API 17TR8: High-pressure High-temperature (HPHT) Design Guidelines

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparison between American and European Pressure Vessel Rules
Advertisements

TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
©2002 First Consulting Group F I R S T C O N S U L T I N G G R O U P Security HIPAA Tool Training.
An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Subsea Standardization. Brief History SPE ATW on Subsea Standardization held Dec 2008 SPE ATW on Subsea Standardization held Dec 2008 –Form workgroup.
API 20K Flange Design Task Group API SC6 Task Group
The various engineering and true stress-strain properties obtainable from a tension test are summarized by the categorized listing of Table 1.1. Note that.
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures –
SUBSEA PRODUCTION SYSTEMS (SC17) Liaison Report
ATTACHMENT 2 An Overview of the New ASME Section VIII, Division 2 Pressure Vessel Code API Exploration & Production Standards Conference on Oilfield Equipment.
© 2011 Chevron API 16A 3 rd Edition Summer Conference Committee Meeting 24-June-2013 API 16A Chairman: John Busby Co-Chair: Jim McCabe.
Product Design and Qualification (Validation) Testing for HPHT Systems
Lab 6B -Fracture Toughness and Fracture Toughness-limited Design Big bang for the buck!
1 API SC6 Winter Meeting Update on CSOEM MARG Activities Tim Haeberle Chief Consulting Engineer – Materials and Processes GE Oil & Gas 4 February 2015.
Pressure Vessels.
Field Validation and Parametric Study of a Thermal Crack Spacing Model David H. Timm - Auburn University Vaughan R. Voller - University of Minnesota Presented.
Progress Since January Meeting
API Standard 6A718 Inclusion of Additional Alloy 718 Strength Classes
© Chevron 2013 D EEP S TAR ® A Global Deepwater R&D Consortium Task Report Update: DeepStar Study AUV Interface Standards for Deepwater Fields Reporting.
API 17 – Subsea HPHT Discussion HPHT Design Materials Design Performance Test 1 Design Methodology has been in review and development for 5+ years and.
1 HPHT Equipment Development Process Presented by Jim Raney Based on the work from 6HP.
API Standard 6X: Design Calculations for Pressure-Containing Equipment
Orynyak I.V., Borodii M.V., Batura A.S. IPS NASU Pisarenko’ Institute for Problems of Strength, Kyiv, Ukraine National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Pisarenko’
API 6HP Process1 API 6HP Example Analysis Project API E&P Standards Conference Applications of Standards Research, 24 June 2008.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
API 6A 21 st Edition WG API Subcommittee SC-6 Discussions Valves and Wellhead Equipment.
Msc. eng. Magdalena German Faculty of Civil Engineering Cracow University of Technology Budapest, Simulation of damage due to corrosion in RC.
Accuracy of Fully Elastic vs. Elastic-Plastic Finite Element Analysis Masters of Engineering Rensselear Polytechnic Institute By Nicholas Szwaja May 17,
November 9, 2005 Thomas Hill, NSNFP DOE SNF Canister Planned Activities.
TG3 17TR8 Liaison Report HPHT Design Flow Chart
EvergreenEcon.com ESA 2011 Impact Evaluation Research Plan Public Workshop #1 February 20, 2013 Presented By: Steve Grover, President.
SOURCE 2 AISI SPECIFICATION.
API Standard 6A718 Inclusion of Additional Alloy 718 Strength Classes – June Update Acceptance of alloy 718 at 140 ksi min yield strength Rashmi Bhavsar.
1 ME383 Modern Manufacturing Practices Lecture Note #3 Stress-Strain & Yield Criteria Dr. Y.B. Guo Mechanical Engineering The University of Alabama.
API SC6 Valves and Wellhead Equipment TG3 – Wellhead Design in Standards and TRs Kenneth Young 14 June 2012 SC6 Summer Meeting - Westminster, CO1.
PER15K Protocols for Equipment Rated Greater Than 15,000 PSI ECS Report
API RP 6HP (draft 5.2) Status Presentation Tech Session II Summer Standards Conference.
API SC6 Work Group Plan for Development of HPHT Flange Design Requirements Date: June 25 th, 2015.
Nuclear Standards for Polymeric Piping Aaron Forster, NIST Engineering Laboratory NIST, MS Bureau Drive Gaithersburg, MD (301)
SC17 Materials Initiatives 2015 Summer Meeting Update.
Beam Design Beams are designed to safely support the design loads.
19th January 2012 Don Wells (Hess)
USING FAIR, DOES TRAINING HELP REDUCE SPEAR PHISHING RISK? CASE STUDY SHARED COURTESY OF RISKLENS CONFIDENTIAL - FAIR INSTITUTE
Current Industry Assessment
SC21 & Subsea Materials Bruce Witwer - SC17 Materials Liaison.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
704 MHz cavity design based on 704MHZ_v7.stp C. Pai
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
API SC19 HPHT Template (Proposed as SC19TR1)
API 17TR8: High-pressure High-temperature (HPHT) Design Guidelines
Atmiya Institute of Technology & Science
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
API SC 10, Work Group 3 Update:
CENF - LBNF cryostat Relevant safety codes
Update on CTAC LNG Subcommittee
Impact on SC 6 Documents by Kenneth Young
API SC6 Valves and Wellhead Equipment
API Standard 6X: API/ASME Design Calculations
Specification on float equipment
Development of a specification
Impact on SC 6 Documents by Kenneth Young
API 17 TR8 HPHT Design Guideline Methodology
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
2nd Edition: 2019 Winter Standards Meeting
TG3 17TR8 Liaison Report ASME Task Group on Subsea Applications
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
CSOEM Materials Advisory Resource Group
API SC6 Valves and Wellhead Equipment
Presentation transcript:

