Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Random RU selection process upon TF-R reception Date: 2015-09 Slide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protocol for SU and MU Sounding Feedback
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 May 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Regarding trigger frame in UL MU Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0550r0 May 2015 K. Yunoki and B. Zhao, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 L-Preamble Issues for UL-OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0354r1 March 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Bandwidth granularity on UL-OFDMA data allocation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1096r0 Sep 2015 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Recovery Procedures in Cascading Sequences Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /1120r0 Submission Buffer Status Report Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0363r1 March 2015 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD Date: Slide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1265r1 November 2015 Slide 1 RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1280r1 November 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Traffic priority for random Multi User Uplink OFDMA Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0843r1 July 2015 Submission(ZTE) UL MU Random Access Analysis Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Yonggang.
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection for MU Transmission Date: Authors: July 2015.
Channel Access in A-BFT over Multiple Channels
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 January 2016 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Congestion control for UL MU random access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1116r1 September 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Trigger Frame Channel Access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0662r0 May, 2016 Jing Ma, NICTSlide 1 Further consideration on channel access rule to facilitate MU transmission opportunity.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Issues related to OCW management Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
HE Trigger Frame Format
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
Doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
UL OFDMA Random Access Control
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
AP access procedure for UL MU operation
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
Traffic priority for random Multi User Uplink OFDMA
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Channel Access Efficiency
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
Considerations on Trigger Frame for Random Access Procedure
Issues related to OCW management
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Regarding UL MU protection
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Follow up on Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs
Regarding HE fragmentation
Duration/ID field in UL-MU
CW value after UL MU procedure
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
UL MU Random Access Analysis
Random Access UL MU Resource Allocation and Indication
Reception Status of Frames Transmitted in Random Access RUs
Congestion control for UL MU random access
Regarding HE fragmentation
TGbb MAC Channel Access features proposal
TGbb MAC Channel Access features proposal
20MHz Channel Access in 11bd: Follow-up
Considerations on Trigger Frame for Random Access Procedure
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Random RU selection process upon TF-R reception Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Stéphane BARON Canon Cesson-Sevigné, France Patrice NEZOU Romain GUIGNARD Pascal VIGER

doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Abstract ax SFD specifies OFDMA to be supported. [2] [1] defines a trigger frame (TF-R) to enable random access mechanism for MU UL transmissions. The selection method of the Random RU (resource unit (RU) that can be randomly accessed by more than one STA) is TBD. The random selection of random RU suffers of a waste of spectrum due to collided and unused RU (similar to slotted aloha method )[1][3]. In this contribution, we propose a random RU selection procedure for the STAs receiving a TF-R frame, based on their active backoff values. Slide 2

doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Background CSMA/CA – is contention based access technology - CSMA/CA, which is originally designated for single STA to occupy the medium in a fairness way. –In the contention period, a STA could 1.Not transmit due to backoff procedure 2.Try to access the medium upon its backoff counts down to 0 ( Either successfully transmit a packet, or collide with other station’s transmission) –The random backoff procedure is a fully distributed method and ensures the fairness (allocates the channel to stations with roughly the same probability). Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Background Random Trigger Frame (TF-R) –TF-R is proposed in last July IEEE meeting [1] The Trigger frame indicates at least one available resource unit for random access –UL MU transmissions using TF-Rs reduce number of UL SU transmissions in conventional EDCA-based access: In the ax dense context, as the number of contending stations increases, the classical CSMA/CA experiences a significant collision rate. Slide 4

doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon RU selection for Random MU-UL transmission Principle –The multiple stations use their pending backoff count to select a Resource Unit (RU) to be used for the next UL MU TXOP: Upon receiving a TF-R, the stations analyze if they are eligible: –The current backoff count should fit in the number of available RUs (for example, backoff value < Nb of random RUs defined by the TF-R) –A station transmits inside the RU corresponding to its backoff value (for example, RU index = backoff value), and redraws its backoff. At the UL MU TXOP end, all other (non-eligible).11ax stations should also have updated their backoff counts (for example : decreases per the number of available RUs specified in TF-R) Advantages –Respectful of the EDCA (including Access Category management). –No need to perform a specific random computation on TF-R reception (backoff is already randomly generated) –The proposed station-eligibility procedure reduces the probability of RU collision Slide 5

doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Example Slide 6 SIFS AP ACK SIFS TF Primary 20MHz channel Secondary 20MHz channel PIFS MU STAs STA1 STA2 STA n STA n-1 STA Example: –TF-R indicates 8 random RUs, over a 40MHz band –Due to (backoff) randomization: some RUs are free, some are collided Backoff at last Contention : (before TF-R): ACK STA1 STA2 STA n STA n-1 STA3 Resulting Backoffs after TF-R: 10-8=2 New bckf value UL MU TXOP New bckf value X RU#1 UL MU PPDU (STA i) RU#2 RU#3 RU#5 RU#6 RU#7 RU#8 RU#4 UL MU PPDU (STA 2) UL MU PPDU (STA 6) UL MU PPDU (STA 3 & n-1) AP Defer later No more data

doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Summary In this presentation, we proposed a selection process of the random RU for STAs for UL OFDMA transmissions, triggered by a random trigger frame (TF-R). The method, based on backoff values, is respectful of the EDCA (including Access Category management). Random RU usage efficiency can be further improved. Slide 7

doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon References [1] IEEE /0875r1 “Random Access with Trigger Frames using OFDMA” [2] IEEE /0132r2 “Specification Framework for Tax” [3] IEEE /0843r1 “UL MU OFDMA Analysis” Slide 8

doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Straw-poll Do you agree to add to the TG specification framework document? The spec shall define a procedure for random resource unit selection in a UL OFDMA TXOP (triggered by a TF-R), respectful of EDCA (including Access Category management), that is based on the backoff count(s) of any.11ax station willing to transmit. Yes: No: Abstain: Slide 9