Framework for Assessing Organizational Excellence Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DoD Logistics Human Capital Strategy (HCS) Executive Overview 1 October 2008.
Advertisements

Slides have references to related pages in the Guide
Presented by the US Department of Education. More information at
People In Aid Conference
Presentation at WebEx Meeting June 15,  Context  Challenge  Anticipated Outcomes  Framework  Timeline & Guidance  Comment and Questions.
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
NSF Regional Grants Conference St. Louis, MO
Sunflower blank National Science Foundation Dan Maki Kathleen Bergin Math and Science Partnership Education and Human Resources Directorate Division of.
Business & Operations Advisory Committee -- March 31, Performance Assessment.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program 2011 Criteria for Performance Excellence Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Steve Bonk PMI
Baldrige National Quality Program 2010 Criteria for Performance Excellence Baldrige National Quality Program Steve Bonk PMI Baltimore
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
South Carolina Finance Workshop for Small Water Systems June 4, 2013 Water Partnerships: Financial Advantages and Challenges SC Case Study: Lowcountry.
SEM Planning Model.
“How” We Do It An Introduction to NSLIJ’s Behavioral Expectations Model.
Do You Know ???.
U.S. Science Policy Cheryl L. Eavey, Program Director
A Roadmap to Service Excellence – The UW-Madison IT Strategic Plan October 15, 2008.
NSF Investments in Engineering Research Centers Vilas Mujumdar, P.E., S.E. Program Director Engineering Research Centers National Science Foundation Summative.
B&O Committee May 2015 iTRAK - Change Management An Agency Adapting to Change.
0 Contract Specialist Army Contracting Command – Redstone CPCM, CFCM, CCCM, FELLOW Huntsville Chapter President Director, Mohawk Valley Small Business.
1 LEADERSHIP 100 points (10%) 3 PEOPLE 90 p. (9%) 2 POLICY & STRATEGY 80 p. (8%) 4 PARTNERSHIPS & RESOURCES 90 p. (9%) 5 PROCESSES 140 points (14%) 7 PEOPLE.
1 Provost’s Report to the Board of Trustees The Pennsylvania State University Strategic Plan: through PRESENTED BY Nicholas P. Jones,
“How” We Do It An Introduction to NSLIJ’s Behavioral Expectations Model.
MGT-555 PERFORMANCE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Human Capital Management Assessment Joe Burt Director, HRM March 31, 2004.
Human Capital Management Assessment of Organizational Excellence NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations May 5-6, 2005 Joseph F. Burt Director,
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
Organizational Excellence Assessment Overview Anthony A. Arnolie.
NSF/ENG SBIR TASK FORCE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE NSF SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR) SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (STTR) PROGRAMS.
)Talk about Pat Kinlaw- Transition back to the Baldrige framework- focusing on the leadership category something like:) Now that we have the right people.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Distinguished University Professor
Students Becoming Scientists in the World: Integrating Research and Education for Sustainable Development Dr. James P. Collins Directorate for the Biological.
Directorate for Engineering Engineering Education and Centers Engineering Education and Centers EPSCoR “Developing NSF Centers” Conference Lexington, KY.
Partnerships for Innovation Key Underlying Tenets ¬ Innovation happens locally - partnerships with state, regional and local governments and industry are.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Performance Assessment Assessment of Organizational Excellence NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations May 5-6, 2005.
© 2001 by Prentice Hall 1-1 Key HR Challenges for Today’s Managers Environment Rapid Change Workforce Diversity Globalization Rise of Internet Legislation.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure 10/31/06 Craig.
Award Monitoring Update National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Mary Santonastasso, Director, Division.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
FY2005 Committee Of Visitors Information Technology Research Program Brian Bershad Office of Polar Programs, Office Advisory Committee member Computer.
Congress created the NSF in 1950 as an independent federal agency. Budget ~$7.0 billion (2012) Funding for basic research.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
EU/US International Conference on Aging, Disability, and Independence Preparatory Workshop: High Technology Track June 26-27, 2003 NSF Activities in Disability-related.
1 Advanced Collaborative Environments Kris Brown Carmel Conaty Johnny Medina.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
IDigBio Summit meeting Judith E. Skog Biological Sciences Directorate Office of the Assistant Director Emerging Frontiers Division.
Opportunity Structures for Preparation and Inspiration (OSPrI): Case Studies of 8 “Exemplar” Inclusive STEM-focused High Schools This work was conducted.
Journey to Excellence An Introduction to the Malcolm Baldrige Framework for Excellence.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY OPP Advisory Committee 10/26/06.
Applied Sciences Perspective Lawrence Friedl, Program Director NASA Earth Science Applied Sciences Program LANCE User Working Group Meeting  September.
Module Road Safety Program Management Identify strategies for establishing and sustaining effective multidisciplinary collaborative relationships.
NSF FY 2006 Assessment: Organizational Excellence Advisory Committee for Business and Operations May 18, 2006.
New Framework for Strategic Goal Assessment NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations November 8-9, 2006 Tom Cooley, Director, BFA.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
NSF Draft Strategic Plan for Data, Data Analysis, and Visualization Chris Greer Program Director National Science Foundation.
Team C Final Project  Team C:  Eugene Holloman  John McGonegal  Regina Williams  GB520 Strategic Human Resources Management.
UNCLASSIFIED Lift the living standards and wellbeing of all Victorians by sustainably growing Victoria’s economy and employment and by working with the.
State Steering Committee
Strategic Planning Process
Strategic Planning Process
HHS STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2018 – 2022 AN OVERVIEW
Critical Factors in Managing Technology
Conducting a Self Assessment and Developing Your CQI Plan
Army Medical Logistics Enterprise: USAMMA Overview
The Curry School of Education October 3, 2018
Presentation transcript:

Framework for Assessing Organizational Excellence Introduction

2 NSF Strategic Plan: Outcome Goals People – to develop a diverse, internationally competitive and globally-engaged workforce of scientists, engineers and well-prepared citizens. Ideas – to provide a deep and broad fundamental science and engineering knowledge base. Tools – to provide widely accessible, state-of-the-art science and engineering infrastructure. Organizational Excellence – to develop an agile, innovative organization that fulfills its mission through leadership in state-of the-art business practices.

3 Organizational Excellence Goal Objectives Human Capital Management. Develop a diverse, capable, motivated staff that operates with efficiency and integrity. Technology Enabled Business Processes. Utilize and sustain broad access to new and emerging technologies for business application Performance Assessment. Develop and use performance assessment tools and measures to provide an environment of continuous improvement in NSF’s intellectual investments as well as its management effectiveness. Merit Review. Operate a credible, efficient merit review system

4 Assessment of Organizational Excellence Goal NSF Assessment B&O Advisory Committee reviews assessment and evaluates results Human Capital Management Technology Enabled Business Processes Performance Assessment

5 Assessment TimeLine Today –Present Framework Human Capital Management – Joe Burt Technology Enabled Business Processes – Andrea Norris and Mary Santonastasso Performance Assessment – Craig Robinson –Get Feedback Tomorrow to Mid-May –NSF to Conduct Assessment Mid-May –Transmit results to B&O Committee via a “report card” Early June –Committee conference call to discuss results –Letter from Committee June 22-23, 2004 – AC/GPA Meeting