Advanced LIGO UK 1 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G030534-00-K Modal testing facility for Advanced LIGO Caroline Cantley University of Glasgow Advanced LIGO SUS Workshop,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Shaker training March 2011 Renard Klubnik Applications engineer The information contained in this document is the property of Meggitt Sensing Systems and.
Advertisements

Finite Element Analysis and Testing Correlation of the Mercury Laser Altimeter Craig L. Stevens Mechanical Systems Analysis & Simulation.
Motion Control for Packaging Machines Vibration analysis through motion control-motor-load interaction.
Quickfilter Pro Software Demonstration for QF1D512 The following slides will illustrate how you can design and verify a filter design in minutes! BEGIN.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
slide 1 Measuring Natural Frequency and Non-Linear Damping on Oscillating Micro Plates ICEM 13 Alexandroupolis, Greece July 1-5, 2007 Sandia is a multiprogram.
Laser Doppler Vibrometer (LDV)
1414 Ball Sound Jakub Chudík Task When two hard steel balls, or similar, are brought gently into contact with each other, an unusual ‘chirping’
Lecture 10. AFM.
MODULE 10 EXPERIMENTAL MODAL ANALYSIS Most vibration problems are related to resonance phenomena where operational forces excite one or more mode of vibration.
Wearable Sensor Analysis for Gesture Recognition Supervisor:Dr. Manolya Kavakli Student:Alexey Novoselov St. ID:
Review of HAM Suspension Designs for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson HAM Isolation Requirements Review Caltech, July 11th 2005.
NSF : Nov. 10, LIGO End to End simulation overview  Time domain simulation written in C++  Like MATLAB with Interferometer toolbox  Major physics.
Use ofSiesta in VIRGO commissioning Lisa Barsotti University of Pisa – INFN Pisa For the Virgo collaboration Caltech, December 19th 2003.
Page 1 GLAST LAT ProjectAugust 30, 2004 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT Accelerometer and Thermal Instrumentation Review Presented by Leonard Lee John.
Ae105c CDR, June 3, 2009 p. 1 Ae105c Term Project CDR Team report from Experimental Team Jason Cerundolo Vivek Viswanathan Pelayo Bohorquez.
Benoit BOLZON Nanobeam 2005 – Kyoto Active mechanical stabilisation LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF.
QD0 stabilisation update (since last update in MDI) A.Jeremie A.Badel, B.Caron, R.LeBreton, J.Lottin, J.Allibe, G.Balik, J.P.Baud, L.Brunetti, G.Deleglise.
Metra Mess- und Frequenztechnik Radebeul / Germany Piezoelectric Accelerometers Theory & Application.
On the Accuracy of Modal Parameters Identified from Exponentially Windowed, Noise Contaminated Impulse Responses for a System with a Large Range of Decay.
Development of Light Weight Composite Constraining Layers for Aircraft Skin Damping RAM 7 Workshop November 4 & 5, 2014 Nick Oosting Roush Industries
Fiber-Optic Accelerometer Using Wavefront-Splitting Interferometry Hsien-Chi Yeh & Shulian Zhang July 14, 2006.
NI DAQ, Nanopositioner (Tilt mirror)  Reference: NARIONAL INSTRUMENT, “NI-DAQ 7, DAQmx C Reference Help ”, 2004 NARIONAL INSTRUMENT, “DAQ, 6534X User.
STREGA WP1/M1 mirror substrates GEO LIGO ISA Scientific motivation: Mechanical dissipation from dielectric mirror coatings is predicted to be a significant.
SUSPENSION DESIGN FOR ADVANCED LIGO: Update on GEO Activities Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow for the GEO 600 suspension team LSC Meeting, Louisiana,
Conceptual Design for Advanced LIGO Suspensions Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University for the GEO suspension team +contribution.
Test Planning Modal Analysis and Testing S. Ziaei-Rad.
Update on Advanced LIGO suspension design and technology development towards the quad noise prototype Caroline A. Cantley for Advanced LIGO Suspension.
1 Challenge the future High accuracy machines on factory floors Anthonie Boogaard.
Tsinghua University·Beijing Real-time dynamic hybrid testing coupled finite element and shaking table Jin-Ting Wang, Men-Xia Zhou & Feng Jin.
Advanced LIGO Suspension Status Caroline A. Cantley Advanced LIGO Suspension Team / University of Glasgow for the GEO600 Group LSC Meeting, LLO March 2004.
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
Progress in identification of damping: Energy-based method with incomplete and noisy data Marco Prandina University of Liverpool.
Noncontact Modal Analysis of a Pipe Organ Reed using Airborne Ultrasound Stimulated Vibrometry May 25, 2004 Acoustical Society of America Meeting Thomas.
Advanced LIGO UK G K 1 Some recent work on blade performance Caroline Cantley, Justin Greenhalgh, Mike Plissi, Norna Robertson, Calum Torrie,
LIGO Surf Project Q Of the Thermal Noise Interferometer Adam Bushmaker Mentor: Dr. Eric Black LIGO-G D.
Update on Suspension Activities for Advanced LIGO Caroline A. Cantley University of Glasgow for the GEO600 Group LSC Meeting, Livingston, March 2003 (Technical.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
Update on Activities in Suspensions for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University LSC meeting, Hanford, Aug 20 th 2002.
Noncontact Modal Excitation of Small Structures Using Ultrasound Radiation Force Society for Experimental Mechanics Annual Meeting Springfield, MA June.
Introduction: The use of piezoelectric materials in smart/adaptive structures has been studied intensely for more than a decade. Engineering applications.
Thermal Noise in Thin Silicon Structures
Charles University Prague Charles University Prague Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Absolute charge measurements using laser setup Pavel Bažant,
Mechanical Mode Damping for Parametric Instability Control
REDESIGN OF AN AIRCRAFT ENGINE EQUIPMENT USING 3D DYNAMIC WHOLE ENGINE MODEL Company: SNECMA MOTEUR Engineering System Integration Division Author: Alain.
Passive isolation: Pre-isolation for FF quads A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, A. Hervé, N. Siegrist, F. Ramos.
Advanced LIGO UK 1 LIGO-G Z Development issues for the UK Advanced LIGO project Caroline Cantley Glasgow University for the UK Advanced LIGO Team.
Modal Analysis Dept. of Mechanical Engineering Yungpeng Wang 南臺科技大學 STUST.
Non-contact mode excitation of small structures in air using ultrasound radiation force Acoustical Society of America Meeting: May 17, 2005 Thomas M. Huber,
Modal Testing 523L (Session 5). Frequency Response Frequency Response Function – System characteristics in frequency domain How to find FRF – Mathematical.
Detector Characterisation and Optimisation David Robertson University of Glasgow.
The Mechanical Simulation Engine library An Introduction and a Tutorial G. Cella.
Advanced LIGO UK 1 LIGO-G K OSEM Development UK Advanced LIGO project Stuart Aston University of Birmingham for the UK Advanced LIGO Team LSC.
LIGO-G Z LIGO’s Thermal Noise Interferometer Progress and Status Eric D. Black, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, and Shanti Rao (Caltech) Seiji Kawamura.
1/31 Correlation and Error Localization Analytical versus Experimental Dynamics of a Large Structural Assembly Thesis presentation, Herman Marquart, 2013.
NIST 1-kilonewton Dynamic Force Calibration Facility Ako Chijioke, Rick. L. Seifarth, Zeina J. Kubarych Mass and Force Group Quantum Metrology Division.
SPM Users Basic Training August 2010 Lecture VIII – AC Imaging Modes: ACAFM and MAC Imaging methods using oscillating cantilevers.
FUNCTION GENERATOR.
Modal Testing 421L/521L (Lab 9) 10/21/2016. Frequency Response Frequency Response Function – System characteristics in frequency domain How to find FRF.
Model Reduction & Interface Modeling in Dynamic Substructuring Application to a Multi-Megawatt Wind Turbine MSc. Presentation Paul van der Valk.
Integration and Differentiation of Time Histories
Status of Vibration Measurement Work at BNL
Signal recycling R&D at LAL: Influence in Virgo
Tuned Mass Damper Investigation for Apache Struts
1/10 prototype support tube
Mechanische trillingen
Experimentele Modale Analyse
Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection
Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection
Vibrationdata Modal Testing, Part I By Tom Irvine.
Presentation transcript:

Advanced LIGO UK 1 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Modal testing facility for Advanced LIGO Caroline Cantley University of Glasgow Advanced LIGO SUS Workshop, Caltech, Oct ‘03 LIGO-G K

Advanced LIGO UK 2 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K What is modal testing? Experimental process of characterising the dynamic behaviour of a structure in terms of its modal properties (frequencies / mode shapes / damping factors)

Advanced LIGO UK 3 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Why do we need a modal testing facility? Modal analysis of structure –Establish modal parameters (dynamic properties) Natural frequencies Mode shapes Damping factors Can be done by: –Theoretical FE analysis Approximate theoretical method Accuracy always should be questioned Validation is important consideration or –Experimental modal analysis Accurate since based on measured not predicted behaviour Design/troubleshooting tool Validation tool for FE restriction - the physical structure must exist or –Both (complementary tools) Design stage FE analysis  manufacture prototype  experimental modal analysis  modal model  verification or structural modification within modal model  structural modification of prototype  FINAL STRUCTURE

Advanced LIGO UK 4 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Modal testing: step details 5 main steps: –(1) MODEL – creation of the structure Points, lines and surfaces used to define the shape of an object –(2) MEASUREMENTS - acquire the data Driving point DOF (may be more than one) Response (3 DOF multi-point) –(3) ANALYSIS - analyse the data Frequency, identify peaks and curve fit, FRF synthesis

Advanced LIGO UK 5 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Modal testing: step details –(4) RESULTS – synthesis of mode shapes time domain animation –(5) MODIFICATIONS – modify the structure To simulate the effects of a structural modification –Mass, stiffness, damping

Advanced LIGO UK 6 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Applications to Advanced LIGO Suspension design: 1)Support structures (1 st mode <150Hz?) 2)Cantilever blades (internal modes) 3)Other substructures e.g. tablecloth modes Other: 1)Optics table 2)Silica/sapphire mirror substrates (thermal noise predictions) 3)Silica fibres/ribbons

Advanced LIGO UK 7 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K The task in hand Source suitable equipment for proposed ‘Modal Testing Facility’ for Advanced LIGO Three equipment functions to consider in the process of modal testing: –Excitation method –Response measurement method –Data acquisition & analysis software

Advanced LIGO UK 8 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Requirements for the various applications

Advanced LIGO UK 9 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Contact excitation Mechanical shaker –White noise wide range of frequencies –Sinusoidal testing sweep through frequency until hit resonance – test at this frequency Impact hammer –Impulse response frequency range depends on properties of hammer tip so choose the tip for the application –hard tip (high frequency modes) –soft tip (low frequency modes)

Advanced LIGO UK 10 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Non-contact excitation Electrostatic –Swept sine Currently used to locate modes on mirror substrates and then perform Q measurements (ringdown) –White noise Acoustic –White noise would work for ribbon/fibre excitation (limited to measurements in air only)

Advanced LIGO UK 11 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Impact hammers Impact Hammers –PCB Impact Hammers by Techni measure –instrumented hammers for measuring the force input during modal impact testing. Kits which include power supplies, two accelerometers and cabling, are also supplied. –General purpose hammer kit £2.5K –Sledge hammer kit £3.5K

Advanced LIGO UK 12 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Response measurement Accelerometers (contact) –Two main types (Capactive – simple battery hookup – static acceleration measurement) Piezoelectric – ICP charge output (integrated circuit piezoelectric) with built-in signal conditioning –e.g. ICP structural test / array accelerometers (PCB 333 series) –Lightweight for multi-point modal and structural testing Laser systems (non-contact) –Laser vibrometer – Doppler effect 1D - basic 3D – measures shear from perpendicular offset Scanning – precision applications Lambda Photometric (Polytec)

Advanced LIGO UK 13 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Laser Vibrometer 1D general purpose use ~ £28K 3D contains 3 independent laser Doppler sensors in one common optical head ~ £32K

Advanced LIGO UK 14 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Data acquisition and analysis Data acquisition –Dual channel (~£15K) Larson Davis FFT analyser –Multi-channel (x few £10K’s) Zonic data acquisition system Data analysis software –STAR6 modal - simple, PC based, user friendly (<£11K) –IDEAS – advanced (x few £10K’s) –LMS -advanced (x few £10K’s)

Advanced LIGO UK 15 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Preliminary conclusions Testing time is not a major consideration. Facility required intermittently. OPTION ‘1’ –Impact hammer kit. ICP accelerometers with dual channel Larson Davis. STAR6 modal analysis software mounted on available PC (~£23K to ~£31K depending on STAR6 edition) OPTION ‘2’ –Impact hammer kit. 1D laser vibrometer with STAR6 modal (~£34K to ~£42K depending on STAR6 edition). Laser vibrometer modal tests will be starting soon at Glasgow.

Advanced LIGO UK 16 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Next steps Feedback from this discussion Detailed prices Final recommendations to follow