Goizueta Foundation Center For Research And Doctoral Education Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Optimus Signature Boutique Offices, India AE Senior Thesis 2013 Punit G. Das | Structural Option Faculty Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan.
Advertisements

BIMception Proposal Thomas Villacampa Alexander Stough Christopher Russell Stephen Pfund.
Picture Lake Geneva, Switzerland Surrounded by the Alps 20°C mean temperature in summer Annual snow fall – 30in Site Context.
Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural.
A Medical Office Building For The Primary Health Network Daniel Goff I Structural Option Dr. Thomas Boothby l Faculty Advisor Sharon, Pennsylvania Source:
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
Construction Management
C AMPUS S QUARE H ARRISBURG, P ENNSYLVANIA A NDREW M ARTIN | C ONSTRUCTION M ANAGEMENT | A PRIL 12, 2010.
Crocker West Building State College, Pa Eric M. FosterStructural OptionSpring 2009.
Daniel Bellay Lancaster County Bible Church Structural Option Lancaster County Bible Church.
“All Wall” as a Superstructure Walls on a footer Presentation to the Architectural and Construction Students at the University of Florida in their Alternate.
The Warrenton Aquatics and Recreation Facility Warrenton, Virginia Derek DiPiazza Construction Management.
Hershey Academic Support Center Structural Option Shawn Jones Building Analysis of the Hershey Academic Support Center Hershey, PA Shawn Jones Structural.
360 State Street New Haven  CT  Structural | Sabrina Duk | T. Boothby.
THE COMMONWEALTH MEDICAL COLLEGE (TCMC) SCRANTON, PAXIAO YE ZHENG | STRUCTURAL OPTIONSENIOR THESIS 2013 ADVISOR: HEATHER SUSTERSIC.
Rockville Metro Plaza II Rockville Pike John Vais | Structural Option PSU AE Senior Thesis 2014 Faculty Advisor – Dr. Hanagan Rockville, Maryland
Hershey Research Park Building One Jonathan Krepps Structural Option Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Introduction Connected to existing Benton Hall via skywalk Size: 103,154 SF above grade on 4 levels 82,661 SF below grade parking on 3 levels Cost: $23,651,159.
Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option Office Building Washington, DC Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option.
GARY NEWMAN STRUCTURES OPTION ADVISOR: DR. HANAGAN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION SPRING 2008.
Kennedy Krieger Institute Outpatient Medical Center Baltimore, Marylan d Katie Sennett Construction Management Dr. Messner Spring 2008.
TYPICAL member spot checks & alternate systems design study
Charles Miller Construction Option Spring Dr. Riley WestEnd25.
BRYAN DARRIN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION MILLENNIUM HALL DREXEL CAMPUS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Final Thesis Presentation Washingtonian Center Lee ResslerApril 15, 2008 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Memari.
Presented By: Derek Snover Construction Management.
SEAN BEVILLE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. BOOTHBY APRIL 13, 2009 TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER “STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL.
Lancaster, PA Courtyard by Marriott Danielle Shetler - Structural Option Senior Thesis - Spring 2005.
The Health Care Center Dauphin County, PA Ken Lorenz Penn State University Architectural Engineering Construction Management April 17, 2007.
Architectural Engineering Construction Management Senior Thesis April 11 th, 2011 Consultant: Dr. Riley Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior.
Greg Blatt Penn State Architectural Engineering Construction Management April 12, 2004.
The Towers at the City College of New York Robin Scaramastro - Structural Option - Advisor: Dr. Memari Senior Thesis Final Presentation – Spring 2007.
Robert M. Arnold Building Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Howard County General Hospital Patient Tower Addition Columbia, MD Kelly M. Dooley Penn State Architectural Engineering Structural Option.
Waynesburg Central High School Waynesburg, Pennsylvania Robert Owen Brennan The Pennsylvania State University Construction Management.
Ryan Pletz Structural Dr. Hanagan The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis April 14, 2008.
New Middle School Geneva, Il Greg Kemerer AE Senior Thesis 2006 – CM Option.
Swedish American Hospital Heart and Vascular Center Philip Frederick Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 15 April 2008.
Senior Thesis 2006 The Pennsylvania State University
Jonathan Goodroad Structural Option 2005 Thesis Penn State AE Delaware State University Administration and Student Services Building.
T IMOTHY H P ARK – S TRUCTURAL O PTION. Building Summary Current Systems Proposal Description Gravity Lateral Other Structural Factors Breadth Options.
Craig Owsiany Architectural Engineering – Construction Management STEM Building Hagerstown Community College Hagerstown, Maryland Science Technology.
Oklahoma University Children’s Medical Office Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma AE Senior Thesis Final Report April 14, 2014 Jonathan Ebersole Structural.
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Jon Hill – Structural OptionSpring 2005 Senior Thesis Structural Analysis and Redesign of Lynde and Harry Bradley School of Technology & Trade Milwaukee,
Justin Purcell Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Introduction 120,000 SF 10 Stories (90ft) $40 Million Aug – Dec.2011 Presentation Outline Introduction Base Steel Redesign Progressive Collapse Tie.
 Building Background  Building Structural System  Problem Statement  Proposed Solution  Structural Investigations  Architectural Impact  Sustainability.
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
Arts & Humanities Instructional Building Noah J. Ashbaugh Construction Management 2006.
Brandon mckee ae senior thesis 2007 construction management penn state university ambridge area high school Ambridge Area High School ambridge, pennsylvania.
Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Senior Thesis 2006 The College of Business Administration Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona.
Biobehavioral Health Building The Pennsylvania State University Daniel Bodde Structural Option Advisor – Heather Sustersic.
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
Arlington Gateway Hotel 801 North Glebe Road Arlington, Virginia Michael Gray Penn State University AE Senior Thesis Presentation 2005.
The New Student Housing Building at The Mount St. Mary’s University Emmitsburg, Maryland Erik Shearer Mechanical Option Advisor: Dr. Srebric Spring 2007.
William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio Michelle Benoit Senior Thesis Presentation Spring 2007 Structural Option.
Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Baltimore, MD Todd Drager Faculty Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex.
ANTONIO DESANTIS VERNE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. PARFITT APRIL 14, 2008 BRIDGESIDE POINT II PITTSBURGH, PA “BUILDING SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT.
Hunter Woron Spring 2012 Structural Professor Parfitt.
Pearl Condominiums Philadelphia, PA
Multistory Office Building
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Introduction James W. & Frances G. McGlothlin Medical Education Center
Ryan Johnson - Structural Option
JAKE POLLACK NEW YORK POLICE ACADEMY STRUCTURAL OPTION
TOWERS CRESCENT BUILDING B Mike Synnott Structural.
Mitre III Building McLean VA Debra Schroeder Structural Option.
Masonry Bearing Walls.
The Calvert Hall High School College Project
Presentation transcript:

