentation Outline  Working Group 51 Objectives  Elements of Report  WID Background (Theory, Applicability, Environmental Impacts, etc.)  WID Fleet  WID Contracts  WID Advantages and Disadvantages  Case Studies  Summary

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® Working Group 51 Objectives  Provide guidance when WID is feasible.  Provide guidance on contract conditions for WID-contracts between the contractor and the client.  Describe potential environmental effects of WID  Produce a summary of WID projects executed, and their performance.  Produce an overview of environmental studies related to WID  Produce an overview of existing WID-equipment (size, type, etc.)

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® Elements of Report  Theoretical considerations and physical principles of WID  Natural boundary conditions needed for an efficient use of WID  List of typical applications for the WID technique  List of available WID equipment throughout the world  Environmental considerations to be taken into account when using WID  Monitoring needs  Typical contract conditions that can be used for WID projects

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® Theory of WID The WID process can be divided in four sub-processes: Reduction of the soil’s cohesion; Fluidization of the soil layer; Flow of the density current; Settlement of the soil particles.

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® WID is NOT Agitation Dredging!  In WID the vertical movement of the sediment is purposely limited to approximately 1 to 3 metres, just above the bed;  During agitation dredging and hopper overflow the sediment is put into suspension, preferably over the whole height of the water column.

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® Applicability of WID Depends on:  Soil characteristics;  Site bathymetry and geometry;  Hydrodynamic conditions;  Geographic location (accessibility, proximity to structures, etc.);  Type and level of contamination

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® Environmental Impacts of WID Special attention has to be given when following conditions occur at or nearby the dredging site:  Sensitive habitats near the dredging area e.g. shellfish beds, spawning habitats, sandy gravely habitats, clear water estuaries, coral reefs…  When contaminants are in the soil. Effected parameters such as:  suspended solids,  turbidity,  contaminants  dissolved oxygen

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® WID Monitoring  Operational monitoring to control the process (mainly for the contractor)  Contractual monitoring to control the contractual obligations (mainly for the client)  Environmental monitoring to prove that all requirements are met (mainly for third parties)

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® WID Dredgers (as per June 2010)

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® Contractual Conditions Four general categories of contracts which are typically used for WID are:  the lump sum contract  the re-measurable contract  the charter (rental) contract  the target cost contract on an alliance or partnership basis

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® WID Advantages  In right conditions WID can be capable of high production rates at low costs.  Can be operated with minimal crew and other auxiliary plant.  Due to the relatively small amount of auxiliary equipment it can offer a relatively rapid excavation alternative.  WID has a continuous operating methodology. There is no need to transport the dredged material to a placement site.  Sediment remains in the natural system  It can be highly mobile, operate while leaving the shipping channel relatively unimpeded.  Can used underneath jetties and moored vessels), and have a reduced risk of damaging submerged infrastructure i.e., pipelines, cables, quay walls, lock aprons, dry-docks, etc.  Portable WID vessels can allow rapid deployment to relatively remote sites  Can be used for levelling water bottom for pipelines, tunnel sections, etc., or increasing depth of pipelines and cables.  An ambient current is not necessarily required if conditions right.  Can result in reduced carbon footprint.  WID may provide either a standalone dredging solution or a complement to conventional dredging methods.

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® WID Disadvantages  WID can only be used where in-water dredged material placement is allowed.  Applicability is more restricted by site-specific conditions than more traditional types of dredgers. Discharge channels, where necessary, require maintenance.  WID cannot be used where unacceptable environmental impacts can be caused by the generated density current (i.e., contaminate resuspension, unacceptable suspended solids impacts, etc)  Production can only be measured by pre- and post-dredge hydrographic survey, and surveying in fluid mud can be complicated (nautical depth - concept).  Destination of dredged material is more difficult to predict.

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® 6 Case Studies  Water Injection Dredging in the Weser Estuary  Port of Antwerp – Controlling Sediment Accumulation Behind Zandvliet Lock Using WID  Demonstration on the Michoud Canal, Louisiana  Outer Harbours of Bremerhaven  WID Assisting Trailing Suction Hopper Dredge Kakinda (India)  Sao Luis - Brazil

Innovative solutions for a safer, better world BUILDING STRONG ® Summary  Report Status – Pending PIANC approval of final draft.  While WID is a relatively new dredging method, its existed for approximately 25 years, can currently be considered as proven technology - WID fleet available on the market growing every year.  As opposed to agitation dredging, the WID generated density current does not disperse the sediment over the whole water column. The density current is more controllable than agitation dredging.  The exact destination of displaced material is difficult to predict.  The use of WID is more restricted by site-specific conditions than more traditional types of dredgers.  When applicable, WID has been demonstrated to be extremely effective and economical in tidal harbours, rivers, and estuaries, especially for fine grained soils.  All types of contract are possible however, currently most clients prefer a charter contract.