Conclusion and follow-up. October 10th 2005 1 © Raúl García-Castro Conclusion and follow-up Raúl García-Castro October 11th, 2005 Interoperability Working.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

© by cellconsult.com Application Testing & Test Management.

Advertisements

Usage Record: Response to Public Comments Presented by Laura McGinnis at GGF17 May 11, 2006 Tokyo, Japan.

NEXOF-RA Standardisation Support Franz Kudorfer, Siemens AG NEXOF-RA.

Using XSLT for Interoperability: DOE and The Traveling Domain Experiment Monday 20 th of October, 2003 Antoine Isaac, Raphaël Troncy and Véronique Malaisé.

Improvements on the benchmark suites. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Improvements on the benchmark suites Raúl García-Castro October 10th, 2005.

Method for developing the benchmark suites. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Method for developing the benchmark suites Raúl García-Castro October.

Wrap up – Day 1. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Wrap up – Day 1 Raúl García-Castro October 10th, 2005 Interoperability Working Days October 10th-11th,

Key Considerations for Report Generation & Customization Richard Wzorek Director, Production IT Confidential © Almac Group 2012.

Alumni Surveys Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Advisory Board Meeting October 18, 2006.

Prof. Dr. Barbara Witte Web 2.0 in the German Election Campaign.

© ABB Ltd ABB Experience Neela Mayur CIM Users’ Group Meeting June 12, 2008.

M-learning for PDAs: Enhancing the Flexibility of Distance Education – Experiences with a Learning Environment for Mobile Distance Learners.

OntoStudio & KAON results of interoperability benchmark 10. october 2005 Markus Zondler, University of Karlsruhe.

Electronic questionnaires between Customs statistics and PSIs for data checking Anne Oikarinen, Finnish Customs, Statistics Unit.

Using the H-index to Measure Czech Economic Research and Czech Researchers’ Habits Related to Research Papers T. Cahlík, H. Pessrová.

1/ 27 The Agriculture Ontology Service Initiative APAN Conference 20 July 2006 Singapore.

Impact Evaluation: Initiatives, Activities, & Coalitions Stephen Horan, PhD Community Health Solutions, Inc. September 12, 2004.

1 PDF Optimizer J. Poole. Optimizer, TM Knoxville, October 2007, J. Poole 2 Documentation The documentation on the JACoW website concerning use of the.

Chapter 13: Developing and Implementing Effective Accounting Information Systems

UESCO/IFLA Workshop on Development of Information Literacy through School Libraries in Southeast Asia September 2005.

Web & TV Workshop – Next Steps Giuseppe Pascale, Opera Software.

Benchmarking in WP 2.1. Sep 28th, 2004 © R. García-Castro, A. Gómez-Pérez Raúl García-Castro Asunción Gómez-Pérez September 28th, 2004 Benchmarking.

11111 Benchmarking in KW. Sep 10th, 2004 © R. García-Castro, A. Gómez-Pérez Raúl García-Castro, Asunción Gómez-Pérez September 10th, 2004 Benchmarking.

Benchmarking the interoperability of ODTs. April 7th © Raúl García-Castro, Asunción Gómez-Pérez Benchmarking the interoperability of ontology development.

Register-Based Census 2011 in Slovenia – Some Quality Aspects Danilo Dolenc Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia UNECE-Eurostat Expert Group.

Benchmarking Methodology. Sep 27th, 2004 © R. García-Castro, A. Gómez-Pérez Raúl García-Castro Asunción Gómez-Pérez September 27th, 2004 Benchmarking.

Performance appraisal of civil servants in Azerbaijan Republic Baku, 10 October 2012.

Export experiments in Corese. October 10th Export experiments in Corese Olivier Corby October 10th, 2005 Interoperability Working Days October 10th-11th,

, 1/21, © Library and Documentation Systems Division 21 st APAN Meeting Tokyo, January 2006 AGROVOC and AOS, Margherita Sini, FAO From.

Conclusion Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –

Semantic based P2P System for local e-Government Fernando Ortiz-Rodriguez 1, Raúl Palma de León 2 and Boris Villazón-Terrazas 2 1 1Universidad Tamaulipeca.

Using Several Ontologies for Describing Audio-Visual Documents: A Case Study in the Medical Domain Sunday 29 th of May, 2005 Antoine Isaac 1 & Raphaël.

FAO of the UN Library and Documentation Systems Division AOS workshop Beijing April 04 Tutorial 2: Ontology Tools Boris Lauser Food and Agriculture Organization.

Oregon Standards: An Update 2009 Superintendent’s Summer Institute Oregon Department of Education August 3, 2009.

Improving Dependability in Service Oriented Architectures using Ontologies and Fault Injection Binka Gwynne Jie Xu School of Computing University of Leeds.

Export experiments in WebODE. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Export experiments in WebODE Raúl García-Castro October 10th, 2005 Interoperability.

