AAC&U Members on Recent Trends in General Education Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
About AAC&U AAC&U is the leading national association concerned with the quality of student learning in college 1,300 institutional members—including.
Advertisements

HART RESEARCH P e t e r D A S O T E C I Raising The Bar
HART RESEARCH P e t e r D A S O T E C I
It Takes More Than A Major:
HART RESEARCH ASSOTESCIA AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
Association of American Colleges and Universities.
College Learning and Oregons Future January 7, 2010 Debra Humphreys Association of American Colleges and Universities College Learning.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
What is LEAP? Roundtable Discussions October 19 & 20.
Connecting Completion and Quality for Student Success Illinois Performance Funding Steering Committee Chicago, IL November 13, 2013 Carol Geary Schneider.
Organizing Assessment to Foster Students’ Best Work Council for the Advancement of Standards National Symposium November 16, 2009 Carol Geary Schneider.
College of Engineering Engineering Education Exploring Engineering Education Heidi Diefes-Dux, ENE Graduate Chair ASEE Student Chapter – November 15, 2005.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Degree Profile Bringing new currency to the meaning of U.S. degrees February 2011.
ENGAGING STUDENTS: HIGH IMPACT PRACTICES By Mark Stoner and Vanessa Arnaud.
Implementing the AAC&U Value Rubrics in Sakai Sean Keesler and Janice Smith Three Canoes June 15, 2010.
Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement.
Defining Institutional Learning Outcomes: A Collaborative Initiative Facilitated by the Office of Academic and Student Affairs AND the College Governance.
Falling Short? College Learning and Career Success
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
Student Success as a University-wide Commitment Faculty Presentation August 25, 2011.
Optimistic About the Future, But How Well Prepared? College Students’ Views on College Learning and Career Success Key findings from survey among 400 employers.
NMU Towards the 21 st Century Mitchell Klett Alan Willis Ruth Watry Laura Reissner Gary Brunswick.
GENERAL Edu. IN U.S. 美國通識教育 主講人 : 顏善邦 銘傳大學行政副校長 地 點 : 東海大學 銘賢堂 日 期 : 99 年 11 月 11 日.
The Current Refocusing of General Education. Objectives for the Workshop Proposing and/or Renewing a Course Assessing the general education aspect of.
The Personal Development Plan (PDP)
Promoting Universal Values in the Face of Societal Change The Council of Europe Caryn McTighe Musil November 20, 2007 Association of American Colleges.
A Degree is More than a Major: Explaining USU’s Degree Profile Norm Jones, Director of General Education and Curricular Integration
Betsy Barefoot John Gardner. Integrative Learning.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
Pendidikan Liberal untuk Membentuk Karektor Riza Atiq.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Changing Understandings of Liberal and Liberal Education COPLAC Summer Meeting Keene, New Hampshire June 20, 2009 Carol Geary Schneider President.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in Student Development – Part I Student Development Division Meeting SUNY Oneonta May 9, 2008.
A General Education Core Curriculum at IUPUI Campus Town HallMarch 30, 2012.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Jason D. Powell Ferrum College Saturday, October 15, :30-2:30 PM ACA Summit Asheville, NC.
A presentation of key findings from a national survey of 800 registered voters conducted September 10-12, 2007.
LEARNING OUTCOMES & SNAAP ATHE Leadership Institute Montreal, July 2015 Sally Gaskill, Director Strategic National Arts Alumni Project Indiana University.
More Degrees, Higher Quality Learning: How Do We Get Both? SHEEO Higher Education Policy Conference: Collaborating Across Boundaries in Challenging Times.
COM 101 Training 2013 Roberta Rea. Teaching and learning practices have been widely tested and have been shown to be beneficial for college students from.
 Pressures  Considerations  Charge  Progress & Thinking So Far  Feedback.
Debra Humphreys Association of American Colleges & Universities Employment and Market Data and Trends Rethinking Success:
An Overview.  Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U)  Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP)  aacu.org/leap.
Liberal Education and America’s Promise: Changing the Conversation about Student Success and Institutional Accountability SHEEO—Denver, CO August 2009.
A Transferable Core Curriculum at IUPUI Program Review and Assessment Committee April 13, 2012.
A LEAP Toward an Educated Citizenry: The Role of Public Health APHA Washington, DC November 1, 2011 Susan Albertine Vice President Association of American.
America´s Lab Report. Chapter 2: The Education Context Key Points: “High school students’ science achievement nationwide is not impressive and has not.
Living Our Liberal Arts Mission Workshop for Academic Advisors Cara Meade Smith Julia Metzker July 30 th, 2015.
Cultivating Excellence UW-Madison’s Challenging Undergraduate Academic Experience Virginia Sapiro, Interim Provost University of Wisconsin-Madison December.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
WELCOME! Signature Work: Who Needs it in the Digital Age? Terrel Rhodes VP, Quality, Curriculum and Assessment 1.
Dr. Tia McNair Florida Connections 2015 Senior Director for Student Success, 2015 May 14, 2015 Evidence-Based Campus Strategies for Unlocking the Door.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Dr. Christopher L. Markwood Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi January 23, 2014.
CAA Review Joint CAA Review Steering Committee Charge Reason for Review Focus Revision of Policy Goals Strategies Milestones.
Liberal Education & Public Health
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
Academic Affairs Update Monday, April 17, 2017
General Education Review
Helping Students Connect:
General Education Review
High Impact Practices: HU-HIPs plan
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
Purposeful Pathways: Designing Relevant and Transparent HIPs
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
HART RESEARCH A S O T E C I AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
Presentation transcript:

AAC&U Members on Recent Trends in General Education Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic Officers or designated representatives at AAC&U member institutions, conducted July 15 to October 13, 2015, by Hart Research Associates for the Association of American Colleges and Universities 1

Profile of the Sample 2 Carnegie Classification Associate’s degree Bachelor’s degree Master’s degree Doctoral degree/ research Other 11% 30% 39% 19% 1% Affiliation Public Private/religious Proprietary 46% 53% 1% The survey was conducted among 325 Chief Academic Officers or designated representatives at AAC&U member institutions from a list of 1,001, with a response rate of 32%.

November/December 2008July – October 2015 Does your institution have a common set of intended learning goals or learning outcomes that apply to ALL undergraduate students? Most AAC&U member institutions have a common set of learning outcomes for all of their undergraduate students. 3

AAC&U members with common learning outcomes have outcomes that apply to a broad range of skills and knowledge areas; significant consensus exists on outcome areas. 4 Proportions saying their institution has learning outcomes for ALL undergraduate students that address specific skills and knowledge areas* * Among members at institutions that have a common set of learning outcomes for all undergraduate students Writing skills Critical thinking and analytic reasoning skills Quantitative reasoning skills Knowledge of science Knowledge of mathematics Knowledge of humanities Knowledge of global or world cultures Knowledge of social sciences Knowledge of the arts Oral communication skills Intercultural skills and abilities % 98% 94% 92% 89% 85% 82% 79% % 95% 91% 87% 92% 87% 90% N/A 88% 79% (continued)

5 * Among members at institutions that have a common set of learning outcomes for all undergraduate students Information literacy skills Research skills and projects Ethical reasoning skills Knowledge of diversity in US Integration of learning across disciplines Application of learning beyond the classroom Civic engagement and competence Knowledge of technology Knowledge of languages other than English Knowledge of American history Knowledge of sustainability % 75% 73% 68% 65% 63% 49% 48% 47% 27% % 65% 75% 73% 63% 66% 68% 61% 42% 49% 24% AAC&U members with common learning outcomes have outcomes that apply to a broad range of skills and knowledge areas; significant consensus exists on outcome areas. Proportions saying their institution has learning outcomes for ALL undergraduate students that address specific skills and knowledge areas* (continued)

Educational leaders at institutions with common learning outcomes do not report that students have a greater understanding of these goals in 2015 than they did in November/December 2008July – October 2015 What is your sense of how many of your students understand your institution’s intended learning outcomes for undergraduate learning?* 45% 55% 42% 58% * Among members at institutions that have a common set of learning outcomes for all undergraduate students

Many institutions are implementing evidence-based practices, and they are most likely to require those that support the successful transition to college. 7 What approach is your campus taking with regard to these types of learning practices? This is offered as an option 31% 30% 41% 23% 53% 79% 59% 87% 90% 92% 94% Total offered 91% 82% 93% 65% 87% 93% 71% 96% 97% 98% 96% First-year experiences that support transition to college First-year academic seminars Global/world culture studies Orientations to liberal education, purpose/value Diversity studies/ experiences Service learning in courses Learning communities Undergraduate research Practicums and supervised fieldwork Internships Study abroad

Required for all students Some campuses are exploring ways to engage students in more problem-based learning. For instance, institutions are providing opportunities to students to do significant learning projects that are integrative and/or applied and that take a semester of study or longer. These projects may be conducted within capstone courses, research projects, or in field-based activities or internships. Which describes your campus’s current approach to significant learning projects like these? Required for some students Offered option for all students Offered option for some students Not a current option Nearly all AAC&U member institutions offer significant applied learning projects for at least some students; fewer than one in four require all students to participate. 8

Most administrators think that at least some of their teaching faculty is effectively using digital learning tools, but they see room to expand their effective use. 9 How many of your current faculty are using digital learning tools effectively in their courses? “All/most of our teaching faculty should be using more digital learning in undergraduate courses.” At your institution, how high a priority is increasing the number of undergraduate online courses? * Described as programs designed around demonstrated mastery rather than completion of courses and credits Most Some Very few Agree 44% Strongly agree 89% High Medium Minor/not 45% Somewhat agree (1% all programs, 10% some programs)

