Hardianto Iridiastadi, Ph.D. Introduction to Human Factors/Ergonomics (HFE) “Engineering Anthropometry” Hardianto Iridiastadi, Ph.D.

Introduction Variability in physical dimensions Studied earlier in Anthoropology (study of mankind) Interest in physical aspects (beginning of anthropometry) Later, data are used for biomechanics investigations The need to design workplaces to accomodate differences in body dimensions Lifting, theater, faucets, car stereo, cigarette ad, challenger,

Human variation

Factors Affecting Anthropometrical Variation Age Gender Race & Ethnic Socio-economics Occupation Life style Circadian Secular trend Measurement

Ergonomic Implications International markets Different target countries Transfer of technology Job selection Healthy worker effect Fit the man to the job

Engineering Anthropometry “a branch of science originating from anthropology that attempts to describe the physical dimensions of the (human) body” “anthropos” = man “metron’ = measure

Types of Anthropometric Data Physical (Static) anthropometry – which addresses basic physical dimensions of the body. Functional anthropometry – concerned with physical dimensions of the body relevant to particular activities or tasks. Newtonian data – body segment mass data and data about forces that can be exerted in different tasks/postures

Applications Tools design Consumer product design Workplace design Interior design

Applied Anthropometry

Measurement Techniques Positions Standing naturally upright Standing stretched to maximum height Lean against a wall Sitting upright Lying (supine posture) “Anatomical position” (see Kroemer et al)

Measurement Techniques Some key measurement terms Height Breadth Depth Distance Curvature Circumference Reach

Measuring Devices

Newer Measuring Devices Photograph Use of grids Image processing techniques Can record all three dimensional aspects Infinite number of measurements Drawbacks Parallax Body landmarks cannot be palpated

Newer Measuring Devices Whole body scanner Ergonomic center UI $50,000 - $400,000 Hundreds of variables Standing and seated posture Combined with modeling software (Jack, Mannequin, etc.)

Sample Anthropometric Data

Statistics Coefficient of variation Standard error of the mean (se) Data diversity = sd/mean CV ~ 5% (10% for strength data) Large CV should be suspected Standard error of the mean (se) se = sd/√n Useful for describing confidence interval E.g., 95% CI = mean ± 1.96 se

Statistics Means () and standard deviations () are typically reported for anthropometric data (often separated by gender) Use of these value implicitly assumes a Normal distribution. Assumption is reasonable for most human data. Percentiles can easily be calculated from mean and std.dev. using these formulas and/or standard statistical tables (usually z).

Statistics Percentile Commonly used: 5th, 95th, 50th (median) Lower-limit dimension: the smaller the system, the more unusable by the largest user  Use high percentile Upper-limit dimension: the bigger the system, the more unusable by smallest user  Use low percentile

Statistics - Standard Normal Variate Z = (y-)/ Normally distributed with mean = 0 and variance = 1 z is N(0,1) From tables of normal cumulative probabilities P{z≤z(A)} = A Example: if zA = 2, A = 0.9772 (two std.dev. above mean is the 97.7%-ile) Properties of z: zA > 0; above mean (>50%-ile) zA = 0; at mean (50%-ile) zA < 0; below mean (<50%-ile)

Normal Distribution Table

Percentile Example For female stature (from Table)  = 160.5 cm  = 6.6 cm What female stature represents the 37.5th %-ile? From normal distribution: z(37.5%) = -0.32 Thus, X(37.5%) =  + z = 160.5 - (0.32)(6.6) = 158.4 cm

Anthropometric Data: Variances To combine anthropometric dimension, need to calculate a new distribution for the combined measures, accounting also for the covariance (Cov) between measures (M = mean; S = std. dev.): MX+Y = MX + MY SX+Y = [SX2 + SY2 + 2Cov(X,Y)]1/2 SX+Y = [SX2 + SY2 + 2(rXY)(SX)(SY)]1/2 MX-Y = MX - MY SX-Y = [SX2 + SY2 - 2Cov(X,Y)]1/2 SX-Y = [SX2 + SY2 - 2(rXY)(SX)(SY)]1/2 Means add, variances do not!

Class Activity

Anthropometrical Design Procedures Determine dimensions of product which are critical for design (considering effectiveness, safety and comfort) Determine the related body dimensions Select user population (who will use the product or workplace) Conduct reference study to find secondary data, if available (considering population characteristics) or conduct measurement Select percentile

The “Average Human” Anthropometric data for individuals is often estimated using stature or body weight in linear regression equations. Ex: average link lengths as a proportion of body stature Advantages: Simplicity Disadvantages: relationships are not necessarily linear, nor the same for all individuals Values represent averages for a portion of a specific population

Anthropometry in Design Anthropometric data is most often used to specify reach and clearance dimensions. The criterion values most often used: Reach: 5% Female Clearances: 95% Male Try to accommodate as large as possible user population within constraints

Design Approaches Design for extremes Design for average emphasize one 'tail' of distribution Design for average emphasize the center of a population distribution Design for adjustability emphasize that all potential users/consumers are 'equal’ Varying ranges of accommodation: 5th-95th %ile: typical 25th-75 %ile: less critical functions or infrequent use 1st - 99th %ile: more critical functions +/- low $ 0.01 - 99.99 %ile: risk of severe outcomes

Design for Extremes Example: Door Height Assuming a normal distribution z = (X - )/ Obtain z => %-ile from stats table What height to accommodate? (95th%-ile male)  = 69”;  = 2.8” (from anthropometric table) z0.95 = 1.645 = (X - 69)/2.8 => X = 73.6” Additional allowances? Hair Hats and shoes Gait Etc.

Examples Which design strategy should be employed? leg clearance at a work table finger clearance for a recessed button height of an overhead conveyor system grip size for a power tool weight of a power tool height of a conveyor strength required to turn off an emergency valve

General Strategies and Recommendations Design for Average: Usually the worst approach: both larger and smaller users won’t be accommodated Design for Extremes: Clearance: use 95th percentile male Reach: use 5th percentile female Safety: accommodate >99% of population Design for Adjustability Preferred method, but range and degrees of adjustment are difficult to specify

Homework Working in groups: Select a workplace near campus. Identify any ‘ergonomic mismatch’. Suggest how the workplace can be better designed from the perspective of engineering anthropometry. You should outline the design approach. Pick a journal paper that discusses the use of anthropometric data in design. Submit a one-page summary (in Indonesian) of the paper. Also submit softcopy of the paper.