CS 463 Sample Presentation G. S. Young Computer Science Department.

11 Benchmarking Ontology Technology. May 13th, 2004 © R. García-Castro, A. Gómez-Pérez Raúl García-Castro, Asunción Gómez-Pérez May 13th, 2004 Benchmarking.

NEFIS (WP5) Evaluation Meeting, November 2004 Evaluation Metadata Aljoscha Requardt, University of Hamburg Response rate: 93% (14 of 15 partners.

May 16, 2005Chair, IEEE May 16, 2005Chair, IEEE Next Steps & Action Items from March 2005 Plenary Status Review - - May 2005 Interim.

The next generation in cadastral mapping - MUNSYS Presented by Colin Hobson California Cadastral Mapping Association, Conference of.

Continuous Integration CruiseControl.Net. Best Practices Use version control; Automate the build; Build should be self tested; Developers must commit.

Coaching with the Homemade Test Keep your Class on Track and Still Prepare them for the High-Stakes Test.

The Education Framework (or: What’s going on in the education area) Jörg Diederich (L3S) Berlin meeting, 2007.

Writing 1 and Writing 2—January 8, 2016

Satisfying Requirements BPF for DRA shall address: –DAQ Environment (Eclipse RCP): Gumtree ISEE workbench integration; –Design Composing and Configurability,

T Iteration Demo Vitamin B I1 Iteration

Baldrige in Action the sequel Proudly presented by the teachers in K- 2.

Experimentation phase 2. October 11th © Raúl García-Castro Experimentation Phase 2 Raúl García-Castro October 11th, 2005 Interoperability Working.

1 Ontology Evolution within Ontology Editors Presentation at EKAW, Sigüenza, October 2002 L. Stojanovic, B. Motik FZI Research Center for Information Technologies.

Malta-Surveys: Online Polls May 2014.

Import experiments in Protégé. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Import experiments in Protégé Raúl García-Castro October 10th, 2005 Interoperability.

Presented by Jacki Naughton, Online Education Specialist Frank Tomsic, Director of Online Learning Using Web Tools and Strategies to Enhance Student Engagement.

HOW TO FIX MSVCR100. DLL IS MISSING ERROR? missing-error.

THE EU CIRCULAR ECONOMY PACKAGE: THE GOVERNANCE?

WIGOS Data Quality Monitoring System (WDQMS)

Q023 This diner used to give its employees a free meal. Now everyone must steal what they want to eat. Change ... used > use its > their everyone > workers.

Review of Authoring Subsystem

Development of the Amphibian Anatomical Ontology

A review of ontology editor evaluation Presenter: Yujie Cao

Coordinate Operations Standard

Summing-up discussion

Content. Content Energy system design steps.

Actively Learning Ontology Matching via User Interaction

“Access to Natura 2000 Data” -

The Web Development Life Cycle

Stuart McAllister ESTAT F4

Progress with transition to new SDF

Summary of Conference Call – Feb 8

Instructor: Kurt Baker

Presentation transcript:

Conclusion and follow-up. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Conclusion and follow-up Raúl García-Castro October 11th, 2005 Interoperability Working Days October 10th-11th, 2005

Conclusion and follow-up. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro What did we achieve? Refinement of the benchmark suites. Report on the evaluation of RDF(S) import and export capabilities of ontology editors using the latest versions of the tools. Preparation of the next phase of the evaluation.

Conclusion and follow-up. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Exporting and Importing RDF(S) Most of the tools export correctly to RDF(S). Every tool has some problem when importing RDF(S). RDF-based tools are the ones that import/export better. Information addition/loss is common when importing/exporting.

Conclusion and follow-up. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Tool Interoperability We are still far from achieving ontology development tools interoperability using RDF(S) as an interchanfe format.

Conclusion and follow-up. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Developer involvement Involvement of tool developers is crucial for improvement. All the tools that participated with support of tool developers were improved, correcting errors in their RDF(S) importers/exporters.

Conclusion and follow-up. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Comments / Open Questions Automation of the experimentation can be quite useful. How do we improve interoperability? –Agreement between developers. –Tools must export/import correctly. Should ontology tools agree on “how” to export RDF(S)? –Tools must be compliant with standards. –Problems with agreements: may induce to forget/misuse standards. Should we use fragments of a “real” ontology in the benchmarks (see Corese)? –Not necessary with the current simple ontologies.

Conclusion and follow-up. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Next steps Refinement of the benchmark suites. Perform again the modified/new benchmarks before end of Meet again (maybe in Knowledge Web general assembly in Trento, January 2006).

Conclusion and follow-up. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Thanks everyone for coming!

Conclusion and follow-up. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Conclusion and follow-up Raúl García-Castro October 11th, 2005 Interoperability Working Days October 10th-11th, 2005