Estimating fuel loading under various disturbance regimes and vegetation types in Northern Wisconsin forest landscape Class presentation, Mar 17 2004 Soung-Ryoul.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1st of 3 Part Training Series Christopher Woodall INTRODUCTION TO THE P2+ DOWN WOODY MATERIALS INDICATOR.
Advertisements

Welcome Chequamegon National Forest, Wisconsin FARSITE and HARVEST model Interactive By Jacob LaCroix, LEES Lab, UT Introduction Introduction Introduction.
Effects of Forest Thinning on CO 2 Efflux Peter Erb, Trisha Thoms, Jamie Shinn Biogeochemistry 2003: Block 1.
Rapid River Schools FOREST ECOLOGY “Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land.” “A Sand County Almanac” Aldo Leopold
Bottomland Forest Ecosystem. Description Bottomland Forests are deciduous, or mixed deciduous /evergreen forests They form closed-canopy forests on riverine.
Peter S. Curtis Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University Managing Great Lakes Forests for Climate Change Mitigation.
Silvicultural experiments exploring linkages between stand structural diversity and ecological variables in California Carl Skinner, Martin Ritchie, Eric.
Can partial harvesting in boreal mixedwoods maintain processes and fungal communities associated with coarse woody debris? Manuella Struckelj Hedi Kebli.
Examining fire spread patterns across a managed forest-land mosaic in northern Wisconsin, USA using a modeling approach Jacob LaCroix, Daolan Zheng, Soung-Ryoul.
Wildlife Management Principles. Goals What are some goals related to the management of wildlife habitats?
Growth and yield Harvesting Regeneration Thinning Fire and fuels.
Managing forests for carbon storage Bill Keeton Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Vermont.
Climate Change and Douglas-fir Dave Spittlehouse, Research Branch, BC Min. Forest and Range, Victoria.
LANDIS 4.0, A New Generation Computer Simulation Model for Assessing Fuel Management Effects on Fire Risk in Eastern U.S. Forest Landscapes Hong S. He.
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. USDA Forest Service GTR NE-343.
Lodgepole Pine / Ponderosa Pine Ecotone By Tyler Bieneman Lodgepole Pine / Limber Pine Ecotone VS. Winter Ecology – Spring 2005 Mountain Research Station.
o What were we looking at? o The Pit Crew studied soil patterns throughout the landscape.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: Informed forest management decisions need information about current and projected conditions.
Dynamics of the Northern Hardwood Ecosystem Yuqiong Hu, Jeff Plakke, Sharon Shattuck, Erin Wiley.
EFFECT OF HARVEST REMOVAL ON PRODUCTIVITY OF A 15-YEAR-OLD DOUGLAS-FIR PLANTATION. by Dale W. Cole and Jana E. Compton University of Washington and Harvard.
Introduction Subalpine meadows play a crucial role in species diversity, supporting many endangered species of plant and wildlife. Subalpine meadows play.
Fire Effects on Soil. What are the Functions of Soil within Ecosystems? Provides a medium for plant growth and supplies nutrients Regulates the hydrologic.
Elevation Distribution of Vaccinium Myrtillus in Spruce-Fir and Lodge Pole Forests. By: Nicholas Condello Schwinger 7/ 17/2013.
Ecosystem processes and heterogeneity Landscape Ecology.
Effects of Forest Management on Carbon Flux and Storage Jiquan Chen, Randy Jensen, Qinglin Li, Rachel Henderson & Jianye Xu University of Toledo & Missouri.
Fires and the Contemporary Global Carbon Cycle Guido van der Werf (Free University, Amsterdam, Netherlands) In collaboration with: Jim Randerson (UCI,
Schmidt et al GTR RMRS-87.
FireBGCv2: A research simulation platform for exploring fire, vegetation, and climate dynamics Robert Keane Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Rocky Mountain.
Plant Ecology - Chapter 14 Ecosystem Processes. Ecosystem Ecology Focus on what regulates pools (quantities stored) and fluxes (flows) of materials and.
EFIMOD – a system of models for Forest Management A.S. Komarov, A.V. Mikhailov, S.S. Bykhovets, M.V.Bobrovsky, E.V.Zubkova Institute of Physicochemical.
Non-pollutant ecosystem stress impacts on defining a critical load Or why long-term critical loads estimates are likely too high Steven McNulty USDA Forest.
These three elements form a “fire triangle.” Heat Oxygen Fuel.
A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v. 3.0) A. D. Friend, A.K. Stevens, R.G. Knox, M.G.R. Cannell. Ecological Modelling.
Analysis as a Potential Source of Renewable Energy And Bedding Material For the Organic Dairy Research Farm John Aber and the NR 403 Forest Production.
