Deb Stover, Principal, EH Phillips Elementary, Central Dauphin School District Margee Ziegenfuss, Former Supervisor of Curriculum, East Pennsboro Area.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAS and RTII ED 517 Spring Edward G. Rendell, Governor Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak, Secretary of Education Standards Aligned System Integration Trainer.
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
The Role of the Literacy Coach In a Primary School: A Collaborative Model International Reading Association Annual Conference Atlanta, 2008 Presenters.
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
Tier 1- all students Tier 2- All students not succeeding at Tier 1 Tier 1- All students.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Y3D1 SBLT Tier 3 Problem Identification & Problem.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 1 Getting Ready for SIP: Developing the Action Sequences FALL 2006.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
Getting Started with RTI School-wide Assessment Tool for an RTI Model.
0 1 Response to Intervention is NOT: Just a Special Education initiative Only for students with disabilities Only for beginning reading A new way to.
0 1 What is Response to Intervention : Response to Intervention is NOT: Just a Special Education initiative Only for students with disabilities Only for.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Moyock Middle School School Improvement Plan Results and Next Steps.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Getting It Right at the Building Level  Introductions  Burton Street Elementary  NYS TAC Grant Pilot School.
Waverly Community Schools Standards Overview AdvancED District Accreditation External Review Team Visit April 21-24, 2013Welcome.
Teaching and Learning Elementary Math November 27, :30 am – 12:30 pm.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
Data Summit July 27, 2012 Stephanie Smyka RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Timberlane Regional School District
RtII for Middle School Bethann M. McCain; RtII Consultant
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
Creating, Monitoring and Evaluating a Master Schedule That supports student learning.
D62 Response to Intervention
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
. Overview of the RTII Process September 20, 2012.
Initial Group Data Meeting Preparation & Facilitation August 23, 2012.
High Plains Education Cooperative.  A Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS) is a term used in Kansas to describe how schools go about providing supports.
Ingham ISD RtI District Leadership Team March 8, 2010.
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
RtII Response to Instruction and Intervention paTTAN.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
School Improvement Process
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
West Lane Elementary SW-PBIS Tier 3. Foundation for Learning Effective Teams What students need to know and do Systematic Process for Intervention & Student.
1 What will the work look like per quarter to help reach the goal? School wide goal: In order to increase student achievement Brown School will use a balanced.
Using DIBELS to Improve Reading Outcomes in Grades 3-5.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT October 8, 2009 PBIS National Forum.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Math + SRBI: Adding It Up Robin Moore Math Coordinator, Regional School District 6 & Clare Wurm, SERC Consultant.
The True RtI: Teacher-Led Learning Groups Presented by: Kirk Elementary B uilding L eadership T eam Millington, MI Andrea Lahnanen, KDGMelissa Trato, 1.
School-Based Problem-Solving for Individuals (SBIT)
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Nottingham West Elementary School
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Multi-Tiered System Of Supports (MTSS)
The Principles of Data Use in a RtI / 3-Tier Model
Chapter 1 Special Education Assessment.
Presentation transcript:

Deb Stover, Principal, EH Phillips Elementary, Central Dauphin School District Margee Ziegenfuss, Former Supervisor of Curriculum, East Pennsboro Area School District

 Introduction  Needs of the Field  Core Elements of RTII  Focus Areas of Practice  School Teams  Collaboration/Communication  Schedules/Time  Improvement Cycle  Layering Services  Your Realities / Your Process

 Standards Aligned Instruction  Universal Screening  Shared Ownership  Data Sources & Decisions  Tiered Intervention & Delivery System  Parent Involvement

 Whose standards?  Common Core Standards  State Standards  Applying Standards to Curriculum  Curriculum Mapping without Tears  Best Practices for Core Instruction  “What Works” for Your Students  Essentials

 Curriculum Based Measurement  Dibels Next  4Sight  Aimsweb

 District Level Support  Building Level Teams  Grade Level Teams  Specialist Support  Parent Involvement  Total Staff Involvement

 What data?  Normed  Referenced  Curriculum Based  How Collected?  Who administers?  Who inputs, formats and/or summarizes?  How Used?  Curriculum decisions  Student decisions

 Core Instruction  Tiers  Resources  Layers of Support

 Planning Phase  Program Information  Student Progress Updates  Feedback

 School Teams – Responsibilities & Tasks  Collaboration & Communication  Schedules & Time Constraints  Management of the Improvement Cycle

Core Leadership Team Data Team Grade Level Team Point of Contact Child Study Team Staff Development Team Site Based

District Based  District Leadership Team  Building Leadership Team  Grade Level Goal Teams

 POC person with grade level members  Skill tracking sheets for students  Parent/ Student Communication  Strategies and Materials  Grade level common planning time  Liaison with District  Data displays  Team building and Professional Learning Communities

 Grade level common planning  Building Leadership Team – building level meetings  Grade level data team meetings  Parent Communication  Liaison with District  Team building and professional development

 Core schedule must include:  Instructional blocks  Intervention groups  Progress monitoring  Benchmarking process  Additional intervention layers based on student need  Transition time  Fidelity - observations

Sample 1 Intervention groups  K 9:20 – 9:40 a.m. /1:10 – 1:30 p.m.  Extended K12:00 – 12:30 p.m.  1st 9:20 – 9:50  2nd & 3rd 10:40 – 11:20  4th & 5th 1:35 – 2:15

Sample 2 Intervention groups  K - 1:30 – 2:00 p.m.  :50 – 11:20 a.m.  :55 – 12:25 a.m.

 Changes or ideas to sustain student growth  Integration of new students and how to meet their needs  Professional Development  Ongoing – Monthly data team meetings  End of year Evaluation Summaries – guide program for next year

 Ongoing – monthly meetings  Professional development – intra-staff; external  Schedule and program adjustments  End of Year Evaluation – data and program  Implementation plans

 A Work in Progress –  Specific Ideas To Build and Improve: School Teams / Responsibilities Collaboration/ Communication Schedules / Time Improvement Cycle Contact Information: Deborah Stover – Margee Ziegenfuss –