Metro Atlanta Project Delivery Task Force Overview GAMPO Annual Work Session October 29-30, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning Collaborative Spaces in Libraries
Advertisements

Evaluation Plan in Hungary Dr. Tamás Tétényi Head of Department for Strategy and Evaluation National Development Agency.
Mn/DOT & ACEC/MN Collaboration 1. Mn/DOT Commissioner and Executive Staff ACEC Transportation Executive Leadership Team ACEC - Mn/DOT Collaboration Team.
1 PRSp Alignment Finnish Aid in a PRS Context Helsinki Workshop May 2003.
Arizona Department of Homeland Security SAA Site Monitoring 6 th Annual Homeland Security UASI Conference May 2012 May 2012 Governor Janice K. BrewerDirector.
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
Improvements to Project Development and Program Management of New Starts Projects FY 2008 Proposed Effective April 30, 2006.
Administration, Management, and Coordination of Supportive Housing: Guidelines from CSH’s Dimensions of Quality MHSA TA Operations Call September 1, 2010.
SLO Review Principal Meeting CLIU October Student Learning Objective REVIEW -Quality Assurance-
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
Simplified Risk Management Planning for A Risk Management Process Overview presentation, which should take about.
NEPA ASSUMPTION SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DELIVERY PROGRAM.
Transforming the Procurement Process
Project Management Process. Project Complexity means that: a team of people are needed to supply expertise the work needs to be broken into manageable.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA’s Talking Freight Seminar presented by Michael Williamson Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April.
Project Management Module 3. Keep focused on the timeline Week Prepare for Kick-off Meeting Assign teams Team forming Review and execute.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
IS&T Project Management: Project Management 101 June, 2006.
IS&T Project Management: How to Engage the Customer September 27, 2005.
Certification/Qualification Program. Certification Program What is it? Who is involved? What should be considered? Where can a Certification Program work.
N A managed approach to planning and controlling the implementation of complex application software. n A flexible tool kit, designed to support the Project.
Developing Business Rules and Standards for the Delivery of SDS, FMS and I&A Supports April 21, 2015.
MnDOT Project Management History and Future MnDOT – ACEC/MN Annual Conference March 5, 2013 Earle Brown Heritage Center.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
Ohio DOT’s Online CE System Presented by Kevin E. Davis Environmental Supervisor Office of Environmental Services.
I Larry Heil, FHWA October 15, 2003 Environmental Streamlining.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
Greening Government Operations Green Procurement Implementation Tools & Resources Canadian Public Procurement Forum October 1 st, 2007.
ODOT’s Local Agency Certification Program The Basics Beth Vargas Duncan Certification Program Manager May 2006.
An Introduction to World Bank Organization and Operations Jean-Charles Crochet Senior Transport Economist World Bank.
February 9, 2012  Partner with the community  Provide an effective educational experience  Prepare every student to find success in our complex society.
Dominique Poulin Environmental Health First Nations and Inuit Health Branch Health Canada Health Canada’s Implementation of the Drinking Water Safety Program:
2010 W EST V IRGINIA GIS C ONFERENCE Wednesday, June 9, 2010.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Update on REDD+ Readiness in Nigeria Presented at the GCF Annual Meeting,20-22 Sept Palangka Raya,Centrall Kalimantan Indonesia Odigha Odigha I.
Award Monitoring Update National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Mary Santonastasso, Director, Division.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
© Commonwealth of Australia 2003 The Quality Assessment Framework.
Circuit Rider Training Program (CRTP) Circuit Rider Professional Association Annual General Meeting and Conference August 30, 2012.
Innovative Solutions for tomorrow’s transportation needs Local Agency Program Performance Measures, Project Scheduling, and Efficient Project Delivery.
Massachusetts Part C Department of Public Health (LA) 62 programs, 38 vendor agencies 6 Regions 6 Regional Specialists.
Strategic Business Planning: Building More Centralized Services Tim Cox June 2014.
NOTES FROM INFORMATIONAL BRIEFINGS FOR POTENTIAL REGIONAL CENTER AND CONTENT CENTER APPLICANTS JUNE 19,20 & 22, 2012 Comprehensive Centers Program.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Required for: Full EIA based on Palestinian EIA Policy Category A projects based on World Bank Policy.
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Key Steps to Delivering Project 1.Lead agency submits final project scope, budget and schedule to MTC 2.MTC.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
Project Development Process. ODOT’ PDP A project management and transportation decision-making tool. Developing the detail to the level necessary to make.
Public Involvement. Why? Who Cares? –What we do matters to the public –Effective PI enables proactive input and enhances the decision- making process.
D.d. delivers district department of transportation d.d. delivers FAISAL HAMEED RONALDO T. NICHOLSON. P.E. Innovative Project Delivery Processes Innovative.
Regulatory Streamlining Task Force Update Discussion Item December 6, 2011 Board of County Commissioners.
Implementing Local Action Strategies and the Puerto Rico Resolution Proposal to the U.S. Coral Reef Task Force October 3-5, 2003 Saipan, CNMI.
Illuminating Britelite’s Internal Services for Success Strategy for Process Improvement.
Key Functions & Responsibilities (from the old governance document) – Coordinates the program-level adaptive management system and assists the GITs in.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
1 Transportation FY 2014 Sources - $ million  General Fund - $4.496 million  Transit Funds - $9.739 million  Parking Funds - $ million.
ITS Device Standards & Procurement Project PURPOSE  Develop a series of Standards & Strategies designed to guide and provide consistency across the development.
Building Capacity and Culture within a Research & Evaluation Team anzea July 2007 Research & Evaluation Team Research Division.
I P M 1 City Council Presented by Ken Hall, IPM Program Manager, CH2M HILL October 21, 2008 I n t e g r a t e d P r o g r a m M a n a g e m e n t Executive.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.
I P M 1 City of Fort Worth City Council Presented by Doug Rademaker, Deputy Director, PMO Ken Hall, IPM Program Manager, CH2M HILL October 6, 2009 I n.
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
PRESENTER Jose A. Galan ▸ Division Director, Internal Services Department, Real Estate Development Division ▸ Current Chair of the Florida Council For.
Project Management Lifecycle Phases
Business System Development
Interoperability of Data Systems Administration for Children & Families Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation Robert (Bob) Garcia Regional Administrator,
Presentation to Project Certification Committee, DoIT August 24, 2008
National Disaster Risk Management Fund
Presentation transcript:

