Examples. Path Model 1 Simple mediation model. Much of the influence of Family Background (SES) is indirect.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Equation Modeling. What is SEM Swiss Army Knife of Statistics Can replicate virtually any model from “canned” stats packages (some limitations.
Advertisements

Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
Structural Equation Modeling
1 SSS II Lecture 1: Correlation and Regression Graduate School 2008/2009 Social Science Statistics II Gwilym Pryce
Regression Analysis Once a linear relationship is defined, the independent variable can be used to forecast the dependent variable. Y ^ = bo + bX bo is.
SOC 681 James G. Anderson, PhD
Path Analysis A Brief Intro.
Structural Equation Modeling
Path Analysis SPSS/AMOS
Chapter 10 Simple Regression.
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 11 - Structural Equation Modeling.
The Simple Regression Model
LECTURE 11 Hypotheses about Correlations EPSY 640 Texas A&M University.
Structural Equation Modeling
Chapter 11 Multiple Regression.
G Lecture 51 Estimation details Testing Fit Fit indices Arguing for models.
Dr. Mario MazzocchiResearch Methods & Data Analysis1 Correlation and regression analysis Week 8 Research Methods & Data Analysis.
LECTURE 13 PATH MODELING EPSY 640 Texas A&M University.
Correlation 1. Correlation - degree to which variables are associated or covary. (Changes in the value of one tends to be associated with changes in the.
Relationships Among Variables
Stages in Structural Equation Modeling
G Lecture 61 G SEM Lecture 6 An Example Measures of Fit Complex nonrecursive models How can we tell if a model is identified? Direct and.
Confirmatory factor analysis
Path analysis: Observed variables Much has been written about path analysis; has been around for over 20 years; started in sociology. Usually has been.
1 MULTI VARIATE VARIABLE n-th OBJECT m-th VARIABLE.
Structural Equation Modeling 3 Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
Understanding Multivariate Research Berry & Sanders.
SEM Analysis SPSS/AMOS
Structural Equation Modeling
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Purpose ● Takes factor analysis a few steps further. ● Impose theoretically interesting constraints on.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 7: fitting a model, fit indices, comparingmodels, statistical power.
Statistical Analysis. Statistics u Description –Describes the data –Mean –Median –Mode u Inferential –Allows prediction from the sample to the population.
ROB CRIBBIE QUANTITATIVE METHODS PROGRAM – DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY COORDINATOR - STATISTICAL CONSULTING SERVICE COURSE MATERIALS AVAILABLE AT:
Multiple Linear Regression. Purpose To analyze the relationship between a single dependent variable and several independent variables.
Ordinary Least Squares Estimation: A Primer Projectseminar Migration and the Labour Market, Meeting May 24, 2012 The linear regression model 1. A brief.
MGS3100_04.ppt/Sep 29, 2015/Page 1 Georgia State University - Confidential MGS 3100 Business Analysis Regression Sep 29 and 30, 2015.
1 General Structural Equations (LISREL) Week 1 #4.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Assessing Hypothesis Testing Fit Indices
Measures of Fit David A. Kenny January 25, Background Introduction to Measures of Fit.
CFA: Basics Beaujean Chapter 3. Other readings Kline 9 – a good reference, but lumps this entire section into one chapter.
Regression Understanding relationships and predicting outcomes.
Environmental Modeling Basic Testing Methods - Statistics III.
SEM Basics 2 Byrne Chapter 2 Kline pg 7-15, 50-51, ,
Assessing Hypothesis Testing Fit Indices Kline Chapter 8 (Stop at 210) Byrne page
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Chapter 13.  Both Principle components analysis (PCA) and Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) are used to understand the underlying patterns in the data.
SEM Model Fit: Introduction David A. Kenny January 12, 2014.
Example x y We wish to check for a non zero correlation.
ALISON BOWLING CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS. REVIEW OF EFA Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Explores the data All measured variables are related to every.
The general structural equation model with latent variates Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
Jump to first page Inferring Sample Findings to the Population and Testing for Differences.
The SweSAT Vocabulary (word): understanding of words and concepts. Data Sufficiency (ds): numerical reasoning ability. Reading Comprehension (read): Swedish.
Measures of Fit David A. Kenny.
Structural Equation Modeling using MPlus
Correlation and Simple Linear Regression
Regression Analysis Part D Model Building
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
Evaluating IRT Assumptions
Correlation and Simple Linear Regression
Professor EOC Ijeoma and Antony Matemba Sambumbu
Writing about Structural Equation Models
Correlation and Simple Linear Regression
Structural Equation Modeling
Factors Affecting Measures of Fit
Simple Linear Regression and Correlation
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
SOC 681 – Causal Models with Directly Observed Variables
James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University
Testing Causal Hypotheses
Presentation transcript:

