osnabrueck.de 1 13 – a Lucky Number for the German Qualifications Framework TEMPUS-Project NQF Macedonia Ghent Oct. 21.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Management of Quality in the Context of NQF „National Qualifications Framework (NQF) and Quality Assurance (QA) in Europe – a general overview“ Dr.
Advertisements

Page 1 IMPLEMENTING THE MALTA QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK FOR LIFELONG LEARNING THE KEY CHALLENGES TIPTOE Conference: Working on EQF – From Framework to Practice.
ECA working group 1: Mutual recognition PARIS, 6 December 2006 Europe in Transition: ACCEPTING & RESPECTING Marianne Cox NARIC/ENIC THE NETHERLANDS.
JOINT DEGREES The Experience of the ENIC and NARIC Networks Dr. E. Stephen Hunt Manager, USNEI and President, ENIC Network ECA Team II Conference Joint.
Aligning national against European qualifications frameworks: the principles of self-certification Professor John Scattergood Pro-Chancellor, Trinity.
Self-certification of qualifications frameworks: background and challenges Gerard Madill Policy Adviser, Universities Scotland.
The German Accreditation System: From programme to institutional approach Accreditation Council Foundation for the Accreditation of Study Programmes in.
FRAMEWORK FOR QUALIFICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA Tirana, March 2005.
Compatibility of NQFs with QF-EHEA: Analysis of Verification Reports Bryan Maguire 2 nd Regional Meeting of Ministers of Education Strasbourg, November,
ARMENIA: Quality Assurance (QA) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Tbilisi Regional Seminar on Quality Management in the Context of National.
NVAO’s role in framework development 7 June 2007 by Axel Aerden International Policy Advisor.
“Articulating the work on NQF, QA and recognition ” JULY 2008, Cetinje.
Bologna Process in Albania and its NQF versus EQF Bratislava 2008 by Aleksander Xhuvani Rajmonda Buhaljoti Miranda Kullolli.
The Self-Certification process (Croatian example) Prof. Mile Dželalija, PhD Regional Network on Qualifications Frameworks for South East Europe, Fourth.
Designing and Implementing of the National Qualifications Framework - activities and outcomes – Elizabeta Bahtovska Tempus Project N° TEMPUS SE-SMHES.
Bologna Process and Quality Assurance
For learning and competence Practical aspects of the Lisbon Recognition Convention UNICA Admission and Credential Evaluation University of Lausanne April.
Developing the National Qualifications Framework: the Georgian experience Case of Georgia Lali Bakradze Expert University Curriculum Development Programme.
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
Developing a National Qualifications Framework: the Georgian experience General Overview Nodar Surguladze Deputy Minister Ministry of Education and Science.
SQA Standards Colloquium 28 February 2013 – Can Qualification Frameworks Provide a Useful Basis for Comparing Qualifications? Aileen Ponton, CEO,SCQF Partnership.
Tempus “QUASYS” Dubrovnik, October 11-12, Harmonization with European Trends in Higher Education Prof. dr. Pero Lučin Vice-Rector University of Rijeka.
The Bologna Process The UK HE Europe Unit Tish Bourke.
The UK Credit Framework and the Bologna Process Tim Cobbett Director of Quality and Governance.
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Fiona Crozier QAA
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Yerevan, Armenia, 2008 European qualifications framework Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis,
European Higher Education and the Bologna Process Dr Frank McMahon Director of Academic Affairs Dublin Institute of Technology August 2010.
Unit 2 Regulations and legal framework of ECTS introduction in Russian Federation.
The Framework of Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area Azerbaijan Seminar Baku, 12th June 2007 Stuart Garvie National Qualifications Authority.
TEMPUS AND BOLOGNA PROCESS IN BIH TEMPUS AND BOLOGNA PROCESS IN BIH BERGEN – LONDON PHASE Tempus Information Day, Sarajevo, June 7, 2006.
RECOGNITION OF DEGREES FOR THE LABOR MARKET Sjur Bergan, Council of Europe Bologna conference on employability Luxembourg, November 6 – 7, 2008.
Akkreditierungsrat The German System of Accreditation Franz Börsch Accreditation Council Office SYSTEM OBJECTIVES STANDARDS PROCEDURE.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
Designing and implementing of the NQF in RM 2nd seminar, Linköping University, 7-9 October 2009 Presentation by Elizabeta Bahtovska & Zamir Dika.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
ACE Opening Session 2002 News from the Recognition Field Lesley Wilson Secretary General European University Association (EUA)
Improving the recognition system Prof. Andrejs Rauhvargers President, Lisbon Convention Committee.
1 EQF – Referencing criteria Criteria and procedures in 10 points to ensure that the information made public - is validated by the competent authorities,
Dr Vladimir Radevski Ohrid, 4 April 2012 National Frameworks and their associated Quality Assurance.
Bologna self-certification Implications and challenges.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
An overview in slides. A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001.
Ss Cyril & Methodius University Skopje, June 2009 GUIDE FOR DESIGNING A NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK FOR HE Elizabeta Bahtovska.
“The procedure for self-certification of National Qualifications Frameworks: a Dutch-Flemish experience” Prof. dr. Luc François, Director Ghent University.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Erevan, Armenia, 2008 The Three-Cycle System Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis, Bologna.
Role of Quality Assurance in the Establishment of the EHEA presentation given at the conference ”Bologna Process Implementation in Turkey after 10 Years”,
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Skopje, June 2009 Nadezda Uzelac MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
Mike Murphy 26 September, 2005 Bologna Process Update Engineering Education in Ireland.
The scorecard indicators for 2012 Overview of the scorecard indicators for the integrated implementation report for the BFUG 2012.
1 The Irish Experience Dr. Norma Ryan Director, Quality Promotion Unit University College Cork- National University of Ireland Cork Sarajevo 5 th December.
Making the AzQF compatible to the EQF, what does it mean? Olav Aarna Estonian Qualifications Authority, Kutsekoda.
Compatibility of NQFs with QF-EHEA: Analysis of Verification Reports
Reforming higher education in Europe, The Role of Qualifications Frameworks Mogens Berg Former chair of the Bologna Working Group Belgrade, 1 November.
Prof. dr. Luc François Chief International Officer
The Framework of Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
Self-Certification of Compatibility of NQFs with QF-EHEA
Qualifications Frameworks in the Higher Education system of Armenia: Progress and Challenges Yerevan, 7 December 2010 Stuart Garvie Ireland.
Purpose of referencing
Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian ENIC/NARI Baku, 2017
The Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
Recognition of Qualifications as a stepping stone for further integration Brussels, 26 June 2018.
2nd regional meeting of Ministers of Education on the implementation of the European Higher Education Area Palais de l’Europe, room 10, Council of Europe,
Main steps in designing a national qualifications framework
The Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
Republic of Macedonia - Ministry of Education and Science
Reforming higher education in Europe, The Role of Qualifications Frameworks Mogens Berg Former chair of the Bologna Working Group Yerevan, 8 September.
Presentation transcript:

osnabrueck.de 1 13 – a Lucky Number for the German Qualifications Framework TEMPUS-Project NQF Macedonia Ghent Oct. 21

Steering Group  German Framework for Qualifications in Higher Education: 2005  New Steering Group Initiated by the German Bologna Follow-Up Group in 2008  Members: Representatives of BMBF KMK AK HRK fzs Irish Universities Association Federal Ministry of Science and Research AT

Steering Group  Produced a draft Presented to relevant stakeholders and interested parties Hearing  Finalisation of the report in 2008  Conclusion: 13 issues had been covered: 7 criteria and 6 standards  Nevertheless specific German feature: e.g. 300 credits to be gained to attain Master´s level

Seitenwechsel Change of Paradigm

Part I Compatibility of the Criteria German versus the European Qualifications Framework for Higher Education qualifications

Germany 0 – Europe 47

Criterion 1  The national framework for higher education qualifications and the body or bodies responsible for its development are designated by the national ministry with responsibility for higher education Checked successfully

Criterion 2  There is a clear and demonstrable link between the qualifications in the national framework and the cycle qualification descriptors of the European framework

Criterion 2  Focus: descriptors – German expert´s viewpoint  No longer any degrees located between the levels of the European framework Degrees within the binary system equivalent Recognition of study periods abroad – applying ECTS Recognition of professional qualifications ENIC-NARIC: equivalence of foreign degrees

Criterion 2  There is a clear and verifiable compatibility between the descriptors of the QF for German Higher Education Qualifications and the European Qualifications Framework  All qualifications that are or were awarded in the German system can be clearly and unequivocally assigned to the stages of the national qualifications and the European Qualifications Framework

You never stop learning

Criterion 3  The national framework and its qualifications are demonstrably based on learning outcomes and the qualifications are linked to ECTS or ECTS compatible credits.

WE got married Outcome! Same? Cloned? EHEA ECTSLO

Total of 300 credits for Master level Not foreseen for doctoral degrees – some do Equality provisions „Former“ FH Diplom = Bachelor „Former“ Uni Diplom = Master Criterion 3

Criterion 3  The level descriptors of the German qualifications framework are oriented in line with the learning outcomes for the various stages  ECTS bandwiths are specified for the Bachelor´s and Master´s graduation levels, while the German system does not plan to use ECTS for the doctoral phase

osnabrueck.de 16 The Key to All in Mobility 5 ECTS = ?

Criterion 4  The procedures for inclusion of qualifications in the natioal framework are clear

You never stop learning

Criterion 4  For new qualifications: responsibility with the Länder  The degrees that currently exist in the German HE system, including those previously awarded, have been considered in the QF  In this respect, the Länder associated with the KMK and the KMK itself, in its capacity as the organisation responsible for adopting the qualifications framework, are responsible for considering further types of degrees or, in cases of doubt, for categorising the degrees

Criterion 5  The national quality assurance systems for higher education refer to the national framework of qualifications and are consistent with the Berlin Communiqué and any subsequent communiqué agreed by ministers in the Bologna Process

Criterion 5  Accreditation: programme level introduced 1998, additional option since 2008: Systems accreditation  Decentralised agencies  Central accreditation body: Accreditation Council  Adopting the Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area into its own standards for the accreditation of agencies and degree programmes  These procedures and bodies were ivestigated: no change required (2007/2008)

Criterion 6  The national framework and any alignments with the European framework are referenced in all Diploma Suppements

Criterion 6  KMK drew up a generic version in German and in English  Since 2008 – based on an agreement by KMK and HRK – explicit reference is given to the Qualifications Framework for Higher Education Qualifications

Criterion 7  The responsibilities of the domestic parties to the national framework are clearly determined and published

Criterion 7  The German framework provides orientational assistance for students, employers and employees and how these qualifications are to be assessed

Mutual Trust Built on

Part II Compatibility of the Procedural Standards German versus the European Qualifications Framework for Higher Education qualifications

LO Question Standard Threshold Compatibility

You never stop learning

Standard 1  The competent national body/bodies shall certify the compatibility of the national framework with the European framework Fulfilled

Standard 2  The self-certification process shall include the stated agreement of the quality assurance bodies in the country in question recognised through the Bologna Process

Standard 2  The German Accreditation Council confirmed that the German Qualifications Framework was compatible with the Qualifications Framework for the European Higher Education Area

Standard 3  The self-certification process shall involve international experts Fulfilled

Standard 4  The self-certification and the evidence supporting it shall be published and shall address separately each of the criteria set out. Fulfilled:  Published on the respective web sites

Standard 5  The ENIC and NARIC networks shall maintain a public listing of States that have confirmed that they have completed the self-certification process.

Standard 5  The Central Office for Foreign Education (ZAB) performs the role of ENIC/NARIC. Besides publishing the report on its website, it will also inform the other ENI C/NARICs of the procedures

Standard 6  The completion of the self- certification process shall be noted on Diploma Supplements issued subsequently by showing the link between the national framework and the European framework

Standard 6  A reference to the completion of the self-certification process and its results will be added to the National Statement of the DS in agreement between the KMK and HRK

YOU never stop learning

Germany 13 – Europe 47