Goizueta Foundation Center For Research And Doctoral Education Emory University, Atlanta, GA

Outline Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits I.Project Background II.Analysis I - Additional LEED Points III.Analysis II - Façade Redesign IV.Analysis III - Research – Mold & Moisture Detection V.Summary & Recommendations VI.Credits

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Owner: Emory University Risk: Holder Construction Architect: The Sizemore Group Project Team

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits General Building Information

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits 5 Story Steel Structure EIFS Façade & Clay Tile Roof 91,054 sf $33.4 million LEED Accredited Houses PhD Program Catering Kitchen Indoor/Outdoor Café Bridge Connecting to Existing Building General Building Information

Analysis I - Additional LEED Points Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits

LEED Point Distribution Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Rating Breakdown:Certified Silver GoldPlatinum CategoryPossible PointsPoints Awarded Sustainable Sites1410 Water Efficiency54 Energy & Atmosphere175 Materials & Resources131 Indoor Environmental Quality159 Innovation & Design Process52 Total:31

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Materials & Resources Rapidly Renewable Materials: - Harvest cycle of 10 years or less - Must account for 5% of total building material Material Choices: Current MaterialProposed Alternative Porcelain and Quarry TileBamboo Flooring Millwork: Cherry WoodPoplar Wood Wood Door Frames Wood Base Particleboard Core DoorsParticleboard Core Doors (Aspen, Poplar, Basswood Core)

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Bamboo Flooring - Durable - Cost Effective - Life Cycle of years Rapidly Renewable Materials

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Poplar Wood - Same Hardness as Cherry - Roughly 60% Cheaper - Same Appearance as Cherry Once Stained CherryPoplar Rapidly Renewable Materials

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Particleboard Core Doors - Same Appearance - 55% Cheaper - Core Contains Aspen, Poplar & Basswood Marshfield Signature Series™ Environmental Class™ Doors Scientific Certified Systems (SCS) Certified Particleboard Core Doors Rapidly Renewable Materials

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Rapidly Renewable Materials Millwork MaterialQuantityUnitUnit CostTotal Cost Cherry Door Frames42frame$1,000.00$42, Cherry Wood Base2150lf$14.00$30, Poplar Door Frames42frame$400.00$16, Poplar Wood Base2150lf$5.60$12, Doors MaterialQuantityUnitUnit CostTotal Cost Particleboard Core Doors213door$450.00$95, Particleboard Core Doors (Aspen, Poplar, Basswood)213door$200.00$42, Flooring MaterialQuantityUnitUnit CostTotal Cost Quarry Tile1450sf$4.04$5, Porcelain Tile4500sf$5.16$23, Bamboo Flooring5950sf$4.83$28, Original MaterialsGrand Total: $197, Alternative MaterialsGrand Total: $100, Savings: $96,849.50

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Analysis II – Façade Redesign: Architectural Precast Panels

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Existing Façade Exterior Insulation Finish System (EIFS) A. Substrate/Sheathing B. Adhesive C. EPS Insulation Board D. Reinforcing Mesh E. Base Coat F. Finish Coat

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Existing Façade Benefits: - Cost Effective: $10/sf - Lightweight: 15lb/sf - Good Insulation: R-value 3.8/in thickness Downsides: - Moisture penetration and mold problems - Labor intensive – requires scaffolding, all work done from exterior - Only 35 years old - 5 year warranty - Higher maintenance – also expensive upkeep

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Proposed Façade Architectural Precast Panels - 5” thick solid panels lb/sf - $40/sf

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Proposed Façade Benefits: - Very durable - Non-combustible - Low maintenance - Higher quality - Insulated from interior - Faster erection time - Aesthetics Downsides: - More expensive: $40/sf - Heavy: 62.5lb/sf - R-value of.1/in thickness

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Cost Comparison MaterialQuantityUnitUnit CostTotal Cost EIFS façade57000sf$9.73$554, Architectural Preacast57000sf$40.00$2,280,000.00

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Structural Analysis - Determined smallest column in rear façade that carries a typical load - Calculated loads from members, floor slabs, roof, and façade that are carried by the column - Analyzed in RAM Advanse

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Structural Analysis W14x99 W14x61 W21x68 W21x44 W18x35 W21x44 W18x35 W24x55 W21x44 W24x55 W24x68 15’-6” 18’-6” 16’ 13’ 14’ Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Lower Roof Diagram of the analyzed column with beams, girders, and floor heights shown

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Structural Analysis Floor LevelLoad TypeLoadsUnitTotal Load Lower Roof Roof Façade17.0kip Members1.9 Level 5 Slab Façade15.7kip Members2.1 Level 4 Slab Façade19.0kip Members1.9 Level 3 Slab Façade21.8kip Members2.4 Level 2 Slab Façade0.0kip Members1.9

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Once analyzed – Ran code check for combination of moments and axial loads All sections of the column had a stress ratio < 1 Current columns are able to carry additional façade load

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Analysis III – Research: Mold & Moisture Detection

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Moisture Detection Readily Available Information: - Mold Sources - Remediation Plans - Prevention Needed Information: - Better Moisture Detection - Inexpensive, Accurate, Easy Solution

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Moisture Detection Moisture Sensors: - Log Temperature and Relative Humidity - Cost Effective - $85/ea. - Very Accurate - Easy To Install - Log Large Amounts of Data

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Moisture Detection Jobsite Experiment: - Smeal College of Business Building - Recently Enclosed - Temperature and Moisture Control

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Moisture Detection Installed 5 Sensors - Atrium - Basement - 3 rd Floor East Wall - 4 th Floor North Wall - 1 st Floor North West Corner Sensor on Atrium WindowsillInterior View of Atrium

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Moisture Detection 3 rd Floor East Wall4 th Floor North Wall Basement Stairwell1 st Floor NW Corner

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Moisture Detection

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Moisture Detection

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Moisture Detection

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Summary & Recommendations Analysis I – Additional LEED Points: Materials & Resources - Materials alternatives must be of same quality - Green doesn’t have to be more expensive Analysis II – Façade Redesign – Precast - Able to last for life of building - Much higher quality façade - Low maintenance Analysis III – Research – Mold & Moisture Detection - Moisture detection is essential to avoid problems - Inexpensive & Easy to install - Log large amounts of data, Easy to retrieve data from

Background Overview Additional LEED Points Façade Redesign – Precast Research – Mold & Moisture Detection Summary & Recommendations Credits Thank You Holder Construction: Bob Campbell Gilbane Construction: Steve O’Connor AE Faculty: Dr. Riley Friends Family Frank Zappa

Fin