NIC3 FOM Dithered Observations of the Orion Nebula Eddie Bergeron, STScI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. absolute brightness - the brightness a star would have if it were 10 parsecs from Earth.
Advertisements

MAST-VizieR/NED cross correlation tutorial 1. Introduction Figure 1: Screenshot of the MAST VizieR Catalog Search Form. or enter here as object class:
The Light Ray Model of Light
A wave front consists of all points in a wave that are in the same phase of motion. A wave front is one of many properties that light waves share with.
Alt.Aperturer 0 (m)FWHM(")  0 (")  0 (sec) 4 kmCFHT 3.8m km2.4 m~ ~600~5 35km10 m~ ~600~5 h (km)P (mbars)T (K)  (gm m.
1 Lites FPP-SP Performance SOT #17 Meeting, NAOJ, April Solar-B FPP As-Built Performance of the FPP Spectro- Polarimeter October, 2004 FPP Team Bruce.
The Earthshine Spectrum in the Near Infrared M. Turnbull 1, W. Traub 2, K. Jucks 3, N. Woolf 4, M. Meyer 4, N. Gorlova 4, M. Skrutskie 5, J. Wilson 5 1.
Lesson 7: Remote Sensing Dr Andrew Ketsdever MAE 5595.
ENGINEERING GRAPHICS 1E9
Magnet rotated by 5.9 degree Distance from entrance point to magnet right bottom corner m.
Single-view Metrology and Camera Calibration Computer Vision Derek Hoiem, University of Illinois 02/26/15 1.
Rendering with Concentric Mosaics Heung-Yeung Shum Li-Wei he Microsoft Research.
PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars Thierry Appourchaux for the PLATO Consortium
WFC3/IR LESSONS FOR WFIRST Jay Anderson STScI. WFC3/IR Lessons for WFIRST 1)Absolute astrometry 2)PSF modeling and variation (space/time) 3) Bulge-type.
Diffraction vs. Interference
Jan. 12, th AAS Meeting, San Diego The HST Survey of the Orion Nebula Cluster Science team: M. Robberto (ESA-STScI), D. Soderblom (STScI), C. R.
Study of NICMOS Non-linearity B. Mobasher, A. Riess, R.de Jong, S.Arribas, E.Bergeron, R.Bohlin, H. Ferguson, A. Koekemoer, K. Noll, S. Malhotra, T. Wiklind.
1 HST Status Cycle 14 TAC/Panels 14 March Telescope and Instrument Status Telescope and support systems are all working well – no unexpected limitations.
NICMOS IntraPixel Sensitivity Chun Xu and Bahram Mobasher Space Telescope Science Institute Abstract We present here the new measurements of the NICMOS.
Memorandam of the discussion on FMOS observations and data kicked off by Ian Lewis Masayuki Akiyama 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
Real Camera Real-time Rendering of Physically Based Optical Effects in Theory and Practice Yoshiharu Gotanda tri-Ace, Inc.
Laboratory prototype for the demonstration of sodium laser guide star wavefront sensing on the E-ELT Sexten Primary School July 2015 THE OUTCOME.
PACS IIDR 01/02 Mar 2001 FPFPU Alignment1 D. Kampf KAYSER-THREDE.
Reflection Regular reflection occurs when parallel light rays strike a smooth surface and reflect in the same direction. Diffuse reflection occurs when.
First results of the tests campaign in VISIBLE in VISIBLE for the demonstrator 12 October 2007 SNAP Collaboration Meeting Paris Marie-Hélène Aumeunier.
15 October Observational Astronomy Direct imaging Photometry Kitchin pp ,
PACS Page 1 NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena Sept 10-14, 2012 SPIRE Spectrometer Data Reduction: Mapping Observations Nanyao Lu NHSC/IPAC (On behalf.
Graphic material for HSC FAQ – March 23, Five things you should know about the Hubble Source Catalog (HSC) 1. Coverage can be very non-uniform,
Sphere Standards and Standard Spheres Dr. Richard Young Optronic Laboratories, Inc.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
AST 443/PHY 517 : Observational Techniques November 6, 2007 ASTROMETRY By: Jackie Faherty.
2004 January 27Mathematical Challenges of Using Point Spread Function Analysis Algorithms in Astronomical ImagingMighell 1 Mathematical Challenges of Using.
