Greater Portland and Vancouver Indicators Meeting Systems Thinking and Team Collective Intelligence July 30, 2010 Portland, Oregon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dialogue and Discussion: Tools for Creating and Sustaining a PLC
Advertisements

Coaching Conversations Content adapted from Facilitative Leadership: Tapping the Power of Participation Interaction Associates, Inc.
MENTORING! CRITICAL FRIEND OR FRIENDLY CRITTER Support versus Challenge Challenge and Support Mentoring requires a rigorous process of self-review, personal.
Continuous Improvement Through Continuous Learning Until you are willing to be confused about what you already know, what you know will never become wider,
Copyright © 2008 First Steps Training & Development, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 1 Coaching for Personal Accountability Presented by:
Experience of a Learning Organization: How To Grow Beyond Blame.
Northern Convening Butte College April 26, 2013 College Team Facilitators’ Presentation Student Support (Re)defined.
University of Nebraska- Linkcoln Extenstion Opening Headline Data Reference: University of Nebraska – Lincoln Extension NebGuide; Greenleaf, Center for.
Week 1. World Class Business and Communications M. en I. Alejandro Flores World Class Business and Communications M. en I. Alejandro Flores Instituto.
Fundamental Leadership Skills -Examining Mental Models Karen J. Hannan Collaboration Works, Inc.
DIALOGUE. What does ‘Dialogue’ mean to you? WHAT DOES DIALOGUE MEAN TO YOU? A – General Discussion B – Random thoughts C – Focused problem solving D.
Rotary and Team Building
Problem-Solving or “ Problems Are Our Friends” Mickey Hughes Christine Combs.
How Can We Develop Critical Thinkers? “Everything flows.” (Panta rei.) (Brookfield, S.D. (1987). Developing Critical Thinkers, Jossey-Bass Publishers,
Marketing Summit June 6-8, 2004 A DVENTIST EDUCATION A DVENTIST EDUCATION.
Learning from Differences
MGTO 630C Staffing and Managing Human Resources Dr. Christina Sue-Chan Performance Management: Chapter 7 Saturday, March 15, 2003 Please note: This is.
Putting It all Together Facilitating Learning and Project Groups.
COLLABORATION “…a collection of superstar teachers working in isolation cannot produce the same results as interdependent colleagues who share and develop.
Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Companies

SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Collaborative Teaching. This Session Collaboration Matters Realities Teachers Face Analyzing Student Assessment Data Technology Supporting Collaboration.
Signs of Safety Toni Morkin, Senior Manager
Using Situational awareness and decision making
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Organizational Learning (OL)
Conflict Resolution.
Signs of Safety Barb Lacroix Child Intervention Practice Specialist
Identification, Analysis and Management
Living and loving unconditionally featuring Dr. Stephen Franson.
AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT Cydne Zabel, INFX 543 Winter 2009.
Group Members S. Lyon V. Garcia L. Mitra-Gast. What is Organizational Culture Unique to that company; built and changed over time Beliefs, assumptions,
The Influences of Learning Behavior on the Performance of Work Teams -- A System Dynamics Approach Elaine Lizeo Albany-MIT 4th SD Colloquium April 5, 2002.
Foundations of Team Leadership
11 C H A P T E R Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems.
Communicating Up! Instructor: Gail Griffith An Infopeople Workshop Spring 2008.
United States Fire Administration Chief Officer Training Curriculum Leadership Module 3: Core Values.
Can you think of a few examples? Greeting – We establish who we are and introduce ourselves on first and subsequent meetings. Satisfying needs- In order.
Self Management Project MGT 494 Lecture-8 1. Recap Experiential Learning and Self-Management The EIAG Model 2.
Jashapara, Knowledge Management: An Integrated Approach, 2 nd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011 Slide 6.1 THE LEARNING ORGANISATION.
DC EAPA Chapter October 21, 2010 Presented by Becky Choi and Shirley Gross.
EVALUATION OF HRD PROGRAMS Jayendra Rimal. The Purpose of HRD Evaluation HRD Evaluation – the systematic collection of descriptive and judgmental information.
Building Learning Organizations in Dementia Care December 2010 Kelly Papa MSN, RN.
Reading Strategies To Improve Comprehension Empowering Gifted Children.
From Here to There “ From Here to There ” Louise Van de Water Kelston Girls College.
Acting to bring about change in a system or situation
Independent Enquirers Learners process and evaluate information in their investigations, planning what to do and how to go about it. They take informed.
Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) As a Curriculum Model
MARILYN K. GALE, LISW-S JULIE M. SHEEHAN, LSW FAMILY THERAPY MEETS CRISIS INTERVENTION.
THE ART & PRACTICE OF THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION The Fifth Discipline.
Team Building HEAD START of Greater Dallas Information from Susan M. Heathfield, Your Guide to Human Resources. About.com.
Reflective Thinking. Reflective thinking Critical thinking and reflective thinking are often used synonymously. However, where critical thinking is used.
Use these nine strategies to help achieve your full career potential. They will profoundly affect your career success at every step.
Family-Centered Care Collaboration: Practice Components Unit II 1.
Introduction to Literary Criticism Part One Goals: -define Literary Criticism -define and describe Reader Response Criticism -define and describe Formalism.
Presented by Ms. Vayas At Bancroft MS March 25, 2008.
Lesson Observations and Learning walks
BACKGROUND TO RISK AND UNCERTAINTY 위험도 관리 및 의사 결정론.
Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Decision Making and Creativity.
‘There is somebody wiser than any of us, and that is everybody.’
a Corporate Communication Plan for Strategic Change
Competencies.
Chapter 12 Handling Problems, Conflicts, and Mistakes
The Eight Norms of Collaboration
Mental Models Provide an internal guide if they are clear images and are consistently used Have 2 dimensions if they are good: Complexity (for more linkages)
Chapter 3 Organizational Behavior And Management Thinking.
Interview Preparation Workshop
BUSINESS AND LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT
New Faculty and Mentors Session 2
Presentation transcript:

Greater Portland and Vancouver Indicators Meeting Systems Thinking and Team Collective Intelligence July 30, 2010 Portland, Oregon

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/ Two Paradigms for Managing Management by Results (“Performance Management”) Management by Means Seek Activities that will Produce Results Design Reliable System of activities, practices, structures Define Results are necessary byproduct of the system

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/2016 3

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/ Progression to Operational Excellence Design Design it so it does not break Precision Don’t just fix it, improve it Planned Fix it before it breaks Reactive Fix it after it breaks Performance Measures React to defects (Survival) Anticipate defects (Imposition of will) “Initiative Disipline” Continuously improve defects (Creative Tone) Design from the Ideal (Identity) Behavior States Unstable System Stable System © Winston Ledet 2007

Structures of Conversation Four Player System

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/ BYSTAND Without Bystanders there is no Perspective FOLLOW Without Followers there is no Completion MOVE Without Movers there is no Direction OPPOSE Without Opposers there is no Correction Inquiry Structures of Conversation: The Four Player System © 1995 David Kantor

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/ Ladder of Inference Practices –Listen to your reactions: Where are you on the ladder? –Listen to others: Where are they? –Come down the ladder and illustrate your reasoning. © 1990 Chris Argyris Background of Experience Assumptions Beliefs Observable Data Conclusions Paraphrased Meaning Reinforces how we select data

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/ Advocacy Inquiry Matrix Advocacy Inquiry LoHi Lo

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/ The Learning Grid The Learning Grid can be used to assess the quality of conversations. Seeks confirming views Asks leading questions Doesn’t encourage challenge Seeks alternative views Probes views of others Encourages challenge Doesn’t explain thinking Doesn’t give specific examples Explains steps in thinking Gives specific examples Limits Learning Promotes Learning InquiryAdvocacy © 1994 Action Design Associates

Whole Systems Diagnosis

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/ Action Structure Tone Identity The Flame Model Action –Symptoms –Events, Pattern –Observable behavior –Actions and words Structure –Formal and informal rules and decision rights –Feedback processes and policies –Physical limits – Mental models Tone –Field –Mood –Quality of character –Quality of energy and atmosphere –Network of Relationships Being/Identity –Center –Self-Image –Quality of presence

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/ Action Structure Tone Identity Identify Symptoms and Patterns over Time Map the Structures Name Tone Identity Diagnosis and Design of Systems Direction of Design Direction of Diagnosis

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/ Events Reactive Patterns Proactive Directly observable events and results Patterns of behavior over time Systemic Structures Design Mental Models Reflective Formal and informal policies and rules governing the flow of information, feelings and physical material Images guiding how we see the world and take action in it Intention & Vision Imaginative Container Participative Intentions and dreams / aspirations of desired future state: expressed as a picture Quality of energy, possibility and safety; atmosphere Presence Generative My/our identity in this situation/system Action Mode DescriptionCurrent Situation Flame Matrix: Inquiring Into the Gap Action Structure Tone Identity Unrealized Potential Inquiring Into the Gap Action Modes

Capability Trap

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/ A Model of Process Performance

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/ Biases towards working harder People overweight salient and tangible features of their environment –Work activities usually have clearer, more tangible outcomes than implementation and improvement activities People are risk averse and ‘ambiguity’ averse –Work activities have a more certain outcome than implementation activities –“…nobody ever gets credit for fixing a problem that never happened.” People are biased toward activities that produce immediate returns –Work activities produce a more immediate result than implementation activities

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/

© 2009 Dialogos1/31/