Examples

Path Model 1 Simple mediation model. Much of the influence of Family Background (SES) is indirect

Path Model 2 Additional mediator

Path Model 2 Model Chisquare = Df = 1 Pr(>Chisq) = e-06 Chisquare (null model) = Df = 6 Goodness-of-fit index = Adjusted goodness-of-fit index = RMSEA index = % CI: ( , ) Bentler-Bonnett NFI = Tucker-Lewis NNFI = Bentler CFI = SRMR = BIC =

Path Model 3 A more complex model that subsumes the previous

Path Model 3 Model Chisquare = Df = 1 Pr(>Chisq) = e-06 Chisquare (null model) = Df = 10 Goodness-of-fit index = Adjusted goodness-of-fit index = RMSEA index = % CI: ( , ) Bentler-Bonnett NFI = Tucker-Lewis NNFI = Bentler CFI = SRMR = BIC = The fit is practically identical, though there is still room for improvement

Path Model 4 Derived from modification indices

Path Model 4 Model Chisquare = Df = 1 Pr(>Chisq) = Chisquare (null model) = Df = 10 Goodness-of-fit index = Adjusted goodness-of-fit index = RMSEA index = 0 90% CI: (NA, ) Bentler-Bonnett NFI = Tucker-Lewis NNFI = Bentler CFI = 1 SRMR = BIC = Excellent fit

Fully Saturated Model

Psychosomatic Model Model Chisquare = Df = 5 Pr(>Chisq) = e-07 Chisquare (null model) = Df = 10 Goodness-of-fit index = Adjusted goodness-of-fit index = RMSEA index = % CI: ( , ) Bentler-Bonnett NFI = Tucker-Lewis NNFI = Bentler CFI = SRMR = BIC =

Conventional Medical Model Model Chisquare = Df = 3 Pr(>Chisq) = Chisquare (null model) = Df = 10 Goodness-of-fit index = Adjusted goodness-of-fit index = RMSEA index = % CI: (NA, ) Bentler-Bonnett NFI = Tucker-Lewis NNFI = Bentler CFI = SRMR = BIC =

Fit Index Reference Chi square is actually a test of badness of fit, and is not very useful as a result of having to accept a null hypothesis and its sensitivity to sample size –Compares current model to just-identified one with perfect fit, so no difference is ‘good’ –May easily flag for significance with large N Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) and Adjusted GFI –Kind of like our R 2 and adjusted R 2 for the structural model world, but a bit different interpretation –It is the percent of observed covariances explained by the covariances implied by the model R 2 in multiple regression deals with error variance whereas GFI deals with error in reproducing the variance-covariance matrix Rule of thumb:.9 for GFI,.8 for adjusted, which takes into account the number of parameters being estimated; However technically the values of either can fall outside the 0-1 range Root mean square residual –As the name implies, a kind of average residual between the fitted and original covariance matrix –Standardized (regarding the correlation matrix) it ranges from perfect fit Bentler’s Normed Fit Index, CFI (NFI adjusted for sample size), and Non-Normed FI (Tucker- Lewis Index, adjusts for complexity) test the model against an independence model –Independence model chi-square is given in the output –E.g. 80% would suggest the current model fits the data 80% better Others Akaike Information Criterion, Bayesian Information Criterion –Good for model comparison, smaller better