Youth Capture the Colorful Cosmos THIS IS With Host... Your.
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
ACS Drizzling Overview J. Mack; DA Training 10/5/07 Distortion Dither Strategies MultiDrizzle ‘Fine-tuning’ Data Quality Photometry.
Testing the Shear Ratio Test: (More) Cosmology from Lensing in the COSMOS Field James Taylor University of Waterloo (Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) DUEL Edinburgh,
September 16, 2008LSST Camera F2F1 Camera Calibration Optical Configurations and Calculations Keith Bechtol Andy Scacco Allesandro Sonnenfeld.
NICMOS Status Roelof de Jong (STScI) and the NICMOS team: Santiago Arribas, Elizabeth Barker, Eddie Bergeron, Ilana Dashevsky, Anton Koekemoer, Sangeeta.
MIRI Dither Patterns Christine H Chen. Dithering Goals 1.Mitigate the effect of bad pixels 2.Obtain sub-pixel sampling 3.Self-calibrate data if changing.
Design Studies 20 ‘Show Off’ Project How to make a computer monitor In Google Sketchup By: Liam Jack.
Torsten Böker TIPS May 2, 2002 NICMOS post-cooldown detector performance 1) SMOV status 2) Dark current 3) Quantum efficiency 4) “First light”, focus and.
Chapter 38 Diffraction Patterns and Polarization.
Synopsis of Yang/Wang’s Analysis and Optimization on Single-Zone Binary Flat-Top Beam Shaper Blake Anderton Mon, Dec
Image at:
PSF in-flight calibration - PN IFC/CNRRingberg, April 2-4, 2002 PSF in-flight calibration for PN camera Simona Ghizzardi Silvano Molendi.
Working with Shapes Guided Lesson. Objective  In this lesson you will learn how to insert a shape and format it by changing its fill color, outline color,
NICMOS Calibration Challenges in the Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
The HESSI Imaging Process. How HESSI Images HESSI will make observations of the X-rays and gamma-rays emitted by solar flares in such a way that pictures.
HLA WFPC2 Source List Photometric Quality Checks Version: August 25, 2008 Brad Whitmore 1.Introduction 2.Comparison with Ground-based Stetson Photometry.
Weak Lensing - PSF Calibrations Steve Kent Apr 1, 2005 ● Motivation for studies: – 1. Develop concise metrics for requirements for weak lensing calibrations.
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
PACS Page 1 NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena Aug 26-30, 2013 SPIRE Spectrometer Data Reduction: Mapping Observations Nanyao Lu NHSC/IPAC (On behalf.
Peterson xBSM Optics, Beam Size Calibration1 xBSM Beam Size Calibration Dan Peterson CesrTA general meeting introduction to the optics.
Introduction NICMOS (Near-Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectroscopy) was installed on the Hubble Space Telescope during SM2 in 1997 and has been the.
Marco Sirianni TIPS 12/18/2003 Anomalous scattered light in ACS/WFC Data Marco Sirianni D. Van Orsow, A. Welty, T. Wheeler R. Gilliland, R. van der Marel.
Initial Results from the Scintillator Fast Lost Ion Probe D. Darrow NSTX Physics Meeting February 28, 2005.
Photometry and Astrometry: Bright Point Sources May 16, 2006 Cullen Blake.
Basics Reflection Mirrors Plane mirrors Spherical mirrors Concave mirrors Convex mirrors Refraction Lenses Concave lenses Convex lenses.
# x pixels Geometry # Detector elements Detector Element Sizes Array Size Detector Element Sizes # Detector elements Pictorial diagram showing detector.
ATST Scattered Light Issues
NIRSpec pipeline concept Guido De Marchi, Tracy Beck, Torsten Böker
JWST NIRCam Time Series Observations
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
GPI Astrometric Calibration
Diffraction vs. Interference
An Overview of the HST Treasury Program on the Orion Nebula
Echidna: current status and expected performance
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
Observational Astronomy
star 2004 june 26 nelson, Na footprints Zenith, 90 km Na layer
Presentation transcript:

NIC3 FOM Dithered Observations of the Orion Nebula Eddie Bergeron, STScI

HST Treasury Program a survey of the Orion Nebula Cluster with ACS/WFPC2/NICMOS 104 Orbits Data collected fall 2004/spring 2005 ACS prime, WFPC2 & NICMOS in parallel Seamless coverage in ACS & WFPC2, NICMOS along for the ride Used NICMOS FOM (Field Offset Mechanism) to increase acreage without moving telescope

HST Treasury Program a survey of the Orion Nebula Cluster with ACS/WFPC2/NICMOS 104 Orbits Data collected fall 2004/spring 2005 ACS prime, WFPC2 & NICMOS in parallel Seamless coverage in ACS & WFPC2, NICMOS along for the ride Used NICMOS FOM (Field Offset Mechanism) to increase acreage without moving telescope NIC3 pointings shown in green. Obs lost due to Guide Star Acq failures shown in red.

FOM mechanism is a mirror on a gimbal, designed to select different portions of the NICMOS FOV off the nominal telescope pointing. Tip-Tilt motion is complex and in the curved telescope focal plane. FOM offsets are subject to variations in image quality - the dominant effects are astigmatism and piston (focus). Fortunately, focus goes in the good direction for NIC3 with +Y FOM offsets, bringing the camera closer to the optimal which is unreachable with the PAM focus mechanism alone. In addition to a FOM-dependent PSF, part of the NICMOS FOV is vignetted at the forward bulkhead (NICMOS entrance aperture). The bottom 1/3 of the FOM-reachable focal plane is severely obstructed, limiting the full- aperture imaging area to a window of ~58” height in the Y direction and ~84” width in the X direction (the old ground-system FOM offset limit was a circle of radius ~23”)

Bulkhead vignetting spans 70 rows in going from 0% to 100% throughput. The NIC3 nominal aperture is always set to FOM Y = +16” by default to push the vignetting off the bottom edge of the detector. These curves provide a rudimentary illumination correction by themselves, although a small rotation angle of the NIC3 relative to the vignetting edge makes life harder.

Ground limits on FOM throw were set conservatively to a radius of 23” from FOM mechanism 0,0. Safe range of +/-23” is actually per-axis, not radial from center. The ground limits were changed partway through the program and now users can cover extra area in the corners of the FOM range (new area shown in light grey).

Fortuitously, a 1998 program made 3x3 NIC3 F110W and F160W mosaics of the trapezium region using telescope slews. We can use the overlapping portions of this existing data as a “truth” model against the FOM-offset observations to extract an illumination correction and characterize its badness. The NICMOS observations taken in parallel at each ACS pointing were made in a 4- point dither to the maximum FOM range in X, and from the maximum +Y to the 0% throughput level in -Y, thus sampling the entire vignetted part of the beam. We will attempt to make an illumination correction to recover information as far as possible into the vignetted region to maximize spatial coverage. Even if the correction is only workable to 70% of the full illumination level, that’s still a gain of 30 rows (6” linear, or 0.16 square arcmins per ACS pointing) over using the nominal FOM Y offset as the minimum point. There is plenty of vertical overlap in the 4-point dither pattern to cover this extra offset.

Outline of the 1998 NICMOS mosaic is shown here relative to the new FOM-offset observations.

Ratio of old/new Fit a smooth function to the ratio Check the function against the ratio image

UncorrectedCorrected Application of the correction to the various pointings shows some variation in effectiveness. Scattered light in the bright trapezium region may affect the generated model. To do: Make consistency check of the roll-off profile of each field in uniform parts of the nebula Compare point-source photometry at the edge to catalog photometry (also in 1998 trapezium overlap region)

A few pretty pictures…

Two-color composites (F110W, F160W) Entire NICMOS two-color mosaic

Mosaic Detail

Take it from Frankenstein… FOM GOOD!! Fire BAD!!

(end transmission)