NASA CMS UNCERTAINTY WORKING GROUP Active members (2013-2014): Chris Badurek, David Baker, Nicolas Bousserez, Jim Collatz, Riley Duren, Sangram Ganguly,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional flux estimates of CO2 and CH4 inferred from GOSAT XCH4:XCO2 ratios Liang Feng Annemarie Fraser Paul Palmer University of Edinburgh Hartmut Bösch.
Advertisements

Quantification of the sensitivity of NASA CMS-Flux inversions to uncertainty in atmospheric transport Thomas Lauvaux, NASA JPL Martha Butler, Kenneth Davis,
Summary discussion Top-down approach Consider Carbon Monitoring Systems, tailored to address stakeholder needs. CMS frameworks can be designed to provide.
Improving Understanding of Global and Regional Carbon Dioxide Flux Variability through Assimilation of in Situ and Remote Sensing Data in a Geostatistical.
CMS – 2012 Reduction in Bottom-Up Land Surface CO 2 Flux Uncertainty in NASA’s Carbon Monitoring System Flux Project through Systematic Multi-Model Evaluation.
Inter-comparison of retrieved CO 2 from TCCON, combining TCCON and TES to the overpass flight data Le Kuai 1, John Worden 1, Susan Kulawik 1, Kevin Bowman.
Near-Real Time Analysis of the Modern Carbon Cycle by Model-Data Fusion Scott Denning, David Baker, Chris O’Dell, Denis O’Brien, Tomohiro Oda, Nick Parazoo,
Near-Real Time Analysis of the Modern Carbon Cycle by Model-Data Fusion Scott Denning, David Baker, Chris O’Dell, Denis O’Brien, Tomohiro Oda, Nick Parazoo,
Simulating Atmospheric CO 2 for 2000: Our Quandary, Our Hypotheses and a Case Study Using Analyzed Climate, Transport and Satellite Vegetation Sheri L.
TransCom Continuous Experiment CSU NASA PCTM Scott Denning, John Kleist.
Andrew Schuh, Scott Denning, Marek Ulliasz Kathy Corbin, Nick Parazoo A Case Study in Regional Inverse Modeling.
Improving estimates of CO 2 fluxes through a CO-CO 2 adjoint inversion Monika Kopacz, Daniel J. Jacob, Parvadha Suntharalingam April 12, rd GEOS-Chem.
TransCom 3 Level 2 Base Case Inter-annual CO 2 Flux Inversion Results Current Status David Baker, Rachel Law, Kevin Gurney, Peter Rayner, TransCom3 L2.
A Variational Carbon Data Assimilation System (CDAS-4DVar)
Monthly Mean Carbon Flux Estimates: Some Network Considerations Lori Bruhwiler, Anna Michalak, Wouter Peters, Pieter Tans NOAA Climate Monitoring and.
Testing the consistency of T3L2 Cyclo-stationary fluxes with  13 C observations John Miller 1, Scott Denning 2, Neil Suits 2, Kevin Gurney 2, Jim White.
Evaluating the Impact of the Atmospheric “ Chemical Pump ” on CO 2 Inverse Analyses P. Suntharalingam GEOS-CHEM Meeting, April 4-6, 2005 Acknowledgements.
Carbon Flux Bias Estimation at Regional Scale using Coupled MLEF-PCTM model Ravindra Lokupitiya Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University.
Modeling CO 2 and its sources and sinks with GEOS-Chem Ray Nassar 1, Dylan B.A. Jones 1, Susan S. Kulawik 2 & Jing M. Chen 1 1 University of Toronto, 2.
Evaluating the Role of the CO 2 Source from CO Oxidation P. Suntharalingam Harvard University TRANSCOM Meeting, Tsukuba June 14-18, 2004 Collaborators.
Improving and extending CMS land surface carbon flux products including estimates of uncertainties in fluxes and biomass. Jim Collatz, Randy Kawa, Lesley.
Using High-Resolution Forward Model Simulations of Ideal Atmospheric Tracers to Assess the Spatial Information Content of Inverse CO 2 Flux Estimates Steven.
Modeling framework for estimation of regional CO2 fluxes using concentration measurements from a ring of towers Modeling framework for estimation of regional.
Impact of Reduced Carbon Oxidation on Atmospheric CO 2 : Implications for Inversions P. Suntharalingam TransCom Meeting, June 13-16, 2005 N. Krakauer,
Cyclo-stationary inversions of  13 C and CO 2 John Miller, Scott Denning, Wouter Peters, Neil Suits, Kevin Gurney, Jim White & T3 Modelers.
Differences in Model Transport of CO2. Cloud Contamination ✦ Radar indicates precipitation along fronts ✦ Coincidentally, this is where much of interesting.
Interannual inversions with continuous data and recent inversions with the CSIRO CC model Rachel Law, CSIRO Atmospheric Research Another set of pseudodata.
GEOS-CARB: A Framework for Monitoring Carbon Concentrations and Fluxes Steven Pawson 1, Lesley Ott 1, David Baker 2, George J. Collatz 1, Janusz Eluszkiewicz.
External Communications Working Group Kevin Bowman, Peter Griffith, Kevin Gurney, Elizabeth Nelson, Ariane Verdy Interns: Maya Hutchins, Adam Norris 2013:
1 Oceanic sources and sinks for atmospheric CO 2 The Ocean Inversion Contribution Nicolas Gruber 1, Sara Mikaloff Fletcher 2, and Kay Steinkamp 1 1 Environmental.
Algorithm Assessment/Intercomparison WG WG Coordinator: Sangram Ganguly - BAERI/NASA ARC (represented by Cristina Milesi) Group Members: David Baker, Molly.
Flux-Biomass Integration Scott Denning, Colorado State University Nancy French, Michigan Technological University Eric Kasischke, Univ of Maryland Don.
The Importance of Atmospheric Variability for Data Requirements, Data Assimilation, Forecast Errors, OSSEs and Verification Rod Frehlich and Robert Sharman.
Results from the Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) 3 FastOpt 4 2 Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 1 Heinrich Widmann 3, Thomas.
Between-Groups ANOVA Chapter 12. >When to use an F distribution Working with more than two samples >ANOVA Used with two or more nominal independent variables.
Atmospheric Validation Working Group Members (23): Heather Graven, Manvendra Dubey, Arlyn Andrews, David Baker, Kevin Bowman, Martha Butler, Jim Collatz,
Regional Inverse Modeling in North and South America for the NASA Carbon Monitoring System Arlyn Andrews (NOAA/ESRL), John Miller (NOAA/ESRL, CIRES), Thomas.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Interfaces EO data with Atmospheric and Land Surface Model: Progress report Liang Feng, Paul Palmer.
Simulation Experiments for GEO-CAPE Regional Air Quality GEO-CAPE Workshop September 22, 2009 Peter Zoogman, Daniel J. Jacob, Kelly Chance, Lin Zhang,
Data Assimilation Working Group Dylan Jones (U. Toronto) Kevin Bowman (JPL) Daven Henze (CU Boulder) 1 IGC7 4 May 2015.
1 04/2003 © Crown copyright Open Ocean Modelling of the Carbon Cycle and Air-Sea CO 2 Fluxes Science Element 3a of CASIX Steve Spall (Met Office)
Research Vignette: The TransCom3 Time-Dependent Global CO 2 Flux Inversion … and More David F. Baker NCAR 12 July 2007 David F. Baker NCAR 12 July 2007.
Development of an EnKF to estimate CO 2 fluxes from realistic distributions of X CO2 Liang Feng, Paul Palmer
# # # # An Application of Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter (MLEF) to Carbon Problems Ravindra Lokupitiya 1, Scott Denning 1, Dusanka Zupanski 2, Kevin.
Multivariate Data Assimilation of Carbon Cycle Using Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter 1 Ji-Sun Kang, 1 Eugenia Kalnay, 2 Junjie Liu, 2 Inez Fung,
Carbon dioxide from TES Susan Kulawik F. W. Irion Dylan Jones Ray Nassar Kevin Bowman Thanks to Chip Miller, Mark Shephard, Vivienne Payne S. Kulawik –
Use of space-based tropospheric NO 2 observations in regional air quality modeling Robert W. Pinder 1, Sergey L. Napelenok 1, Alice B. Gilliland 1, Randall.
ICDC7, Boulder September 2005 Estimation of atmospheric CO 2 from AIRS infrared satellite radiances in the ECMWF data assimilation system Richard.
Estimating background ozone in surface air over the United States with global 3-D models of tropospheric chemistry Description, Evaluation, and Results.
Uncertainty in eddy covariance data and its relevance to gap filling David HollingerAndrew Richardson USDA Forest ServiceUniversity of New Hampshire Durham,
1 EMMMA: a web-based system for Environmental Mercury Mapping, Modeling, and Analysis Steve Wente, Paul Hearn, David Donato, and John Aguinaldo U.S.Department.
Simulation Experiments for TEMPO Air Quality Objectives Peter Zoogman, Daniel Jacob, Kelly Chance, Xiong Liu, Arlene Fiore, Meiyun Lin, Katie Travis, Annmarie.
External Communications Working Group Molly E Brown, NASA GSFC with WG team.
NASA Carbon Monitoring System (NASA-CMS) NASA Carbon Monitoring System Science Team Overview George Hurtt NASA-CMS Science Team Leader Department of Geographical.
Error correlation between CO 2 and CO as a constraint for CO 2 flux inversion using satellite data from different instrument configurations Helen Wang.
The application of ensemble Kalman filter in adaptive observation and information content estimation studies Junjie Liu and Eugenia Kalnay July 13th, 2007.
NASA CMS Algorithm Assessment/Intercomparison Working Group Summary Presentation November 6 th, 2013 Coordinator: Scott Powell Members: David Baker, Molly.
Climate model OSSE: Evolution of OLR spectrum and attribution of the change Yi Huang, Stephen Leroy, James Anderson, John Dykema Harvard University Jon.
UNCERTAINTY WORKING GROUP BREAKOUT REPORT Paul Duffy, Doug Morton, Laura Duncanson, Cristina Milesi, Dimitris Menemenlis, Steve Stehman, Zhiliang Zhu,
Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation with a Variational Approach (“4-D Var”) David Baker CGD/TSS with Scott Doney, Dave Schimel, Britt Stephens, and Roger Dargaville.
The Lodore Falls Hotel, Borrowdale
Data Assimilation and Carbon Cycle Working Groups
Surface Pressure Measurements from the NASA Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group II, agenda item WGII/10 David Crisp.
EMIS: Improve Emission Inventories of Environmentally Relevant Species
PI: Steven Pawson (GMAO) Atmosphere:
Carbon Model-Data Fusion
Hartmut Bösch and Sarah Dance
Integrated Satellite Global Energy Data for Climate Studies
Presentation transcript:

NASA CMS UNCERTAINTY WORKING GROUP Active members ( ): Chris Badurek, David Baker, Nicolas Bousserez, Jim Collatz, Riley Duren, Sangram Ganguly, Stephen Hagen, Robert Kennedy, Dimitris Menemenlis, John Miller, Steve Pawson NASA CMS Nov 20141

2 What we did: Uncertainty framework Definitions and documentation What we’re trying to do now: Integration Comparison across projects We need your help

NASA CMS Nov Observation Map of state or flux What is uncertainty here? Map 2 of state or flux Propagation Model Data If we were all talking about the same thing, then we could put all of our results together and everything should overlap!

NASA CMS Nov 20144

5

6 * Numbers correspond to project IDs in briefing material appendix

NASA CMS Nov Are uncertainty estimates from CMS projects CONSISTENT & RELEVANT? Are uncertainty estimates from CMS projects CONSISTENT & RELEVANT?

NASA CMS Nov Ideal: Quantify and map agreement among products Reality? Voluntary comparisons on pairwise project basis Now: Visual comparisons!

NASA CMS Nov 20149

, ,000 0 Jim Collatz Stephen Hagen Robert Kennedy

NASA CMS Nov g C / m 2

NASA CMS Nov

NASA CMS Nov A priori monthly flux uncertainty A posteriori monthly flux uncertainty Variational Data Assimilation: GOSAT X CO2 measurements OSSE experiment, PCTM transport Variational data assimilation method Measurement uncertainties (1σ): 1.0 ppm, ocean glint 1.5 ppm, M-gain land 1.7 ppm, H-gain land David Baker

NASA CMS Nov Junjie Liu Variational Data Assimilation: GOSAT X CO2 measurements OSSE experiment, GEOS-Chem transport Variational data assimilation method Measurement uncertainties (1σ): Actual GOSAT Xco2 (H-gain land observations only) observation errors (between 1 ppm and 2.5 ppm) Uncertainty calculation method 60 ensemble member Monte-Carlo method

NASA CMS Nov Fractional error reduction The mean error reduction at each grid point is calculated as:

NASA CMS Nov Identify linkages where projects could compare uncertainty products Document what data prep is needed to achieve comparisons Document what data prep is needed to achieve comparisons Begin identifying approaches to assess consistency and relevance