API 17TR8: High-pressure High-temperature (HPHT) Design Guidelines API Special Summer Meeting - 2015 API 17TR8: High-pressure High-temperature (HPHT) Design Guidelines

Highlights on Working Items of 2nd Edition Design Verification workgroup Extreme and Survival conditions Fatigue input parameters - GoM Hydrostatic pressure tests (Deepstar Project 12302) Load-bearing design for HPHT: Load-bearing interface designs and allowables Material workgroup Material characterizations (Testing protocols)

Extreme and Survival Conditions Objectives: Define design factors for extreme & survival events Define the probability of occurrence or ‘buckets’ for extreme and survival conditions Define function and/or performance post extreme and survival scenarios Define potential impact on fatigue life for these events Participations from API 17D, 17G, 16A, and ASME

Extreme and Survival Conditions DRAFT GLOBAL PLASTIC COLLAPSE Conditions Linear-Elastic API 6A/6X/17D/17G Elastic-Plastic (LRFD) ASME Section VIII, Div. 2 ASME Section VIII, Div. 3 Normal 0.67 x Sy 2.4 1.8 Extreme 0.80 x Sy 2.0 (10-x) 1.5 (10-x) Survival 1.00 x Sy 1.6 (10-y) 1.2 (10-y) DRAFT LOCAL PLASTIC COLLAPSE Conditions Linear-Elastic API 6A/6X/17D/17G Elastic-Plastic (LRFD) ASME Section VIII, Div. 2 ASME Section VIII, Div. 3 Normal N/A 1.70 1.28 Extreme 1.42 (10-x) 1.07 (10-x) Survival 1.13 (10-y) 1.00 (10-y)

Fatigue Input Parameters Objectives: To expedite the fatigue calculation process for Gulf of Mexico application Identify and standardized input parameters Collect data Manufacturer can perform fatigue calculations based on standardized input parameters Sensitivity checks of project-specific items, as necessary

Fatigue Input Parameters DRAFT

Fatigue Input Parameters

Hydrostatic Pressure Tests Objectives: Industry’s studies to assess each design path of HPHT design flow chart and the effects of: varying hydrostatic test pressures on equipment’s strain limit damage/equivalent plastic strain and its effects on fatigue life estimation and environmental cracking resistance These studies are to include validation testing program of the analytical results Deepstar’s Project 12302 – 20ksi Systems, incorporated 17TR8 objectives into their project work scope. Project Champion: Chris Kocurek (COP)

Deepstar 12302 Executive Summary 20K working pressure for subsea equipment has been in discussion for several years now gaining more and more traction within the various operators. This CTR will perform the design verification of a representative 5” 20K TEE, per API SC17 TR8 along with a proposed validation program. This exercise will provide an example analysis that provides independent usage of API SC 17 TR8. Additionally, this CTR would have current 20K contributors and operators comment on the scope of work and the outputs of verification. This CTR is to help put into practice and provide independent design verification as outlined in TR8.

Deepstar 12302 Project Objectives and Key Deliverables Generation of a functional specification, FMECA Conduct pre-workshop to present proposed design methodology to DeepStar members and solicit input on gaps and path forward. Design verification of 5” 20K tee body, flange, bolting & gasket Proposed validation program, schedule, and cost. Workshop for initial results and proposed validation program review. Investigate the Effects of Hydrostatic Test Pressure Magnitude Load monitoring approach recommendations Cladding – NDE & Welding requirements, potential improvements Development of potential extreme and survival limits Comparison of Design Life to Total Life Post-Workshop: present verification results, solicit gaps, path forward

Material Characterizations Objectives: To define material properties necessary for Design Verification and identify gaps in 17TR8 document for material requirements With considerations to environmental effects, i.e. temperatures (min / max), H2S, CO2, Chloride, pH, etc.

Material Characterizations Testing Protocols for Properties Used in Design Verifications Tensile properties Modulus of elasticity Yield strength True-stress True-strain Reduction in area (%RA) Min specified elongation (%EL) Fatigue properties da/dN: function of frequency / R ratio, ASTM E647 S/N: function of frequency / R ratio, ASTM E466/E468 or full scale KJIC / J-a: air and temperature KIEAC: environmental and/or temp

Material Characterizations Environmental Effects for Material Testing Define environmental screening tests; SSRT, ripple SSRT, and/or ‘C’ Ring Define KIEAC test and determine if this should be upper limit for da/dN vs ∆K curves Define test parameters for da/dN vs ∆K in environment The test environment and test temperature for LASs and CRAs GoM Proposed Environments Gas Field Oil Field Cl 1,000-5,000 ppm 50,000-100,000 ppm (CO2)gas 5-20 mole % (H2S)gas 5-50 ppm pH 3-4 5-6 Temp 40 0F (MDT)