Managing Patch Edge Fuel Effects Fire Spread in a Fragmented Landscape By: Jacob J. LaCroix, Soung- Ryoul Ryu, Qinglin Li, Daolan Zheng, and Jiquan Chen.
Carbon Flux and Storage in Mixed Oak Forests of the Ozarks MDC Project Leader: Randy Jensen Principal Investigator: Jiquan Chen Team Members: Qinglin Li,
Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.
Methods Model. The TECOS model is used as forward model to simulate carbon transfer among the carbon pools (Fig.1). In the model, ecosystem is simplified.
The impacts of land mosaics and human activity on ecosystem productivity Jeanette Eckert.
Water and Carbon Cycles in Heterogeneous Landscapes: An Ecosystem Perspective Chapter 4 How water and carbon cycles connect the organizational levels of.
Estimating aboveground biomass: remote sensing approach Daolan Zheng Dept. of EEES, University of Toledo.
Fire and Fuels 8/31/2010. OXYGEN HEAT FUEL THE FIRE TRIANGLE FIRE.
Introduction: Globally, atmospheric concentrations of CO 2 are rising, and are expected to increase forest productivity and carbon storage. However, forest.
Objective: Have a working knowledge of the relationship between the vegetative cover in a watershed and water yield and water quality.
Coarse Woody Debris Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Randy G. Jensen Stephen R. Shifley Brian L. Brookshire.
The effects of the 2002 Hayman Fire on the ponderosa pine/bunch grass ecosystem Nick Kelley Blake Schnebly
Sharon Stanton & FIA National Indicator Leads RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCED FOREST INDICATORS.
Plant Responses To Land Mosaics EEES 4760/6760, University of Toledo Feb19, 2007 Reading: Chapter 2.
Edge Corridor (road) Patch Matrix LANDSCAPE MOSAIC.
Forest Ecology. What is forest ecology? Study of –Relationships between organisms and their environments –Interactions of organisms with one another –Patterns.
What questions are researchers asking in order to understand fire ecology? Landscape perspectiveSpecies perspective How does the ecosystem, topography.
Site Description This research is being conducted as a part of the Detritus Input and Removal Treatments Project (DIRT), a cross-continental experiment.
Overstory Vegetation Overstory Vegetation 2008 MOFEP PI Meeting John Kabrick and Randy Jensen.
Disturbance and Equilibrium Lecture 11 March 10, 2005.
Effects of simulated climate change on the abundance of an exotic weevil, Cyrtepistomus castaneus Bryan Marbert (ASU ) and Paul Hanson (ORNL) Contact Information:
Landscape Management & Harvest Model A Case Studies from Chequamegon National Forest EEES4760/6760 April 15, 2009 HARVEST used to simulate different landscapes.
Landscape Management & Harvest Model A Case Studies from Chequamegon National Forest EEES4760/6760 April 20, 2009 HARVEST used to simulate different landscapes.
Welcome Chequamegon National Forest, Wisconsin and FARSITE Surface Fire Interactive By Jacob LaCroix, LEES Lab, UT ► Introduction Introduction ► Fire Spread.
Ecology & Management of Disturbed Landscapes Challenges and Opportunities Jiquan Chen Landscape Ecology & Ecosystem Science University of Toledo Apr 16,
2017 EEA report “Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction in Europe - Synergies for the knowledge base and policies” Rob Swart, Koen Kramer,
Uncertainty analysis of carbon turnover time and sequestration potential in terrestrial ecosystems of the Conterminous USA Xuhui Zhou 1, Tao Zhou 1, Yiqi.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Above and Below ground decomposition of leaf litter Sukhpreet Sandhu.
Daily net carbon exchange as a mediator of heterotrophic soil respiration across two forest chronosequences Jared L. DeForest, Asko Noormets, and Jiquan.
Prescribed Fire in the Forest Ecosystem FORS 5610 / 7610 Location: Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center For more information: Dr. Pete Bettinger.
Forest Management Service Center Providing Biometric Services to the National Forest System Program Emphasis: We provide products and technical support.
June 2016What problems/opportunities/needs are there with forest management? Development of the purpose of and need for action. July 2016What tools are.
Jiquan Chen Kim Brosofske Asko Noormets Tom Crow Soung Ryu Many others
Species Diversity Comparison North and South Slopes
What Do You See? Message of the Day: Informed forest management decisions need information about current and projected conditions.
Presentation transcript:

Estimating fuel loading under various disturbance regimes and vegetation types in Northern Wisconsin forest landscape Class presentation, Mar Soung-Ryoul Ryu, John A. Rademacher, Jiquan Chen, Daolan Zheng and Thomas R. Crow

Fire and Forest Ecosystem Forest structure, species composition and diversity (Wang et al. 2001, Brisson et al. 2003, Taft, 2003, Wang 2003). Forest structure, species composition and diversity (Wang et al. 2001, Brisson et al. 2003, Taft, 2003, Wang 2003). Increase mortality of young plants (Ivanauskas et al. 2003) Increase mortality of young plants (Ivanauskas et al. 2003) Ecosystem productivity (Pausas et al. 2003). Ecosystem productivity (Pausas et al. 2003). Potential to accelerate the invasion of exotic species or insect (Kulakowski et al. 2003, Lesica and Martin 2003), Potential to accelerate the invasion of exotic species or insect (Kulakowski et al. 2003, Lesica and Martin 2003), Soil surface temperatures, nutrients cycling, soil water infiltration, nutrient availability and soil microbial community Soil surface temperatures, nutrients cycling, soil water infiltration, nutrient availability and soil microbial community (Schlesinger and Gill 1980, Knapp and Seastedt 1986, Brewer 1995, Dumonte et al. 1996, Brais et al. 2000, Thompson et al. 2000, Nardoto and Bustamante 2003, van der Werf et al. 2003).

Altered the patterns of fuel loading (Baker 1992, Tilman et al. 2000, Thompson et al. 2000, Wotton et al. 2003). Altered the patterns of fuel loading (Baker 1992, Tilman et al. 2000, Thompson et al. 2000, Wotton et al. 2003). Fire prevention, Fire prevention, Fire suppression, Fire suppression, Timber harvesting Timber harvesting Pest management Pest management Climate change Climate change Affect the intensity and frequency of fire through changing fuel quality and quantity (Stocks et al. 1998, Franklin et al. 2001, Wotton et al. 2003). Affect the intensity and frequency of fire through changing fuel quality and quantity (Stocks et al. 1998, Franklin et al. 2001, Wotton et al. 2003). Why Fuel Loading?

Climate Change Forest structure change (Odion and Tyler 2002, Lorimer and White 2003), Forest structure change (Odion and Tyler 2002, Lorimer and White 2003), Disturbance frequency (Lindbladh et al. 2003), Disturbance frequency (Lindbladh et al. 2003), Habitat changes (Lindbladh et al. 2003), DeGraaf and Yamasaki 2003) Habitat changes (Lindbladh et al. 2003), DeGraaf and Yamasaki 2003) Fine fuel mainly control fire ignition and spreading (<2.5cm in diameters) (Andrews and Bradshaw 1997). Fine fuel mainly control fire ignition and spreading (<2.5cm in diameters) (Andrews and Bradshaw 1997).

Study Objectives The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of various disturbance regimes and alternative forest ecosystem types on the fuel loading through modeling. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of various disturbance regimes and alternative forest ecosystem types on the fuel loading through modeling. Possibility of developing a simple model Possibility of developing a simple model Estimate the effect of various vegetation and disturbance regimes on fuel loading Estimate the effect of various vegetation and disturbance regimes on fuel loading Alternative productivity, decomposition, disease and mortality, and fire frequency Alternative productivity, decomposition, disease and mortality, and fire frequency

Contents Model Description Model Description Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity Analysis Scenario Test Scenario Test Fuel loading and alternative disturbances regimes projected to the Chequamegon National Forest Fuel loading and alternative disturbances regimes projected to the Chequamegon National Forest Conclusions Conclusions

Model Description We developed a fuel loading model for three theoretical forest ecosystems mimicking northern hardwood, red pine, and jack pine forests. We developed a fuel loading model for three theoretical forest ecosystems mimicking northern hardwood, red pine, and jack pine forests.

Maximum Net Primary Production (NPP) Aber and others 1995

Net Primary Production Aber 1979 Odum 1969 Canopy Closing

Aboveground tree, branch, and foliage biomass at various ages and model prediction for three ecosystem types.

Predicted forest floor fine fuel ( ● ) and measured forest floor fien fuel ( ▼ ). Error bar indicates one standard deviation.

(a)(b) Slope =0.95 R 2 =0.82 Slope =0.88 R 2 =0.69 The relationship between predicted and mean measured forest floor biomass. (a) when two outliers in red pine (empty triangles) were excluded, and (b) when thinning applied at age 25.

Sensitivity Analysis VariablesStandard Value TestedSensitivity of Model Value% Change SI Maximum NPP (Mg/ha/yr) % % Litter Decay % % FWD Decay % % Possibility of Disease % % Maximum Mortality Rate % % Fire PFI = 0.09 PFI = 0.1 MFD = 0.2 MAD = 0.05 MFD= % MAD = PFI = 0.11 MFD=0.1810% MAD=0.045