Attitudes Toward Digital Learning and Online Courses, by Key Subgroups 10 “All/most of our teaching faculty should be using more digital learning in undergrad- uate courses.” At your institution, how high a priority is increasing the number of undergraduate online courses? Strongly agree 29% 53% 52% 51% 36% 42% By Carnegie Classification: Bachelor’s degree Master’s degree Doctoral degree/research By Affiliation: Public Private/non-religious independent institutions Religious Some- what agree 53% 38% 42% 42% 48% 48% High priority 14% 28% 27% 34% 16% 22% By Carnegie Classification: Bachelor’s degree Master’s degree Doctoral degree/research By Affiliation: Public Private/non-religious independent institutions Religious Medium priority 23% 42% 41% 44% 24% 35% Minor/not a priority 63% 30% 32% 22% 60% 43%

In regard to electronic portfolios, which describes your campus? Required of almost all students Used for some students and programs Not used/exploring feasibility of using Not used/no plans to use November – December 2008July – October 2015 (64% required/used)(57% required/used) Many AAC&U member institutions use e-portfolios, but few require the for all students. 11

How has general education changed as a priority for your institution in the past five years? The majority of AAC&U member institutions continue to say that general education is more of a priority than it was five years ago. 12 Has become more of a priority Has not changed as a priority Has become less of a priority

Institutions are placing greater emphasis on integration of knowledge, skills, and application than on broad knowledge acquisition in their general education programs. Integration of knowledge, skills, and application Applied learning experiences Cross-cutting skill development Broad knowledge acquisition Proportions saying their institution is placing more emphasis on each practice in their general education program 13

Clear learning outcomes Assess student achievement of learning outcomes Has requirements linked to outcomes Ensures all develop ability to integrate/apply learning to complex questions Proportions saying each describes* their institution’s general education program * ratings on a five-point scale, 5 = describes the program very well % 49% 62% N/A Large majorities describe their gen ed programs as “having clear learning outcomes,” “assessing achievement of learning outcomes,” and “having requirements linked to outcomes.” 14

Proportions saying each describes* their institution’s general education program * ratings on a five-point scale, 5 = describes the program very well % N/A Few institutions describe their general education programs as coherent or having structured pathways. 15 Coherent sequence of courses and/or educational experiences Structured pathways that progressively develop proficiencies in key areas

Includes global courses Includes first-year seminars Includes diversity courses Includes interdisciplinary courses Includes service learning opportunities Includes civic learning or engagement activities Requires experiential learning opportunities Proportions saying each describes* their institution’s general education program * ratings on a five-point scale, 5 = describes the program very well % 58% 56% 51% 38% 36% AAC&U member institutions report similar curricular patterns for their general education programs today as in 2008 and are most likely to include global courses and first-year seminars. 16

The majority of institutions use a distribution model with addition- al integrative features. Fewer use only a distribution model in 2015 than did so in Which of these features are part of your institution’s general education program? Other features: Common intellectual experience Thematic required courses Upper-level requirements Core curriculum Learning communities November – December 2008July – October

Distribution model Capstone or culminating studies (taken in major programs) Upper-level general education requirements Core curriculum Thematic required courses A common intellectual experience Capstone or culminating studies (taken as part of general education) Learning communities Proportions saying each is included as part of their institution’s general education program Institutions incorporate various general education program design elements. 18

The majority of member institutions think that their general education programs are well integrated with students’ major requirements, but there is still room to improve. 19 November/December 2008July – October 2015 How well integrated would you say that your general education program is with students’ major requirements? 58% 42% 48% 52%

Only minor shifts have occurred since 2008 in the required number of general education credits at AAC&U member institutions. 20 Nov/Dec 2008July–Oct 2015 How many total general education credits are required at your institution for this degree? Nov/Dec 2008July–Oct 2015 Bachelor’s degree*Associate’s degree* * Among members in institutions that grant bachelor’s degrees or higher* Among members in institutions that grant only associate’s degrees Mean: 46.6 Median: 44 Mean: 44.6 Median: 42 Mean: 33.5 Median: 29 Mean: 35.1 Median: 33

Very familiar with the LEAP initiative AAC&U’s Liberal Education and America’s Promise initiative (LEAP initiative) champions the importance of--and assists campuses in providing--a 21st century liberal education through a focus on principles of excellence, Essential Learning Outcomes, high-impact educational practices, and the creation and effective use of authentic assessments. How familiar are you with the LEAP initiative? Nearly all of AAC&U’s member institutions are familiar with the LEAP initiative. Fairly familiar with the LEAP initiative Only somewhat (9%) /not at all (2%) familiar with the LEAP initiative 89% VERY/FAIRLY FAMILIAR 21

Increasing development of and participation in engaged learning practices * Defining or updating common student learning outcomes Improving the assessment of student learning outcomes Reforming general education programs Advancing civic and global learning Advancing equity and student success Does your institution use AAC&U’s LEAP initiative to advance goals in these areas? Among those who are familiar with LEAP, most institutions are already using or are planning to use LEAP to achieve specific goals. * Described as high-impact practices such as learning communities, undergraduate research, applied hands-on projects, internships, etc. 78% 75% 73% 67% 53% 22