Confidential AECOM Environment Draft TMDL for pH Compliance for Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir October 20, 2009 Draft TMDL Review Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2005 Stream Phosphorus TMDLs to be proposed in July 5th NJR The NJDEPs Division of Watershed Management is seeking stakeholder input on proposed phosphorus.
Advertisements

RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
Los Angeles County MS4 Permit Reissuance: New Directions & Strategy Presented by LA Regional Water Quality Control Board Southern California Water Dialogue.
Estimating Allowable Phosphorus Load to Chatfield Reservoir Jim Saunders WQCD Standards Unit 10 April 2008.
RICE CREEK CHAIN OF LAKES TMDL. PELTIER LAKE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS MONITORING DATA.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.
The Wisconsin River TMDL: Linking Monitoring and Modeling Ann Hirekatur, Pat Oldenburg, & Adam Freihoefer March 7, 2013 Wisconsin River TMDL Project Team.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
City of El Monte Draft Watershed Management Program (WMP) Ed Suher, P.G. CASC Engineering and Consulting October 9, 2014.
Justification of Review of Water Quality Standards for Nutrients and other Constituents Randy Pahl, NDEP.
Confluence at the Confluence Chatfield Watershed Authority September 22, 2014.
Water Policy in the US and the EU K H Reckhow and C Pahl-Wostl Part I: US Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering NYC Watersheds 
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering NYC Watersheds.
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
2007 State of the Watershed Barr Lake & Milton Reservoir Watershed Association Q & A.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Water Quality Trading in Washington Helen Bresler (360)
WATERSHED PERMITTING IN NORTH CAROLINA NPDES PERMIT NCC BECAME EFFECTIVE JAN 1, 2003 NEUSE RIVER COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATION MORRIS V. BROOKHART, P.E.
Ed Dunne, Ph.D, Division of Environmental Sciences, SJRWMD P.O. Box 1429, Palatka, FL 32178; ph:
Changes in Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in the Assabet River Following Mandated Reductions in Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharges U.S. Geological.
Development of a Watershed-to- Very-Near-Shore Model for Pathogen Fate and Transport Sheridan K. Haack Atiq U. Syed Joseph W. Duris USGS, Lansing, MI.
QA/QC Assessment of Lay Monitoring in Rhode Island Elizabeth M. Herron, Linda T. Green & Arthur J. Gold URI Watershed Watch University of Rhode Island.
Barr-Milton Watershed Modeling Project - Workshop #4 David Pillard, Ph.D. – Project Manager, Ft. Collins, CO Ken Heim, Ph.D. – Lead Modeler, Westford,
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
2010 Barr Lake & Milton Reservoir Watershed Association A Watershed Approach: Developing a TMDL to Meet Water Quality Standards.
State Board Modeling Needs and Interests Eric Berntsen, PH, CPESC, CPSWQ State Water Resources Control Board CWEMF Hydrology and Watershed Modeling Workshop.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Point Source Loads and Decision Criteria for Toxics Modeling Baltimore Harbor TMDL Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
Chatfield Reservoir Hydrologic Scenario Development Jim Saunders WQCD Standards Unit 13 March 2008.
Chatfield Reservoir Phosphorus Budget Jim Saunders and Jamie Anthony WQCD, Standards Unit 13 Dec 2007.
Resourceful. naturally. Protecting Non-Impaired Resources West Metro Water Alliance September 21, 2011 Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering Company.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
The Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan Evaluation Update, 2007 The Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan Evaluation Update February 8, 2007.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Water Resources Technical Committee Chesapeake Bay Program Overview & Updates July 10, 2008 Tanya T. Spano.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering NYC Watersheds.
Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.
Sept. 10 and 11, 2007Lake Tahoe TMDL - Phase Two1 Lake Tahoe TMDL Phase Two Fall 2007 Public Participation Series Source Category Group Focus Team Meetings.
Request approval to proceed to EMC with 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan.
BMW Association 2006 Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir Watershed Management Plan ~ Brief History of the Reservoirs ~ Overview of the BMW Association ~ Outline.
Technical Update Task Force & Technical Track Work Group Meeting Dave Dilks June 15, 2016.
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
2016 Water Quality Assessment Update (thru Sep. 2016)
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
MACo Winter Conference
Updates 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan
Drww general membership meeting
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Phosphorus and Suspended Solids TMDL For the Lower Fox River/Green Bay Area of Concern – Putting the Pieces Together Bud Harris, P. Sager, D. Scheberle,
Protecting Non-Impaired Resources
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
So I have a TMDL Wasteload Allocation
October 29, 2018 Terry Lauritsen, P.E.
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Passaic Trading Formula
EQUATION 5.1 The Production Function
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Validation of Trading Program: Scenario Simulations
Presentation transcript:

Confidential AECOM Environment Draft TMDL for pH Compliance for Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir October 20, 2009 Draft TMDL Review Meeting

2 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Table 1.1. Summary of pH data for Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir.

3 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Barr averages >0.7 mg/L Milton averages >0.5 mg/L

4 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Watershed vs. Datashed

5 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Poor relationship of TP to CHL in Barr or Milton; TP is too high to be a factor currently

6 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Poor relationship of CHL to pH in Barr or Milton; evident that high CHL yields high pH

7 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Relationship of TP to pH in Barr or Milton is minimal at current high TP; shape of decline to expected background is a key question in TMDL development

8 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL

9 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Table 3.1 Apportionment of loads to Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir among sources with the SWAT- WASP model.

10 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Table 3.3. Comparison of TP loading estimates for three canals in the Barr-Milton system.

11 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Table 3.4. Partitioning of current loading into categories relevant to a TMDL.

12 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Table 4.2 Wasteload and load allocations for Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir.

13 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Table 4.3 Assessment of variability of flows in three canals delivering loads to Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir.

14 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL

15 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL –Public participation –Monitoring Extensive data Intensive plan –Restoration Strategy External vs. Internal Load Wasteload vs. Load Applicable measures  WWTP effluent limits  BMP to control MS4/NPS inputs  Internal load controls

16 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Table 8.1 Summary of allowable loads for Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir.

17 Confidential AECOM Environment BMW TMDL Questions, Comments, Discussion