Scenarios I ScenariosPDMDFF CLNCLN CLHCLH CLLCLL CHNCHN CHHCHH CHLCHL HLNHLN HLHHLH HLLHLL HHNHHN HHHHHH HHLHHL

Disturbance Types Productivity and Decay (PD) Current (C)High (H) Forest Types Maximu m NPP Decay Rate Maximu m NPP Decay Rate LitterFWDLitterFWD Hardwood Red Pine Jack Pine Disturbance Types Disease and Mortality (DM) Low (L)High (H) Forest Types Possibility of Disease Mortality Possibility of Disease Mortality Hardwood Red Pine Jack Pine Disturbance Types Fire Frequency (FF) No Fire (N)High Frequency (H)Low Frequency (L) Forest Types FIPMFDMADFIPMFDMADFIPMFDMAD Hardwood Red Pine Jack Pine

Model Assumptions 1 Fire ignition and damage was calculated with random function Fire ignition and damage was calculated with random function Fire ignition, fuel combustion, and aboveground biomass damage Fire ignition, fuel combustion, and aboveground biomass damage We assumed that the ecosystem productivity returned to the 5 years prior to the fire occurrence with each 10% biomass reduction. We assumed that the ecosystem productivity returned to the 5 years prior to the fire occurrence with each 10% biomass reduction. Disease decreases the amount of live foliage resulting in the proportional NPP decrease. Disease decreases the amount of live foliage resulting in the proportional NPP decrease.

Model Assumptions 2 Harvesting method Clearcutting method removes all stems and leaves branches and foliage on the ground. Clearcutting method decreases 10% of the NPP for 10 years after harvesting Thinning was applied only for the red pine age 30 and 45 and every thinning removes 20% of biomass Thinning also harvests stem and converts branch and foliage to ground fuel. Thinning decrease the NPP 10% after harvests and recovers productivity 2% every year following harvest. After thinning, there is a 10% increase in carbon allocated to foliage lasting for 5 years.

Fuel loading under alternative disturbance regimes. Mean (AVE) and standard deviation (SD) of fuel loading were calculated for each simulation. Letters on the box-whisker plot indicate the significance effect of fire frequency on fuel loading (α=0.05).

Ecosystem TypesHardwoodRed PineJack Pine The Effect of Fire Frequency Productivity and Decomposition (PD) CHCHCH Disease and Mortality (DM) L AVE< SD < H AVE< < SD The Effect of DM Productivity and Decomposition (PD) CHCHCH Fire Frequency N AVE< < SD< H AVE SD L AVE SD The Effect of PD Disease and Mortality (DM) LHLHLH Fire Frequency N AVE < SD< < < H AVE < SD L AVE SD

Age distribution of Vegetation in CNF

Fuel loading under current age structure for three ecosystem types with alternative disturbance scenario. Each scenario was simulated ten times and averaged fuel laoding was used for the calculation. Each run had five harvest cycles. Letters on the box- whisker plot indicate the significance effect of fire frequency on fuel loading (α=0.05).

Ecosystem TypesHardwoodRed PineJack Pine The Effect of Fire Frequency Productivity and Decomposition (PD) CHCHCH Disease and Mortality (DM) LAVE HAVE The Effect of DM Productivity and Decomposition (PD) CHCHCH Fire Frequency NAVE< HAVE LAVE The Effect of PD Disease and Mortality LHLHLH Fire Frequency NAVE< HAVE LAVE Results of the analysis of variance test on estimated fuel loading in the Chequamegon National Forest under alternative disturbance regimes.

Conclusions We showed that possibility of simple model to predict the fuel loading under various ecosystem conditions We showed that possibility of simple model to predict the fuel loading under various ecosystem conditions Fire frequency had the largest effect on the fuel loading at the scenario testing Fire frequency had the largest effect on the fuel loading at the scenario testing Scenario showed that alternative PD and DM generally influenced fuel loading only under no fire condition. Scenario showed that alternative PD and DM generally influenced fuel loading only under no fire condition.

Conclusions However, when we projected the same disturbance regimes, each ecosystems responded to the disturbance regime differently. However, when we projected the same disturbance regimes, each ecosystems responded to the disturbance regime differently. Only jack pine ecosystem showed significant response to the fire frequency. Only jack pine ecosystem showed significant response to the fire frequency. Red pine showed highest variability to the fire frequency Red pine showed highest variability to the fire frequency Hardwood forest showed significant difference to the alternative disease and mortality condition under high productivity and decay condition. Hardwood forest showed significant difference to the alternative disease and mortality condition under high productivity and decay condition.

Thank you ! This project is funded by JFSP Program, USDA Forest Service NC station, and University of Toledo Thank you for the constructive advice and help of LEES Lab and Dr. Daryl Moorehead.

Question?

Contributions We expect the results of the study will contribute to our understanding about mechanisms between forest ecosystem characteristics and fuel loading, as well as about the effects of forest management and fire regime on fuel loading. We expect the results of the study will contribute to our understanding about mechanisms between forest ecosystem characteristics and fuel loading, as well as about the effects of forest management and fire regime on fuel loading. It will further facilitate developing forest management plan under various climate and management conditions. It will further facilitate developing forest management plan under various climate and management conditions.