Metro Atlanta Project Delivery Task Force Overview GAMPO Annual Work Session October 29-30, 2015

PDTF Background

“To accelerate Metro-Atlanta transportation project delivery through improved collaboration between transportation planning and project delivery activities.” Proposed Mission Statement

Project Expectations by Phase Planning Initial Purpose/Need Preliminary Cost Preliminary Scope Logical Termini Elected Official/Public Expectations Initial ROW Estimate Environmental Screening Project Champion(s) Local Government/ Public/Stakeholder Support Programming Firm Purpose/Need Funding Source(s) Funding Partner(s) Budget Commitment(s) Production Schedule Final Scope Environmental Fatal Flaws Refined ROW estimate Cost Estimate (by phase) Local Government/ Public/Stakeholder Support NEPA/Design Project Funding Agreements Correct Contract Requirements and Certifications Refined ROW estimate NEPA Document/ Class of Action Refined Project Cost (by phase) Funding/Budget Commitments Local Government/ Public/Stakeholder Support

Key Topics Identified in Technical Training/Technical Support 2.Early Vetting of Environmental Issues/Data- Sharing 3.Scheduling Protocols and Templates 4.Improved Project Descriptions/Concepts 5.Project Delivery Case Studies 6.ROW/UTIL Review and Coordination

7.Scoping Phase Requirements 8.Expediting Project Framework Agreements (PFAs) 9.Changes in Ground Rules After the Project Starts 10.Project Cost Threshold for Federal Aid/Streamlined Process for Small Projects 11.Engaging Elected Officials and Managing Expectations Key Topics Identified in 2014 (Cont’d)

Project Delivery Task Force (PDTF) Focus Areas 1.Streamlined Environmental Analysis/Data-Sharing 2.Project Feasibility and Programming 3.Dealing with Change 4.Less Complex Projects 5.Transit Expansion Delivery

PDTF Issue Group Strategies

Project Programming and Feasibility Screening Phase Funding the Screening Phase Outstanding Issues – Criteria – Process – Requirements

Dealing with Change Education and Accountability of Elected Officials and Local Staff Consultant Procurement Waiver Process Project History Documentation Explore Abbreviated PFAs for Studies

Limited Scope Projects

Problem: When is it not cost effective to use Federal Funds? Strategies: (1)Set funding thresholds, and (2)Implement fund swaps or trades, and flexing

Problem: Costly & lengthy ROW process for projects requiring only temp. cst easements Strategies: (1)Revise “3’” rule, (2)Changes to cost estimation tool, (3)More training

Problem: NEPA process for CEs take an average of 18 mos. (GDOT est.) to 27 mos. (LCI average) Strategies: Streamline process through programmatic agreements, fund flexing, waiver procedures and/or reduced requirements (when possible), and more.

Problem: Extensive plans required for limited scope projects Strategies: Reduce Plan requirements for certain project types, when possible, as is currently the practice for Quick Fix and maintenance projects.

Problem: Local gov’ts and even some consultants often lack resources, staff and experience to implement projects. Strategies: Improve local capacity to implement projects through a variety of actions, including training, ARC technical assistance, and advanced planning/scoping

Streamlining Environmental Analysis

Create/ Refine Joint Environmental Database Streamlined Environmental Analysis Develop Planning Requirement for Environmental Screening  Definition and Process for Screening Being Developed by the Project Feasibility and Programming Group Provide Technical Resources to Help Local Jurisdictions & Create Checklists to Help Local Sponsors to Comply with Environmental Requirements  Focus less on Checklists and More on Mitigation  Strategies to Better Plan Projects (Scope, Schedule, Budget) Develop Process to Build on Environmental Screening in NEPA Analysis  Meeting with Environmental Review Consultants  Update of GDOT OES Manual & Improvements to Internal Tracking

For additional information… Jean Hee Barrett Principal Planner – Transportation Access & Mobility Division - Project Implementation and Partner Services Kofi Wakhisi Section Supervisor – ARC Transportation Access & Mobility Division - Project Implementation and Partner Services