Funding Target Formula 32.50% Total VMT (on and off State Hwy System) 22.19% Population 16.88% Lane miles (on System) 14.06% VMT (trucks only) 6.88% Percent.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.

Advertisements

Transportation Conformity Basics. What is Transportation Conformity? Transportation conformity (conformity) is a way to ensure that Federal funding and.

2004 Target Formula Re-evaluation Area Transportation Partnership (ATP) Interviews.

Name of Community Date:. Ports-to-Plains Alliance.

Proposition 1 Formula Distribution Proposal for FY 2015 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT PROPOSITION 1 FORMULA DISTRIBUTION PROPOSAL FOR FY 2015 TxDOT/Stakeholder Working.

Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.

The Cost of Status Quo Governor’s Task Force on Modernizing Transportation Funding in Idaho December 2, 2009 Presented by Idaho’s Metropolitan Planning.

California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.

California’sInfrastructureCrisis February 5, 2012.

Ohio Department of Transportation Leadership Meeting#1 Jun 12, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Pike and Wok Travel.

Transportation’s Relation to Growth Management `.

FINANCIAL PLAN AND FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT FOR FTIPS AND FSTIP FINANCIAL PLAN AND REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 2013 FTIP/FSTIP WORKSHOP January 17, 2012 Wade Hobbs,

Transportation Alternatives Program FY 2015 Proposed Projects for Funding in Northern Virginia Transportation Planning Board May 21, 2014 Sarah Crawford.

DRAFT.  Its Mandated for funding › Strategy, activity or project  It is a Guide › How to  It is a story › History (where we were) › Possible look.

21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.

All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E. Traffic Investigations Engineer, ODOT February 26, 2015.

Funding Levels Similar funding levels to the Transportation Enhancement Activities under SAFETEA-LU: FY 2013: $808,760,000 FY 2014: $819,900,000 Total.

State and Federal Funding Programs for Local Agency Projects Alan Lively Local Government Section Project Delivery Specialist.

California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.

U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.

Transportation Planning Board: Background, Constrained Long- Range Plan, and Ongoing Work Presentation to the Board of Directors Metropolitan Washington.

Transportation 2030 Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area: Action Plan Update.

Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTERMODAL DIVISION - TRANSIT Presented to G.A. MPO CONFERENCE November 2012.

California’sInfrastructureCrisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment 2011 “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.

Highway Program Financing July Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment.

MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.

Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University

BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.

Module X: Cooperative Revenue Forecasting. Federal Requirements “For the purpose of developing the metropolitan transportation plan, the MPO, public transportation.

Performance Based Federal-Aid Programs Pete Rahn, Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Performance Management Director, Missouri DOT February 23,2009 AASHTO.

Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.

INDOT Access Management Study _________________________ Long Range Transportation Planning Section Division of Environment, Planning and Engineering INDIANA.

MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.

2015 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Update March 05, 2015 HOBBY MANAGEMENT AREA TRANSPORTATION UPDATE Texas Transportation Commission March 05, 2015.

Recent Trend in Vehicle Miles Traveled in the U.S. Katie Zadrozny Khaled Al-Menayes September 3, 2009.

A Cross-State Comparison of Arkansas's Highway Financing and Infrastructure Quality.

Leanna Depue, Ph.D. On behalf of the Peer Exchange Planning Committee SHSP Survey Summary.

Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive

Industrial System Natural System Industrial System.

3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC

Presentation for Talking Freight, November 16, 2011 Debbie Bowden Freight and Economic Policy Analyst, Office of Freight and Multimodalism Maryland Department.

TxDOT UTP Category 3 Urban Area (Non-TMA) Corridor Projects Workshops.

Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.

All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation November 2014.

All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Angela Kargel Region 2 Traffic Manager Oregon Department of Transportation January 2015.

Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.

Review of Principal Arterial Routes on the National Highway System For MAP-21 Reta R. Busher Chief of Planning and Programming October 17, 2012.

Action 2020 Training Local Context August 15, 2012.

Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT USING GIS TYLER MEYER, AICP 2015 AMPO Conference Clark County, NV October 2015.

The Metropolitan Houston Traffic Safety Program Houston-Galveston Area Council Houston, TX.

Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TEA-21 Prepared by Iowa Department of Transportation September 1998.

Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC

Federal-Aid Funding County Highway Accountants Conference May 10, 2007 zpowerpoint/ProjManagersCriticalIssuesBOB Feb07.ppt.

Mell Henderson, Director of Transportation & Michael Briggs, Transportation Planner Mid-America Regional Council.

New Mexico Safety Corridors Identification and Creation Processes Sandra Martinez Annaliese Mayette.

PROJECT SELECTION & EXPEDITED PROJECT SELECTION FOR MPO FTIPS AND THE STATEWIDE FSTIP 2013 FTIP/FSTIP WORKSHOP January 18-19, 2012 Wade Hobbs, FHWA CADO.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING PROCEDURES FOR REVISIONS STATEWIDE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS (STIP & TIP) State of Alabama Department.

Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.

0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.

Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Carmen Monroy Director, Office of Policy Planning April 28, 2016.

Txdot’s transportation program, 2018 Txapa annual membership meeting

Category 2 Parameters Transportation Management Areas (TMA) – 200,000+ pop. 8 TMAs in Texas Austin Corpus Christi Dallas-Fort Worth El Paso Hidalgo County.

Mr. Greg Slater, Administrator

LEGISLATIVE BRIEFING SERIES

TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT

DRAFT (MOVE $100M) FUNDING CATEGORY WEST ($ IN BILLIONS)

Presentation transcript:

Funding Target Formula 32.50% Total VMT (on and off State Hwy System) 22.19% Population 16.88% Lane miles (on System) 14.06% VMT (trucks only) 6.88% Percent population under federal poverty level 6.56% Fatal & incapacitating crashes 0.93% Centerline miles (on System) Metropolitan Area (TMA) Category 2 Projects

Funding Target Formula 22% Total VMT (on and off State Hwy System) 26% Population 11% Lane miles (on System) 6% Centerline miles (on System) 15% VMT (trucks only) 9% Percent population under federal poverty level 11% Fatal & incapacitating crashes Urban Area (non-TMA) Category 3 Projects

Mobility Corridors – based on congestion Connectivity Corridors – 2-lane roadways requiring upgrade to 4-lane divided. Strategic Corridors – strategic corridor additions to the state highway network. An example would be the Ports-to-Plains. Statewide Connectivity Corridor Projects Selections based on engineering analysis of projects on three corridor types:

Challenges To Be Addressed

The Work Group will begin to address as many of the eight individual challenges as allowable in time permitted. Challenges to be addressed are as follows:

Challenges to be Addressed: 1.Determining the appropriate amount of right of way acquisition and consultant dollars that could be allocated by respective category to the MPOs;

Challenges to be Addressed: 2.Determine an allocation method;

Challenges to be Addressed: 3.Scheduling each area’s use of the total allocation

4.Tracking the actual use of the dollars and balancing future scheduling with past obligations; Challenges to be Addressed:

5.Educating Districts and MPOs on the use of its area’s allocation and what can be accomplished with the funds; Challenges to be Addressed:

6.Temporarily continuing data maintenance to fulfill legislative reporting requirements (the Department is currently working on changes to enable tracking of total project costs that should be fully implemented by summer 2006);

7.Investigating legal issues (contained in the Texas Administrative Code and the Texas Transportation Code); and Challenges to be Addressed:

8.Developing recommendations to present to the Districts and MPO. Challenges to be Addressed: