Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.

Advertisements

Eric TorrenceJanuary Oregon Tau Activities Tau Trigger Efficiency Z→ττ Dijet Fakes Tau Spin Analysis Tau Trigger Activities Validation HLT Monitoring.

Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS

J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,

Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.

1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.

A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.

Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Jets Production Association with a Z boson in pp Collision at 7 and 8 TeV with the CMS Detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon Ph. D. Thesis.

PAT-driven Efficiency Measurements and Calculations A. Singh, Amandeep Singh, S. Beri, Pb. University(Chd.)‏ J. Berryhill, K. Misra FermiLab (U.S)

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.

Data results for inclusive all-hadronic (RA  with 318 nb -1 SUSY Hadronic/GMSB Meeting [C. Rogan et al.] Data Plots Towards.

H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.

Klaus Rabbertz CERN, LHC MBUE Working Group 1 First UE Results from CMS at 900 GeV Klaus Rabbertz, KIT for the CMS Collaboration LHC MBUE Working.

A measurement of the Ratio of Tree over Two Jet Cross Sections with CMS at 7TeV P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas, I.Evangelou, N.Manthos University.

Instructions for DP Approval Slides I Plots: – Fonts Large for readability Standard fonts : – Arial, Times New Roman, or similar – Do not use Comic Sans.

73X Validation, Feb. 23 rd, 2015 Robert Schöfbeck, Mariarosaria D’Alfonso, Matthias Weber report on 73X rereco Feb. 23 th, 2015 Robert Schoefbeck, Mariarosaria.

Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.

Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.

Centrality Categorization and its Application to Physics Effects in High-Energy d+A Collisions Javier Orjuela-Koop University of Colorado Boulder For the.

Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections: Update 36 pb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University of Ioannina, Greece QCD High p T Meeting 17.

Jet Calibration Experience in CDF Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool -CDF calorimeter -Relative Calibrations -Absolute Calibration -Multiple Interactions.

Status of Muon Trigger Efficiency Measurement for ICHEP Benedikt Hegner, Benjamin Klein, Yvonne Küssel, Patricia Lobelle, Markus Marienfeld, Rahmat Rahmat,

Study of L1 and HLT efficiency in VBTF Monika Jindal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Jasbir Singh (panjab University, Chandigarh), Kajari Mazumdar (TIFR,

Update ON the Study of Subjet Multiplicity at CMS 7TeV Manuk Zubin Mehta, Manjit Kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh 11/27/

Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.

Low p T Muon trigger studies for J/       Supreet Pal Singh (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Prof. J.B.Singh (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Prof.

Hadronic Event Shapes at 7 TeV with CMS Detector S,Banerjee, G. Majumdar, MG + ETH, Zurich CMS PAS QCD M. Guchait DAE-BRNS XIX High Energy Physics.

C2CR07-Lake Tahoe February 28, 2007 Rick Field – Florida/CDFPage 1 C2CR07 Rick Field University of Florida (for the CDF Collaboration) CDF Run 2 Min-Bias.

Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.

Study of the Subjet Multiplicity at CMS Manuk Zubin Mehta Prof. Manjit Kaur Panjab University Chandigarh 12/21/2015Inida CMS-Meeting.

1 Hadronic Event Shape Variables in pp collision at 7 TeV Introduction Data-set and Event Selection Comparison of Basic Jet Objects in Data and MC Event.

1 Search for Dijet Resonance in 7 TeV pp Collisions at CMS Sertac Ozturk Cukurova University / LPC.

1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.

Update : Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas, I.Evangelou, N.Manthos University of Ioannina, Greece Senior Editor.

Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.

Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,

The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.

Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.

DN/d  and dN/dp T analysis status Gabor Veres for the working group QCD meeting, Jan 12, 2010.

394 Data ValSkim Validation JetMET DQM and Validation Group.

Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.

Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.

A measurement of the Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections with CMS at 7TeV 70 nb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas, I.Evangelou, N.Manthos University.

Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.

Impact Parameter Resolution Measurements from 900 GeV LHC DATA Boris Mangano & Ryan Kelley (UCSD)

I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.

Muon Reconstruction and Vertex Constraint Giovanni Abbiendi Bologna CMS meeting, 20 November 2007.

 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.

PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.

Moriond 2001Jets at the TeVatron1 QCD: Approaching True Precision or, Latest Jet Results from the TeVatron Experimental Details SubJets and Event Quantities.

Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.

David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

(members of the group) Underlying CMS F.Ambroglini, D.Acosta, P.Bartalini, A.De Roeck, L.Fanò, R. Field, K.Kotov, E.Izaguirre, A.Vilela.

Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies

Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS

Jet Studies 1. Changes in seed finding for cone jets reconstruction

Bernard Andrieu (LPNHE,Paris)

W→τν Note & Tau candidates in first data

Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick

for the CMS Collaboration

Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS

Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS

Quarkonium production in ALICE

Lake Louise Winter Institute

Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS

Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS

Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).

