Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 Met Office Verification -status Clive Wilson, Presented by Mike Bush at EWGLAM Meeting October 8- 11, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC CAT verification Objective verification of GRIB CAT forecasts Dr Philip G Gill, WAFC Science Meeting, Washington, 20.
Advertisements

Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor University of Reading, UK What is the half-life of a cloud forecast?
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Damian Wilson Malcolm Brooks Evaluation statistics of cloud fraction and water content.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Cloudnet level 3 products.
Page 1 NAE 4DVAR Oct 2006 © Crown copyright 2006 Mark Naylor Data Assimilation, NWP NAE 4D-Var – Testing and Issues EWGLAM/SRNWP meeting Zurich 9 th -12.
1 Met Office, UK 2 Japan Meteorological Agency 3 Bureau of Meteorology, Australia Assimilation of data from AIRS for improved numerical weather prediction.
Validation of Satellite Precipitation Estimates for Weather and Hydrological Applications Beth Ebert BMRC, Melbourne, Australia 3 rd IPWG Workshop / 3.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Use of radar data in modelling at the Met Office (UK) Bruce Macpherson Mesoscale Assimilation, NWP Met Office EWGLAM / COST-717.
© Crown copyright Met Office Impact experiments using the Met Office global and regional model Presented by Richard Dumelow to the WMO workshop, Geneva,
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Quantitative precipitation forecasts in the Alps – first.
Univ of AZ WRF Model Verification. Method NCEP Stage IV data used for precipitation verification – Stage IV is composite of rain fall observations and.
Monthly Composites of Sea Surface Temperature and Ocean Chlorophyll Concentrations These maps were created by Jennifer Bosch by averaging all the data.
Weather Observation What is the weather in different places?
Performance of the MOGREPS Regional Ensemble
Verification has been undertaken for the 3 month Summer period (30/05/12 – 06/09/12) using forecasts and observations at all 205 UK civil and defence aerodromes.
© Crown copyright Met Office Operational OpenRoad verification Presented by Robert Coulson.
1 On the use of radar data to verify mesoscale model precipitation forecasts Martin Goeber and Sean Milton Model Diagnostics and Validation group Numerical.
Unit 4 Lesson 5 Weather Maps and Weather Prediction
Section 12.3 Gathering Weather Data
© Crown copyright 2011 Met Office WOW - Weather Observations Website Crowd-sourced weather obs for real OGC TC 79 Brussels, Chris Little & Aidan.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik SRNWP – Revised Verification Proposal Clive Wilson Presented by Terry Davies at SRNWP Meeting.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 SRNWP – Revised Verification Proposal Clive Wilson, COSMO Annual Meeting September 18-21, 2007.
© Crown copyright Met Office Preliminary results using the Fractions Skill Score: SP2005 and fake cases Marion Mittermaier and Nigel Roberts.
Verification of the distributions Chiara Marsigli ARPA-SIM - HydroMeteorological Service of Emilia-Romagna Bologna, Italy.
© Crown copyright Met Office Plans for Met Office contribution to SMOS+STORM Evolution James Cotton & Pete Francis, Satellite Applications, Met Office,
“New tools for the evaluation of convective scale ensemble systems” Seonaid Dey Supervisors: Bob Plant, Nigel Roberts and Stefano Migliorini.
Dubrovnik - EWGLAM/SRNWP 8-11/10/ 2007 COSMO strategy for Verification Adriano Raspanti COSMO WG5 Coordinator – “Verification and Case studies” Head of.
“A view of the 2 nd and 3 rd August COPE cases using storm-permitting ensemble MOGREPS-UK” S. Dey Supervisors: R. Plant, N. Roberts and S. Migliorini COPE.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Priority project « Advanced interpretation and verification.
Meteorological Data Analysis Urban, Regional Modeling and Analysis Section Division of Air Resources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Real-time Verification of Operational Precipitation Forecasts using Hourly Gauge Data Andrew Loughe Judy Henderson Jennifer MahoneyEdward Tollerud Real-time.
Chapter 9: Weather Forecasting Surface weather maps 500mb weather maps Satellite Images Radar Images.
© Crown copyright Met Office Benefit of high resolution data assimilation and observing systems in the Met Office UK NWP model G.T. Dow and B. Macpherson.
Using satellite data to understand uncertainties in reanalyses: UERRA Richard Renshaw, Peter Jermey with thanks to Jörg Trentmann, Jennifer Lenhardt, Andrea.
© Crown copyright Met Office High resolution COPE simulations Kirsty Hanley, Humphrey Lean UK.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Quantitative precipitation forecast in the Alps Verification.
© Crown copyright Met Office Data Assimilation Developments at the Met Office Recent operational changes, and plans Andrew Lorenc, DAOS, Montreal, August.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 SRNWP Lead Centre Report on Data Assimilation 2005 for EWGLAM/SRNWP Annual Meeting October 2005, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
NWP Activities at INM José A. García-Moya SMNT – INM 27th EWGLAM & 12th SRNWP Meetings Ljubljana, October 2005.
© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC CAT verification Objective verification of GRIB CAT forecasts Dr Philip G Gill, WAFS Workshop on the use and visualisation.
Strategic Intervention A novel use of Ensembles in Forecast Guidance
U. Damrath, COSMO GM, Athens 2007 Verification of numerical QPF in DWD using radar data - and some traditional verification results for surface weather.
Page 1 Developments in regional DA Oct 2007 © Crown copyright 2007 Mark Naylor, Bruce Macpherson, Richard Renshaw, Gareth Dow Data Assimilation and Ensembles,
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 The use of an intensity-scale technique for assessing operational mesoscale precipitation forecasts Marion Mittermaier and.
Trials of a 1km Version of the Unified Model for Short Range Forecasting of Convective Events Humphrey Lean, Susan Ballard, Peter Clark, Mark Dixon, Zhihong.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 DEVELOPMENT OF 1- 4KM RESOLUTION DATA ASSIMILATION FOR NOWCASTING AT THE MET OFFICE Sue Ballard, September 2005 Z. Li, M.
Diagnostic verification and extremes: 1 st Breakout Discussed the need for toolkit to build beyond current capabilities (e.g., NCEP) Identified (and began.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 2 Outlook Some focus on Temperature with common plots and Conditional Verification Some Fuzzy verification Long trends.
10th COSMO General Meeting, Cracow, Poland Verification of COSMOGR Over Greece 10 th COSMO General Meeting Cracow, Poland.
© Crown copyright Met Office Verifying modelled currents using a threshold exceedance approach Dr Ray Mahdon An exploration of the Gerrity Skill Score.
WG4 Oct 2006 – Sep 2007 plans COSMO General Meeting, 21 September 2006 Pierre Eckert.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
© Crown copyright Met Office High resolution model developments at the Met Office Mike Bush Thanks to Jorge Bornemann, Peter Lean, Alison Eadie, Pete Francis,
Unit 4 Lesson 5 Notes Answer Key
Unit 4 Lesson 5 Weather Maps and Weather Prediction Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
© Crown copyright Met Office Review topic – Impact of High-Resolution Data Assimilation Bruce Macpherson, Christoph Schraff, Claude Fischer EWGLAM, 2009.
Station lists and bias corrections Jemma Davie, Colin Parrett, Richard Renshaw, Peter Jermey © Crown Copyright 2012 Source: Met Office© Crown copyright.
© Crown copyright Met Office EUMETNET- SRNWP verification programme -Met Office Responsible member Clive Wilson – Project manager 31st EWGLAM/16th SRNWP.
UERRA user workshop, Toulouse, 3./4. Feb 2016Cristian Lussana and Michael Borsche 1 Evaluation software tools Cristian Lussana (2) and Michael Borsche.
New results in COSMO about fuzzy verification activities and preliminary results with VERSUS Conditional Verification 31th EWGLAM &16th SRNWP meeting,
Unit 4 Lesson 5 Weather Maps and Weather Prediction
60 min Nowcasts 60 min Verification Cold Front Regime
Systematic timing errors in km-scale NWP precipitation forecasts
COSMO Priority Project ”Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts”
NOAA - LAPS Albers, S., 1995: The LAPS wind analysis. Wea. and Forecasting, 10, Albers, S., J. McGinley, D. Birkenheuer, and J. Smart, 1996:
Daniel Leuenberger1, Christian Keil2 and George Craig2
Winter storm forecast at 1-12 h range
Challenge: High resolution models need high resolution observations
Quantitative verification of cloud fraction forecasts
Presentation transcript:

Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 Met Office Verification -status Clive Wilson, Presented by Mike Bush at EWGLAM Meeting October 8- 11, 2007

Page 2© Crown copyright 2005 Outline  Main systems – area and station  Use same packages for operations and R&D  Mesoscale Limited area  UKindex  Trials  Precipitation validation – radar, gauges  High resolution  Fractions skill  Intensity scale

Page 3© Crown copyright 2005 Main systems  2 systems  Ver – only stores area averaged statistics/scores  Obs – surface, upper air, satellite winds, aircraft, radar precipitation  Analyses  Continuous and categorical statistics, skill scores  SBV- station based relational database (Oracle)  Enables greater flexibility  Conditional verification  Used for many operational and research forecasts  Model  Site specific  Forecasters  Continuous and categorical statistics, skill scores

Page 4© Crown copyright 2005 NAE and UK4 verification  Operational:  UK index – surface parameters  Verification against radar composites (Nimrod)  “fuzzy” – Fractional skill score  Research  Intensity-scale

Page 5© Crown copyright 2005 UK Index  Screen level Temperature, 10m wind  MSE skill  6h precipitation, visibility, cloud cover, cloud base  Equitable threat score, 3 thresholds  All WMO 03, UK stations  Equal weights to T+6 to +48 by 6h  Equal weights to each parameter  36 month contingency tables, running means  I=100*S/S o, S o =value at March 2000

Page 6© Crown copyright 2005 UK index Thresholds and weights

Page 7© Crown copyright 2005

Page 8© Crown copyright 2005 Trials verification –use same verification as operational

Page 9© Crown copyright 2005 Validation monthly precipitation against gauge analysis UK4 gauges difference

Page 10© Crown copyright 2005 SBV error maps

Page 11© Crown copyright 2005 Intensity-scale 4km model precipitation Highlights intensity-scales where worse than random forecast

Page 12© Crown copyright 2005 Verification (Fractional Skill Score) July 2007

Page 13© Crown copyright 2005 Verification (Fractional Skill Score) August 2007

Page 14© Crown copyright 2005 Questions & Answers