Hydrologic Indices Yuba River Development Project FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Thursday, April 11, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Streamflow conditions across North Carolina Assessment of hydrologic conditions observed through.
Advertisements

Skill Analysis for Runoff Forecasts on the Western Slope of the Sierra Nevada B. D. Harrison; R. C. Bales Sierra Nevada Research Institute University of.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Water Supply & Operations Meeting Billings, Montana October 8, 2009 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Cynthia Palmer – Forecaster National Weather Service – Sacramento.
The Normal Distribution
1 Overview of South Yuba River Hydrology Bob Center Presented to FERC Academy on December 10, 2005.
ESTIMATING THE 100-YEAR FLOOD FORDECORAH USING THE RAINFALL EVENTS OF THE RIVER'S CATCHMENT By Kai TsurutaFaculty Advisor: Richard Bernatz Abstract:This.
Start Audio Lecture! FOR462: Watershed Science & Management 1 Streamflow Analysis Module 8.7.
The hydrograph for Ten Mile Creek is shown to the right. Hydrographs are calculated for each of the 30 Subcatchments. Radar data is used to create rainfall.
June 26, PCWA - Middle Fork Project Project Operations
Recap of Water Year 2008 Hydrologic Forecast and Forecasts for Water Year 2009 Francisco Munoz-Arriola Alan F. Hamlet Shraddhanand Shukla Dennis P. Lettenmaier.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
Normal Distributions What is a Normal Distribution? Why are Many Variables Normally Distributed? Why are Many Variables Normally Distributed? How Are Normal.
As with averages, researchers need to transform data into a form conducive to interpretation, comparisons, and statistical analysis measures of dispersion.
1 (Student’s) T Distribution. 2 Z vs. T Many applications involve making conclusions about an unknown mean . Because a second unknown, , is present,
1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
CRFS Technical Committee Fall Meeting LC Operations Update November 20, 2014.
Hood River Basin Study Water Resources Modeling (MODSIM) Taylor Dixon, Hydrologist February 12, 2014.
CRFS March 30, Virgin River NWS-SWS: 90 NWS-ESP: (+8-15% El Nino weighted) NRCS daily: 80 NRCS statistical: 78 Coordinated: 80 / 195% median.
Reclamation Mid-Term Operational Modeling Seasonal to Year-Two Colorado River Streamflow Prediction Workshop CBRFC March 21-22, 2011 Katrina Grantz, PhD.
STATISTIC & INFORMATION THEORY (CSNB134) MODULE 2 NUMERICAL DATA REPRESENTATION.
Chapter 3 - Part B Descriptive Statistics: Numerical Methods
Municipal Water District of Orange County 2015 Water Supply Report February 10, 2015.
Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium Tempe, AZ September 28, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center : A Year of Extremes.
Chapter 3 – Descriptive Statistics
The Colorado Surface Water Supply Index (SWSI) Performance Since 1981 Nolan Doesken Colorado State Climatologist Colorado Climate Center Colorado State.
44 th Annual Mid-Pacific Region 2011 Water Users Conference Water Supply Outlook Reno, Nevada January 26-28, 2011.
46 th Annual Mid-Pacific Region 2013 Water Users Conference Water Supply Outlook Reno, Nevada January 23-25, 2013.
Business and Finance Colleges Principles of Statistics Eng. Heba Hamad week
Climate: Outlook and Operational Planning Jayantha Obeysekera (’Obey’), Ph.D.,P.E.,D.WRE Department Director Hydrologic & Environmental Systems Modeling.
Lake and Stream Hydrology 2009 UJ,UH, &TPU Timo Huttula JY/BYTL& SYKE/VTO
New Mexico Rio Grande Water Operations Modeling: Creating a synthetic flow sequence representative of regional paleo-hydrology for alternatives analysis.
Watershed Hydrology Modeling: What is Considered Calibrated? Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, HIT Tetra Tech Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, HIT Tetra Tech 27 th.
1 1 Slide STATISTICS FOR BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS Seventh Edition AndersonSweeneyWilliams Slides Prepared by John Loucks © 1999 ITP/South-Western College.
RIVER DISCHARGE *
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.
Climate Outlook Jayantha Obeysekera (’Obey’), Ph.D.,P.E.,D.WRE Department Director Hydrologic & Environmental Systems Modeling.
A Comparison of a SWAT model for the Cannonsville Watershed with and without Variable Source Area Hydrology Josh Woodbury Christine A. Shoemaker Dillon.
Assign Annual Demand for a Purpose CALSIM Simulation Compare the Long-term Average Annual Friant Unit Delivery to Benchmark Study CALSIM Simulation Completed.
USBR Updates: Green River CRFS Meeting March 27, 2014.
Hydrologic Conditions Update and Outlook for Flood Season December 2013 Hydrology and Flood Operations Office Division of Flood Management Department.
Statistical Analysis. Variability of data All living things vary, even two peas in the same pod, so how do we measure this variation? We plot data usually.
Water Balance/Operations Modeling Yuba River Development Project FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Wednesday, May 9, 2012.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Water Supply & Operations Meeting Billings, Montana October 9, 2008 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Wastewater Workgroup Conference Call December 6, 2011.
YCWA Flood Management for Relicensing 9/24/14 9/24/20141.
October 28, 2015 Yuba River Development Project Slide 1 Licensee Response to Relicensing Participant Tunnel Closure Proposal Yuba County Water Agency Yuba.
AGRICULTURAL DROUGHT INDICATORS AT REGIONAL SCALE BASED ON MODELS OF WATER BALANCE AT LEFT MARGIN OF GUADIANA RIVER N. Kotsovinos, P. Angelidis Democritus.
NON-TREATY STORAGE AGREEMENT “Introduction to Operations and the Non Treaty Storage Scenarios” Presenter: Jim Gaspard.
Martin Rule Curve Study Ashley McVicar, APC Maurice James, Water Resources Consulting LLC.
Point Sources Progress Reporting Management Board Conference Call February 9, 2012.
DO NOW1/29/14 Use the gas price data to answer the following questions. {$4.79, $4.60, $4.75, $4.66, $4.60} 1.Find the mean of the data (hint: average)
1 Day 1 Quantitative Methods for Investment Management by Binam Ghimire.
Aug 11, 2015 Yuba River Development Project Slide 1 Licensee Response to Relicensing Participant Tunnel Closure Proposal Agency/NGO Yuba River Development.
CBRFC April 2010 Water Supply Webinar 10am, May 7, 2010 Kevin Werner These slides: PLEASE MUTE YOUR PHONES.
Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process Plan April 25, 2006.
Long-term Trends in Water Supply Forecast Skill
Case Closed The New SAT Chapter 2 AP Stats at LSHS Mr. Molesky The New SAT Chapter 2 AP Stats at LSHS Mr. Molesky.
Chapter 9 Describing Variations in Data. A variable is…  A single characteristic that can vary and can be measured  Medical Variables:  Biological.
CRFS Technical Committee Fall Meeting LC Operations Update December 8, 2015.
LESSON 5 - STATISTICS & RESEARCH STATISTICS – USE OF MATH TO ORGANIZE, SUMMARIZE, AND INTERPRET DATA.
Water Year 2011: Review of Conditions and Forecasts in the Colorado River Basin CRFS November 8, 2011.
Measures of Dispersion Advanced Higher Geography Statistics.
CRFS Technical Meeting LC Operations Update November 14, 2012.
CRFS Technical Meeting LC Operations Update March 27, 2014.
Quantitative vs. qualitative analysis of snowpack, snowmelt & runoff
What is the average rate of change of the function f (x) = 8 x - 7 between x = 6 and x = 7? Select the correct answer:
Central Tendency Central Tendency – measures of location for a distribution Mode – the commonly occurring number in a data set Median – the middle score.
Hydrologic Conditions: Surface and Ground Water Resources July 2012
Warm Up # 3: Answer each question to the best of your knowledge.
Presentation transcript:

Hydrologic Indices Yuba River Development Project FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Thursday, April 11, 2013

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Hydrologic Indices  Introduction  Hydrologic index usage  Existing indices in the Yuba River watershed  Unimpaired Yuba River flow at Smartsville  Comparison of indices  Comparison of indices and Middle Yuba River flow  Comparison of year-type classifications

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Yuba River Watershed

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Hydrologic Index Usage  Hydrologic Indices have two purposes:  Characterize hydrology  Define year-type classifications  Characterizing hydrology is critical to ensure accurate representation of a natural process  Year-type classifications are a statistical exercise to make sure “bins” capture correct flow ranges

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Existing Indices in Yuba River Watershed  Existing YCWA FERC License (4 WY)  Based on annual unimpaired flow at Smartsville  Year-types defined by percentage of 50-year average unimpaired flow  Yuba River Index (5 WY)  Part of RD-1644, no current application for determining flows  Based on weighted unimpaired flow at Smartsville  0.2*(prev index) + 0.3*(Oct-Mar) + 0.5*(Apr-Jul)  North Yuba Index (6 WY)  Part of Yuba River Accord  Based on end-of-Sept. New Bullards Bar storage + annual inflow  YB/DS Index (6 WY)  Part of proposed license conditions  Based on annual unimpaired flow at Smartsville

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Annual Unimpaired Yuba River Flow at Smartsville

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Annual Unimpaired Yuba River Flow at Smartsville

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Selected Comparisons of Existing Indices

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Selected Comparisons of Existing Indices

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Comparisons of Existing Indices  Three primary indices generally characterize hydrology similarly.  Slight differences due to variations in approach  YRI emphasizes April-July runoff, so years like WY 2013 are represented as drier than in YB/DS  NYI includes storage, so transitions from dry to wet are represented as drier than in YB/DS (and inverse)

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Existing Indices vs. Middle Yuba River Flow

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Existing Indices vs. Middle Yuba River Flow

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Existing Indices vs. Middle Yuba River Flow

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Existing Indices vs. Middle Yuba River Flow

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Existing Indices vs Middle Yuba River Flow  Existing indices do a good job of representing annual hydrology of the Middle Yuba River  Monthly variability in Middle Yuba River flow is not well represented

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Comparison of Year-Type Classifications

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Comparison of Year-Type Classifications

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Comparison of Year-Type Classifications Index Schedule 1/ Wet Schedule 2/ Above Normal Schedule 3/ Below Normal Schedule 4/ Dry Schedule 5/ Critical Schedule 6 (7)/ Extremely Critical (Conference) North Yuba Index (1) Yuba River Index YB/DS Index

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Comparison of Year-Type Classifications

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Year-Type Distribution

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Year-Type Distribution

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Year-Type Distribution

Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Where do we go from here?