Tracks and double partons

Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi

Presentation transcript:

Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked

1) Responsible for taking care of Data Quality Monitoring code for UE analysis. This code is in CVS and included in standard reconstruction sequence. DQM/Physics/src/QcdUeDQM.cc 2) Participating very actively in UE analysis for LHC 900 GeV to 7 TeV; Main responsibility is track validation, event and determination of track selection efficiencies and optimization. Approved for ICHEP!! Some plots in next slides PAS : CMS AN-2010/ The underlying event in proton - proton collisions at 7 TeV PAS : CMS AN-2010/ The underlying event in proton - proton collisions at 900 GeV 3) Activity in JetMET group: Code maintenance and improvement for Offline JetMET HLT Determination of Jet related trigger efficiencies. Underlying Event Analysis

Data and MC samples, Events/Tracks Selection Vertex Selection:  Exactly one vertex  vtx != bs  |z(vtx) – z(bs)| < 10 cm  ndof > 4 Track Selection:  pT > 0.5 GeV, || < 2.0  d xy /σ dxy, d dz /σ dz < 3  σ/pt < 5%  high quality tracks Data: /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-May6thPDSkim_GOODCOLL-v1/RAW-RECO (using JSON file for good LS and run selection) MC: /MinBias_TuneD6T_7TeV-pythia6/Spring10-START3X_V26B-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO /MinBias_TuneP0_7TeV-pythia6/Spring10-START3X_V26B-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO /MinBias_7TeV-pythia8/Spring10-START3X_V26B-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO /MinBias_TuneCW_7TeV-pythia6/Summer10-START36_V10-v1/GEN-SIM- RECODEBUG 1/30/20163Sunil Bansal  dz = sqrt((  dz track) 2 + (  dz vertex) 2 )  dxy = sqrt((  dxy track) 2 + (  dxy vertex) 2 )

PAS: Event Selection Efficiency Good agreement between data and MC (within few %) Cut “ndof > 4” show different efficiency for data and MC Systematic because of this is ~2%. Cut on leading track jet also give different efficiency for data and MC. This is because of different pT and multiplicity spectrum in data and MC. (MC tuning is required)

Track Selection Efficiency PAS: Good agreement between data and MC (within few %) Cut on track pT give different efficiency for data and MC. This is because of different pT and multiplicity Spectrum in data and MC. (MC tuning is required) Events with leading track jet pT > 3 GeV, |eta| < 2.0

Charged Particle Density PAS: Large discrepancy between data and MC. Data is described better by MC ( with tunes, Like CW, DW) after asking for a hard scale in the event (track jet pT > 20 GeV) Same observation as during 900 GeV analysis

pT sum density vs azimuth No tune describes data well, agreement improves after requiring hard scale in the event

Activity in JetMET group 1)Responsible (with Shabnam Jabeen) for taking care Offline DQM code of HLT triggers for Jet and MET. This code is in CVS and included in standard reconstruction sequence and output can be seen in Offline GUI. DQMOffline/Trigger/src/JetMETHLTOfflineSource.cc This code include the analysis of L1, HLT and reco objects. All possible plots (always chances to improve further) in place to debug the problem in HLT (if it is there). This code also includes the function to calculate the Jet and MET trigger efficiency using 3 independent methods. 2)Studying in detail the performance of Jet triggers. Plots are approved for ICHEP!! See in next slides.

Data samples & Selections Data: /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-GOODCOLL-May27thSkim_v5/RAW-RECO Using JSON file: Cert_ _7TeV_StreamExpress_Collisions10_JSON.txt Run , (”tower scheme 6”) L ~ 1.7 nb -1 MC: /QCD_Pt-15_7TeV-pythia6/Spring10-START3X_V26B-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO TPG Skim: Atleast two jets with eT > 4 GeV and |eta| < 2 Atleast one jet within |eta| < 1 Jet ID: e.m.f > 0.01 n90Hits > 1 fHPD < Many plots approved by collaboration

Efficiency estimations  Select unbiased event samples Many options available with data already collected: 1) Inclusive sample: no trigger requirement, skimming based on the jet pT with threshold lower than HLT threhold i.e. HLT_Jet GeV HLT_Jet GeV HLT_Jet GeV 2) MinBias triggered sample: skimming based on HLT_MinBias_BSC 3)Muon triggered sample: skimming based on HLT_L1MuOpen  Take the selected sample, check how many them fire the trigger (under study) and leading jet (satisfying loose jet ID) have matching HLT object (dR < 0.1)

Comparison of efficiency estimated using different unbiased samples data Trigger efficiency estimated w.r.t. different samples are in good agreement for HLT_Jet15, HLT_Jet30 and HLT_Jet50. This statement holds for MC as well. Next plots are w.r.t. sample selected using Muon trigger (HLT_L1MuOpen)

Trigger efficiency in data

Data vs MC

Summary Active participation in data analysis and service work during last 7/8 months. Very happy to contribute towards ICHEP results from CMS, felt the pulse! Here presented brief overview of some of the contributions. Also working (with Kalanand on the Jet Energy Correction using Z(ee) + 1 jet balance technique. Mainly concentrating in the evaluation of systematic effect and including the PF and JPT jets in the machinery (No slides here).